Asian Stocks Estimated Below Intrinsic Value In June 2025
Name
Current Price
Fair Value (Est)
Discount (Est)
Taiwan Union Technology (TPEX:6274)
NT$216.50
NT$424.21
49%
StemCell Institute (TSE:7096)
¥1070.00
¥2118.09
49.5%
Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology (SZSE:002518)
CN¥21.98
CN¥43.55
49.5%
PixArt Imaging (TPEX:3227)
NT$219.50
NT$436.51
49.7%
Peijia Medical (SEHK:9996)
HK$6.43
HK$12.71
49.4%
Livero (TSE:9245)
¥1719.00
¥3376.98
49.1%
Good Will Instrument (TWSE:2423)
NT$43.90
NT$87.32
49.7%
Food & Life Companies (TSE:3563)
¥6579.00
¥12942.09
49.2%
Dive (TSE:151A)
¥917.00
¥1832.47
50%
cottaLTD (TSE:3359)
¥442.00
¥866.08
49%
Click here to see the full list of 292 stocks from our Undervalued Asian Stocks Based On Cash Flows screener.
Here we highlight a subset of our preferred stocks from the screener.
Overview: S&D Co., Ltd, with a market cap of ₩397.75 billion, develops and sells health functional food in South Korea.
Operations: Revenue Segments (in millions of ₩):
Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 23.1%
S&D Co., Ltd is trading at ₩137,500, which is 23.1% below its estimated fair value of ₩178,875.67, indicating it may be undervalued based on cash flows. The company's earnings are forecast to grow significantly at 23.4% annually, outpacing the Korean market's average growth rate of 21%. Revenue growth is also expected to exceed market averages at 20.9% per year. However, recent share price volatility could pose risks for investors seeking stability.
The analysis detailed in our S&D growth report hints at robust future financial performance.
Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in S&D's balance sheet health report.
Overview: DPC Dash Ltd, along with its subsidiaries, runs a chain of fast-food restaurants in the People's Republic of China and has a market cap of HK$12.92 billion.
Operations: The company generates revenue primarily from its chain of fast-food restaurants in the People's Republic of China, totaling CN¥4.31 billion.
Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 17.9%
DPC Dash Ltd, trading at HK$98.7, is priced 17.9% below its fair value estimate of HK$120.2, reflecting potential undervaluation based on cash flows. The company recently turned profitable with net income of CNY 55.2 million and expects earnings to grow significantly at 51.3% annually, surpassing the Hong Kong market's growth rate of 10.6%. However, significant insider selling over the past quarter could be a concern for investors evaluating stability and confidence in future performance.
Our growth report here indicates DPC Dash may be poised for an improving outlook.
Click here and access our complete balance sheet health report to understand the dynamics of DPC Dash.
Overview: Peijia Medical Limited, with a market cap of HK$4.28 billion, focuses on the research, development, manufacturing, and sales of transcatheter valve therapeutic and neurointerventional procedural medical devices in the People's Republic of China.
Operations: Peijia Medical generates revenue from its Neurointerventional Business, which accounts for CN¥355.55 million, and its Transcatheter Valve Therapeutic Business, contributing CN¥259.94 million.
Estimated Discount To Fair Value: 49.4%
Peijia Medical, trading at HK$6.43, is significantly undervalued based on cash flows with a fair value estimate of HK$12.71. Despite reporting a net loss of CNY 226.58 million in 2024, the company is expected to become profitable within three years and outpace market growth with projected revenue increases of 27.9% annually. Recent advancements include regulatory acceptance for innovative medical devices and successful clinical trials, potentially enhancing future revenue streams and investor confidence.
Upon reviewing our latest growth report, Peijia Medical's projected financial performance appears quite optimistic.
Take a closer look at Peijia Medical's balance sheet health here in our report.
Delve into our full catalog of 292 Undervalued Asian Stocks Based On Cash Flows here.
Are you invested in these stocks already? Keep abreast of every twist and turn by setting up a portfolio with Simply Wall St, where we make it simple for investors like you to stay informed and proactive.
Take control of your financial future using Simply Wall St, offering free, in-depth knowledge of international markets to every investor.
Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention.
Diversify your portfolio with solid dividend payers offering reliable income streams to weather potential market turbulence.
Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include KOSDAQ:A260970 SEHK:1405 and SEHK:9996.
This article was originally published by Simply Wall St.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the U.S. and China Are Playing Nice
Credit - Getty Images The U.S. and the People's Republic of China are strategic rivals in the battle for global leadership in the 21st century. So it was no surprise when President Donald Trump hit China with 20% tariffs in the first few weeks of his second term and then imposed reciprocal tariffs of 34% on 'Liberation Day.' And when Trump a few days later lowered tariff rates for everyone else to calm markets, he quadrupled duties on China to a whopping 145%. But all that now feels like ancient history. Over the past four months, Trump has bent over backwards to be kind to Beijing. The two sides announced a 90-day ceasefire in Geneva in early May, agreeing to reduce tariffs and negotiate their differences over export controls and other issues. (Remaining U.S. tariffs on China are still at roughly 55%, and China's tariffs on the U.S. stand at almost 33%. These are historically high levels, but not sufficient to outright stop trade.) Further discussions in London and Stockholm made enough progress for the two sides this week to announce another extension of the ceasefire, with the White House praising Beijing for being cooperative and flexible in the negotiations to date. Read More: Why Trump Will Blink First on China In the same vein, the Trump Administration has not shut down TikTok in the U.S. despite the fact that it is still Chinese-controlled, in contravention of American law; it denied a transit visa for Taiwanese President William Lai; and it is allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell advanced chips in China despite originally blocking many of these sales, following a pay-for-play deal. So why the sudden about-face on China? It is doubly odd given the U.S.'s simultaneous tough tact toward other members of the BRICS—a rival to the U.S.-led G7 that includes Brazil, Russia, India, and South Africa—not to mention many of America's traditional allies. Three reasons stand out. First, both Washington and Beijing now have proven weapons that are restraining the aggressive instincts of the other side. Unlike others who caved in to Trump's pressure, Beijing retaliated, first with its own high tariffs, and then, more importantly, with restrictions on rare earth minerals, over which they have a global chokehold. Once Trump began lowering most of the initial reciprocal tariffs and calling for talks with Xi, they had confidence that restricting rare earths minerals and magnets would be met not with counterstrikes but with concessions. That includes the Trump Administration backing off imposing new export controls on several technologies and scrapping their threat to 'aggressively revoke' Chinese student visas. Beijing now believes it has perfected the recipe for making a 'TACO' ('Trump always chickens out'). Second, Trump and Xi both have an interest in strengthening economic confidence at home. With persistent overcapacity and price wars across industrial and consumer sectors, 'involution' has become the word of the year in China, a nod to the excessive competition that is hurting local businesses. Xi needs to shore up government finances, consolidate industries, and avoid further international barriers to Chinese exports and investment. The U.S.'s current economic picture is stronger, but constituents in town halls across the country have expressed deep worries about lost export markets, inflation, budget deficits, and a potential recession. Third, both Trump and Xi want to meet each other, most likely in the Fall in Asia. Trump has been signaling his desire for direct communication with Xi since at least April. He wants to assemble a deal that he can sell at home as boosting U.S. business opportunities and stopping the fentanyl epidemic, given China's role in producing most of the precursors in the synthetic opiod that is trafficked to America. The Chinese have played hard to get, privately saying any summit must be preceded by detailed negotiations and planning. Based on my conversations with experts in China in recent weeks, Xi wants to avoid being disrespected, as Ukrainian President Zelensky and other world leaders were during their White House visits. And with Trump making concession after concession, Beijing may want to consolidate its recent gains and aim even higher, perhaps inducing Trump to make further compromises over tariffs, export controls, and Taiwan. Read More: It's Time for Trump and Xi to Meet Although one should not dismiss the value of stable ties between the world's two largest economies, each equipped with massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons, this warming trend is unlikely to last very long. Both sides prefer calmness now because it aligns with their short-term interests. Chinese official rhetoric aside, neither side sees the relationship in cooperative terms, and neither is willing to take major steps to provide strategic reassurance to the other. The underlying fundamental challenges created by the countries' deep divisions over their economic ties, the potential for conflict over Taiwan and other hotspots, and their competing visions of the international order can only be papered over for so long. At some point Beijing may run out of luck, and either not concede enough in negotiations or push too hard to make a TACO, and instead generate a Trumpian tirade or policy overreaction. Trump's unpredictability make linear extrapolations of any U.S. policy or strategy a risky bet. At some point, for either reasons of policy or fashion, the U.S.'s current gentle approach toward Beijing is likely to eventually harden, and for a new scene in the drama to unfold. Read More: Why China Can't Win a Trade War Beijing knows no deal with Trump is permanent. They will enjoy the peace and quiet as long as they can, but they know they need to be prepared for the next round of escalation—whenever it arrives. Other countries, companies, and markets should, too. Contact us at letters@ Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
World leader who took swipe at Trump over tariffs appears to cozy up to China
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva declared his country open to foreign companies at the inauguration of Chinese automaker GWM's factory in São Paulo. The remarks come as Brazil faces steep U.S. tariffs, which Lula has repeatedly denounced. By making the statement at a Chinese factory opening, Lula signaled a possible pivot further away from Washington and toward Beijing. "Count on the Brazilian government. Whoever wants to leave, leave. Whoever wants to come, we welcome you with open arms," Lula said at the ceremony, according to Reuters. The news agency also reported he criticized President Donald Trump's tariffs as "unnecessary turbulence." Both Brazil and China face tariffs, though at different levels. China's tariffs, once as high as 145%, now stand at 30% but could rise if Beijing and Washington fail to reach a deal. Brazil, meanwhile, is facing a 50% tariff on its goods. Lula and Chinese President Xi Jinping, both BRICS leaders, spoke earlier in the week ahead of the factory's opening. The call followed Lula's comments to Reuters that he planned to raise the issue of responding to U.S. tariffs with fellow BRICS leaders. On Wednesday, the Brazilian government unveiled an aid package for companies hurt by U.S. tariffs. According to Reuters, the package focused on credit lines for exporters and government purchases of products struggling to find new markets. The U.S. tariffs on Brazil are expected to impact the coffee, beef, seafood, textiles, footwear and fruit industries, Reuters reported. Earlier this month, Lula told Reuters he was willing to talk to Trump but would not "humiliate" himself by trying to engage while the U.S. president "doesn't want to talk." However, Trump has said that Lula is free to "talk to me anytime he wants." Tensions between the two leaders extend beyond tariffs into politics. The Trump administration has lambasted Brazil's treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is under house arrest. Trump commented on the situation in an executive order in which he denounced Brazil's "politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution" of Bolsonaro. Lula told Reuters that Brazil's Supreme Court "does not care what Trump says, and it should not." He also reportedly said that Bolsonaro was a "traitor to the homeland" who should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia and AMD's ‘special treatment' from Trump is shaking up an already tangled global chip supply chain
Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia and AMD export AI processors to China in exchange for a cut of their sales will have repercussions far beyond the semiconductor supply chain is global, involving a wide array of non-U.S. companies, often based in countries that are U.S. allies. Nvidia's chips may be designed and sold by a U.S. company, but they're manufactured by Taiwan's TSMC, using chipmaking tools from companies like ASML, which is based in the Netherlands, and Japan's Tokyo Election, and using components from suppliers like South Korea's SK Hynix. The U.S. leaned on these global companies for years to try to limit their engagement with China; these efforts picked up after the passage of the CHIPS Act and the expansion of U.S. chip-export controls in 2022. Washington has also pressured major transshipment hubs, like Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, to more closely monitor chip shipments to ensure that controlled chips don't make their way to China in violation of U.S. law. Within the U.S., discussion of Trump's Nvidia deal has focused on what it means for China's government's and Chinese companies' ability to get their hands on cutting-edge U.S. technology. But several other countries and companies are likely studying the deal closely to see if they might get an opening to sell to China as well. Trump's Nvidia deal 'tells you that [U.S.] national security is not really the issue, or has never been the issue' with export controls, says Mario Morales, who leads market research firm IDC's work on semiconductors. Companies and countries will 'probably have to revisit what their strategy has been, and in some cases, they're going to break away from the U.S. administration's policies.' 'If Nvidia and AMD are given special treatment because they've 'paid to play', why shouldn't other companies be doing the same?' he adds. Getting allies on their side The Biden administration spent a lot of diplomatic energy to get its allies to agree to limit their semiconductor exports to China. First, Washington said that manufacturers like TSMC and Intel that wanted to tap billions in subsidies could not expand advanced chip production in China. Then, the U.S. pushed for its allies to impose their own sanctions on exports to China. 'Export controls and other sanctions efforts are necessarily multilateral, yet are fraught with collective action problems,' says Jennifer Lind, an associate professor at Dartmouth College and international relations expert. 'Other countries are often deeply unenthusiastic about telling their firms—which are positioned to bring in a lot of revenue, which they use for future innovation—that they cannot export to Country X or Country Y.' This translates to 'refusing to participate in export controls or to devoting little or no effort to ensuring that their firms are adhering to the controls,' she says. Paul Triolo, a partner at the DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, points out that 'Japanese and Dutch officials during the Biden administration resisted any serious alignment with U.S. controls,' and suggests that U.S allies 'will be glad to see a major stepping back from controls.' Ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and its trading partners could weaken export controls further. Chinese officials may demand a rollback of chip sanctions as part of a grand bargain between Washington and Beijing, similar to how the U.S. agreed to grant export licenses to Nvidia and AMD in exchange for China loosening its controls on rare earth magnets. Japan and South Korea may also bring up the chip controls as part of their own trade negotiations with Trump. 'Expect continuing diversions' A separate issue are controls over the transfer of Nvidia GPUs. The U.S. has leaned on governments like Singapore, Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates to prevent advanced Nvidia processors from making their way to China. Scrutiny picked up in the wake of DeepSeek's surprise AI release earlier this year, amid allegations that the Hangzhou-based startup had trained its powerful models on Nvidia processors that were subject to export controls. (The startup claims that it acquired its processors before export controls came into effect). As of now, the two chips allowed to be sold in China–Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308–are not the most powerful AI chips on the market. The leading-edge processors, like Nvidia's Blackwell chip, cannot be sold to China. That means chip smuggling will continue to be a concern for the U.S. government. Yet 'enforcement will be spotty,' Triolo says. 'The Commerce Department lacks resources to track GPUs globally, hence expect continuing diversions of limited amounts of GPUs to China via Thailand, Malaysia, and other jurisdictions.' Triolo is, instead, focused on another loophole in the export control regime: Chinese firms accessing AI chips based in overseas data centers. 'There is no sign that the Trump Commerce Department is gearing up to try and close this gaping loophole in U.S. efforts to limit Chinese access to advanced compute,' he says. How much will the global supply chain change? Not all analysts think we'll see a complete unraveling of the export control regime. 'The controls involve a complex multinational coalition that all parties will be hesitant to disrupt, given how uncertain the results will be,' says Chris Miller, author of Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology. He adds that many of these chipmakers and suppliers don't have the same political heft as Nvidia, the world's most valuable company. Yet while these companies may not be as politically savvy as Nvidia, they're just as important. TSMC, for example, is the only company that can manufacture the newest generation of advanced chips; ASML is the only supplier of the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines used to make the smallest semiconductors. 'I don't believe it's leverage that the Trump administration will easily give away,' says Ray Wang, a semiconductor researcher at the Futurum Group. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
