Security intensified in capital in wake of PoK leader's comments
Anwarul Haq
, the self-proclaimed Prime Minister of
Pakistan Occupied Kashmir
, surfacing online. In the video, Haq warned of "repercussions" that could affect areas ranging from Kashmir to the national capital.
While unleashing the vitriolic rant against India following the
Pahalgam terror attack
, Haq also implicitly acknowledged that the conspiracy behind the attack was hatched in Pakistan. When asked a question about the attack by the Pak media, Haq described it as revenge for Balochistan. "Agar tum Balochistan mein Pakistaniyon ke khoon se Holi kheloge, iski keemat tumhe Dilli se lekar Kashmir tak deni padegi..We've been actively involved in this fight, and our efforts will only intensify from here on," Haq said.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Haq's veiled acknowledgement came in the backdrop of Adil Raza, a former Pakistani army officer, alleging that the Pakistan Army chief directly ordered the Pahalgam terror attack.
Security has been tightened in Delhi, especially at tourist places and markets. Rapid Action Force, paramilitary units and local police have been deployed near Pakistan High Commission. In the border areas, thorough checks are being conducted on suspicious vehicles. tnn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Gilgit-Baltistan: A New Uprising In Pakistan's ‘Last Colony' Against Oppressive Rule
Last Updated: For decades, GB has sought autonomy, political representation, and development aligned with local needs and ambitions, but has faced growing neglect and exploitation from Pakistan A fresh wave of resistance against the Pakistani state's illegal occupation of the region is being witnessed in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). The local traders and business community of GB have launched a movement to oppose trade and travel between Pakistan and China via the Khunjerab Pass. This latest protest is the outcome of the relentlessly exploitative economic and political conditions imposed on GB by the Pakistani state. The protest by the traders has come close on the heels of a mass movement by the local residents of GB against the controversial Land Reforms Act, 2025, passed on May 21. For the last four weeks, traders have been continuing with a sit-in at the Karakoram Highway, bringing the region to a standstill. They are demanding recognition of local interests by Islamabad as well as its accountability. To understand GB's tumultuous relationship with Islamabad, it is important to look at the history of this asymmetric and oppressive power dynamic, which continues to disenfranchise, marginalise, and politically erase the identity, aspirations, and future of the people of this region. According to the US-based Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Pakistan has treated GB more as a colony rather than as part of the federation. 'The region has long been regarded by Pakistan not as a cherished part of the federation, but as a distant and burdensome periphery. Successive governments have turned a blind eye to the fundamental needs of the humble inhabitants of Gilgit-Baltistan, relegating the region to an ad hoc governance framework administered from afar—governed not by participatory laws, but by decrees handed down from Islamabad," says a recent MEMRI report. The origins of this injustice lie in the 1949 Karachi Agreement. Under this 'agreement", the control of GB (then called Northern Areas) was transferred from Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) to Islamabad without any representative from the region. Since then, Islamabad has directly ruled GB through the Ministry of Kashmir Affairs, using the draconian colonial-era Frontier Crimes Regulation. Its constitutional status remains in limbo as Pakistan has tried to use it to build another false narrative by linking it to the resolution of the Kashmir issue with India. But to deal with growing frustration among the local residents, it introduced limited self-governance reforms to the region, renaming it 'Gilgit and Baltistan' in 2009. However, this move was exposed as hollow; right from the beginning, the GB assembly was systematically populated by 'compliant figureheads or puppets, rather than leaders who dared to interpret their roles with independence and purpose," as emphasised in the MEMRI analysis. For decades, GB has sought autonomy, political representation, and development aligned with local needs and aspirations, but instead has faced growing neglect and exploitative policies from Pakistan. The Pakistani magazine Herald once described Gilgit-Baltistan as Pakistan's 'last colony", a phrase that aptly reflects Islamabad's governing attitude toward the region. Very recently, GB was engulfed in massive demonstrations against the forcibly passed Land Reforms Act, 2025. This legislation was opposed by the people, as it would enable land grabs by Punjabi landlords and the Pakistani military, displace the local population, and exploit natural resources. This law would also intensify military control. As GB is the only region under Pakistan's occupation that has a Shia and Ismaili majority, Islamabad has also undertaken a systematic campaign of altering the demography by opening up the region to outsiders. Now, fed up with increasing federal taxes and deliberate obstacles to local trade, GB traders—backed by a host of local political parties and religious groups—have sustained a resilient sit-in at Sost. This powerful show of solidarity and demand for justice compelled Chief Minister Haji Gulbar Khan and Governor Mehdi Shah to seek federal intervention, leading to the formation of a federal committee to make recommendations for the issue's resolution. The protestors' demands are simple: exemption from income, sales, and other federal taxes on commodities imported from China through the Khunjerab Pass—deemed illegal by traders considering GB's lack of constitutional status—and urgent customs clearance for 280 consignments stuck at Sost Dry Port under a one-time amnesty scheme. Ironically, while Gilgit-Baltistan is considered to be geographically very significant for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Islamabad's treatment of local traders sends a clear message that it is least bothered about the interests of the local population and is only interested in exploiting the strategic position and resources of the region. All routes connecting Pakistan to China, including the critical Karakoram Highway, pass through GB, which should ideally have brought more economic opportunities for the local population. However, in contrast, it has resulted in increased Chinese military presence. This reinforces the fact that Pakistan follows the template of exploiting the region while keeping the people underdeveloped. If the locals dare to express their aspirations, they are handled brutally by the Pakistani military and its death squads. Therefore, the traders' blockade in GB represents more than an economic conflict—it is the roar of a voice silenced for decades from a region long suffering under the thumb of Islamabad's colonial and oppressive policies. The writer is an author and columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. tags : China Kashmir pakistan view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 16, 2025, 22:02 IST News opinion Global Watch | Gilgit-Baltistan: A New Uprising In Pakistan's 'Last Colony' Against Oppressive Rule Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Historic T-55 tank ‘Shivashakti' now in Ranebennur
The historic T-55 war tank 'Shivashakti', which was used in the historic Indo-Pak war for Bangladesh liberation will now be on public display in Ranebennur of Haveri district. The historic tank will now be on display permanently before the Mini Vidhana Soudha in Ranebennur, thanks to the interest taken by Ranebennur MLA Prakash Koliwad. During the Independence Day celebration on Friday, Speaker of Karnataka Legislative Assembly U.T. Khader unveiled the tank. Speaking on the occasion, Mr. Prakash Koliwad said: 'The display of the war tank is a way of honouring the brave soldiers, who led the tank in the war field. It is also aimed at inspiring the youngsters and sensitising them about country's military power'. Speaker U.T. Khader termed the installation of the tank at Ranebennur as a matter of pride for the whole State. 'It inspires the younger generation to know more about the history our military and take pride in it'. He also called on everyone to understand the history and be patriotic and contribute towards nation building. History During the Indo-Pak war in 1965, the necessity of armored fighting vehicles was felt by the Indian Army. Therefore, the Indian government approached European countries for the supply of battle tanks. The T-55 tank was procured during the period 1966-77. It was the main battle tank at that period of time and as per the prevailing policy, it was to have a life of 15 years with one mid-life overhaul. This T55 tank was procured from Russia during the war between Indo-Pak for Bangla liberation in 1971, named Shivashakti and it helped army men to succeed in their mission and to achieve victory. Shivashakti belongs to assault regiment of Indian Army and has been procured from the Central Army Fighting Vehicle Depot at Kirkee in Pune (Maharashtra). The tank has been installed in Ranebennur utilising ₹15 lakh released from the MLA's local area development fund and ₹9.85 lakh from the municipal grants.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Owaisi criticises UAPA misuse after acquittal of eight accused linked to SIMI
Hyderabad parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi criticised the misuse of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) against the backdrop of the acquittal of eight men who were accused of having links with the banned outfit of the Students Islamic Movement of India. Interacting with the media at the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen party headquarters in Darussalaam, Mr Owaisi recalled that when the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had amended the law, he had opposed it in the Parliament. He recollected warning the then government that the law would disproportionately affect Muslims and dalits. 'Eighteen years later, the court acquitted them. Their youth has been stolen. Who will answer for this?' he asked. Drawing a parallel with recent political developments, Mr Owaisi referenced Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's remarks on voter data fudging, which he described as vote chori (vote theft). 'They are saying chori, chori. But what about these men whose lives have been taken away in the name of justice?' he asked. Referring to a recent Supreme Court order on stray dogs that triggered a debate, Mr Owaisi questioned the silence around those who remain incarcerated under the UAPA provisions. 'I do not understand how those who have spent six years in jail without bail continue to be ignored,' he said. Mr Owaisi clarified that he respects the judiciary but also expressed grave concern that the some of the undertrials have up served sentences prescribed under the very sections of laws invoked against them. The Hyderabad MP also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day for the second time in which he praised the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Mr Owaisi accused the organisation of playing no role in the freedom struggle, calling its literature objectionable. He made a specific reference to Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, an RSS leader who served as a minister in the Bengal cabinet under Fazl-ul-Haq in 1941. 'In March 1940, Fazl-ul-Haq supported the Pakistan resolution moved by the Muslim League,' he said. Criticising the narrative around Partition, Mr Owaisi argued that the voting rights of Muslims at that time were severely restricted. 'Hardly 2% or 3% of Muslims had the right to vote. These were elite, who had right to vote which was conditional,' he said, adding that a vast majority of Muslims could not vote. Touching upon the political climate in Bihar, Mr Owaisi said that his party leaders are already active on the ground working towards the upcoming polls, including those of local bodies, and then the assembly elections. He said that he would campaign in that State soon.
