
California Gas Prices to Go Up July 1: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California drivers will see higher gas prices starting July 1, as two state policies take effect.
First, the state's gas excise tax will increase from 59.6 cents to 61.2 cents per gallon, part of an annual adjustment for inflation.
At the same time, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is rolling out stricter rules under its Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), which requires fuel producers to cut the carbon emissions from their products more sharply than before. The 2025 benchmark requires a 22.75 percent cut in carbon intensity from 2010 levels—a sharp increase from the previous goal of 20 percent by 2030.
To meet these targets, companies will need to blend in more expensive clean fuels or buy emissions credits—costs that are expected to be passed on to drivers.
Meanwhile, two major refineries, Phillips 66 in Los Angeles and Valero in Benicia, announced they will close by the end of 2026. The closures will reduce the number of gasoline producers in the state from nine to seven, which could trigger a sharp spike in fuel prices, based on analysis by University of Southern California Professor Michael Mische. His projections indicate gas could hit $6.43 per gallon after the first closure and soar to $8.43 once both refineries are offline, with even higher prices possible under volatile market conditions.
Together, these changes could raise gas prices by as much as 6 to 10 cents per gallon. But some experts warn the increase could be even higher.
Why It Matters
Retail prices for regular grade gasoline in California are already consistently higher than in any other state in the continental United States, often exceeding the national average by more than a dollar per gallon.
Therefore, a dramatic surge in gas prices could deepen California's cost-of-living crisis, strain working families, and reverberate through the broader economy.
Gasoline prices above 6.00 dollars a gallon are shown at a gas station in Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 7, 2022.
Gasoline prices above 6.00 dollars a gallon are shown at a gas station in Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 7, 2022.
Richard Vogel/AP
What To Know
A University of Pennsylvania report projected that changes to California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could raise gas prices by 65 cents per gallon in the near term and 85 cents by 2030.
In response, Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones launched a Change.org petition urging lawmakers to repeal what he called an "unaffordable 65 cent gas price hike," arguing, "Californians already face the highest gas prices in the country." As of Thursday morning, the petition has more than 29,000 signatures — 21,000 short of its target.
However, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) disputed the 65 cent figure, calling it "misinformation." A spokesperson said prices may rise only 5 to 8 cents and that any increase would come from oil companies deciding how much compliance costs to pass on. Governor Newsom's office echoed that, calling the higher estimate false and emphasizing the LCFS could actually reduce fuel costs per mile by 42 percent by 2045.
Studies back this up. Research from the University of Minnesota and Biofuels Digest found little connection between LCFS credit prices and retail gasoline prices. In fact, California's gas price gap with the national average remained steady before and after the LCFS was introduced.
Jones rejected those claims, calling them "hogwash," telling Newsweek, "I'm really not too concerned about whether it's 10 cents or 65 cents. Basically we're splitting hairs at that point in time. It probably is in between somewhere. The bottom line is, these regulations are going to cause the price of gasoline to increase."
He also accused Newsom's office of trying to walk back an earlier CARB estimate of a 47 cent increase, saying, "They originally came out with 47 cents... and then they had to walk that back."
CARB did initially project a 47 cent increase for 2025, but later clarified that the analysis was not meant as a direct pump price forecast. Meanwhile, Democrats in the state Senate unanimously voted down a bill from Jones to pause the LCFS changes, which he claimed was part of Newsom's broader effort to phase out gas vehicles in favor of EVs.
"I believe Newsom's goal is to push Californians into EVs under the ideological guise that he's saving the planet," Jones said.
Newsom's office defended the policy on environmental grounds, noting that transportation accounts for over half of the state's carbon emissions and nearly all of its toxic diesel pollution. "This is the most impactful step our state can take to fight climate change," Newsom said in 2023, arguing that car emissions worsen asthma, wildfires, and sea-level rise.
But Jones dismissed such arguments. "California has done a very good job over the last 20 to 30 years cleaning up our air," he said, adding that the state's emissions make up just "about 1 percent of global emissions," and eliminating all internal combustion engines "would have zero impact on the rest of the planet."
Meanwhile, California gas prices remain high. In April, the state's average price per gallon was $4.85—$1.69 higher than the national average. Prices have spiked above $6 twice in the past two years, sparking public backlash and new legislation.
What Happens Next
The updated Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulations were resubmitted to the Office of Administrative Law on May 16, after being rejected in February. The office has until June 30 to issue a final decision, and if approved, the changes could take effect as soon as July 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Americans Can Afford Only 28% Of Homes On The Market
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Only 28 percent of homes currently for sale across the country are affordable for the typical U.S. household, according to a new report, showing that homeownership continues moving further out of reach for Americans even as the market finally slows down. The August 2025 Buying Power Report from shows that, as the maximum affordable home price for a median-income household in the U.S. has fallen to $298,000, just a little over a quarter of all homes on the market are priced within reach of the typical U.S. household. Back in 2019, before the pandemic homebuying frenzy, the maximum affordable home price for a median-income household was nearly $30,000 higher, at $325,000. "The buying power report puts a very tangible dollar value on the impact of today's higher mortgage rates on housing affordability," Danielle Hale, chief economist at told Newsweek. "It shows that even though incomes have grown in the last six years, that growth hasn't been enough to keep up with the erosion in buying power from higher mortgage rates," she said. Why Are Americans Struggling To Afford Most Homes On The Market? While buying a home has always been one of the biggest expenses an individual or a family would face in their lives, the cost of buying a home—and maintaining it—has shot up over the past five years, reaching far above what many can afford. Historically low mortgage rates during the pandemic, combined with a new focus on the domestic space, the rise of remote work, and an emphasis on improving one's life-work balance, led to an explosion in homebuying activity across the country between 2020 and 2022. This boom clashed with a general lack of inventory across the U.S., mainly due to the fact that developers had chronically underbuilt, compared to demand, in the years following the subprime mortgage crisis. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Prices skyrocketed amid high demand, as buyers fought each other in bidding wars to snatch the limited inventory available. Nationwide, home prices surged by 43 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. Things got even worse for homebuyers after mortgage rates shot through the roof in 2022 following the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate-hiking campaign to lower rampant inflation—and they have not improved much since then. Mortgage rates are still lingering near the 7 percent mark; home prices are still much higher than they were before the pandemic, and about 10 times higher than they were 50 years ago; and while inventory is growing, giving buyers more options, in most of the country is still below 2019 levels. Wages vs Home Prices Americans' wages have also been growing over the past five years, surging by 15.7 percent between 2019 and now, but not nearly as fast as home prices. The home price to income ratio has grown massively over the past few decades, going from 3.5 in 1985 to 5 in 2025. "In concrete terms, a $325,000 home was affordable to the median household in 2019, but today's median household can only afford to purchase a $298,000 home, a drop of nearly $30,000," Hale explained. "These calculations assume that a buyer is using a 30-year fixed rate mortgage and making a 20 percent down payment—for example, financing 80 percent of the home purchase price," she added. "Compounding the drop in buying power, the price of homes has also risen, which means that in July just 28 percent of for-sale homes were affordable to the typical household compared to more than half (55.7 percent) of for-sale homes that would have been within reach in July 2019." How Are Buyers Reacting? According to buyers' housing affordability struggles are reshaping their behavior. They are dialing up competition for the few affordable homes available in the market, renting for longer than they would have wished for, and delaying their plans to create their own family. This is especially the case for younger, first-time homebuyers, including millennials and Gen Zers, who are having the hardest time on the market because they do not have any equity they can leverage. Changing buyers' behaviors also affects sellers, especially as dwindling demand leads to a pile-up of inventory on the U.S. market. As of July, there were over 1.9 million homes for sale in the country. Sellers are increasingly being forced to slash prices to attract buyers, or delist their property as they wait for a potentially better time in the future. In the near future, "restoring lost buying power will likely depend on a combination of modestly lower mortgage rates, stronger wage growth, and most critically, a boost in housing supply, particularly in the affordable segment," wrote in the report. "Until those conditions improve, today's buyers will need to remain both strategic and flexible in navigating the market."


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Cracker Barrel Logo Change Sparks Fury
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Cracker Barrel has changed its logo for the first time in 48 years—and people are cracking up about it online. The change has prompted backlash, including from conservatives, though many have taken to social media to ridicule the backlash. Newsweek has reached out to Cracker Barrel via an online contact form for comment outside of regular working hours. Why It Matters The Southern country themed restaurant chain first opened in 1969 and initially had a text-only logo. The name originates from a time in the 19th centuary when people would socialize around a barrel full of crackers in a country store. In 1977, the logo was updated to the one many will now recognize, with a man resting by a barrel. The restaurant said in a press release that the new logo is "Rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and wordmark that started it all." L: A Cracker Barrel Old Country Store sign is visible atop one of its restaurants, April 12, 2002 in Naperville, IL. R, and insert: Cracker Barrel's new logo and redesign, in images taken from their... L: A Cracker Barrel Old Country Store sign is visible atop one of its restaurants, April 12, 2002 in Naperville, IL. R, and insert: Cracker Barrel's new logo and redesign, in images taken from their Instagram. MoreLogo changes, branding, and advertising choices made by companies have become a hot-button issue online in recent years, often signaling the onset of online culture wars, as conservatives and social media users have criticized decisions made by brands, likening changes to being 'woke.' What To Know The logo was unveiled this week and has been introduced as part of Cracker Barrel's "All the More" campaign, which is designed to enhance aesthetics. The change has catapulted Cracker Barrel into the sphere of internet discourse, as people react to the logo change from one of America's most popular restaurant chains. "Why would they remove the cracker & the barrel?" one social media user wrote on X in a post viewed over 9 million times. Another post, from Colin Rugg, a media personality, described the new logo as "depressing" and has been viewed over 5 million times as of reporting. In response to this, one social media user wrote, "Why change something that didn't need to change?" in a reply viewed over 140,000 times. The response though, has not been all negative, as many have taken to social media to ridicule the backlash to the redesign. One post, viewed over 60,000 times on X from @AesPolitics1 reads "The people freaked about Cracker Barrel changing logos are why this country is so s***. Like, really out of all the issues this is what you care about? You're f****** jokes." Cracker Barrel doesn't have an active presence on X, though it does on Instagram. The most recent post on Crack Barrel's X is from 2016, and this has been flooded with replies about the rebrand. Who is Julie Felss Masino? Cracker Barrel CEO Masino was named President and Chief Executive Officer for Cracker Barrel in July of 2023. She had previously served as the President, International of Taco Bell from January 2020 to June 2023, and prior to this had held roles at Fisher-Price at Mattel, Inc., Sprinkles Cupcakes, and Starbucks. Speaking on Good Morning America this week, Masino said that the feedback they had received so far has been "overwhelmingly positive." What People Are Saying Julie Felss Masino, speaking on Good Morning America: "Cracker Barrel needs to feel like the Cracker Barrel for today and for tomorrow -- the things that you love are still there. We need people to choose us, and we want people to choose us." @EndWokeness on X in a post viewed 1.5 million times: "Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Masino should face charges for this crime against humanity." @bennyjohnson, in a post on X viewed 3.5 million times: "Cracker Barrel completely changed their iconic logo for the first time in 47 years … and it's absolutely horrible. When will they learn?" Nina Turner, former Ohio State Senator, in a post on X: "People can't afford housing, groceries, and are going bankrupt if they get cancer. So naturally, conservatives are mad about Cracker Barrel's logo." @trackingdonald, in a post on X viewed over 30,000 times: "The Cracker Barrel rebrand is upsetting the crackers." What's Next The country music artist Jordan Davis is starring in a new commercial for the brand and is set to host an event to launch the partnership in New York on August 21.


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Stocks on Fire: Analysts Say These 2 Big Winners Could Climb Even Higher
Everyone loves to go with a winner; that's just a fact. It holds true in stock investing, too, where it's the underlying motivation behind momentum investing. This strategy, based on locating and buying into stocks that have posted solid recent gains, flies in the face of the oldest advice in the economics books, that past performance does not guarantee future returns. But it's human nature to run with a winner – and we all know that when a stock price runs up, there's a reason for it. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. That's why the real key isn't simply spotting upward movement, but understanding why the gains are happening. Momentum investing works best when the stocks rising on the charts also have the fundamentals to keep them climbing. Companies with sound business models, proven leadership, strong customer bases, and profitable niches are the ones most likely to turn a short-term rally into a long-term win. And this is exactly where Wall Street's professional analysts come in, identifying which 'winners' are winning for the right reasons – the ones worth following. With that in mind, we tapped into the TipRanks database to see which stocks fit the bill. Two standouts emerged – each already up more than 50% this year – and recently winning upgrades from analysts who see further upside ahead. Let's take a closer look. Kratos Defense (KTOS) We'll start in the defense sector, with San Diego-based Kratos. Kratos is a defense contractor providing technology, platforms, and systems for customers in the US and allied national security sectors, and in the civilian/commercial security segment. The company's chief areas of operation are in cutting-edge technologies: hypersonics, advanced propulsion and power systems, unmanned systems, weaponry, space tech, and microwave and digital solutions. Kratos boasts high-level connections with the US Navy and Air Force, and is an important contractor with the nation's Missile Defense Agency and the Intelligence Community. Kratos has a range of active development programs that underscore its role at the forefront of next-generation systems. Among the most notable are drones, satellites, and microwave electronics – all technologies vital to strengthening today's military capabilities and expected to become even more indispensable in the future. The centerpiece is the XQ-58 Valkyrie, an unmanned stealth drone currently being evaluated under the Air Force's Low-Cost Attritable Aircraft Technology (LCAAT) initiative, via the Low-Cost Attritable Strike Demonstrator (LCASD) program. The goal is straightforward: to create a relatively inexpensive, long-range strike drone that can be sacrificed in combat if necessary. Kratos has been flight-testing the XQ-58 since 2019, with results pointing toward its ability to fulfill those mission demands. Potential applications range from penetrating advanced air defenses to performing reconnaissance and executing both air-to-air and air-to-ground strikes. Still, the Valkyrie is only one piece of Kratos' broader portfolio. The company is also working with the US Space Force to advance satellite communications, while extending its technology into civilian markets. For example, a recent partnership with satellite services provider hiSky is leveraging Kratos' software-defined ground systems to expand IoT connectivity, targeting both government and commercial customers. Beyond aerospace and satellites, Kratos is finding practical applications for its automation expertise. In late July, the company announced a collaboration with Champion Tire & Wheel to deploy an 'automated truck platoon' at the NASCAR Brickyard 400. The project, which automated the delivery of pit equipment, marked the first use of automated trucking for NASCAR logistics. All of these projects tie back to Kratos' financial momentum. In its most recent quarter, the company reported $351.5 million in revenue, up 17% year-over-year and ahead of expectations by $45.67 million. Non-GAAP EPS came in at 11 cents, 2 cents above forecasts. With KTOS shares up 144% year-to-date, investors are clearly taking note of both the defense contracts and the commercial partnerships fueling growth. Wall Street is noticing, too. BTIG analyst Andre Madrid has turned more bullish, noting: 'We have consistently called out that the lack of a sizable program of record with steady procurement volumes is something that has kept us from seeing further upside for KTOS shares. However, as of this summer, this no longer seems to be the case, with the company having been downselected for the Marine Corps' MUX TACAIR program. Given funding currently earmarked for the program in FY2026 and the broader ~$8.8bn unmanned request, we have conviction that KTOS could see significant growth at Unmanned Systems (KUS) in the coming year. Furthermore, we continue to see upside across the breadth of the portfolio, most notably within hypersonics, C5ISR/Modular Systems (MS), Microwave Electronics (ME), and Kratos Turbine Technologies (KTT).' Following this stance, Madrid upgraded KTOS shares from Neutral to Buy, setting an $80 price target that implies about 24% upside over the next year. (To watch Madrid's track record, click here) TriMas Corporation (TRS) The second winner we're looking at here is TriMas, a manufacturer of various specialty products used in the consumer, aerospace, defense, and industrial end markets. The company employs some 3,900 people in 13 countries, and is known for developing innovative solutions to some of the common problems that face its customers. TriMas has put together a set of brand names that, while not household names, are well known in the industrial world and are recognized for their quality. TriMas has structured its business into several divisions, each targeting different markets with specialized solutions. The smallest of these, TriMas Specialty Products, focuses on the design and manufacture of high-pressure and low-pressure steel cylinders. While seemingly commonplace, these are in fact highly engineered precision devices, critical in the storage, transport, and dispensing of compressed gases. The company's larger divisions – TriMas Packaging, TriMas Life Sciences, and TriMas Aerospace – represent the core of its business. In packaging, TriMas produces dispensing pumps, sprayers, closures, flexible packaging, and even industrial drums, serving markets that range from beauty and food to pharmaceuticals and agriculture. Its Life Sciences division extends the company's reach into the medical field with precision injection-molded components used in patient monitoring, diagnostics, and surgical devices. Finally, the Aerospace division underscores TriMas's engineering depth, supplying everything from air ducts and rivets to anti-icing devices for both commercial aircraft and the US military. This operational diversity translates into measurable financial strength. In 2Q25, TriMas reported revenue of $274.8 million, up 14% year-over-year and beating estimates by $23.6 million. Non-GAAP EPS came in at 61 cents, also ahead of expectations by 13 cents. Investors have taken notice, with the stock climbing 52% year-to-date. Reflecting on these results, KeyBanc analyst Ken Newman points out that TriMas is actively analyzing its business model, yet he sees ample room for the company to remain profitable given the momentum across its divisions. 'While we acknowledge that the portfolio may shift toward a pureplay Packaging mix as the board continues its analysis surrounding its ongoing strategic review, we are cautiously optimistic that transformation could take a slower transition given Aerospace's solid demand visibility into FY26 and FY27. Assuming that Aerospace remains a strategic pillar of TRS's portfolio over the near to intermediate term, we think it could allow the Company to unlock the full potential of its underappreciated multiple,' Newman opined. That conviction also unlocked an upgrade from Newman, who boosted his rating on TRS from Sector Weight (i.e., Neutral) to Overweight (i.e., Buy). His $45 price target points to a 20% upside over the coming year. (To watch Newman's track record, click here) TRS has slipped under most analysts' radar; the stock's Moderate Buy consensus is based on just two recent ratings – but both are Buys. (See TRS stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.