China rallies for opposition as Taiwan gears up for mass parliamentary recall, China News
While President Lai Ching-te won the election last year, his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lost its legislative majority. The opposition has flexed its muscles since then to pass laws the government has opposed and impose budget cuts, complicating efforts to boost defence spending in particular.
The political drama has been happening against a backdrop of China ramping up its own military and diplomatic pressure campaign against Taiwan to assert territorial claims Lai and his government resolutely reject. Lai has offered talks with Beijing many times, but been rebuffed.
Civic groups formally started the recall campaign earlier this year, and on Saturday voters will decide on the fate of 24 lawmakers from Taiwan's largest opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT), around one-fifth of all lawmakers.
The recall groups say theirs is an "anti-communist" movement, accusing the KMT of selling out Taiwan by sending lawmakers to China, not supporting defence spending, and bringing chaos to parliament. The KMT rejects those accusations, denouncing Lai's "dictatorship" and "green terror" — the DPP's party colour.
China has not sat quietly on the sidelines, to the KMT's unease, ever wary of being "painted red" by its opponents.
In June, two senior Chinese officials overseeing Taiwan policy denounced the recalls as a "political scheme" of Lai's.
Lai is "engaging in dictatorship under the guise of democracy" and "using every means possible to suppress the opposition", China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian told a news briefing in June.
Taiwanese tycoon Robert Tsao, one of the most prominent recall campaigners, said such comments would only support their cause.
"It shows they (the KMT) are together with the communist party. It helps us," he told reporters at a campaign event on Monday. 'Our business'
The KMT says it neither asked for nor wants China's support, can't control what China says, and that it is not pro-Beijing.
"We feel the same way as all the people of Taiwan — this is our business. It is the two parties, the DPP and the KMT, fighting for public support, for public recognition. It has nothing to do with the mainland," party spokesperson Crystal Yang told Reuters.
Chinese state media outlets and their affiliated social media accounts published some 425 articles or videos describing the recall campaign as "dictatorship" or "green terror" in the first half of 2025, according to Taiwan research organisation IORG, which analyses Chinese state media.
In an April commentary, China's ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily said Lai was "presumptuously abusing the recall system to crack down on the opposition party, attempting to establish a 'green dictatorship'".
Pointing to the similarity between China and the KMT's arguments against the recalls, Wu Szu-yao, secretary general of the DPP's legislative caucus, said Beijing is "offering ammunition" to the KMT to sway voters.
"China is really concerned that the mass recall will be successful and win the support of Taiwan's public," she said.
China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment.
The KMT says its China engagement is vital given Beijing's refusal to talk to Lai, who it says is a "separatist", and to advocate for Taiwan's interests, such as promoting agricultural exports.
"This is an unfair criticism," Tony Lin, chair of the KMT's Culture and Communication Committee, said, referring to the accusations they are pro-Beijing. "What we have always stressed is that we are pro-communication."
The KMT hopes people will turn out to also express their dissatisfaction with Lai, whom they say is incompetent and has stoked tensions with China.
"The DPP uses its overwhelming propaganda network to bring up a sense of fear (about China) in Taiwan society," said Huang Kwei-bo, a professor of diplomacy at Taipei's National Chengchi University and a former KMT deputy secretary general.
[[nid:715095]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
China can buy Nvidia H20 chips again. But it's not all good news
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Cyberspace Administration of China on July 31 flagged concerns about possible 'backdoor' security risks associated with the H20 chips, which American chipmaker Nvidia has denied. – Two weeks after Nvidia's chief executive Jensen Huang mounted a charm offensive to court the Chinese market, the American chip giant found itself once again the centre of attention in Beijing – and not in a good way. 'Nvidia, how can I trust you?' So read the headline of a commentary published by the People's Daily, the communist party's mouthpiece, a day after Chinese regulators summoned on July 31 the company's representatives over what they deemed 'serious security issues' related to its chips. The processor in question, known as the H20, was until recently the most advanced chip that Nvidia could sell to China under US restrictions. Washington effectively banned their exports in April amid an escalating trade war, but said in July that it would allow sales to resume. Some US officials touted the easing of export controls as a negotiating chip in ongoing trade talks with Beijing. But this apparent concession, analysts say, is not necessarily all good news for China. 'The reversal of the H20 ban offers short-term relief for China's artificial intelligence (AI) industry,' said Mr Charlie Dai, a vice president and principal analyst at advisory firm Forrester Research. 'On the other hand, it could slow domestic chipset adoption and impact the pace of technology self-reliance (amid) ongoing geopolitical frictions.' A taste for Nvidia China has been advocating the use of homegrown chips by its companies as part of a broader push for self-reliance, including in key technologies such as AI. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore President Tharman meets migrant workers who saved driver of car that fell into sinkhole Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business UMS Integration becomes first SGX company with secondary listing in Malaysia Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Despite this, many Chinese AI firms – in particular private tech giants – are said to still prefer using Nvidia's H20s to train and run their models, even though the chips are not Nvidia's most powerful. After the US announced a lifting of its export ban, news agency Reuters reported that Chinese companies were scrambling to buy the H20s, citing sources. It also said that Nvidia had placed fresh orders for 300,000 chipsets from its contract manufacturer amid strong Chinese demand. 'The general sense is that Chinese customers, especially Bytedance, Baidu, Tencent and Alibaba, still prefer Nvidia's solutions, whether it's H20 or whatever comes next,' said Mr Ray Wang, research director for semiconductors, supply chain and emerging tech at advisory firm The Futurum Group. Nvidia's edge over its Chinese rivals – which 'continue to improve' – is manifold for now, he explained. Its hardware has larger memory bandwidth, making it better for inference tasks, or the application of trained AI models that makes them useful in the real world. The company also has a stronger software platform with which to program the chips, as well as more capable networking technology to harness the combined performance of hundreds and thousands of processors, Mr Wang said. Importantly, he added, Chinese firms' rivalry with Huawei – seen as the biggest domestic rival to Nvidia on the chip front – also fuels their preference for the American chipmaker. Huawei has a sprawling business empire that boasts not just chipsets, but also extends to cloud computing and AI model development. This puts them in direct competition with the other tech giants. Mr Wang said: 'So if you're Alibaba or Tencent, do you want to source your most important computing resources from Huawei?' The push for self-reliance Nvidia's current advantages notwithstanding, analysts say that China will simultaneously double down on growing its domestic chip ecosystem – a goal that could be helped by regulators' recent scrutiny of the American firm. The Cyberspace Administration of China had on July 31 flagged concerns about possible 'backdoor' security risks associated with the H20 chips, which Nvidia has denied . A People's Daily commentary released on social media the next day sketched out possible 'nightmare' scenarios associated with such risks, such as electric cars suddenly losing power on the highway. It asked the company to provide proof of the chips' security to alleviate users' worries. The regulators' move 'will likely cause Chinese tech firms to temporarily curb adoption (of the H20) due to fears of potential vulnerabilities and regulatory uncertainty, despite strong underlying demand,' said Mr Dai of Forrester Research. He added that even as companies' continued reliance on Nvidia's superior AI capabilities may sustain some purchases of its chips, he expected firms to simultaneously also accelerate shifts towards domestic alternatives. Mr Su Lian Jye, chief analyst at technology research firm Omdia, said that Chinese firms in recent years had already been buying more homegrown chipsets or developing their own amid sharpening geopolitical tensions. These include China's three major telcos, banks, cloud service providers, and various other state-linked companies, he said. Tech giants including Baidu and Alibaba are also developing their own chips. In recent weeks, following news that Nvidia would once again be allowed to ship H20s to China, local firms have spoken up about strengthening support for homegrown chipmakers. On July 25, AI start-up StepFun, a model developer, announced an 'ecosystem innovation alliance' with several domestic chip companies including Huawei, Cambricon, Moore Threads and MetaX, news outlet Caixin reported. The same day, StepFun released a large language model that was developed with the properties of domestic chips in mind, the report also said. Separately, co-founder of cyber-security company Qihoo 360 Zhou Hongyi said on July 23 that his company had turned to procuring domestic chips, and that its recent purchases had all been of Huawei products, news outlet Yicai reported. The company, which has also branched into AI, is on the US' entity list, which restricts access to American technology. Mr Zhou acknowledged that there was a 'gap' between Chinese chips and Nvidia's, but stressed the need to use domestic processors anyway, in comments that were videoed and uploaded to social media. 'If you don't use them, the gap will always be there,' he said. 'The more (you) use them, the more they will improve.'
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
No passports, no study abroad: China limits public employees' travel
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The rules are part of a push by the central authorities to impose greater so-called political discipline and ideological loyalty on government workers. BEIJING – When Ms Tina Liu was hired to teach literature in a public elementary school in southern China, her contract included the usual warnings about absenteeism and job performance. Then came another line: Travelling abroad without the school's permission could get her fired. The rule was reinforced in a staff group chat. 'According to regulations from higher-ups, teachers need to strengthen their disciplinary awareness,' the message said. 'We will currently not permit any overseas vacations.' Across China, similar warnings are spreading as authorities tighten control over state employees' contacts with foreigners. Some kindergarten teachers, doctors and even government contractors and employees of state-owned enterprises have been ordered to hand in their passports. Some cities make retirees wait two years to reclaim their passports. In many cities, travel overseas by public employees, even for personal reasons, requires approval. Business trips abroad for 'ordinary research, exchange and study' have been banned. And in most provinces, those who have studied abroad are now disqualified from certain public positions. Officials cite various reasons, including protecting national security, fighting corruption and cutting costs. But the scope of the restrictions has expanded rapidly, sweeping up employees who say they have no access to sensitive information or government funds. The New York Times spoke to seven public employees, including an elementary school music teacher, a nurse and a literature professor, who confirmed the restrictions. The rules are part of a push by the central authorities to impose greater so-called political discipline and ideological loyalty on government workers. Two of the people the Times spoke to said they were also ordered to disclose their personal social media accounts to their employers. Another person said she had to notify her employer if she left the city where she worked. Some local governments have banned civil servants from eating out in groups of more than three, measures that came after several reports of excessive drinking at official banquets. But authorities are especially vigilant about overseas contact. The Chinese government has long been wary of the threat of espionage and what it sees as hostile foreign forces seeking to sow discontent. In July, People's Daily, the Chinese Communist Party's mouthpiece, published an article declaring that people-to-people diplomacy 'exists because of the party' and should be led by the party. The result is that even as Beijing advertises itself as eager to attract foreign businesses and tourists, it is preventing many of its own people from leaving. 'On the one hand, you want foreigners to come to China. You advertise Chinese culture and hope they'll boost the economy,' said Ms Liu, who is in her 20s. 'But on the other hand, why are you trapping us here, rather than letting us see more of the world?' Travel restrictions for some state employees are not new. Since 2003, high-ranking officials or those handling state secrets must report foreign travel in advance. Their names are given to border officials to prevent unauthorized exits. But under Mr Xi Jinping, China's most powerful leader in decades, the controls have extended to far lower-level workers. Full-time officials at six fishing villages near the city of Zhoushan, in coastal Zhejiang province, were told to surrender their documents, a local government notice shows. In a city in Jiangxi province, a public health agency also told employees to report any overseas trips they'd taken since 2018. A music teacher at an elementary school in central Hebei province said that she had applied to go to Malaysia this summer because her sister would be studying abroad there. Her school principal refused the request, said the teacher, who gave only her surname, Wang, for fear of retaliation. A nurse at a hospital in Zhejiang said she would need four layers of approvals to travel abroad. The nurse, who also asked to be identified only by her surname, Zhu, for fear of retaliation, said she had not applied, even though she had long dreamed of visiting Vietnam. The restrictions, she said, seemed to show a fear that even ordinary workers might flee with sensitive information or illicit funds – an idea she scoffed at. 'If there are any secrets, would people like us know about them?' she said. 'What money do we have to abscond with?' Those who are allowed to travel abroad are sometimes required to pledge not to endanger national security or speak ill of China while away. The Inner Mongolia University of Technology told employees not to accept any media interviews or to meet with any 'outside parties' while abroad, without authorisation. Encounters with 'anti-China forces' should be reported to Chinese embassies, the university said. Failure to hand in one's passport within a week of returning could lead to a five-year travel ban. The restrictions are also creeping into hiring. For new graduates hoping to join China's civil service, some of the most coveted positions are in the programme known as 'xuandiaosheng,' which loosely translates as 'selected students'. Those students, who are recruited from top universities, are put on a fast track to leadership positions. Each province determines which schools it will recruit from, and many, including Guangdong in the south, used to include overseas universities. In 2025, Guangdong listed only Chinese universities; so did five other regions in the past year. Only Shanghai now explicitly accepts graduates of foreign universities for the elite programme. Liaoning province, in the north-east, went even further. Anyone who had lived overseas for more than six months, and whose 'experience and political performance abroad' were hard to investigate, was deemed ineligible in 2025. Police departments in major cities have imposed similar rules. In Shanghai, even having a spouse or close relative who has moved abroad can disqualify a candidate. Professor Dongshu Liu, a professor at City University of Hong Kong who studies China's civil service, said that many of the restrictions most likely did not stem from a clear central mandate. But as the central government's scrutiny of mid-level officials has grown, those mid-level officials were probably trying to avoid any possible sources of trouble. 'Because of US-China relations, because of the competition, I think it's fair to say that Chinese society in general has become more sensitive to foreign countries,' Prof Liu said. For policymakers, that makes 'everything related to foreign countries risky,' he added. The Chinese government still wants to broadcast an image of openness, and would prefer to keep its inward turn more quiet, said Dr Wu Qi ang, an independent political analyst in Beijing. Although some local governments have published their passport regulations online, many interviewees said they were told only verbally. Enforcement of the restrictions appears to be uneven. Zhu said nurses at other hospitals in her city still had their passports, for instance. And government employees are not the only ones being scrutinised for overseas ties. China's state security agency has repeatedly warned ordinary citizens about the dangers of traveling overseas, or to look out for foreigners who might be spies. Ms Dong Mingzhu, chair of Gree Electric, a major Chinese appliance manufacturer, said in 2025 that she would avoid hiring people who returned from overseas, because they might be spies. That declaration drew widespread criticism from social media users who said it promoted discrimination and would harm China's global competitiveness. Even People's Daily ran an opinion piece defending overseas talent. But while ordinary Chinese might complain about restrictions on their freedoms, government employees are unlikely to put up much resistance, said Liu, in Hong Kong. Indeed, the government workers the Times spoke to all said they would not quit over having their passports taken. Zhu, the nurse in Zhejiang, said her stable salary of about US$27,000 (S$34,836) a year – much more than the average in her city – was worth the 'emotional value' she was being denied. And she knew many other workers around her were in the same situation. 'If everyone dies, it's OK, you know?' she said. 'As long as I'm not the only one.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
15 hours ago
- Straits Times
China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The 'Joint Sea-2025' exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days. BEIJING - China and Russia began joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan, also known as East Sea, on Aug 3 as they seek to reinforce their partnership and counterbalance what they see as a US-led global order. Alongside economic and political ties, Moscow and Beijing have strengthened their military cooperation in recent years, and their relations have deepened since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The 'Joint Sea-2025' exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days, China's defence ministry said in a statement on Aug 3. The two sides will hold 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat'. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'. China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters 2024's drills were held along China's southern coast. The Chinese defence ministry said on Aug 1 that 2025's exercises were aimed at 'further deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership' of the two countries. China has never denounced Russia's more than three-year war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies, including the United States, believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. China insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine. AFP
