logo
Refugees in visa limbo for 13 years take their plight to Parliament

Refugees in visa limbo for 13 years take their plight to Parliament

SBS Australia6 days ago
A delegation of four refugees from Sri Lanka and Iran have taken their fight to the halls of parliament. They're representing a group of thousands of people in Australia who've had visa claims rejected under a now-defunct system. arges Shaterian came to Australia with her husband and three children in 2013. 'Please end this limbo, this nightmare, because more than a decade (ago) we came here and we lost lots of relatives in our country.' Tamil refugee Rathy Barthlote is a mother of two daughters - one of them a citizen, having been born in Australia. But Ms Barthlote isn't afforded the same privilege. 'In our country, we are in prison. But here, we are in the open prison.' Both women had their asylum cases rejected under what was known as the Fast Track system, introduced by the Coalition in 2014. It argued the policy would clear the backlog of asylum claims, but critics like Professor Daniel Ghezelbash from the University of New South Wales say the process was heavily restricting. 'The result was a deeply flawed process, where people weren't effectively able to put forward their asylum claims, and many people who were in fact refugees were not found to be owed protection. So I think this will go down as one of the biggest asylum policy failures that the Australian government has made.' In 2024, the new Labor government effectively abolished the system, which UNSW figures show did lead to an increase in cases being approved. But for those already under the scheme like Rathy Barthlote, little changed. ''When Labor won the election, we were celebrating because we thought something was going to happen to our lives. But nothing happened, still we are in limbo, we are in uncertainty.'
The government has committed to resolving the status of those subjected to the Fast Track system - many of them now remaining on short-term temporary visas.
With a commanding majority in the 48th parliament, advocates like Jana Favero from the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre say now is the time for Labor to act decisively on visa processing.
'We heard in Albanese's election speech talking about ambition, talking about opportunity, talking about Australian values and fairness, and those are exactly the same things that refugees who have been abandoned by the Australian government for 13 years are looking for.'
Rathy Barthlote is keen to highlight her contribution to her new home.
'I'm working. I'm an aged care worker, I'm doing my own business. I'm a hairdresser too. So I'm contributing to this community as much as everyone. Every single day I'm giving back to this community. But I haven't got anything back from this government. The system is failing us. The system is punishing us.'
The Coalition, which introduced the scheme, says it's now in the process of reviewing its immigration policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Roads closed, traffic chaos: Sydney prepares for bridge march
Roads closed, traffic chaos: Sydney prepares for bridge march

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Roads closed, traffic chaos: Sydney prepares for bridge march

Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters are expected to stream across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday after the Supreme Court rejected a bid to block the anti-war march across the landmark. Conditions are expected to be wet for the rally, with the Bureau of Meteorology predicting 10 to 35mm of rain on Sunday, but organisers claim as many as 50,000 people could take part. Protesters will gather at Lang Park in the Sydney CBD at 1pm before marching across the bridge. Beginning at York and Grosvenor streets at 1.30pm, protesters will then file onto the bridge before finishing on the northern side of the bridge at Bradfield Park, according to rally organisers the Palestine Action Group. The march is expected to last three hours. Traffic on the bridge will be closed from 11.30am and is expected to be re-opened by 4pm. Residents and motorists are being urged to avoid the area having been warned of significant disruptions. Bus services will terminate in the CBD on the south side of the bridge and at North Sydney and St Leonards on the northern side. Trains will be running across the Harbour Bridge during the march, but delays are expected given the number of people predicted to be streaming into the city. Transport for NSW says that 'extensive' queues are expected at the entrance to the Sydney Harbour Tunnel, with a flow-on effect expected for the rest of the traffic network. Motorists are being urged to consider alternative routes and allow plenty of extra time, including going from the northern beaches and north shore to the airport. The Metro service will not in operation between Tallawong and Sydenham on Sunday due to trackwork. Buses will replace Metro services between Tallawong and Chatswood . Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, who has been the public face of the group's push to hold the historic march across the bridge, hailed a NSW Supreme Court decision on Saturday as a 'huge victory for the Palestine movement in this country' Premier Chris Minns had publicly expressed his opposition to the march. And the NSW Police made an application to the NSW Supreme Court to block the protesters being issued with a Form 1, which affords protesters protection from anti-assembly laws However Justice Belinda Rigg refused the Commissioner's application. 'The fact the proposed assembly is likely to cause significant inconvenience to residents … is far from determinative,' Justice Rigg said in her judgment. 'If matters such as this were to be determinative, no assembly involving inconvenience to others would be permitted.' The Palestinian Action Group said in a social media post: 'Tomorrow we are going to make history! 'We will hold a massive march over the Sydney Harbour Bridge, dedicated to using our people power to stop the genocide in Gaza. 'We are working with police and NSW transport to ensure a safe, family-friendly event for everyone.'

Unions push for AI protections
Unions push for AI protections

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Unions push for AI protections

Rachel Mealey: As the Commonwealth Bank becomes the first in its industry to publicly attribute job cuts to AI, unions are urgently renewing their push for worker protections. That's prompted a sharp rebuke from industry, saying more regulations will restrict productivity and the goal of AI is efficiency, not job cuts. Isabel Moussalli reports. Isabel Moussalli: The Commonwealth Bank isn't the first company to cut jobs in favour of AI, but the Finance Sector Union says it's the first in its industry to acknowledge it. Joseph Mitchell: Well, it's frankly unjust. Commonwealth Bank has made billions of dollars of profit every year for however many years. Isabel Moussalli: Joseph Mitchell is with the Australian Council of Trade Unions. He's angry that 45 roles will be replaced by a customer service chatbot. Joseph Mitchell: And making them redundant by bringing in AI to replace their jobs is just not fair. Isabel Moussalli: A Commonwealth Bank spokesperson says its investment in technology, including AI, is making it easier and faster for customers to get help, and its priority is to explore opportunities for redeployment and to support affected employees. But Joseph Mitchell says unions will fight mass redundancies from AI. Joseph Mitchell: So we know the most productive way to implement AI in a workplace is through the skilled application of workers. Workers are trained in how to use it. They can make decisions with employers about how it gets used. Isabel Moussalli: The ACTU will call for AI regulations at the Federal Government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month. Joseph Mitchell: We want to see employers required to enter into AI implementation agreements with their staff. That means that employers need to come to their staff with a plan, negotiate with employees and come to a joint agreement about how they're going to implement AI and what are the consequences going to be, with things like guarantees around job security, training and skills development. Isabel Moussalli: But the Australian Industry Group has hit back. Innes Willox: Well, it's kind of ironic because we go into a productivity summit that we have some proposals here that will restrict further productivity growth. Isabel Moussalli: That's Chief Executive Innes Willocks. Innes Willox: There are going to be times where there has to be significant consultation with the workforce and there's going to be other times when they just can't be in business, just has to get on with it. But all the information that we're getting, everything we're seeing and hearing from business is that they're not setting out to use it as a means to cut jobs on the whole. It's really about how to make their business better. Isabel Moussalli: RMIT's Dr. Emmanuelle Walkowiak is an innovation and labour economist specialising in generative AI. She explains the impact on the workforce can't be precisely forecast, but says right now we're in the middle of a massive disruption to the labour market. Emmanuelle Walkowiak: The major impact is through the transformation of jobs themselves. So what we need is really to upskill people. Isabel Moussalli: In a statement, Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth acknowledged AI offers significant opportunities to drive economic growth, but also presents challenges, and says the government's been consulting on introducing safeguards for AI. Rachel Mealey: Isabel Moussalli reporting.

A 'really important initiative' or 'complete overreach': New WFH plan draws mixed reactions
A 'really important initiative' or 'complete overreach': New WFH plan draws mixed reactions

SBS Australia

time10 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

A 'really important initiative' or 'complete overreach': New WFH plan draws mixed reactions

With new Australian-first rules suggested, working from home might soon be a legal right for Victorians. Premier Jacinta Allan announced on Thursday that she would introduce legislation in 2026 legally enshrining the right to work from home for two days a week. Allan said she expected the plan to face some criticism but said many Victorians stood to benefit from the changes, which will cover all employees who can "reasonably" do their job from home. "Bosses who think being seen at a desk is more important than a parent getting home for dinner with their kids, if they want to look their workers in the eye and tell them their time with their families doesn't count, they know where my government stands," Allan said. "We won't stand by while workers — especially women, single mums, carers — get punished for needing balance in their lives." Details are yet to be worked through but Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. 'Complete overreach' Peak business bodies have criticised the plan, with Committee for Melbourne CEO Scott Veenker calling it a "complete overreach". "It's another regulatory burden or requirement that just makes the cost of doing business too hard," he said, adding that his group "hadn't been consulted with prior to the announcement". "The reality is that we want to actually have an environment where businesses can thrive and flourish, and they don't need more regulation and more legislation to prevent them [from] doing that." Veenker said the state government's new plan will make "members both small and large" of the business advocacy group ask if they should "continue trading in Victoria". "We know that businesses will move their staff and their resources accordingly, and we don't want Victoria to be seen as a place that's too hard to do business," he said. "They should be arrangements that are really done in conjunction with staff and the employers, rather than the state government trying to put their nose into this. "We want the state government to be looking at how we should be focusing on economic growth and enabling businesses to prosper." The Committee for Melbourne, which merged with the Melbourne Chamber of Commerce in 2024, describes itself as being founded "to champion key initiatives to stimulate the economy and civic development, which put Melbourne on a pathway to become one of the world's most liveable cities". 'A really good initiative' However, several people SBS News talked to on the streets of Melbourne said they supported the proposal. One young woman said it was "a really good initiative". "I think working from home allows people to have a bit more of better work-lifestyle balance, therefore making them happy — happy to be at work when it is time to be at work, [and] happy to be at home," she said. Another woman SBS News spoke to said the ability to work from home "just makes life so much easier". Source: SBS News A middle-aged man said he currently had an arrangement to work one day a fortnight at home and would "certainly be keen for that to be made a legal thing to do more". A young man who works from home said: "going to [the] office necessarily doesn't mean full productivity, so that's something people have to consider," he said. Several experts recently told SBS News that working from home breaks down barriers to gender equality in the workplace and is necessary for modern families, especially those who face significant commutes to work. LISTEN TO More than one in three Australian employees typically work from home, but that figure rises to 60 per cent among managers and those in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The ABS also says 43 per cent of those who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. State Opposition signals possible support Allan — whose announcement coincided with the Victorian Labor Party meeting for its annual conference — has promised to introduce the law in 2026, prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Allan, who lags Opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. On Saturday, Battin indicated he might support the proposal. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal Opposition's proposal to eliminate remote work for public servants was partly blamed for its poor performance in the May federal election, even though it abandoned the policy before voting day. During the campaign, former Opposition leader Peter Dutton apologised after admitting that the proposal to end work-from-home arrangements for public servants was a "mistake". The plan was immediately framed by Labor and Greens parliamentarians as being a regressive move for women's working rights. — With additional reporting from the Australian Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store