Why Bally's (BALY) Shares Are Falling Today
The council voted 29-9 to disapprove the zoning changes necessary for Bally's to build its proposed casino resort at Ferry Point Park. The project's failure to secure this key approval is a major blow to the company's ambitions to enter the lucrative downstate New York market, for which only three casino licenses are available. Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato, who represents the district, led the opposition, stating the developers "came to the table a little too late, with promises too vague and a process too flawed to rebuild the trust that was already lost in our community." The decision casts significant doubt on the future of the proposed development, which was set to include a 500-room hotel and a 2,000-seat entertainment venue.
The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Bally's? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Bally's shares are extremely volatile and have had 49 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business.
Bally's is down 49.1% since the beginning of the year, and at $9.90 per share, it is trading 55.1% below its 52-week high of $22.07 from November 2024.
Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Ford CEO Found Young People Didn't Want to Work There Because $17 Wages Left Them 'So Stressed' - Then He Made An Expensive Change 'The Country Needs'
Turns out, a $17-an-hour paycheck doesn't go as far as it used to—especially if you're young, exhausted, and juggling two jobs just to survive. Ford (NYSE:F) CEO Jim Farley heard this loud and clear from his own factory floors. And instead of shrugging it off or blaming "kids these days," he made a move that echoed the bold playbook of Henry Ford himself—one that he says America desperately needs more of. In a June interview at the Aspen Ideas Festival with Walter Isaacson—the renowned biographer best known for his books on Steve Jobs, Leonardo da Vinci, and Elon Musk—Farley peeled back the curtain on what younger workers were really telling him about life on a $17 wage. Don't Miss: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics—now it's your turn to $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. "The older workers who'd been at the company said, 'None of the young people want to work here. Jim, you pay $17 an hour, and they are so stressed,'" Farley recalled. "They've got to work at Amazon for eight hours, then they come over to Ford for seven hours, and then they sleep for three or four hours—and then they go back. And they're barely getting by." Rather than issue a tone-deaf memo or wait for another generation to settle for less, Farley made a decisive, expensive change: he converted every temporary worker into a full-time employee. "It wasn't easy to do," he admitted. "It was expensive. But I think that's the kind of changes we need to make in our country." Farley's move isn't just about better paychecks—it's about reviving an old-school idea that once turned Ford into a powerhouse: when you pay workers well, they can afford the products they help build. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Quoting the legendary Henry Ford, Farley said, "'I'm doing this because I want my factory worker to buy my cars. If they make enough money, they'll buy my own product.'" Then he added, "It's a self-fulfilling prophecy, in a way." In 1914, Henry Ford famously raised factory wages to $5 a day—nearly double the going rate. It wasn't a random act of generosity. It was a smart bet that higher wages would lead to a more stable, productive workforce and—bonus—more people who could afford to drive off in a Model T. According to Farley, it worked then, and it can work now. He also pointed to deeper structural issues. For Farley, the wage issue is just one layer of a bigger challenge: the U.S. hasn't kept up in preparing young people for careers in skilled trades. "Our governments have to get really serious about investing in trade schools and skilled trades," Farley said. "You go to Germany—every one of our factory workers has an apprentice starting in junior high school. Every one of those jobs has a person behind it for eight years that is trained."Farley's big bet may not please Wall Street, but it's not aimed at them. "We decided as a company that a cooler problem than full autonomy in an urban setting was high-speed, eyes-off driving on highways—push a button, read a book," he told Isaacson, in reference to how Ford picks its battles. When it comes to labor, he's taking that same eyes-on-the-road approach—focusing on people, not just profits. And while turning temps into full-timers might not boost short-term stock prices, Farley's betting on a longer game: one where the people building America's cars can actually afford to drive them. Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? FORD MOTOR (F): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Ford CEO Found Young People Didn't Want to Work There Because $17 Wages Left Them 'So Stressed' - Then He Made An Expensive Change 'The Country Needs' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Procter & Gamble Warns $800M Rise In Tariff Costs, Picks New CEO
Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG), maker of popular brands such as Gillette, Tide, Pampers and Crest, released its fourth-quarter earnings report on Tuesday and issued the fiscal 2026 outlook. Gillette maker reported fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.48, beating the analyst consensus estimate of $1.42. Quarterly sales of $20.889 billion (+2% year over year) outpaced the street view of $20.765 billion. Organic sales, which exclude the impacts of foreign exchange and acquisitions and divestitures, also increased 2%.Higher pricing and favorable mix impacts contributed a 1% increase in sales growth. Organic sales grew across all segments, with Beauty, Grooming, Fabric & Home Care, and Baby, Feminine & Family Care each increasing by 1% and Health Care rising by 2% year over year. Reported gross margin for the quarter under review decreased 50 basis points to 49.1% year over year. Core gross margin for the quarter decreased 70 basis points compared to the same quarter a year ago, or 50 basis points on a currency-neutral basis. Operating margin jumped 190 basis points to 20.8% in the quarter under review. In June 2025, the company announced a portfolio and productivity plan aimed at improving its cost structure and competitiveness. View more earnings on PG As part of the plan, it expects to incur $1 to $1.6 billion in non-core restructuring costs over two years, including reducing up to 7,000 non-manufacturing overhead roles by the end of fiscal 2027. Half of the costs are expected to be incurred by the end of fiscal 2026, with the rest in fiscal 2027. The company exited the quarter with cash and equivalents worth $9.482 billion. Outlook Procter & Gamble expects fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS in the range of $6.83 to $7.09, compared with the $6.99 consensus estimate. The company projects FY2026 sales between $85.126 billion and $88.498 billion, versus the estimated $86.492 billion. GAAP EPS is forecasted between $6.71 and $7.09, compared with the $6.95 estimate. The company estimates a headwind of around $200 million after-tax from unfavorable commodity costs and a net headwind of roughly $250 million after-tax from modestly higher net interest expense. Procter & Gamble sees a headwind of 39 cents per share for fiscal 2026, or a 6% drag on core EPS growth. The company's outlook includes around $1 billion before-tax, or approximately $800 million after-tax, in higher costs from tariffs. "In fiscal 2026, we expect to deliver another year of organic sales growth, Core EPS growth and strong adjusted free cash flow productivity," said Chief Executive Officer Jon Moeller. Management Transition In a separate release, the firm announced that Shailesh Jejurikar, currently Chief Operating Officer, will succeed Jon Moeller as Procter & Gamble's President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2026. The board has also nominated Jejurikar to stand for election as a Director at the annual shareholder meeting in October 2025. On January 1, 2026, Jon Moeller will become Procter & Gamble's Executive Chairman. Price Action: PG shares are trading higher by 0.10% to $157.27 at last check Tuesday. Read Next:Photo by Jonathan Weiss via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? PROCTER & GAMBLE (PG): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Procter & Gamble Warns $800M Rise In Tariff Costs, Picks New CEO originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Business Wire
2 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Investors To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Lockheed Martin Corporation ('Lockheed Martin' or the 'Company') (NYSE: LMT) securities between , inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Lockheed investors have until September 26, 2025 to file a lead plaintiff motion. Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Investors To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action Share IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (LMT) INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM TO POTENTIALLY RECOVER YOUR LOSSES IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT. You can also contact the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss your legal rights by email at info@ by telephone at (310) 914-5007, or visit our website at What Happened? On October 22, 2024, before the market opened, Lockheed Martin announced it was forced to recognize losses of $80 million on a classified program at the Company's Aeronautics business segment 'due to higher than anticipated costs to achieve program objectives.' The Company also announced it had recognized a reach-forward loss in its Rotary and Mission Systems segment 'as a result of additional quantity ordering risk identified on fixed-price options.' On this news, the Company's share price fell $37.63 or 6.12% to close at $576.98 on October 22, 2024, on unusually heavy trading volume. Then, on January 28, 2025, before the market opened, Lockheed Martin announced it was forced to record pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion associated with classified programs at its Aeronautics and Missiles and Fire Control business. The Company explained 'as a result of performance trends' and 'in contemplation of near-term program milestones,' it had 'performed a comprehensive review of the program requirements, technical complexities, schedule, and risks' based on which it recognized $555 million of losses in its Aeronautics program. The Company further reported additional losses of approximately $1.3 billion in its Missiles and Fire Control business due to, among other things, the 'future requirements of the program, discussions with the customer and suppliers.' As a result, the Company's net earnings in 2024 were $5.3 billion, or $22.31 per share, compared to $6.9 billion, or $27.55 per share, in 2023. On this news, the Company's share price fell $46.24 or 9.2% to close at $457.45 on January 28, 2025 on unusually heavy trading volume. Then, on July 22, 2025, before the market opened, Lockheed Martin disclosed it was forced to record an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses on classified programs, including $950 million in losses related to its Aeronautics Classified program due to 'design, integration, and test challenges, as well as other performance issues.' The Company also recorded $570 million in losses on its Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program due in part to providing 'additional mission capabilities, enhanced logistical support, fleet life extension, and revised expectations regarding flight hours.' The Company further recorded a $95 million charge related to its Turkish Utility Helicopter Program due to the 'current status of the program.' As a result, the Company reported sharply lower net earnings of $342 million, or $1.46 per share, including $1.6 billion of program losses and $169 million of other charges. On this news, the Company's share price fell $49.79 or 10.8%, to close at $410.74 on July 22, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls regarding its purportedly risk adjusted contracts including the reporting of its risk adjusted profit booking rate; (2) that Lockheed Martin lacked effective procedures to perform reasonably accurate comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedule, and risks; (3) that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to deliver on its contract commitments in terms of cost, quality and schedule; (4) that, as a result, the Company was reasonably likely to report significant losses; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. If you purchased Lockheed securities, wish to learn more about this action, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please click HERE or contact us at: This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
