&w=3840&q=100)
‘Philippines can't stay out if Taiwan conflict breaks out': Marcos Jr backs stronger defence ties with India
Amid growing tensions in the Taiwan Strait, Philippines President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr has said his country 'cannot stay out' if a conflict breaks out between China and Taiwan, adding that the Philippines would be 'drawn into it' to protect its citizens.
Speaking exclusively to Firstpost Managing Editor Palki Sharma during his visit to India, Marcos highlighted the urgent need for strategic partnerships with like-minded nations including India to ensure regional security.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'If there is an all-out war, we will be drawn into it. We will have to go into Taiwan and bring our people home,' Marcos said, adding the Philippines' large expatriate population in Taiwan.
Marcos' comments come at a time of intensifying maritime tensions in the South China Sea and growing global concern over a potential military flashpoint in the Indo-Pacific.
Strengthening ties with India
Describing his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi as 'a new beginning, a new phase' in bilateral ties, Marcos said the strategic partnership between India and the Philippines has been 'taken up a notch.' He praised India's defence capabilities, especially its successful Operation Sindoor and the performance of the BrahMos missile system.
'We contacted counterparts in India. We wanted to know how it was used. The system worked very well, no doubt,' he said, confirming that the Philippines is in the process of procuring more BrahMos missiles.
'Everything is on the table,' he added, indicating interest in further purchases of jets and naval equipment.
While Marcos clarified that the Philippines is 'not preparing for war,' he said that upgrading military hardware and ensuring interoperability with regional partners is vital. 'We are only reacting to the challenges we are facing. Military exercises and cross-training are very important,' he said.
A coalition of like-minded nations
Without directly naming China, Marcos stressed the importance of forming a global coalition of nations that respect international laws and reject unilateral changes to borders. 'No one country can stand up for principles alone. We need a coalition,' he said.
On the idea of an 'Asian NATO', Marcos said ASEAN may not be sufficient to tackle all regional challenges. 'One country cannot alone solve global challenges,' he said, adding that the Philippines welcomes India's increasing presence in the Indo-Pacific.
US ties and Taiwan conflict
Marcos expressed confidence that the United States would remain committed to defending the Philippines, regardless of the outcome of the upcoming US presidential election. He described the US-Philippines alliance as 'ironclad' and acknowledged former President Donald Trump's role in coining that term.
Pressed on whether the Philippines would allow the US to use its military bases in a Taiwan contingency, Marcos said: 'Why should we turn down partners who face the Chinese threat? We are not acting as a puppet state. It is our duty to defend our country.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On China and regional diplomacy
While he acknowledged that Beijing was mentioned during his talks with Modi, Marcos said, 'We are not against anyone; we are for defending our territory.' He added that China can be trusted 'in the sense that they are clear about what they want,' but warned against allowing territorial disputes to dominate bilateral relations.
'We want to avoid a shooting war… a misunderstanding can blow up into something bigger. We want to cool rhetoric and keep communication lines open,' he said.
On Gaza and global crises
In rare comments on the war in Gaza, Marcos said the humanitarian toll is 'unacceptable' and called for stronger international action. 'The death, destruction and starvation should not be happening in this day and age. If the US stops sending weapons, there would be a big drop in attacks,' he said.
Reflecting on the global picture, Marcos said that 'uncertainty is the worst thing for the economy' and advised nations to 'negotiate hard' and remain agile in their diplomacy, especially when dealing with major powers like the US and China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India holds firm in US trade talks, eyes EU pact amid tariff tensions
In a key meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Foreign Secretary and the Commerce Secretary briefed members on India-US relations and ongoing trade negotiations, sources said on Monday Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule.(REUTERS) The government outlined three categories under which the US has been imposing tariffs. The issues included Global Tariffs - measures applied to all countries, not just India, sector-specific tariffs - designed to attract certain industries to the US, such as automobiles, leather, and textiles and revenue-oriented tariffs - targeting sectors like agriculture and oil for revenue generation. Officials stressed that negotiations with the US are continuing, but India will not compromise in the agriculture and dairy sectors. The government is actively assessing the impact of tariffs in consultation with stakeholders, including exporters, and is exploring alternative trade partnerships. Talks on trade agreements with the EU are being expedited, and new agreements with other countries are also under consideration. On broader ties, the government noted that India-US relations remain strong beyond trade. Recent developments include resolutions passed at the UN Security Council and the QUAD on the Pahalgam attacks, the extradition of Tahawwur Rana from the US, and the designation of TRF as a terrorist organisation. There has been no India-US dialogue regarding Pakistan in the current trade discussions. Committee Chairperson Shashi Tharoor confirmed that around 50 questions were raised in the meeting. He reiterated that trade is only one dimension of the India-US partnership. On Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's nuclear threat remark, the government stated that such statements are unacceptable, especially when made from the soil of a friendly country. Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule. On whether the nuclear threat issue would be raised with Washington, officials deferred to the Foreign Secretary but affirmed that such rhetoric is unwelcome. Commenting on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy following his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the government noted that if the war ends, 25 per cent of existing tariffs--imposed due to India's purchase of Russian oil--would be lifted. However, India remains focused on addressing the remaining 25 per cent tariff impact.


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Sri Lankan MP backs India amid tariff row
Synopsis Amid India-US trade issues, a Sri Lankan MP, Harsha de Silva, backs India. He highlighted India's support to Sri Lanka during its economic crisis. De Silva urged against mocking India's situation. He reminded everyone of India's generosity when Colombo faced difficulties. India provided significant financial assistance to Sri Lanka in 2022. The MP's statement occurred during a parliamentary debate. New Delhi: Amid the India-US tariff standoff, a Sri Lankan parliamentarian has come out in support of New Delhi and drawn attention to how the Indian government came to Colombo's aid when the island nation was facing a crisis. During a recent parliamentary debate on the growing India-US trade tension, Colombo district MP and former minister Harsha de Silva reminded critics of India's generosity during Sri Lanka's difficult days, according to people in the know. "Don't laugh at India. Don't mock them when they are down, because when we were down, they were the only ones to lend us a hand," a source quoted de Silva as saying. "It ain't over until the fat lady sings. We witnessed you laughing. Don't laugh. India expected the tariffs to come down to 15%, and so did we."India had provided close to $4 billion in assistance to Sri Lanka during the economic crisis in 2022.


News18
4 hours ago
- News18
US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage
Curated By : Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 00:39 IST It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case (Pexels/Representative Image) The US Supreme Court legalised same-sex marriage in 2015 following its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Now, nearly a decade after that historic decision, the nation's highest court is being urged to revisit the ruling. Kim Davis, a former county clerk from Kentucky, has submitted a petition asking the Court to consider granting her protection from personal liability under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, reported ABC . Davis made national headlines in 2015 when she was jailed for six days after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing her religious beliefs. At the time, she was the only official authorised under Kentucky law to issue marriage licenses in Rowan County. When she denied a marriage certificate to David Ermold and David Moore, a lower court ordered her to pay $100,000 in damages for infringing on their constitutional rights. Recommended Stories In her recent appeal to the Supreme Court, Davis is contesting the $100,000 jury verdict and is also seeking $260,000 in emotional damages and attorneys' fees. Her claims had previously been dismissed by lower courts. A federal appeals court panel earlier this year ruled against her, stating that the former clerk 'cannot raise the First Amendment as a defence because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case. The justices are expected to consider if they will take the matter during a private conference at the end of September. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments would likely take place in the spring of 2026, with a final decision anticipated by the end of June. 'I'm hoping that we'll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks," said Matt Staver, Davis' legal representative, in a statement to Scripps News . View All "Dragging Out War" Zelensky Eyes "Stronger Global Pressure" on Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Meet Donald Trump Will Try To Get Back Territory For Ukraine In "Feel-out Meeting" With Putin In Alaska North Korea Slams US-South Korea Drills; Lukashenko Admits Kim's Troops Took Part in Ukraine War |4K Air India Crash Victims' Families Demand Immediate Release Of Flight Recorders, Hire Us based Lawyer "Road To Misery" IRGC Slams Trump-Backed Zangezur corridor, Iran to Hold Meet with Armenia | 4K View all Meanwhile, William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, expressed confidence in the current legal outcome. In a statement to ABC , he noted, 'Not a single judge on the US Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis' rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that her arguments do not merit further attention." In her petition, Davis further argues that the Court should treat the issue of same-sex marriage similarly to how it addressed abortion in its 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. This is the first time that someone has challenged the same-sex marriage ruling after it was announced in 2015. News world US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage Read More