He donated the land that became Griffith Park. Then he shot his wife
Surely you are familiar with the sprawling, rugged glory of Los Angeles' Griffith Park. But do you know about the park's benefactor and namesake, Griffith J. Griffith?
The philanthropist and felon endowed L.A. with what was then the largest urban park in the world and still remains a jewel of the city.
He also shot his wife in the face. She survived; he served two years at San Quentin; they divorced. We'll get to that.
But first, let's rewind back to December 1896.
Los Angeles was a city with great ambitions — a rapidly exploding boomtown that was still in the process of leaving its rancho past behind.
Col. Griffith J. Griffith and his wife Tina were the talk of the town, often spotted at theater openings or the opera. She was from a prominent society family. He was a formerly penniless Welsh immigrant who'd made his fortune in mining and other ventures.
Our paper described Griffith as 'part visionary and part blowhard.' One acquaintance dubbed him as 'midget egomaniac,' another as a 'roly-poly pompous little fellow.' He was, by all accounts, bizarre.
His business card just read: 'G.J. Griffith, capitalist.' He insisted on being called 'Colonel,' though his military title was thought to be entirely phony.
On December 16, 1896, Tina and Griffith donated more than 3,000 acres of hilly splendor to be used as an L.A. public park. The massive, city-altering gift was several times larger than New York's Central Park.
'It must be made a place of rest and relaxation for the masses, a resort for the rank and file, for the plain people,' Griffith demanded at the time.
Griffith was grandiose and eccentric, but he also believed in shaping the fledgling city, according to Mike Eberts, a historian and author of 'Griffith Park: A Centennial History.'
'He was a fellow who wanted to be loved. He wanted to be seen as a great leader. He was also, in his own way, and for his time, something of an idealist,' Eberts said.
Some believed that Griffith's mighty bequest was also angled, in part, to dodge taxes. But for generations of Angelenos who've savored the park, such details are — like Griffith's military title — mere semantics.
The initial gift brought him great acclaim locally. Here's how our paper put it in 1898: 'No need to ask 'Who is G.J. Griffith?' The individuality of the man has impressed itself so deeply and favorably on this community that his name is even as a 'household word.''
While thought to be in a delusional — and potentially drunken — stupor in a room at Santa Monica's Arcadia Hotel, Griffith shot his wife in the face in 1903.
She lost an eye but lived. Our paper breathlessly covered the ensuing trial, which ended with Griffith taking a short trip to San Quentin.
A few years after his release, Griffith (now divorced, according to Eberts) appeared at City Hall once again bearing gifts just before Christmas and hoping to rehabilitate his tarnished image.
'I wish to pay my debt of duty in this way to the community in which I have prospered,' Griffith reportedly told the mayor and City Council as he offered a significant sum of money to build Griffith Observatory.
They accepted, though our paper reported that other citizens and public officials angrily protested the decision.
One prominent community member suggested that the 'bribe' would send an egregious message to the city's youth: 'Are you prepared to say to them that if a man is a millionaire he can commit a crime and then with his wealth bribe the community to receive him back into fellowship?'
The city's parks commission eventually rejected Griffith's gift, our paper reported, and it wasn't until after his death in 1919 that it was accepted as a bequest in his will.
The observatory celebrated its 90th birthday this year.
For Eberts, the takeaway is simple: 'You don't have to be a perfect person to do a great thing.'
Today's great photo is from Times photographer Myung J. Chun, outside the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, which is set to open next year.
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Nathan Silver, who chronicled a vanished New York, dies at 89
'By 1963, it seemed urgent to make some sort of plea for architectural preservation in New York City,' he wrote. 'It had been announced that Pennsylvania Station would be razed, a final solution seemed likely for the 39th Street Metropolitan Opera' -- it was destroyed in 1967 -- 'and the commercial buildings of Worth Street were being pounded into landfill for a parking lot.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up He added, 'While cities must adapt if they are to remain responsive to the needs and wishes of their inhabitants, they need not change in a heedless and suicidal fashion.' Advertisement He found images in archives of 'first-rate architecture' that no longer existed, including a post office near City Hall; Madison Square Garden, at Madison Avenue and 26th Street; art collector Richard Canfield's gambling house, on 44th Street near Fifth Avenue; the 47-story Singer Tower, at Broadway and Liberty Street; the Produce Exchange, at Beaver Street and Bowling Green; and the Ziegfeld Theater, at 54th Street and Sixth Avenue. Advertisement A haunting photo of the interior of Penn Station adorns the book's cover. 'The book was a cri de coeur about the losses the city was experiencing,' Anthony C. Wood, the founder of the nonprofit New York Preservation Archive Project, said in an interview. 'It gave comfort to those trying to push back against that, and provided solace to people who cared about preservation and opened the eyes of a wider public.' The city passed the landmarks preservation law in 1965. But, Wood said, 'Out of the gate, it was tentatively administered; it wasn't like once the law passed, preservation was unleashed.' Roberta Brandes Gratz, a journalist who was a member of the Landmarks Preservation Commission from 2003 to 2010, wrote in an email that Silver's book 'added pressure on the relatively new Landmarks Commission to act.' By the time the book was published, Silver had left for Britain to teach architecture at the University of Cambridge. He remained in Britain for the rest of his career. 'Lost New York,' which Silver said sold more than 100,000 copies, was a finalist for the National Book Award in history and biography in 1968. Silver was also a Guggenheim fellow in architecture, planning and design that year. Silver expanded and updated his book in 2000 to include his pantheon of preservation villains: A.J. Greenough, president of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 'who wantonly engineered' Penn Station's destruction; Anthony A. Bliss, who took the Metropolitan Opera from 39th Street and Broadway to its new home at Lincoln Center in 1966, which 'ensured smithereens for the old building'; and Robert Moses, New York's midcentury planning czar, 'for his recurrent terminations of any place he autonomously decided upon.' Advertisement In 2014, when Silver made a rare trip to New York City, David Dunlap of The New York Times wrote that Silver believed landmarks 'were vessels of human history,' adding, 'How a building was used, and by whom, were almost as important to him as what the structure looked like.' Nathan Silver was born on March 11, 1936, in Manhattan and grew up in the borough's Inwood section and in the Bronx. His father, Isaac, taught mechanical drawing at Stuyvesant High School in Manhattan and was also an architect. His mother, Libby (Nachimowsky) Silver, taught Hebrew school when her three children were young, then became a public-school teacher. Silver, a fan of opera and theater, originally wanted to be a set designer. But he could not find an academic program in that specialty, so he chose to study architecture -- first at the Cooper Union, where he earned a certificate in 1955, and then at Columbia University, graduating in 1958 with a bachelor's degree. After traveling through Europe on a fellowship, he worked at the architecture firm Kramer & Kramer, where he helped design a new location for the Argosy Book Store in Manhattan in 1963. Janet Malcolm of The New Yorker wrote in 2014 that the store had been transformed 'into a room of great charm, a vision of cultivation and gentility as filtered through a mid-20th-century aesthetic.' In 1961, he started teaching at Columbia, where he mounted the exhibition that would become 'Lost New York.' 'He was surprised by the number and quality of buildings that had been torn down and pretty much forgotten,' his brother said. Advertisement He began lecturing at Cambridge in 1965 and earned a master's degree there a year later. He was a partner in a large architectural firm and also ran his own practice; headed the architecture department at the University of East London; edited the newsletter of the Westminster Society, a conservation advocacy group in London; and was the architecture critic of The New Statesman magazine. He also wrote a book about the Pompidou Center in Paris, and another, about improvisation in architecture and other fields, with his fellow architect Charles Jencks. And he designed renovations to the Seven Stars, a 17th-century pub in London owned by his wife, Roxy Beaujolais. In addition to his brother, she survives him, as do a daughter, Liberty Silver, and a son, Gabriel Silver, from his marriage to Helen McNeil-Ashton, which ended in divorce; and four grandchildren. His first marriage, to Caroline Green, also ended in divorce. ( This article originally appeared in
Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
He donated the land that became Griffith Park. Then he shot his wife
Surely you are familiar with the sprawling, rugged glory of Los Angeles' Griffith Park. But do you know about the park's benefactor and namesake, Griffith J. Griffith? The philanthropist and felon endowed L.A. with what was then the largest urban park in the world and still remains a jewel of the city. He also shot his wife in the face. She survived; he served two years at San Quentin; they divorced. We'll get to that. But first, let's rewind back to December 1896. Los Angeles was a city with great ambitions — a rapidly exploding boomtown that was still in the process of leaving its rancho past behind. Col. Griffith J. Griffith and his wife Tina were the talk of the town, often spotted at theater openings or the opera. She was from a prominent society family. He was a formerly penniless Welsh immigrant who'd made his fortune in mining and other ventures. Our paper described Griffith as 'part visionary and part blowhard.' One acquaintance dubbed him as 'midget egomaniac,' another as a 'roly-poly pompous little fellow.' He was, by all accounts, bizarre. His business card just read: 'G.J. Griffith, capitalist.' He insisted on being called 'Colonel,' though his military title was thought to be entirely phony. On December 16, 1896, Tina and Griffith donated more than 3,000 acres of hilly splendor to be used as an L.A. public park. The massive, city-altering gift was several times larger than New York's Central Park. 'It must be made a place of rest and relaxation for the masses, a resort for the rank and file, for the plain people,' Griffith demanded at the time. Griffith was grandiose and eccentric, but he also believed in shaping the fledgling city, according to Mike Eberts, a historian and author of 'Griffith Park: A Centennial History.' 'He was a fellow who wanted to be loved. He wanted to be seen as a great leader. He was also, in his own way, and for his time, something of an idealist,' Eberts said. Some believed that Griffith's mighty bequest was also angled, in part, to dodge taxes. But for generations of Angelenos who've savored the park, such details are — like Griffith's military title — mere semantics. The initial gift brought him great acclaim locally. Here's how our paper put it in 1898: 'No need to ask 'Who is G.J. Griffith?' The individuality of the man has impressed itself so deeply and favorably on this community that his name is even as a 'household word.'' While thought to be in a delusional — and potentially drunken — stupor in a room at Santa Monica's Arcadia Hotel, Griffith shot his wife in the face in 1903. She lost an eye but lived. Our paper breathlessly covered the ensuing trial, which ended with Griffith taking a short trip to San Quentin. A few years after his release, Griffith (now divorced, according to Eberts) appeared at City Hall once again bearing gifts just before Christmas and hoping to rehabilitate his tarnished image. 'I wish to pay my debt of duty in this way to the community in which I have prospered,' Griffith reportedly told the mayor and City Council as he offered a significant sum of money to build Griffith Observatory. They accepted, though our paper reported that other citizens and public officials angrily protested the decision. One prominent community member suggested that the 'bribe' would send an egregious message to the city's youth: 'Are you prepared to say to them that if a man is a millionaire he can commit a crime and then with his wealth bribe the community to receive him back into fellowship?' The city's parks commission eventually rejected Griffith's gift, our paper reported, and it wasn't until after his death in 1919 that it was accepted as a bequest in his will. The observatory celebrated its 90th birthday this year. For Eberts, the takeaway is simple: 'You don't have to be a perfect person to do a great thing.' Today's great photo is from Times photographer Myung J. Chun, outside the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, which is set to open next year. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Artificial reef aims to bring wild oysters back
Wild Oysters are set to be introduced into Conwy Bay after an almost two-year delay was brought to an end by a succession of storms. Bangor University have been given permission to proceed to the final stage of the project and "reseed" a 660-tonne artificial reef. Harbourmaster Matthew Forbes said the project would "finally move towards completion" with the first distribution run set to take place on Friday. Wild oysters, once a major part of Wales's fishing industry, have been in decline as a result of over-fishing, changes in water quality, and disease. It was first reported in July 2023 that Bangor University was working with the Zoological Society of London to reintroduce wild oysters into the waters. Conwy Council's Harbour Advisory Committee met this week for an update on the project. Speaking at the meeting, harbourmaster Matthew Forbes said the reef was initially "above the marine licensed permitted height". "Over the last couple of years, storms have knocked the reef height down," he added. Mr Forbes said Natural Resources Wales had agreed the project could now move forward and 76 bags of oysters were ready to be distributed. Meeting chairwoman Joan Vaughan said it would be "lovely" to have oysters in the River Conwy. Native oysters used to be found around Conwy in large numbers but have virtually disappeared in recent years. Oyster beds were a common sight in the Menai Strait and around Anglesey. The Wild Oysters Project website said they were a "vital food source" for coastal communities and "contributed" to the Welsh economy. The Mumbles or 'Oystermouth' fishery was the largest in Wales supporting 400 fishers across 188 boats. In the mid-1800s Welsh oyster boats reported landing 8,000 oysters daily, but up to 15,000 to 20,000 oysters in some areas. The efforts to reintroduce the shellfish in Wales follow a pattern of declining numbers in other parts of the UK. A wildlife project on the East Yorkshire coast is testing a new breeding technique to reintroduce 500,000 native European flat oysters over the next five years. It was also mooted that oysters could return to the Thames as part of an effort to clean London's rivers last year. Mass oyster release aims to stop species dying out New breeding technique aims to bring back oysters Baby oysters move from maternity ward to nursery
