
Starmer faces Scottish revolt over welfare cuts as by-election looms
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a revolt from Scottish MPs over welfare cuts amid concerns that Reform is poised to secure a breakthrough in a critical by-election next week.
Senior Labour figures are braced for the party to finish third behind the SNP and Reform in the Holyrood by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse.
Government whips have been warned by Scottish MPs that they will not back reforms to disability benefits and wider welfare overhauls as a result.
A senior government source told The Times: 'The Hamilton loss will have some serious implications. We're about to get quite considerably humped in the by-election and it will ripple through the Scottish parliamentary Labour Party.
'It sounds like it's really rubbish on the ground and, when we lose, are the Scottish MPs really going to traipse through the lobbies to back us on welfare cuts? It's an SNP seat but it looks like Reform will at least come second, pushing us into third.'
The Hamilton by-election was triggered by the death of the SNP MSP Christina McKelvie in March. Although she had a 4,582 majority over Labour, she won the seat in 2021 when SNP were high in the polls. It is a seat that Labour would be expected to win if it is to have any hope of forming a government in the Holyrood elections next year.
Instead, Labour strategists fear the party's candidate, Davy Russell, could be pushed into third place behind the SNP and Reform. The Reform candidate, Ross Lambie, joined the party in March, having defected from the Conservatives.
However, senior Labour sources loyal to Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, insisted that they remain locked in a two-horse race with the SNP and say claims they are certain to fall behind Reform are misguided.
Insiders believe Scottish MPs will blame Starmer's decision to cut winter fuel payments for all but the most vulnerable of pensioners for the result in Hamilton and some are considering making their opposition to forthcoming cuts public.
'Something pretty radical is going to have to change off the back of this result for me to change my mind,' one said.
The government is increasingly concerned that any concessions offered to welfare rebels will fall on deaf ears, as those planning to defy the whip sense 'safety in numbers'.
The Times revealed on Monday that disability benefit claimants could get more time to seek new support before the £3.4 billion cuts are imposed, in an attempt to soften the blow and provide an 'off-ramp' for those who could otherwise vote against the government.
Other tweaks being considered include the potential expansion of free school meals to cover more children, while there are ongoing discussions around the two-child benefit cap before a report due in the autumn from the government's child poverty taskforce. Starmer has also committed himself to partially reversing the cuts to winter fuel payments.
However, senior sources told The Times that although they did not expect the number of potential rebels to increase much further, 'everyone is pretty entrenched and it's safety in numbers'. They added: 'There are three figures worth of them so it's quite difficult to peel them off individually at this point.'
Labour's Scottish MPs were said to have been particularly angry in their questioning of Pat McFadden, the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, on winter fuel and welfare during a meeting of MPs last week.
In contrast to the Westminster government, Holyrood announced in November that every Scottish pensioner household would receive a winter fuel payment this year. One source said there were 'increasing divisions' within Labour's parliamentary party in Westminster, with many of the party's 37 Scottish MPs concerned that the government was not paying sufficient attention to next year's Holyrood elections.
They are particularly concerned about the impact on their prospects from the government's welfare reform package.
About 433,050 people — or about eight per cent of the population in Scotland — receive adult disability payments, the Scottish equivalent of personal independent payments (PIP). Any reduction on PIP spending by the Treasury would have a knock-on effect on the Scottish government's budget to fund these payments.
On Saturday, a busload of about 40 Reform activists will arrive in Hamilton from Runcorn, returning the favour after a Scottish delegation travelled south to help Sarah Pochin overturn a 14,696 Labour majority earlier this month.
Although Farage's camp expects to deploy 100 foot soldiers in total, Labour insists it will have twice that number campaigning in Hamilton.
'We are still neck and neck with the SNP,' a senior Labour source said from the constituency. 'We have a well-oiled machine, we know exactly who to target and how. Reform are loud but they don't know what they're doing.
'There is not a chance we will finish third'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Purdy replaces Koppen as Ibrox technical director
Rangers' new American owners are continuing their restructuring of the club by appointing Everton's former head of recruitment Dan Purdy as technical director to replace Nils week, a US-based consortium, including the investment arm of the San Francisco 49ers, completed a multi-million pound takeover of sporting director Kevin Thelwell officially begins his role on Monday, and the club have moved to bring in Purdy to work alongside him, as they did at previously head of scouting for Dutch club PSV Eindhoven, originally joined Rangers as director of football recruitment in January 2024 before the Belgian stepped up to become technical director 10 months later. Now the club's new owners have decided to move in a different direction, though Koppen will assist Thelwell with the transition into his new Ibrox club are expected to appoint a new head coach soon, with Davide Ancelotti and Russell Martin believed to be the two main Cavenagh will be confirmed as the club's new chairman at an annual meeting at the end of June. His vice-chair will be the current chairman of Leeds United, Paraag Marathe. Patrick Stewart will continue as chief executive.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Farage's 'leftwing' pose is flimsy – but so are Labour's own governing fantasies
In a much-publicised press conference last week in London, Nigel Farage invited Keir Starmer to a one-to-one debate at 'a working man's club' anywhere 'in the red wall'. The suggested location was more noteworthy than the debate-me machismo. Its message was clear: having trampled over the Tories in the recent local elections, Reform UK is coming for Labour and nowhere is safe. 'Let's go to one of the former mining communities, let's go somewhere that Labour has held the seat pretty much consistently since 1918,' Farage said, and then let's 'test' whether Labour or Reform is the real 'party of the workers'. If Starmer felt brave enough, they could even 'enjoy a few beers with the lads' – a nod to what has always been Farage's favourite interpretation of what 'standing with workers' entails. Farage's speech made waves for, among other things, calling for the two-child benefit cap to be overhauled and for Starmer's restrictions to the winter fuel allowance to be reversed. For the Thatcherite fanboy and former City trader, these were unusual positions, and the Westminster lobby lapped up the controversy – suggesting that, for parts of the Tory press, deviations from austerity will only be permissible when delivered with Farageist chutzpah. 'How Farage's fiery speech signals a seismic shift in UK politics – and the end for Starmer,' the Daily Express declared. 'Nigel leans left and hits the bullseye,' Tim Stanley cooed in the Daily Telegraph. The Sun wondered whether they should now call Farage 'Red Nigel'. But in reality, rather than represent an unprecedented reconfiguration of British politics, the speech was a typically opportunistic and cynical intervention from Farage: he noisily supported two policies that mounting reports suggested Labour were set to implement anyway, within a broader message that was far more George Osborne than Jeremy Corbyn. 'The great divide that is opening up in British society,' Farage claimed, was between those who wake up early and go to work and those who stay in bed and enjoy a similar quality of life. Workers and shirkers, in other words – same as it ever was. How worried should Labour be by Reform's overtures to the left? Farage's star is clearly rising and Reform has already surpassed Ukip's electoral achievements. After triumphing in the recent local elections, with more than 670 new council seats and a third of the vote, Reform now leads the pack in many national opinion polls. But Labour should first and foremost be worried by itself. Starmer's government appears to be in a permanently defensive state, commanding an enormous majority in parliament and yet rarely seeming to do more than react to events around it – sometimes left, often right. The prime minister's personal approval rating has suffered the consequences of this hapless strategy, reaching record lows with 38-point drop since last year's election. Meanwhile Red Nigel circles like a vulture. The two-child cap is illustrative. Since entering government with the promise of 'change', Labour maintained it would have to keep the policy – a transparently cruel inheritance from Osborne that made child poverty levels soar. Now the party appears increasingly likely to lift the cap, but what could have been a historic moment of rupture with Cruel Britannia – a move that will lift half a million children out of poverty, according to the Resolution Foundation – may easily be seen by the public as a reluctant concession to various Labour MPs and now Farage: not an empowered rebuttal of Tory austerity and the dawn of a new era, but yet more flip-flopping and an affirmation of Farage's influence. In his speech, Farage claimed that Reform represented the biggest revolution in British politics since Labour overtook the Liberal party in the 1920s – and there are some parallels. Back then, the Tories saw Labour as both an existential threat and an opportunity: Labour was a foreboding movement, but the Tories could take fleeting comfort in the knowledge that it was the Liberals who would suffer the severest blow. Labour now treats Reform with a similar ambivalence: worried yet reassured that the Tories will be the main victim. But an irreverent and vengeful Farage, powered by grievances and resentment from both deindustrialised Britain and the elite will have a far more corrosive effect on British politics and wider society than Labour ever threatened. For now, after the fallout of his 'island of strangers' speech, Starmer's strategy to deal with Reform will be to call out its economics as a fantasy. Farage's economic programme – binning net zero, waging war on asylum seekers and abolishing inheritance tax – is indeed reminiscent of Liz Truss. But it is not enough for Labour to play the role of the miserly Tories, saying to Reform what the Tories have historically said to them: we can't afford that, we must live within our means, and so on. Labour needs its own positive vision of the country. For now, the party indulges its own set of fantasies: that it can outflank the Tories and even Reform on the right without being outflanked on the left; that it is enough to be the least unpopular party, no matter how uninspiring one is; and that you can break with the harsh inequities of Tory Britain, as promised, without upsetting anyone important. Before Starmer's podiums were emblazoned with dispiriting slogans like 'fixing the foundations' and 'securing Britain's future' they carried various versions of a more optimistic one: 'it's time for change.' A major reason for its massive majority in 2024 was that, after 14 years of joyless Conservative misrule, Labour better embodied that spirit of feeling than any other party. But unless Labour can show they are that change from the Tories – and that will involve taking Britain beyond its overfed interests in tightening immigration controls and the welfare state – this spirit of feeling will only endure and deepen, and the answer to it will no longer be Labour. Samuel Earle is the author of Tory Nation: How One Party Took Over


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Disposable vapes are now banned from UK shops. This is what you need to know
The government has banned the sale of single-use disposable vapes in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland to combat youth nicotine addiction and environmental pollution. The ban makes it illegal for retailers, including corner shops and supermarkets, to sell disposable vapes, which are defined as having non-rechargeable batteries or non-refillable containers. The primary reasons for the ban are to protect the environment and reduce vaping among young people; it applies to both online and in-store sales of all disposable vapes, regardless of nicotine content. The Local Government Association (LGA) has cautioned against stockpiling disposable vapes due to the risk of fires caused by lithium batteries, which can enter thermal runaway and release toxic gases. Retailers can still sell reusable vapes, but those who continue to sell disposable vapes face a £200 fine for the first offense, with potential for unlimited fines or jail time for repeat offenses.