Xi Jinping's defiance against Donald Trump paid off for China: Report
The US and China announced their decision to lower tariffs on each other's products for a period of 90 days, proving that Xi Jinping's firm stance against Donald Trump turned out to be beneficial for the former's country. Following two days of high-level talks in Switzerland's Geneva, a joint statement said that the combined US levies of 145 per cent on most Chinese imports will be reduced by 30 per cent while China's duties on American goods will drop to 10 per cent.
During the discussions, the United States ended up meeting all of China's core demands. The elevated "reciprocal" tariff, which Trump set up for China at 34 per cent on April 2, has been suspended, leaving Beijing with the same 10 per cent levy that applies to the UK, reported Bloomberg.
The deal provided some much-needed relief for American markets as well as for Trump as the dollar and stocks went soaring, while Chinese equities also saw an uptick.
At the talks in Geneva, the two sides agreed to take "aggressive actions" to curb the flow of fentanyl, which could subsequently result in the elimination of the extra 20 per cent tariff.
Chinese President Xi Jinping maintained his stance against the US despite Trump raising their tariffs to the highest level in any country. He refused to get on a call with Trump in contrast to other world leaders and stood his ground.
Beijing reportedly instead opted to cut key interest rates and other measures to protect China's economy, while also sending out diplomats around the world to lock in fresh markets for Chinese products and slam America's "bullying".
While economic difficulties did indeed strike China amid the rising US tariffs, nationalist spirit back home encouraged Xi to not give in to American coercion. Trump, on the other hand, faced immense pressure from market players and business lobbies.
Trey McArver, co-founder of research firm Trivium China, said, "This is arguably the best outcome that China could have hoped for; the US backed down."
"Going forward, this will make the Chinese side confident that they have leverage over the US in any negotiations," McArver was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.
Meanwhile, Gerard DiPippo, associate director of the RAND China Research Centre, said the lesson out of this trade talk is that "economic power matters".
"For Beijing, it's a strategic vindication, and one that makes Xi's focus on manufacturing and self-reliance harder to argue against, at least from an economic security perspective," DiPippo added.
The Trump administration's retreat from sky-high tariffs wouldn't have occurred if China hadn't responded so forcefully, not only with retaliatory duties but also export controls and other steps, according to Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
'This will strengthen Xi's political standing at home and his diplomatic standing internationally,' Kennedy said. 'He's the big winner from this round of the conflict.'
On Monday, the US President said that he could speak to Xi as soon as the end of this week, touting a "total reset" in Washington's relations with China. However, he said that the trade deal does not include the sectoral tariffs on cars, steel, aluminium, and possibly pharmaceuticals.
At a briefing, Trump said that the "relationship is very good" with China, adding that America is not looking to hurt Beijing. "China was being hurt badly. They were closing up factories. They were having a lot of unrest, and they were very happy to be able to do something with us," the US President added.
With the tariff war between the US and China on a halt for 90 days, Beijing now has a three-month time to strike a wider deal with Washington to rebalance trade and safeguard its own interests as well.
China's white paper on national security, as cited by the state-run Xinhua news agency, said that it is committed to the stable development of relations with the US. However, it added that imposing pressure and threats is not the right way to deal with China.
With Bloomberg inputs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump open to extending trade talks' deadline, but says it won't be necessary
US President Donald Trump said he's willing to extend the July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with several countries. However, he believes an extension may not be to reporters before attending Les Misrables at the Kennedy Centre, Trump said, "We're rocking in terms of deals. We're dealing with quite a few countries, and they all want to make a deal with us." He noted that ongoing discussions include trade partners like Japan, South Korea, and the European expressed confidence that most agreements would be in place before the deadline. "I don't think it's a necessity," he said when asked about a possible extension. Trump also shared plans to move forward with trade terms soon. "At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out saying, 'This is the deal. You can take it, or you can leave it,'" he said. "We're not quite ready, but we're close."US OFFICIALS SIGNAL FLEXIBILITY FOR 'GOOD-FAITH' NEGOTIATORSTreasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee that countries negotiating seriously could see the July 8 deadline pushed back."It is highly likely that those countries -- or trading blocs like the EU -- who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward," Bessent said. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not."advertisementThis is the Trump administration's first overt indication that it might prolong trade deadlines for nations involved in serious negotiations. He pointed out that the European Union, which had been slow earlier, is now showing signs of "better faith" in the talks. BLOODBATH IN MARKETS AFTER LIBERATION DAY TARIFFS Trump had announced the 90-day pause in tariffs on April 9. This came a week after he unveiled "Liberation Day" tariffs that targeted nearly all countries across the world. The announcement shook global markets, with the S&P 500 dropping more than 12% in four days -- the worst performance since the COVID-19 started their recovery on April 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. The recovery continued in early May when the Trump team agreed to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. Those events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens move led many on Wall Street to jokingly refer to the situation as the "TACO" trade -- acronym for "Trump Always Chickens Out."
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran war looming? US evacuates non-essential staff from middle-east, UK cautions ships in Gulf
Amid rising tensions with Iran over its nuclear program, the U.S. is reducing its non-essential staff presence in the Middle East, including Baghdad, Bahrain, and Kuwait. This decision reflects concerns about regional unrest, with potential impacts on maritime activities. While diplomatic talks face uncertainty, military readiness and security assessments are being closely monitored. A soldier looks out from an M1A2 Abrams tank ahead of the upcoming U.S. Army 250th anniversary celebration parade in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 11, 2025. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran, the United States is drawing down non-essential personnel from several diplomatic and military sites across the Middle East , citing growing regional State Department on Wednesday ordered the departure of all nonessential staff from the US Embassy in Baghdad, noting ongoing security concerns and a commitment to protecting American lives. While the embassy was already operating with limited personnel, the move marks a further nonessential staff and family members in Bahrain and Kuwait have been authorized to leave at government expense, the department Central Command said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has approved the voluntary departure of military dependents across the region as a precautionary step. "CENTCOM is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East," the statement Donald Trump, speaking at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday, acknowledged the drawdown: 'They are being moved out, because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens.'The US and Iran appear to be at a diplomatic impasse over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. A sixth round of talks, initially set for this weekend in Oman, is now in doubt, according to two American speaking on the Pod Force One podcast, said he was "getting more and more less confident" about a breakthrough with Iran. 'They seem to be delaying... Something happened to them.'Iran, for its part, pushed back on the mounting pressure. Its UN mission stated, 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and US militarism only fuels instability.' Defense Minister Gen Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that Iran is fully prepared to respond to any military conflict.'If conflict is imposed, the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours... all [US] bases in host countries are within our reach,' he a parallel move, the United Kingdom issued a maritime alert, warning ships in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Strait of Hormuz about the risk of military escalation. The UK Maritime Trade Operations center urged vessels to exercise a possible censure of Iran is on the agenda at the International Atomic Energy Agency, which could pave the way for the reimposition of UN sanctions under the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal — from which Trump withdrew during his first Erik Kurilla, head of US Central Command, was scheduled to testify before the Senate on Thursday, but the hearing has been postponed without officials, meanwhile, downplayed the significance of the US Embassy drawdown in Baghdad, calling it part of a broader US regional reassessment.'There are no security indicators that warrant evacuation,' Iraq's state-run news agency quoted an unnamed official as saying.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from detaining Mahmoud Khalil over pro-Palestinian protests
A U.S. judge stopped the Trump administration from deporting Mahmoud Khalil. Khalil is a Columbia University student and pro-Palestine activist. The administration claimed Khalil threatened U.S. foreign policy. Judge Farbiarz ruled the action likely unconstitutional. He cited First Amendment rights infringement. Khalil's lawyers argued deportation endangered him. The case tests immigrant speech rights. FILE -- Mahmoud Khalil speaks during a press conference at Columbia University, near the campus in New York, April 22, 2024. A federal judge on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, barred the Trump administration from continuing to detain Mahmoud Khalil. (Bing Guan/The New York Times) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot continue detaining or deporting Mahmoud Khalil , a Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist, on the grounds that his presence allegedly threatens U.S. foreign policy interests. The decision, issued Wednesday by Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey, represents a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to use a rarely invoked provision of immigration law to target student a legal U.S. resident and green card holder married to an American citizen, was arrested by immigration authorities on March 8 in the lobby of his New York City apartment building and has since been held in a Louisiana detention facility. The government's case relied on a 1952 law that allows the Secretary of State to expel noncitizens whose activities are deemed a threat to U.S. foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had asserted Khalil's involvement in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University fostered a 'hostile environment for Jewish students' and posed adverse foreign policy Judge Farbiarz found this rationale likely unconstitutional, stating that the administration's actions infringed on Khalil's First Amendment rights and caused 'irreparable harm' to his career, family, and freedom of speech. The judge noted that Khalil's continued detention was not supported by substantial evidence and that similar omissions on green card applications—another basis the administration cited—rarely result in ruling does not take immediate effect; the administration has until 9:30 a.m. Friday to appeal. If no appeal is filed, Khalil will be eligible for release on a nominal $1 bond. Khalil's legal team welcomed the decision, with attorney Baher Azmy calling it a relief that the court recognized the 'grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine'.This case follows a pattern, as other student activists swept up in the administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian demonstrations have also challenged their detentions and, in some cases, secured release. The Department of Justice , State, and Homeland Security have not commented on the ruling. Khalil's attorneys have submitted extensive documentation to counter allegations of antisemitism and warn that deportation would expose him to grave danger in Syria or Algeria, where he has roots but faces outcome of this case is seen as a landmark test of immigrants' speech rights in the U.S. and could set precedent for how the government handles similar cases involving political activism and foreign policy.
