logo
American AI chipmakers' eyes are on Saudi Arabia now, not China

American AI chipmakers' eyes are on Saudi Arabia now, not China

Asia Times19-05-2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) chip makers in the United States have complained in recent years about Washington's chip export ban against China, but they are less grumbly now as they see rising opportunities in the Middle East.
On a trip to the Middle East on May 13, US President Donald Trump was welcomed by Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman. Both sides agreed to boost their cooperation in AI development.
Trump said Saudi Arabia's DataVolt plans to invest $20 billion in AI data centers and energy infrastructure in the US. At the same time, Google, DataVolt, Oracle, Salesforce, AMD and Uber are committing to invest $80 billion in cutting-edge transformative technologies in both countries.
The same day, the US Commerce Department said its Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) will not enforce the AI diffusion rule. That rule dates from January, when the Biden administration announced US companies, such as Nvidia and AMD, were required to apply for export licenses if they ship high-end AI chips to foreign countries other than 18 US allies.
'The good news about the US is that the administration has changed,' Mohsen Moazami, President of Groq International and an Iranian-American entrepreneur, who joined Trump's recent tour to Saudi Arabia, told Asia Times in an interview on the sidelines of a London event called AI Rush on May 16. 'The administration has changed, and therefore the mind has changed.' Mohsen Moazami, President of Groq International and an Iranian-American entrepreneur Photo: Asia Times / Jeff Pao
'What the former administration thought,' he said, 'could be different from what the current administration thinks. Right now, the current administration is very keen on making American technology available to all the legitimate players on the planet to ensure that they benefit from the usage, and that America benefits from them using American technology,' Moazami said.
Commenting on the ongoing US-China chip war, he said the market would decide who would win.
He noted that Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive, 'was on record 10 days ago saying 50% of the world's AI researchers are Chinese. A country with that much wealth and human resources should be respected, as long as everybody abides by the set of rules in a fair competition.'
Moazami added: 'We don't steal from you, and you don't steal from us. Then we can compete and let the market decide who is the winner.'
Nvidia and Groq are both headquartered in California. Nvidia makes graphic processing units (GPUs) for AI model training, while Groq makes language processing units (LPUs) for AI inference, which uses trained AI models to reason and make predictions for machine learning. Groq is unrelated to technology guru Elon Musk's AI model Grok.
In October 2022, the Biden administration unveiled a package of export controls, forbidding Nvidia from shipping A100 and H100 AI chips to China. A year later, it also banned the exports of A800 and H800 chips to China. Nvidia then tailor-made H20 chips for the Chinese markets, but it still faced shrinking revenue and margins in China and rising challenges from Huawei Technologies' Ascend AI chips.
In his final week at the White House in January, US President Joe Biden announced the AI diffusion rule, which would create heavy compliance costs for American AI chipmakers.
However, on May 13, the BIS rescinded the AI diffusion rule and replaced it with three guidelines to forbid companies from using Ascend chips,
deploying US chips to help Chinese firms train their AI models or
re-exporting US high-end chips to China.
The new rules shifted compliance burdens from chipmakers to the end users.
The Trump administration also helped American AI firms open new markets in the Middle East.
Also on May 13, Humain, an AI development unit of Saudi Arabia's state-owned Public Investment Fund (PIF), announced a strategic partnership with Nvidia to build AI data centers in the kingdom with a projected capacity of up to 500 megawatts powered by several hundred thousand of Nvidia's most advanced GPUs over the next five years.
In the first phase, Nvidia will deploy an 18,000-unit Nvidia GB300 Grace Blackwell AI supercomputer with NVIDIA InfiniBand networking to Saudi Arabia.
On May 15, Humain named Groq as its official inference chip provider. In February, Groq opened a data center in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
'Groq is fortunate to be chosen to power the largest cluster of AI inference in the Middle East,' Moazami said. 'We have an extension of GroqCloud coming out of Dammam. Saudi Arabia is now serving tokens [providing AI and machine-learning services] not only domestically but also internationally.'
'Low energy cost is the most critical factor,' he said. 'At the end of the day, things not only have to be fast – they have to be cheap,' he said, adding that the power cost is only three US cents per kilowatt hour in Saudi Arabia, compared with more than 30 cents per kWh in the United Kingdom.
Chinese media said Huawei's Ascend chips currently have a 30% market share in Saudi Arabia, mainly due to an AI project in the Neom planned city.
On April 9, the US government informed Nvidia that it would need to obtain licenses to export H20 chips to China.
Huang told Reuters on May 17 that his company is evaluating how to address the Chinese market but will not downgrade the H20 further as 'it's not possible to modify Hopper anymore.'
According to a Financial Times report, Nvidia will open a research and development center in Shanghai to support Chinese clients while complying with US export rules amid growing AI chip trade.
Lin Jian, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said on May 16 that the US overstretches the concept of national security, abuses export controls and long-arm jurisdiction, and groundlessly and maliciously blocks and suppresses China's chips and AI industry.
'China firmly opposes this and absolutely does not accept it. China urges the US to drop its protectionist acts and unilateral bullying, and stop its egregious suppression of China's technology businesses and AI industry,' Lin said. 'China will take firm measures to defend its right to development and Chinese businesses' legitimate rights and interests.'
On Monday, Huawei published a technical paper, saying that its Ascend AI server using the DeepSeek AI model can deploy inferences faster than Nvidia's Hopper.
Jin Lei, a columnist at QbitAI.com, said Huawei successfully used advantages in mathematical theories and algorithms to offset the physical limitations of its hardware, maximizing its servers' performance.
At the AI Rush event, some cloud experts said combining different chips and models is the upcoming trend in the AI sector. Christian Reilly, Cloudflare's Field Chief Technology Officer for EMEA Photo: Asia Times / Jeff Pao
Christian Reilly, Cloudflare's Field Chief Technology Officer for EMEA, said DeepSeek's success showed the importance of using the right technology at the right time.
'As technologists and engineers, we always build for scale and peak. That is a great idea, until you can't do it,' Reilly said. 'DeepSeek engineers were constrained by their limited capacity. So they engineered this differently.'
'Originally, there was a defined way that we kept scaling out the number of parameters … but if you look at DeepSeek, it was genius.'
In late January, Wall Street investors were shocked by DeepSeek's rise. The company used the distillation method and 2,000 H800 chips to train its AI models.
Alexandre Pereira, co-founder and chief executive of 2501.ai, said the AI sector has made enough GPUs to sustain itself for several years, and it's time for AI companies to consider what types of GPUs and language models they need instead of choosing the most powerful ones.
Read: US uses 'poison pills' to isolate China from supply chains

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keeta's dangerous order-grabbing mechanism should be scrapped
Keeta's dangerous order-grabbing mechanism should be scrapped

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Keeta's dangerous order-grabbing mechanism should be scrapped

Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Advertisement I refer to the article , 'Keeta riders stage third strike in Hong Kong over pay, work conditions' (May 22), which highlighted the danger of the food delivery platform's order-grabbing mechanism that has drivers vying for jobs while on the road. In the fast-paced food delivery industry, such a feature poses a significant safety hazard. Instead of automatically assigning orders, this mechanism has riders taking on orders on a first come, first served basis, so they must watch out for pop-up alerts on the app and react quickly. This leads to reckless competition, distracted riding and a higher risk of accidents. The system is flawed and urgently needs reform – or even a ban. In an open letter last week, Keeta said nearly 90 per cent of orders were assigned to drivers, while only a small percentage of orders go out through the order-grabbing mechanism, which is intended to supplement drivers' income. I believe the most effective solution is to scrap this feature. Keeta should assign all orders automatically and adopt artificial intelligence-powered distribution to ensure fairness. Advertisement If Keeta refuses to abandon the order-grabbing mechanism, it must disable order acceptance when a rider is moving faster than 10km/h or in motion for more than three seconds. It should also penalise drivers for reckless riding and suspend those caught accepting orders while driving.

US-China tensions surge as tech and mineral wars intensify
US-China tensions surge as tech and mineral wars intensify

Asia Times

timean hour ago

  • Asia Times

US-China tensions surge as tech and mineral wars intensify

Beijing and Washington accused each other of violating the consensus reached during trade talks in Geneva, as both sides strengthened export controls on technology products and raw materials. Tensions have surged again since US President Donald Trump said in a social media post on May 30 that China 'has totally violated its agreement with us.' Trump said he made a fast deal with China on May 12 because he did not want to see Chinese 'civil unrest' sparked by a deterioration of the Chinese economy caused by his trade war. However, he added that he would no longer be 'Mr Nice Guy.' 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, the US has groundlessly accused China of violating the consensus, a claim that grossly distorts the facts. China firmly rejects these unjustified accusations,' an unnamed spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MoC) said Monday (June 2). 'The US has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations.' The MoC spokesperson said the US has seriously undermined the consensus reached during the China-US economic and trade talks in Geneva by introducing multiple, discriminatory, restrictive measures against China. These measures included issuing guidance on artificial intelligence chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, including those studying technological-related fields. The spokesperson also criticized the US for undermining the consensus reached by Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a phone call on January 17. In that call, Xi congratulated Trump on his reelection as president. He said confrontation and conflict should not be an option for the two countries. Trump said the US and China should get along well for years to come. The MoC's latest comments came after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on May 29 that US-China trade negotiations are 'a bit stalled.' Bessent said the two countries' leaders must speak directly about key issues. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on May 30 that China's reluctance to approve exports of key niche minerals is one reason why Trump said Beijing violated its side of the trade agreement reached in Geneva. White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told ABC News on June 1 that Trump and Xi could talk about trade as soon as this week. Hassett said both sides were willing to talk, but they did not set a specific date for a conversation between the two leaders. He added that Greer's team communicates with their Chinese counterparts daily, 'trying to move the ball forward on this matter.' It is unclear whether a Xi-Trump phone call will be possible in the short run, particularly after the recent volley of accusations. The Chinese side has not commented on the matter. On May 12, China and the US agreed to de-escalate their trade war by significantly lowering tariffs for each other for 90 days. The US agreed to lower its 145% tariff to 30%; China reduced its retaliatory 125% tariff to 10% after the Geneva meeting. According to a US-China joint declaration, China also agreed to adopt all necessary administrative measures to suspend or remove the non-tariff countermeasures taken against the US since April 2, 2025. Immediately thereafter, many Chinese pundits said China does not need to relax its key minerals export rules, as the US-China joint declaration did not state which non-tariff countermeasures would be canceled. 'The current situation is interesting. The US got a trade agreement with China but failed to get what it wanted most,' a Hebei-based columnist wrote in an article on May 13. 'Tariff matters are about money, but key minerals are related to national security, and there is no room for bargaining for this.' The writer said the Americans thought they had found China's weak spot, but they hit a wall. In fact, on May 9, the Office of the National Export Control Coordination Mechanism and several government departments held a meeting in Shenzhen about combating the smuggling of strategic minerals. According to the meeting, the government will take adequate measures to promote and regulate the enforcement of export controls on strategic mineral resources. It will also enhance implementation and refine institutional frameworks regarding methods, scope, timing and intensity. On May 19, China's Cailian Press reported that at least six Chinese companies were granted licenses to export seven types of medium and heavy niche minerals, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium. The seven types of minerals are raw materials used for producing parts for fighter jets, submarines, missiles and radars. China announced the export controls on these minerals on April 4, following Trump's imposition of reciprocal tariffs globally on Liberation Day on April 2. Cailian Press added that obtaining a license takes 45 to 60 days, and exporters must apply for a new license if the formulas of their products change. They also need to seek approval for each shipment. 'We should adopt a dual-track strategy that bans the export of China's key minerals to the US but relaxes the export to the European Union,' Li Jian, a Shanxi-based columnist, writes in an article on June 2. 'Practically, we will loosen our key mineral export controls for the EU companies willing to share technologies with China, such as photoresist formula and magnet designs,' Li says. 'Whoever follows the United States' call to ban Huawei's equipment will receive fewer niche minerals from China,' he says. 'EU firms will then realise whether they should do business with the US or China.' He says China will build facilities in friendly countries, such as Hungary, to refine its key minerals, making it difficult for the US to intervene. After Washington reached a trade deal with Beijing on May 12, Bessent said the US did not want a generalized decoupling from China, but rather a 'strategic decoupling', particularly in the steel, critical medicines, and semiconductor sectors. On May 13, the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security rescinded the Biden administration's AI Diffusion Rule, and replaced it with three guidelines to forbid companies from: -using Huawei's Ascend chips, -deploying US chips to help Chinese firms train their AI models, or -re-exporting US high-end chips to China. On May 23, the US government informed the Electronic Design Automation industry about new export controls on electronic design automation (EDA) software to China and Chinese military end-users globally. The US also suspended the supply of CFM LEAP-1C engines, which power China's Comac C919 jets. 'What the US does overstretches the concept of national security, politicizes and weaponizes trade and tech issues, and is a malicious attempt to block and suppress China,' Lin Jin, a spokesperson of the Chinese foreign ministry, said on May 30. However, he said China is ready to strengthen dialogue and cooperation on export controls with relevant countries and regions to stabilize global industrial and other supply chains. Read: US eases trade war, pursues 'strategic decoupling' from China

Hong Kong principals slam popular schools' class expansion without consultation
Hong Kong principals slam popular schools' class expansion without consultation

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong principals slam popular schools' class expansion without consultation

Principals in Hong Kong have criticised education authorities for failing to consult the sector regarding a new measure that permits popular schools to apply to operate an additional Form One class in the next academic year, raising concerns that the move will intensify competition among institutions. The Hong Kong Association of the Heads of Secondary Schools also questioned the timeliness and necessity of implementing the policy change amid the city's declining student population. The Education Bureau briefed representatives from secondary schools at a meeting on May 20 about new class-size regulations, which are expected to jeopardise the survival of disadvantaged schools. The new regulations have increased the minimum number of students required for operating a class, while also permitting schools with four Form One classes to apply to run an additional class in the coming academic year. A maximum of five school applications will be approved. 'There is no consultation at all with such an important policy change,' Lin Chun-pong, chairman of the Hong Kong Association of the Heads of Secondary Schools, told the Post last Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store