Xi Jinping's defiance against Donald Trump paid off for China: Report
The US and China announced their decision to lower tariffs on each other's products for a period of 90 days, proving that Xi Jinping's firm stance against Donald Trump turned out to be beneficial for the former's country. Following two days of high-level talks in Switzerland's Geneva, a joint statement said that the combined US levies of 145 per cent on most Chinese imports will be reduced by 30 per cent while China's duties on American goods will drop to 10 per cent.
During the discussions, the United States ended up meeting all of China's core demands. The elevated "reciprocal" tariff, which Trump set up for China at 34 per cent on April 2, has been suspended, leaving Beijing with the same 10 per cent levy that applies to the UK, reported Bloomberg.
The deal provided some much-needed relief for American markets as well as for Trump as the dollar and stocks went soaring, while Chinese equities also saw an uptick.
At the talks in Geneva, the two sides agreed to take "aggressive actions" to curb the flow of fentanyl, which could subsequently result in the elimination of the extra 20 per cent tariff.
Chinese President Xi Jinping maintained his stance against the US despite Trump raising their tariffs to the highest level in any country. He refused to get on a call with Trump in contrast to other world leaders and stood his ground.
Beijing reportedly instead opted to cut key interest rates and other measures to protect China's economy, while also sending out diplomats around the world to lock in fresh markets for Chinese products and slam America's "bullying".
While economic difficulties did indeed strike China amid the rising US tariffs, nationalist spirit back home encouraged Xi to not give in to American coercion. Trump, on the other hand, faced immense pressure from market players and business lobbies.
Trey McArver, co-founder of research firm Trivium China, said, "This is arguably the best outcome that China could have hoped for; the US backed down."
"Going forward, this will make the Chinese side confident that they have leverage over the US in any negotiations," McArver was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.
Meanwhile, Gerard DiPippo, associate director of the RAND China Research Centre, said the lesson out of this trade talk is that "economic power matters".
"For Beijing, it's a strategic vindication, and one that makes Xi's focus on manufacturing and self-reliance harder to argue against, at least from an economic security perspective," DiPippo added.
The Trump administration's retreat from sky-high tariffs wouldn't have occurred if China hadn't responded so forcefully, not only with retaliatory duties but also export controls and other steps, according to Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
'This will strengthen Xi's political standing at home and his diplomatic standing internationally,' Kennedy said. 'He's the big winner from this round of the conflict.'
On Monday, the US President said that he could speak to Xi as soon as the end of this week, touting a "total reset" in Washington's relations with China. However, he said that the trade deal does not include the sectoral tariffs on cars, steel, aluminium, and possibly pharmaceuticals.
At a briefing, Trump said that the "relationship is very good" with China, adding that America is not looking to hurt Beijing. "China was being hurt badly. They were closing up factories. They were having a lot of unrest, and they were very happy to be able to do something with us," the US President added.
With the tariff war between the US and China on a halt for 90 days, Beijing now has a three-month time to strike a wider deal with Washington to rebalance trade and safeguard its own interests as well.
China's white paper on national security, as cited by the state-run Xinhua news agency, said that it is committed to the stable development of relations with the US. However, it added that imposing pressure and threats is not the right way to deal with China.
With Bloomberg inputs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US Military To Deploy 700 Marines To Los Angeles As Protests Intensify
Los Angeles: The U.S. military will temporarily deploy about 700 Marines to Los Angeles until more National Guard troops can arrive, marking another escalation in President Donald Trump's response to street protests over his aggressive immigration policies. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a battalion would be sent on temporary duty until more National Guard troops could reach the scene. For now, the Trump administration was not invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement. The official added the situation was fluid and could change. U.S. Marines have been deployed domestically for major disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the September 11, 2001, attacks. They are known for being "first in, last out" in U.S. military interventions abroad, but it is extremely rare for U.S. military troops to be used for domestic policing matters. Using them for police matters is certain to raise further objections from Democrats, who have accused Trump of unnecessarily escalating tensions in Los Angeles. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would support the arrest of California's Gavin Newsom, after Newsom vowed to sue the federal government over the deployment of National Guard troops to Southern California, calling it an illegal act. As Los Angeles faced a possible fourth day of protests over immigration raids in the city, Democrats and Republicans clashed over what has become the biggest flashpoint in the Trump administration's aggressive efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally. Trump deployed the National Guard after street protests on Friday that turned violent over the weekend. He said on Monday he felt he had no choice but to order the deployment to prevent the violence from spiraling out of control. California officials called the deployment an overreaction to events on the ground. Newsom said on Monday that Trump's actions were an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." "We are suing Donald Trump," Newsom said on X. "This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution." California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a release that his office had sued. Reuters could not immediately confirm that a lawsuit had been filed. Federal law allows the president to deploy the Guard if the nation is invaded, if there is "rebellion or danger of rebellion," or the president is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States." California's suit accuses Trump of exceeding his authority under the statute and asks a court to declare his actions as unlawful. Returning to the White House on Monday after a night at Camp David, Trump was asked by a reporter whether his border czar, Tom Homan, should arrest Newsom. Homan has threatened to arrest anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement efforts, including the governor. "I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great," Trump replied. "Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." The White House and congressional Republicans contended the protests were a further reason for Republicans in Congress to pass Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" that would increase border security and military spending. The bill, now in the U.S. Senate after clearing the U.S. House of Representatives, would also slash taxes, cut Medicaid benefits and do away with green-energy initiatives. "We need the One Big, Beautiful Bill to pass ASAP!" White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X. ON GUARD U.S. Northern Command said 300 members of the California National Guard had been deployed to three spots in the Los Angeles area. The Department of Homeland Security said the Guard's mission was to protect federal buildings. On Monday, law enforcement officers stood at intersections surrounding the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, which houses the detention facility where many detained immigrants were sent after ICE actions in Los Angeles neighborhoods. Some National Guard troops stood at the vehicle entrance to the detention center. Anti-ICE graffiti covered walls and windows of the federal building and teams worked to cover the slogans with paint. Hundreds of protesters gathered near Los Angeles City Hall for a rally in support of detained union leader David Huerta. They waved placards calling for Huerta's release and chanted in Spanish "we are all David Huerta." Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, setting the ICE border enforcement agency a daily goal of arresting at least 3,000 migrants. For Democrats, lacking leadership since Trump won the presidential election last November, the Los Angeles protests have served as a rallying point, allowing them to find some political footing while standing up to the administration's policies.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Consumers' loss, farmer optimism: In US, trade war sees key groups at odds
April was one of the most important months in the world's economic history, with the Trump administration's reciprocal tariffs coming into force on April 2 before being put on pause for 90 days a week later. The threat of the reciprocal tariffs, however, has seemingly had the opposite effect as American companies stocked up ahead of the tariffs' rollout. Data released last week showed that while the US' goods and services trade deficit in April 2025 fell a record 55 per cent from March 2025 to a 19-month low of $61.6 billion, the deficit for the first four months of 2025 was up 66 per cent compared to a year ago. The basis of Trump's reciprocal tariffs was that it would help bring down the US' trade deficit with various countries. Take India, for instance, which enjoyed a total trade surplus of $46.09 billion with the US in 2024. However, India's merchandise trade surplus with the US for the first four months of 2025 increased by 45 per cent to $23.29 billion, with imports from India up 29 per cent according to latest data from the US commerce department. In January-April 2025, the US imported $9.49 billion of advanced technology products from India, up 86 per cent from a year ago. Consumers & farmers American consumers have, for long, been considered the biggest losers in the Trump administration's pursuit of balanced trade. According to non-partisan policy research center The Budget Lab at Yale, American households, on average, are facing a consumption loss of $2,500 in 2025 when prices are measured in 2024 levels. 'The post-substitution price increase settles at 1.3%, a $2,100 loss per household,' The Budget Lab at Yale said. The Budget Lab estimates that Americans are facing an overall average effective tariff rate of 15.6 per cent at present — the highest since 1937 — with segments such as clothing and textiles being affected the most. In the short run, shoe and apparel prices for US consumers are up 31 per cent and 28 per cent, respectively. Despite the pain from tariffs, some in the US are still upbeat; in fact, more so than in several years. The Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer index climbed to a four-year high last month, suggesting improved sentiment among farmers due to a 'much more optimistic view of US agricultural export prospects, combined with a less negative view of tariffs' impact on 2025 farm income than respondents provided in either March or April'. Exports are indeed on American farmers' minds, with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins having recently visited Italy as part of her 'aggressive travel agenda to promote American agriculture worldwide'. The trip to Italy follows one to the UK in May 2025, with India, Vietnam, Japan, Peru, and Brazil on Rollins' schedule over the coming months. Shifting views on free trade Rather ironically, even as US and Chinese officials meet in London on Monday to add to the preliminary agreement that was agreed last month, American farmers have over the years grown somewhat skeptical of how beneficial free trade is. As per the Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer, 18 per cent of producers in May 2025 either disagreed or strongly disagreed when presented with the statement that 'free trade benefits agriculture and most other American industries'. Back in December 2020, the corresponding number was just 7 per cent.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Trump supports the idea of arresting Newsom over LA immigration protests
Los Angeles, Jun 9 (AP) President Donald Trump has signalled he would support the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of immigration protests in Los Angeles that flared over the weekend. 'Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job," Trump told reporters after his border czar, Tom Homan, warned that public officials would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Homan later clarified that there was 'no discussion" about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law." Asked if the focus on Newsom would help the Democratic governor's political career, Trump, who is Republican, said, 'I think it's actually very bad for him." Here's the latest: Trump says Newsom's primary crime is running for governor Amid threats to arrest Newsom if he interferes with federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, a reporter asked Trump to explain what crime the Democratic California governor may have committed. 'I think his primary crime is running for governor, because he did such a bad job," Trump said. Trump repeated how much he actually 'liked" Newsom but thinks he's 'incompetent." (AP) RUK RUK
