logo
This is the exact time Americans fall asleep — but here's how to find the 'right' bedtime for you

This is the exact time Americans fall asleep — but here's how to find the 'right' bedtime for you

Tom's Guide7 days ago
Whether you've stuck to the same bedtime for years, or found that it's varied as you've dealt with the changes life can throw at us (like changing jobs, having kids, or health issues), you may have wondered how yours compares to everyone else.
Well, now you can find out: a new survey has revealed the average time Americans fall asleep, as well as the time people begin their bedtime routines and when they actually make it into bed. The research even reveals how many mornings a week people regret late nights, and what tends to keep them up.
Here, we delve deeper into the survey findings, and speak to Heather Darwall-Smith, a UKCP psychotherapist specializing in sleep and neurodiversity, and author of How to Be Awake, to find out whether there is, in fact, an ideal bedtime for you (and what contributes to this), the importance of sleep regularity and how to create a consistent sleep schedule. There's more to getting good sleep than simply buying one of the best mattresses; here's what you need to know.
The survey, conducted on behalf of Avocado Green Mattress, has provided insight into the bedtime habits of Americans — including the exact time people fall asleep.
The survey of 2,000 of the general population found that on average, respondents begin their nighttime routine at 10.15pm, and are in bed at 10.36pm, meaning they spend 21 minutes preparing for sleep before climbing under the covers.
However, the results showed that the average time people actually fall asleep is 11.18pm. This later time indicates that, on average, it takes approximately 40 minutes between snuggling up in bed and actually dropping off.
And, if you've ever regretted a late night, you're aligned with plenty of other Americans. The survey found that respondents have three mornings a week where they awaken wishing they'd gone to bed earlier.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Those who remained awake later than intended gave a variety of reasons for the delay in going to bed. Almost a third (29%) said chores and other things they need to take care of keep them up, while around a fifth (21%) responded that night is their favorite time of the day.
Another 15% want to put off the inevitable (in this case having to go to work the next day), saying they stay up late so they don't "fast-forward" to the workday. Finally, 13% of respondents indicated that they were prioritizing their relationship, saying it was the only time they were able to connect with their partner.
When it came to partners and sleep, of the 46% of respondents who share a bed with theirs, only 49% said they sleep better when said partner is next to them in bed. Of the 14% who sleep worse with their bedfellow, the main culprit by far (63%) was a partner's snoring.
If you read the results of the survey above and are aghast at a bedtime as late as 11.18pm, it may mean your sleep chronotype is 'lark' (a morning person) Alternatively, if it feels a little early to you, you could be an 'owl' (an evening person).
"Larks have an advanced circadian rhythm, meaning their bodies naturally want to go to bed earlier and wake up earlier. Their ideal bedtime would be in the range of 9pm to 11pm to get a full 7-9 hours," explains Darwall-Smith.
Meanwhile, she says, "Owls have a delayed circadian rhythm, preferring to go to bed later and wake up later. Their ideal bedtime is typically much later, often between 12am and 2am."
This means that "the 'right' bedtime really depends on your personal clock!" Darwall-Smith adds.
Whichever your chronotype, it is worth noting that too many late nights staying up past 12.30am may negatively impact your health.
A recent study published in Health Data Science, where researchers analyzed the sleep data of 88,461 adults and found that "irregular bedtime (after 00:30) was linked to a 2.57-fold higher risk of liver cirrhosis," and that less daily stability in bedtime "increased the risk of gangrene by 2.61 times."
If you're concerned that you might not be hitting the 'perfect' bedtime, there's no need to worry too much. Keeping a consistent bedtime matters more than the actual time you're going to bed.
Experts say that going to bed at the same time each night (and not varying that by more than 30 minutes throughout the week) reinforces our circadian rhythm (our internal clock that regulates our sleep-wake cycle), which helps us get deeper, more restorative sleep.
"Think of it like this: your body has a master clock inside called your circadian rhythm. When you go to bed and wake up at the same time every day, you're telling that clock to stay on track. Research from including from places like the (US) National Sleep Foundation highlights that this consistency is more important than the specific time you go to bed," says Darwall-Smith.
"Irregular sleep schedules, even if you're getting enough sleep overall, can lead to what's known as 'social jet lag,' which is linked to an increased risk of health issues like obesity and heart disease," she adds.
Sticking to your regular bedtime can even contribute to a longer life. A recent study showed that "higher sleep regularity" was associated with a 20%-48% lower all-cause mortality risk.
"To determine your chronotype, pay attention to when you naturally feel tired and when you wake up without an alarm over a period of a couple of weeks," says Darwall-Smith.
She adds that holidays can be helpful for doing this, as long as factors like jetlag, later meals and alcohol don't get in the way. An alternative is to try an online chronotype quiz like the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire.
As a general guide Darwall-Smith explains that for 'larks': "Your ideal bedtime is early. You should aim to be in bed between 9pm and 11pm. To create a consistent schedule, listen to your body's early cues for sleepiness."
Meanwhile, for 'owls': "You are naturally wired to go to bed later. Your ideal bedtime is often between 12am and 2am. To create a consistent schedule, try to work with your natural inclination and avoid forcing yourself to go to bed too early."
Making sure you wake up at the same time every day is just as important as a consistent bedtime for your circadian rhythm. And, if you have burned the midnight oil the night before, it's better not to press the snooze button in the morning.
"If you go to bed later than usual, it's super important to still wake up at your regular time in the morning," Darwall-Smith agrees.
"Your wake-up time is like the anchor for your entire sleep cycle. By getting up at the same time, you're resetting your internal clock and strengthening the signal for melatonin, the 'sleepy' hormone. This helps you get tired at your normal bedtime the next night, preventing you from getting stuck in a cycle of going to bed later and later," she says.
Darwall-Smith adds that we don't have to stress over one bad night because "your body will naturally adjust its 'sleep architecture,' or the different stages of sleep, to prioritize what you missed. So you might get more deep, restorative sleep over the next few nights to make up for it. It's a gradual process, not an immediate fix, but your body knows what it's doing."
One of the most straightforward ways to keep a regular sleep schedule involves also being consistent in the period of time beforehand. This is known as a nightime routine.
The idea is to create a series of cues for your body and brain, indicating that it's time to relax and go to sleep. At the same time, these activities should be relaxing themselves (so drinking stimulating coffee and listening to hardcore rave music isn't ideal).
"A nighttime routine is helpful because it signals to your body that it's time to wind down and prepare for sleep. This series of predictable, calming activities—such as reading, taking a warm bath, or meditating—helps to lower your heart rate and quiet your mind," explains Darwall-Smith.
She adds, "This is often referred to as a 'sleep hygiene' practice. It conditions your brain to associate these activities with sleep, making it easier to fall asleep and stay asleep consistently."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New EPA data show more towns have PFAS in their water. Is yours one?
New EPA data show more towns have PFAS in their water. Is yours one?

USA Today

time44 minutes ago

  • USA Today

New EPA data show more towns have PFAS in their water. Is yours one?

Shane Pepe knows exactly how his town's drinking water came to be polluted with the "forever chemicals" it recently reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The borough manager in Emmaus, Pennsylvania, points to a firefighter training facility as the source of contamination that averaged 32 times the federal limit over the past year. For decades, fire-extinguishing foams containing PFAS seeped into the local aquifer during training exercises. "While our firefighters are practicing to save your life, they had no idea that at the same time the water system was getting poisoned," he said. Emmaus was among 839 water systems whose yearly average exceeded EPA limits for two types of forever chemicals, according to a USA TODAY analysis of new test results the EPA released last week. Together, these utilities serve 46 million Americans. These PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are part of a family of chemicals engineered to repel liquids and heat, making them nearly indestructible. They can build up in nature and in human bodies, increasing the risk of certain types of cancer and other health problems. The EPA is nearing the end of the largest PFAS testing initiative it's undertaken – a three-year effort that requires most public drinking water systems serving at least 3,300 customers to sample and report measurements for several types of forever chemicals. Places that have found contamination now need to find other sources of drinking water or install filtration systems that can remove the PFAS within the next few years. That deadline was originally set for 2029, but in May, the EPA announced plans for an extension. The agency also rescinded limits on four other types of PFAS set under the Biden administration in 2024. MAP: Where water systems reported PFAS contamination Click on a system in the map below to review its PFAS measurements. You may also enter an address in the search box to locate the nearest water systems. Don't see a map? Click here. USA TODAY's analysis shows larger water utilities more frequently fail to meet the EPA's standards for the two chemicals it still plans to limit: PFOA and PFOS. Nearly a quarter of systems serving over 100,000 people had average results exceeding the limit, compared to about 8% of those with fewer than 10,000 customers. But in the latest data release, it's some of the smaller communities that have reported the most eye-popping concentrations of forever chemicals in their drinking water. Nashville, North Carolina, a town of 6,000 east of Raleigh, reported one well that measured PFOS at 490 parts per trillion (ppt) last fall and then at 200 ppt in March. The EPA limit is 4 ppt, which puts the average of those samples 86 times over the limit. The city's director of public works did not return USA TODAY's calls requesting comment. The borough of Emmaus, which is home to about 12,000 people just outside Allentown, Pennsylvania, reported several wells over EPA limits – most notably at its waterworks building, where PFOS averaged 32 times over the limit. PFOA also measured high, averaging about five times above the limit. 'These firefighting foam companies knew what was in the water and never notified anybody,' Pepe said. He added that Emmaus declined a $4 million settlement from a class-action lawsuit against PFAS manufacturers and is instead pursuing its own lawsuit to recover damages. A spokesperson from the 3M Co. didn't respond directly to Pepe's allegation, but said they've committed $12 billion to public water suppliers as part of the settlement Emmaus declined. The company plans to stop manufacturing PFAS by the end of 2025. Spokesman Dan Turner of the DuPont Co., another manufacturer that Emmaus named in its lawsuit, declined to comment since the litigation is ongoing. Emmaus discovered the contamination through state-mandated testing in late-2021, Pepe said. The utility immediately shut down one well and studied how to remedy another well. Residents of Emmaus made it clear they wanted to fix Emmaus' water, Pepe said, rather than becoming dependent by buying water from elsewhere. Earlier this year, the town won over $9 million in grant funding and a nearly $2-million loan from the state to install four enormous treatment tanks filled with granular-activated carbon able to filter out PFAS. Pepe said construction should finish by June 2026. Emmaus will need to raise water rates slightly to pay for ongoing maintenance to the new tanks, Pepe said, since it costs about $100,000 per year to replace the carbon filters. But, he's thankful the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority's grant will bear the brunt of costs. 'Had we not gotten the grant,' Pepe said, 'instantly our folks would have been paying four times what they pay today. Instantly. And that would have been for the next 20 to 30 years.' Hundreds of other small water systems face Emmaus' predicament, where local budgets may not suffice to cover the cost to remove PFAS without raising water rates. Several water utility officials have told USA TODAY it's not fair to pass these costs on their customers rather than the manufacturers and processors that created the PFAS contamination. Because of this, industry groups representing water utilities sued the EPA last year, claiming the agency did not follow proper procedures when approving the new PFAS limits. The lawsuit has been on hold since shortly after President Donald Trump took office, to allow the new administration time to review the limits. After the EPA announced plans to rescind some PFAS limits in May, a federal judge said the agency now has until Sept. 10 to clarify its position in the lawsuit, according to the latest court filing. Regardless of the lawsuit's outcome, Pepe said his customers' lives and safety must come first. 'We are being told by environmental agencies that these chemicals in the water are bad and have the potential to cause cancer and other illnesses,' Pepe said. 'We have a duty to mitigate this as quickly as possible, and so that's exactly what we're doing.'

Travel-related chikungunya cases in England climb nearly three-fold
Travel-related chikungunya cases in England climb nearly three-fold

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Travel-related chikungunya cases in England climb nearly three-fold

Aug. 14 (UPI) -- The number of travel-related cases of chikungunya, a mosquito-borne viral infection, has nearly tripled in England during the first six months of the year compared to the same period last year, British health officials said Thursday. According to the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency, there have been 73 cases of the virus reported in England between January and June. During the same period in 2024, there were only 27 cases. The health agency said the 73 cases is the highest number recorded in this period to date. The majority of the infected patients had reported traveling to Sri Lanka, India and Mauritius, where there were infections associated with outbreaks in Indian Ocean countries, it said. Chikungunya is transmitted to humans by infected mosquitoes. Severe symptoms and death associated with the virus are rare, but can occur in babies and the elderly, especially those with serious health problems, according to the World Health Organization. Despite its lack of fatality, the disease can still cause fever and joint pain, which the World Health Organization says can be debilitating and prolonged. Other symptoms include joint swelling, muscle pain, headache, nausea, fatigue and rash. Two vaccines have been approved for use in several countries, including Britain. "Chikungunya can be a nasty disease and we're seeing a worrying increase in cases among travelers returning to the UK," Dr. Philip Veal, consultant in Public Health at UKHSA, said in a statement. "While this mosquito-borne infection is rarely fatal, it can causes severe joint and muscle pain, headaches, sensitivity to light and skin rashes. Thankfully, symptoms usually improve within a few weeks, but joint pain may last for months or longer." According to the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, as of July, there have been 240,000 cases of the virus so far this year and 90 deaths in 16 countries. France has tested positive for 30 cases and Italy for one. However, France's Reunion Island -- located in the Indian Ocean, to the east of Madagascar -- is battling an epidemic of the virus. The Pacific Community, the principal scientific and technical organization supporting development in the Pacific region, said in a statement that the small island has confirmed 54,410 cases of the virus, including 28 deaths, so far this year. "Health authorities are urging heightened vigilance for travelers to La Reunion," SPC said, "visitors are advised to take preventive measures against mosquito bites, including the use of insect repellent, wearing long-sleeved clothing and staying in accommodations with screened windows or air conditioning." Earlier this month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a travel warning for Americans thinking of visiting southern China over an outbreak of chikungunya there. The CDC states there are outbreaks in Bolivia, China's Guangdong Province, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Somalia and Sri Lanka.

Another State Looks To Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits
Another State Looks To Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Another State Looks To Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves has said his state may block the purchase of unhealthy foods using SNAP benefits. Newsweek has contacted Reeves' office for comment via email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters So far in 2025, a slew of states have either barred or are in the process of restricting what Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries can buy using their benefits. Advocates for restricting SNAP purchases argue that cutting unhealthy foods from the program will improve public health, with the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement leading the charge. Opponents counter that such limits dictate the diets of low-income Americans while overlooking deeper problems related to accessing affordable, nutritious food. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in Mississippi, some 384,800 people collect SNAP benefits, representing 13 percent of the state's population. What To Know Reeves, a Republican, said of restricting SNAP benefits, "It is on my radar," SuperTalk Mississippi Media reported on Wednesday. According to the outlet, he also discussed the idea with Health and Human Services Secretary Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has spearheaded the MAHA movement, at the National Governors Association summer meeting. "I spent some time with my fellow governors a week or two ago," Reeves said. "We also had meetings with Secretary Kennedy while we were at the conference, very productive meetings, and that is something we are looking into." Republican Governor Tate Reeves speaks with supporters during an election night watch party at the Refuge Hotel & Conference Center in Flowood, Mississippi, on November 7, 2023. Republican Governor Tate Reeves speaks with supporters during an election night watch party at the Refuge Hotel & Conference Center in Flowood, Mississippi, on November 7, 2023. Brandon Bell/GETTY SNAP Changes Across the U.S. So far this year, 12 states have approved plans to restrict SNAP benefits. While the program is administered by states, it is overseen and largely paid for by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). To make amendments to SNAP, states are required to send waiver requests to the federal agency for approval. Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia have all had their waiver requests approved. Tennessee and South Carolina have indicated that they are in the process of making similar requests to the USDA. Beginning in 2026, the approved waivers are set to prohibit certain foods from being purchased with electronic benefit transfer cards, which are reloaded monthly for use at participating grocery stores nationwide. Not all the new restrictions are the same. For example, in Colorado, Utah and West Virginia, only soft drinks and/or soda would no longer be purchasable with SNAP. In numerous other states, the restriction also extends to candy. What People Are Saying USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in an August 4 news release regarding states with approved waivers: "It is incredible to see so many states take action at this critical moment in our nation's history and do something to begin to address chronic health problems. President Trump has changed the status quo, and the entire cabinet is taking action to Make America Healthy Again. At USDA, we play a key role in supporting Americans who fall on hard times, and that commitment does not change. Rather, these state waivers promote healthier options for families in need." Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in the news release: "For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy—products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics. These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health. I thank these governors who have stepped up to request waivers, and I encourage others to follow their lead. This is how we Make America Healthy Again." Valerie Imbruce, the director of the Center for Environment and Society at Washington College, previously told Newsweek: "Controlling how the poor eat is a paternalistic response to a problem that is not based in SNAP recipients' inability to make good decisions about healthy foods, it is a problem of the price differential in choosing healthy or junk foods. Soda and candy are much cheaper and more calorie dense than 100 percent fruit juices or prebiotic non-artificially sweetened carbonated beverages, thanks to price supports and subsidies by the federal government to support a U.S. sugar industry." What Happens Next Reeves' comments suggest that Mississippi has not formally requested a waiver from the USDA. It remains to be seen whether the state will do so.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store