I'm decluttering due to divorce – here's how to make it easy on you and your ex
My marriage broke down last year, after over a decade of togetherness and three young children. With 42 per cent of couples choosing to end their relationship after an average of 13 years together, there's a strange comfort in knowing I'm a disappointingly average statistic.
Of course, we tried all the cliched things to stay together, a complete upheaval of our lives to the countryside from London, multiple attempts at couples' therapy, we even bought a puppy, but in the end, there was no avoiding the inevitable. For a myriad of reasons we had reached the end of the road.
With our children all being pre-teens, we decided that the 'nesting' approach would be the kindest solution to separate living arrangements while we navigate the longer process and nitty-gritty of divorcing, from the legal stuff to the tricky division of our belongings.
Nesting involves the children staying put in the family home, with the parents alternating being there with them. This method has become increasingly popular over recent years, designed to minimise the disruption to the children's lives by not being shipped between two houses while you all figure out this new normal. However, this only works if both parties adhere to the boundaries and structures in place. If it goes on for longer than planned it can fast become destabilising for the parents to live like this. And if that happens, who is actually steering the ship? So, it's not for everyone, and is usually a medium term solution before the family home is sold.
However, one plus side to my experience of 'nesting' was that it inevitably started the process of removing certain belongings from the family home to furnish a little separate sleepover pad without too much emotion involved. My ex and I were sharing both spaces – the pad and the home – taking turns looking after the children.
I ensured that during the time I spent away from the children and the family home, I would be surrounded with photos of them and simple things that brought me comfort: my favourite pillow – as I got used to sleeping alone again – my mother's vase to fill with fresh flowers for myself, my softest blanket to snuggle under on too-quiet evenings as the chaotic bedtime routine unfolded at home without me. And my ex could do the same with the things that mattered to him in his solitude.
Even if we don't consider ourselves materialistic, there is comfort, attachment and memories associated with certain objects. I have my grandmother's old g-plan coffee table, complete with mug stains and scratches, not because it's hugely aesthetically pleasing, but because the mug stains belong to her, and even though she died decades ago, there are traces of her still alive in the object. I think of how she taught me to play gin rummy on that table. Aged eight, I sat cross-legged on her floral carpet as she dealt the deck. Flicking her cigar into a marble ashtray and sipping Guinness, she was a formidable 97-year-old hustler.
The sentimental objects that only have resonance with one of you are obviously easier to agree on when it comes to splitting belongings. I doubt my ex cares much for Granny's coffee table, for example. But the trickier elements of a divorce declutter come into play when you try and decide who keeps the things that hold meaning to you both as these things can evoke strong emotions and memories, making the process challenging.
For me, I found the biggest struggle was the antique furniture we'd accumulated over many years together and that we both still love, and the vinyl collection that had steadily grown with a passion for music and similar tastes.
Dividing things up according to who bought them can be tricky too. As many (typically) women will know, it's not as simple as 'who paid for it gets to keep it', because if this were true, my years of sacrificing my own career to be a stay-at-home-mum would have me sleeping on a bare mattress on the floor.
Roop Kaur, a BA Hons psychotherapist based in London, has worked with many couples throughout her years of practice, 'There can be several reasons for a marriage breakdown, some can be worked on, but some have just come to their expiry date.'
She adds, 'When there is a longer marriage breakdown, then feelings of rejection, shame, guilt and disappointment may be experienced, but it's in that moment that you accept the duration of the ride was good, but it is time to now get off the bus, leaving the baggage behind. To avoid flashbacks it's always good to clear out, and detach from anything that was related to the marriage, but to hold and cherish the good ones if they exist.'
This advice can be attributed not only to the emotions involved in the break-up but to the objects amassed throughout a couple's time together.
Ultimately what it might come down to in the end is compromise over what you're willing to let go of. Not ignoring the practicalities of course: if one of you has moved in with a new partner then you may find they have little need for the sofa or sideboards. Their new partner might not want to adorn their shared living space with paintings from that little gallery in Cornwall you sheltered in the rain from on your soggy honeymoon, which only has symbolic meaning to you and your ex.
Divorce is not only a legal and financial process but also a deeply emotional journey. The division of shared belongings, especially those with sentimental value, can significantly impact mental health and wellbeing. Everybody's situation will be unique, depending on how amicable the divorce is, but from my own personal experience here are my Dos and Don'ts.
It can be overwhelming when there's a lifetime of things to decide on. Tackle one area at a time.
Avoid impulsive decisions you may regret. Emotional clarity often comes gradually.
Not everything is about money. There can be so much worth in the emotional attachment we hold towards certain objects that far outweighs any monetary value.
Prioritise items that serve a purpose. As an interior designer, my first priority in design is ensuring a space works practically for how it's needed. Do you need the desk and office chair – then keep them. Will the dressing table fit in your new downsize – maybe not, get rid and use the bathroom mirror instead.
Helpful in legal contexts. Making a record of key items with a value over £500 is part of legal proceedings when divorcing (Form E). So it's useful as you declutter to keep an inventory of these things.
Value and attachment aren't always equal.
Enlist a neutral friend or professional organiser if needed.
Emotions can cloud judgment.
Be realistic. It can be hugely cathartic to learn to let go. After all, you've already started with the marriage.
Organise legal and financial documents. Make copies where needed.
Support makes a big difference. If the nature of the split isn't amicable and you're left to do the lion's share, then call on good friends. You know who they are.
Let go of any objects that bring back painful memories – no matter how much you love it. It's time to move on.
Keep what they currently use or love; consider whether a duplicate is needed for the other home.
Ask them to claim their belongings (don't store their clutter indefinitely – you will likely have less space to do this).
Copies are simple and cheap to make or divide originals fairly.
Especially vinyl or CDs; can have emotional and monetary value. Ensure that if one of you keeps all the first pressings worth thousands and the other has Glenn Miller for 99p in Oxfam that the financial disparity isn't overlooked.
Decide what still serves you; libraries or friends may welcome donations.
Items purchased together, such as furniture or art, can be difficult to divide fairly, leading to potential conflict. Assess the practicalities. Consider resale or rotation options but ultimately if you love the same thing it could just come down to good old-fashioned compromise.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
6 hours ago
- CNET
007 First Light: Here's What James Bond Might Be Up to in His Next Game, Based Mostly on My Hopes and Dreams
More than 70 years after the character first appeared in the novel Casino Royale, James Bond is being reinvented yet again. The latest news comes from IO Interactive, makers of the Hitman games, who announced the title of its upcoming Bond game: 007 First Light, which will be shown off later this week. It has been an interesting year for Bond, with longtime producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson handing creative control over to Amazon MGM Studios in February, and the studio hiring Amy Pascal and David Heyman as their effective replacements. And almost 30 years after the iconic GoldenEye 007 blended espionage elements into first-person shooter gameplay on the N64, we're getting a glimpse of the next incarnation of Bond video games, from a studio that has lots of experience with stealth and subterfuge. The website for First Light describes it as "a wholly original Bond origin story" that will be about Bond earning his 00 status. In Bond lore, agents are only granted 00 status after killing one (sometimes multiple) people as part of an assignment. But guessing that James Bond will have to shoot someone in an upcoming 007 game isn't exactly the boldest prediction. So, what should we expect Bond to be up to in this game? I own all of the Ian Fleming 007 novels and most of the movies and have seen every official Eon-produced Bond film. Based on that extensive experience and (moreso) the willingness to blindly gaze into a crystal ball, here's what I think we might see in First Light. Searching for a missing 007 After decades of books and movies following myriad incarnations of James Bond, a lot has already been explored, but one thing the movies haven't really touched is what happened to the previous 007. That point comes up in the plot of an Anthony Horowitz Bond novel, but is otherwise fresh territory for a game portraying Bond's origins. James inheriting the 007 designation after investigating the disappearance of his predecessor could add new layers of meaning and weight to the title. Discovering Spectre Spectre, the Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion organization, became a recurring antagonist in Fleming's later novels and a frequent presence in Connery films. It's basically a melting pot of criminal organizations from around the world, allowing for conveniently apolitical villainous agendas. Bond unraveling the threads that lead to MI6's first encounter with SPECTRE would be a fun way to nod to the character's history while still treading new ground. Uncovering MI6 corruption Bond himself is prone to going rogue, usually because he of course knows better than the official orders handed to him, so another possible angle is sending him to investigate possible traitorous activity inside his own organization. This could play nicely with the "earning 00 status" element, presenting Bond with situations where he's tasked with taking out former agents gone bad. IO Interactive has said that this will be an original incarnation of Bond -- no Connery, Craig, etc. look-alike. The title teaser shows us a silhouette of the character, but we should get our first proper look at the character in a few days.

Condé Nast Traveler
7 hours ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
15 Best Airbnbs in Edinburgh, From a Converted Warehouse to a Medieval Retreat
Edinburgh is filled with secret retreats for a city-break escape, hidden down cobbled mews or tucked away in friendly neighborhoods. With traditional high ceilings, excellent comforts, quirky interiors, and clever design, these are the ultimate Airbnbs in Edinburgh. All are within walking distance of the Scottish capital's best things to do, the best restaurants in Edinburgh, and the top places to drink in Edinburgh. For more options, see our pick of the best Airbnbs in Scotland. While we have not stayed in every Airbnb featured, we have carefully selected these as recommendations based on their location, design, previous guest reviews, and the fact that they have achieved Airbnb's Superhost status at the time of our research.


Gizmodo
8 hours ago
- Gizmodo
U.S. Immigration Authorities Are Adding Children's DNA To a Criminal Database
As if the regular detainment of children isn't bad enough, documents show that U.S. immigration authorities are adding their DNA to a criminal database. In less than five years, the U.S. has collected DNA samples from over 130,000 minors, including children as young as four. Since 2020, the US Customs and Border Patrol has ramped up its contributions to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) overseen by the Federal Bureau of Investigations. CODIS stores DNA profiles from convicted offenders, unsolved crime scenes, and missing persons cases for local, state, and federal law enforcement use. The actual, physical DNA samples are stored indefinitely by the federal government. Excluding forensic ones, CODIS currently has 23 million DNA profiles, and as many as 133,539 of them belong to detained children and teenagers, according to documents reviewed by Wired. According to Wired's report, CBP collected samples of between 829,000 and 2.8 million people from October 2020 to the end of 2024. This came after 2020 updated regulations surrounding DNA collection from the Department of Justice that removed the Department of Homeland Security's exemptions. The California Law Review critiqued the DOJ's decision as one that 'may be the first to result in the government's widespread, permanent retention of genetic materials based solely on a status other than a criminal arrest or conviction.' To comply with the DOJ's orders, CBP launched a pilot program that same year to begin collecting more samples from detained immigrants. At the time, CBP said it would collect samples from people between the ages of 14 to 19. However, CBP's policy gives officers some discretion when it comes to younger children and they have taken advantage of that. Per Wired, CBP obtained samples from as many as 227 children under the age of 13. In one case, CBP officers in El Paso, Texas sent samples from a 4-year old child to the FBI for processing. 'In order to secure our borders, CBP is devoting every resource available to identify who is entering our country. We are not letting human smugglers, child sex traffickers, and other criminals enter American communities,' Hilton Beckham, assistant commissioner of public affairs at CBP, told Wired. 'Toward this end, CBP collects DNA samples for submission to [CODIS] from person in CBP custody who are arrested on federal criminal charges, and from aliens detained under CBP's authority who are subject to fingerprinting and not otherwise exempt from the collection requirement.' However, Stephanie Glaberson, the director of research and advocacy at Georgetown University's Center on Privacy and Technology, told Gizmodo via email, 'The revelation that CBP collected DNA from a 4-year-old and added it to CODIS brings the absurdity of the government's DNA program into sharp relief.' Recently, the Center released a report stating that CBP has added 1.5 million DNA profiles to CODIS since 2020 where they are now housed under the 'offender' label. Overall, ICE and CBP's number of collected samples has increased by 5,000 percent but those numbers are even more shocking when broken down into smaller periods of time. According to Wired, officers in Laredo, Texas submitted as many as 3,930 DNA samples to the FBI with 252 listed as 17 or younger. Every sample was collected on a single day in January 2024. Two years ago, the FBI requested a massive increase in funding to continue maintaining the system. With immigration authorities' contributions, CODIS is likely to continue ballooning exponentially. As Georgetown's report explained, there are several limitations on criminal law enforcement obtaining DNA samples. When it comes to immigrants, however, the only limitation is that they must be detained. 'The meaning of the term 'detained' in the immigration context is notoriously broad, vague, and ever-shifting,' the report stated. 'And unlike in the criminal legal systems, ICE and CBP agents do not have to get judicial authorization to detain someone. There is no process for checking to make sure that every time they do detain someone, they meet constitutional requirements.' 'The lack of procedural safeguards means that DHS can amass data at a much quicker rate than police can, but all of the DNS DHS takes is accessible to the police,' the report added. 'No matter the age of the individuals compelled to hand over this most sensitive information, this program is morally bankrupt and unconstitutional,' Glaberson told Gizmodo. 'Collecting migrants' DNA like this serves no legitimate immigration purpose. What it does is place these individuals, their families, and communities under watch for life, and brings us all one huge step closer to genetic surveillance.'