Ex-New Mexico state candidate gets 80 years for shootings at Dems' homes
The big picture: A federal jury in March found the 42-year-old guilty of of all charges related to the drive-by shootings targeting the homes and offices of elected state state Democratic officials in N.M. in December 2022 and January 2023.
Peña, who ran for the House District 14 seat in the 2022 midterms, was convicted of 13 charges. These included conspiracy, firearms charges, four counts of intimidation and interference with federally protected activities, per a Department of Justice statement Wednesday.
Driving the news: "After his electoral defeat, Peña falsely claimed the election was rigged and began pressuring members of the Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners not to certify the results," per the statement.
He recruited accomplices Jose Trujillo and Demetrio Trujillo to carry out the shootings after the commissioners refused his demands, the DOJ said.
"One of the shootings involved a fully automatic machine gun. Multiple rounds struck areas of the homes where children had recently been or were sleeping," the statement noted.
"Following his arrest, Peña attempted to have Jose and Demetrio Trujillo murdered to prevent them from testifying, offering fellow inmates money and a vehicle in exchange for their deaths."
Zoom in: Jose Trujillo previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy, interference with federally protected activities and other charges including firearms offenses and was sentenced to 37 months in prison, according to the DOJ.
Demetrio Trujillo pleaded guilty to similar charges and was sentenced to 180 months in prison.
For the record: The court in Albuquerque ordered Peña to pay restitution and a $250,000 fine.
"Upon his release from prison, Peña will be subject to three years of supervised release," the DOJ said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Schumer: Trump attack on mail-in voting ‘not based in fact or reality'
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Monday criticized President Trump's broadside against mail-in voting, saying that right-wing claims of widespread voter fraud are inaccurate and 'not based in fact or reality.' Trump earlier in the day announced that he plans to 'lead a movement' to end the use of mail-in ballots in elections. The ballots were used more widely in the 2020 presidential contest due to COVID-19. Trump lost that race to former President Biden, which he has repeatedly and unfoundedly claimed was the result of a rigged election. Schumer said his party will do everything possible to stand in the way of blocking mail-in voting in the coming years. 'Two facts: Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and vote by mail is safe, secure, and reliable,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Let's be clear — this is not based in fact or reality, but it is yet another way for Trump to silence Americans from using their voice in the democratic process and implement Jim Crow laws across America.' 'Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy,' the Democratic leader added. Trump made his remarks in a lengthy Monday morning TruthSocial post, which kept up his drumbeat against mail-in ballots. 'I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election,' Trump wrote in his post. 'WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections.' 'THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!!' he added later on. Trump, however, does not have the power to unilaterally change voting laws. Those must be changed at the state level.
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kat Cammack announces birth of baby girl
Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) on Monday announced the birth of a baby girl, becoming the 15th congresswoman to give birth while serving in office. Cammack said her daughter, Augusta Dair, was born Aug. 14 'after a very long & tough labor.' 'Baby is doing great and already showing us her sweet and sassy personality while Mom is speedily recovering,' Cammack wrote in a post on X that included a photo of her daughter. She thanked her husband and medical team for their help through what she described as a difficult time. 'We would like to thank the most incredible team of doctors and nurses that saw us through a very tough and emotional six days. Never could we have asked for a better team to take care of our family,' she said. Cammack is the 15th congresswoman to give birth in office and the fourth in the past two years: Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-Colo.) had her son in January 2025; Del. Jenniffer González-Colón (R), the former nonvoting member from Puerto Rico, had twins in February 2024; and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) had her son in August 2023. A bipartisan push to allow new parents to vote by proxy in the House gained momentum earlier this year, when Luna teamed up with Pettersen to force a vote on the Democrat's proxy voting resolution. Luna successfully executed a discharge petition on the resolution but never forced a vote on it, ultimately striking a deal with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to formalize 'vote pairing.' The procedure allows an absent lawmaker — in this case, a new mother — to coordinate with another member voting opposite their stance who is willing to abstain from the vote. That way the new mother's absence is canceled out. The present member would state for the Congressional Record how both lawmakers would have voted.
Atlantic
15 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Law and Order: Sandwich Crimes Unit
' WASHINGTON—The Justice Department worker accused of throwing a Subway sandwich at a federal agent was re-arrested by an armed team of at least a half-dozen US Marshals in a dramatic Wednesday night raid, new video shows. Sean Charles Dunn, 37, was cuffed a second time inside his apartment about a mile northwest of the White House—after being slapped with a felony assault charge. Footage of the raid was posted by the White House on X Thursday evening with the caption: 'Nighttime Routine: Operation Make D.C. Safe Again Edition.'' — The New York Post, August 15 Police headquarters, Washington, D.C., present day. A dusty, small office. A trainee walks in carrying a cake with CONGRATULATIONS! 25 YEARS WITHOUT A SANDWICH-BASED CRIME written on it in large frosted letters. Senior Detective J, Junior Detective F, and Sergeant P are sitting around. Everyone claps. Trainee: Who wants to blow it out? A panicked junior detective, K, rushes in. Detective K: Turn on the TV. They turn on the TV. On the screen, footage of a DOJ employee tossing a hoagie at a federal law-enforcement officer and running off. The trainee drops the cake. Detective J: No! Detective K: What in tarnation were those officers doing there? Don't they know the first thing about sandwich-crime prevention? Trainee: It doesn't look like it hit very hard. Seemed soggy. Lady Sleuth: No. They'll count it. Remember the hot-dog incident in '73? Detective F: But a hot dog isn't a sandwich! Detective J: The record keepers didn't agree. Trainee: We should have fired the record keepers! Detective J: (Slamming his fist on the table) That's not how we DO things in the sandwich division. Doesn't matter if we get bad press, like a subpar panini. We don't cut corners, unless the sandwich in question is a round-type sandwich. Detective F: Some are. Officer J: You think 25 years without sandwich crime just HAPPENS? Trainee: No. Officer J: We worked for this. It hasn't been easy. When I got started on this beat, you couldn't walk down the street in Washington without having a grilled cheese shoved in your face, if you were lucky. Egg salad, if you weren't. Detective F: Not all the sandwiches were harmless. Some were clubs. People were too frightened of sandwiches to build a Subway in Georgetown. Officer K: I still have a scar from when I took a meatball sub to the chin in '96 and, afterward, got into an unrelated knife fight. Officer J: I started here after transferring from the bread-crimes division in France. I spent decades hunting down a man who stole bread one time. My name is Javert, but that's not important. His name was Jean Valjean. I also resented him because I had just the one name and he had two. Trainee: That seems excessive. Officer Javert: I think so too! One name is enough for anyone. Officer Javert: Right. It was. It turned out what he needed was rehabilitation and a second chance, not me chasing him across France, singing. But we learned from it! We realized if we were proactive rather than reactive, if we got involved in the communities we served, we could figure out what was going on and stop it. Detective F: Most sandwich crimes are crimes of opportunity. People who aren't carrying sandwiches don't tend to commit sandwich crimes. They do other types of crime. We took that statistic to the chief and said, 'You're sure you want us to go all in on eliminating sandwich crime? Not regular crime? Consider all the murders we could prevent if we just handed sandwiches to people who were about to do other crimes.' And they said, 'No, solve sandwich crime.' Detective F: Lunchables are a gateway. Officer Javert: Teaching little kids to assemble their own sandwiches, as though it were play! We tackled all of that. We started from the bread up, tackling the root causes, and then the additional causes that were layered on top, and then any sauce that was on top of that. Officer K: I remember when Mark Warner made what he claimed was a tuna melt. And everyone said, 'Call the sandwich-crimes unit!' Trainee: That was what started me down this path, sir. I saw it, and I knew it was an abomination, and I wanted to stop it. Officer Javert: The point is, people trust us. We aren't just police officers. We know the community we serve. We know how to deescalate. We look for non-carceral solutions. We ask: why would someone want to throw a sandwich? How can we fix that? We know who has beef and if that beef is corned. Detective F: That didn't happen overnight. We learned what to do: control the mayonnaise supply. And what to avoid: goofy, authoritarian displays of force. Officer K: Because no one has the urge. Trainee: And that's because of all your tireless work. Detective F: Or a caprese. Officer Javert: —with troops! It's not right! (s tares at the TV and sighs) And they just—they ruined it all! They're not stopping crime, regular or sandwich! They're just making good people anxious to walk through their own neighborhoods. I'm so angry I could throw a good-size flatbread! Detective F: (Gasps in horror) NO! You've been a mentor! Officer Javert: With soft bread! A limp one, with the tomato already falling off! Just up into the air, not at any one in particular. bOfficer K: Listen to yourself! Six heavily armed federal law-enforcement officers knock down the door, handcuff Javert, and start to haul him off. Federal enforcement: Sandwich crime is a federal crime. They drag him away, sirens blaring.
