
Congress's fresh 'Narender surrender' salvo at PM features Trump's red MAGA cap
The Congress on Thursday doubled down on its attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, intensifying the row triggered by Rahul Gandhi's 'Narender surrender' jibe. The fresh salvo came in the form of a social media post featuring US President Donald Trump's iconic red 'Make America Great Again' cap, emblazoned with the words 'Narender Surrender' - a pointed reference to Gandhi's allegation that PM Modi agreed to a ceasefire with Pakistan following a call from Trump.advertisementThe controversy erupted on Tuesday when Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, speaking at the launch of the party's Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan in Bhopal, claimed that the PM had succumbed to pressure from the United States. "Trump made one gesture from there (the US), picked up the call and said 'Modiji, what are you doing? Narender surrender'. And Modiji said 'yes sir' and followed Trump's instructions," Gandhi said.NarenderSurrender pic.twitter.com/TlwvChAA0S— Congress (@INCIndia) June 5, 2025Gandhi went on to accuse the BJP and RSS of lacking the courage to withstand pressure. "I know BJP-RSS people; if you put even a little pressure and give them just a slight push, they run away out of fear," he said, contrasting their conduct with that of previous Congress leaders. "You would remember when the phone call had not come, the seventh fleet came in 1971 war. Seventh fleet came, arms came, aircraft carriers came, but Indira Gandhi said 'I will do what I want'. This is the difference," he added.advertisement
Backing Gandhi's remarks, Congress leader Pawan Khera told reporters, "Don't assume that India is Narendra or Narendra is India. He makes grand speeches but ends up surrendering. Just days ago, they talked about China, and now, not even once is China uttered."The BJP hit back sharply at Gandhi's remarks. Party leader Pradip Bhandari said, "Under the leadership of PM Modi, India has given a befitting reply to Pakistan's terror masters. From Salman Khurshid to Shashi Tharoor, every Congress leader is talking about this and Pakistan itself is giving evidence of this... The people of the country see this uncivilised Rahul Gandhi as an agent of Pakistan."Union Minister Kiren Rijiju slammed the Congress as well, stating, "There is also a limit to stupidity and opposition! There's nobody in Congress Party to tell him that being in the Opposition Party does not mean, to oppose the nation?"BJP's IT cell chief Amit Malviya, in a post on X, wrote, "History will remember: From Doklam to Pahalgam, whenever India stood united to defend its sovereignty and rise as a global power, Rahul Gandhi, true to the legacy of his lineage, chose to stand with forces opposed to India's political and economic resurgence."advertisementMeanwhile, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, who is currently leading an all-party delegation to the US, among other countries, as part of India's global outreach following the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, struck a different tone. Responding to a question about Gandhi's comments, Tharoor said that India did not need persuasion to stop the conflict."India didn't need persuasion to stop. No one needed to tell us to stop because we were telling them the moment Pakistan stops, we are prepared to stop. So if they, in turn, told the Pakistani, You better stop because the Indians are willing to stop and that was what they did. And that's a wonderful gesture on their part," he said.Tharoor further stated, "We have no real difficulty speaking the same language as the Pakistanis, as long as they use the language of terrorism. We will use the language of force, and that doesn't require a third party."He added that he would not dwell on the details, emphasising India's "much more important strategic partnership" with the United States. "We have enormous respect for the US," he said.Tune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Defamation case: TMC MP Saket Gokhale apologises to ex-diplomat Lakshmi Puri; calls allegations 'unverified'
Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale and former diplomat Lakshmi Puri NEW DELHI: Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale on Tuesday issued an apology to former diplomat Lakshmi Puri, the wife of Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri, for his posts on social media against her over the purchase of a property in Switzerland. In a post on X, Gokhale said that he regretted putting out a series of tweets that contained wrong and unverified allegations about the purchase of property by Ambassador Puri abroad. "I unconditionally apologise for having put-out a series of tweets against Amb. Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri on 13th and 23rd June 2021, which tweets contained wrong and unverified allegations in relation to the purchase of property by Amb. Puri abroad, which I sincerely regret," he said. Last year, the Delhi high court imposed a Rs 50 Lakh fine on Saket Gokhale for defaming Lakshmi Puri, and had asked him to issue a public apology. The high court determined that allegations suggesting financial misconduct regarding a Swiss property purchase by former diplomat Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri were aimed at her spouse, BJP 's Hardeep Singh Puri. The court deemed Gokhale's publication of "derogatory content" without verification as "extremely irresponsible". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The court stated that while monetary compensation cannot fully restore a damaged reputation, it ordered Gokhale to pay Rs 50 lakh in damages within eight weeks. The apology must remain on his X handle for six months from the posting date. The judge concluded that "the offending posts are per se defamatory" and caused unwarranted legal injury to her standing. The allegations of financial impropriety fundamentally damaged her reputation, resulting in diminished social status and psychological distress, compounded by false accusations. The case originated when Puri filed a petition in the high court in 2021.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's border czar defends Marine deployment to Los Angeles amid immigration protests
LOS ANGELES: President Donald Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, has defended the deployment of hundreds of marines to Los Angeles amid growing immigration protests, calling it a necessary precaution to safeguard federal property and law enforcement personnel, CNN reported. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to CNN's Kaitlan Collins on Monday, Homan said the actions of protesters largely dictated the response. "It all depends on the activities of these protesters they make the decisions. I keep hearing reports that they're rioting because President Trump sent the national guard here it's just ridiculous," he said. According to CNN, Trump became the first US president in decades to activate the national guard without a request from a state governor. On Monday evening, the White House deployed an additional 2,000 national guard members to Los Angeles without invoking the Insurrection Act. Homan did not specify the criteria for marine deployment but clarified that their role was focused on protection. "They're not reinforcing immigration law we're doing that, we're immigration officers," he said. "Their job is protection of property and protection of our agents and their lives and their wellbeing, along with the public's wellbeing." The Pentagon confirmed that over 700 marines from the marine corps air ground combat center in California were mobilized to assist with the situation in Los Angeles, following federal immigration raids that triggered public backlash. Asked whether similar military deployments could happen in other cities, Homan said he hoped it wouldn't become the norm. "I hope not. I hope people protest peacefully. But to attack law enforcement officers who are simply enforcing the laws that Congress enacted that's unacceptable," he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On President Trump's remarks about California governor Gavin Newsom, Homan clarified there was no legal basis for any action. When asked if the governor had done anything to warrant arrest, he said, "Not at this time absolutely not." Homan also confirmed to CNN that immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) operations would continue across the country. "They'll continue every day, not only in California and Los Angeles they're going to continue in every city across the country," he said.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
FIR against BJP leader, kin of Ex-PM Chandrashekhar's son, for threatening Dalit scholar in UP; audio clip goes viral
Representative photo NEW DELHI: A BJP leader closely associated with former Prime Minister Chandrashekhar's son Neeraj Shekhar has been booked for allegedly threatening a Dalit research scholar from Lucknow University on Monday night at Ubhaon Police Station in Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. The FIR was filed based on a complaint by Deepak Kannaujia, a native of Turtipar village and scholar at Lucknow University, who alleged that BJP leader Alok Singh called and threatened him on May 21. According to the complaint, Alok Singh said, "Record this conversation if you want. I am not afraid of the administration or the law and order in Uttar Pradesh." BJP's Bilthara Road area president Arun Kant Tiwari confirmed Alok Singh's affiliation with the party and his close relation to Neeraj Shekhar. Kannaujia claimed there was a longstanding political enmity between his family and Alok Singh. He stated that his father, Kamlesh Kannaujia, died of a heart attack last October due to stress from repeated harassment. The complainant expressed fear for his mother's safety, who lives alone in the village, suggesting Singh might harm her. Superintendent of Police Omveer Singh confirmed that an audio clip related to the incident had recently gone viral on social media. Following a preliminary inquiry conducted by Rasra Circle Officer Alok Gupta, Alok Singh was booked under sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNS for intentional insult and criminal intimidation. Additional charges were filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.