Some think Sabah has too many holidays
Deputy Chief Minister I Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan and Deputy Chief Minister II Dauk Seri Dr Joachim Gunsalam both disagreed with the move to declare Sept 15 a public holiday.
'Personally, I feel Malaysia, especially Sabah, has too many holidays already,' Dr Gunsalam, who is Parti Bersatu Sabah president, said.
Kitingan said Malaysia Day is already a national holiday and there is no need to declare another day.
'For Sabah and Sarawak at this juncture, we want the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and its rights under the Constitution to be fully implemented.
'That should be the priority,' he added.
Sabah Progressive Party president Datuk Seri Yong Teck Lee also said the extra day is unnecessary.
Unionist Laurence Vun said any holiday would be welcomed by workers. However, he felt a holiday on the eve of Malaysia Day might not help the spirit of Malaysia.
'I don't think an additional holiday would bring any significance to the meaning of Malaysia Day.
'For Sabahans and Sarawakians, we feel Malaysia Day should be marked to make all Malaysians equal in every sense of the word – in our civil service as well as all sectors of government and private enterprise,' said Vun, a Sabah Cuepacs executive.
Universiti Malaysia Sabah's Prof Dr Lee Kuok Tiung felt that the announcement was aimed at boosting domestic tourism.
'The additional holiday will encourage more people to go on a longer weekend holiday break,' he said.
Several businessmen also felt that there are too many holidays, resulting in them having to pay overtime to staff and bear higher costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Singapore court reserves judgement on Pannir Selvam's post-appeal application
SINGAPORE: Malaysian death-row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthaman gained reprieve when the Singapore Court of Appeal reserved its judgment, following the second hearing on his post-appeal application held on Wednesday. The Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) policy on the scheduling of executions came under scrutiny during the proceedings, as Pannir Selvam's counsel and the Attorney-General's Chambers addressed the content of affidavits they submitted after the first hearing on May 7. At the initial hearing, the court observed that Pannir Selvam's request for a stay of execution, pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings arising from his complaint to the Law Society, rested fundamentally on the principle that the MHA's policy on execution scheduling must be applied equally to all. His lawyers argued that the MHA policy applied to him differs from an earlier policy, thereby violating his right to equal treatment under Article 12 of the Constitution. On this, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, who led the five-man bench, stated that Article 12 does not prohibit a state agency from changing its policy. "Article 12 applies by looking at the current legislation, the current statute, or the current policy, and asking yourself whether that policy is being applied in a way that is unfairly discriminatory," he said. Pannir Selvam's counsel further argued that the MHA had not provided an explanation for the differing application of its policy between state and non-state proceedings. In their submission, his counsel team argued that the MHA's approach to preserving a prisoner's life had changed. Previously, executions could be delayed if a prisoner's testimony was needed in any legal case. Now, the MHA says delays are only considered if the testimony is needed in a state-led case. "There have been no reasons provided by the MHA as to why this differential treatment between a state and a non-state proceeding is reasonable," said counsel Ng Yuan Siang. In response, Deputy Senior State Counsel Terrence Chua said the distinction exists because state-brought proceedings are, by definition, in the public interest. "It goes beyond the interest of an individual PACP (prisoner awaiting capital punishment), whereas the PACP cannot claim to represent public interest in their private applications. "But even then, I pointed out in my affidavit that state-brought applications are still assessed on a case-by-case basis," he said. The court responded by saying that if the applicant can show that the policy can give rise to an unfair distinction between two categories of persons between whom there is no rational difference, he may be entitled to a finding that the policy offends Article 12. The proceedings, which lasted over an hour, ended with Chief Justice Menon stating that the Court would reserve its judgment. Seated in the dock wearing a purple-coloured prison uniform, Pannir Selvam appeared calm throughout the proceedings in a packed courtroom, which was also attended by his siblings who had arrived from Malaysia earlier in the day. The hearing marks the latest chapter in Pannir Selvam's ongoing legal battle against his death sentence. He was convicted by the High Court on May 2, 2017, for importing not less than 51.84g of diamorphine into Singapore and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. Pannir Selvam filed an appeal, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on Feb 9, 2018. Together with his family and legal team, he submitted petitions for clemency to the President of Singapore, who subsequently declined to commute the sentence. Pannir Selvam and his family were informed that he would be executed on May 24, 2019. He then filed another application to the Court of Appeal, seeking a stay of execution on the grounds that he intended to challenge both the rejection of his clemency petition and the Public Prosecutor's decision not to issue a Certificate of Substantial Assistance (CSA). The court granted this application on May 23, 2019. Following this, he filed several other judicial review applications. Pannir Selvam received another notice of execution on Feb 16, 2025, for a scheduled execution on Feb 20. He then filed for permission to make a Post-Appeal Application in a Capital Case (PACC), seeking a stay of execution, which was granted on Feb 19. Judge of the Appellate Division Woo Bih Li, in his written judgment, stated that the stay was granted pending the determination of his PACC application. Singapore's PACC Act, which came into effect on June 28, 2024, allows prisoners awaiting capital punishment to make post-appeal applications, which can only be heard by the Court of Appeal. – Bernama
Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Madius proposes new national councils for economic coordination
Madius KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 6): Tuaran Member of Parliament Datuk Seri Panglima Wilfred Madius Tangau has urged the Federal Government to promptly fulfil Sabah's constitutional right to 40 per cent of net revenue collected from the state, while also calling for the establishment of three new national councils to strengthen coordination in critical economic sectors. Debating the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat on Wednesday, Madius stressed that the long-overdue revenue entitlement must be honoured in accordance with Article 112C and the Tenth Schedule of the Federal Constitution. 'Negotiations were already concluded in 1963 during the formation of Malaysia. As the generation entrusted with the legacy of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, we must now implement what was agreed. Why the delay?' he questioned. The UPKO Honorary President emphasised that this was not a new demand, but a constitutional right that remains unfulfilled, further warning that Sabahans must no longer be made to bear the brunt of poverty due to the continued failure to implement what is lawfully theirs. He noted that more than 80 per cent of the nation's RM1.3 trillion debt has been spent in Peninsular Malaysia, while Sabah, which contributes substantially to national revenue, continues to receive a disproportionate share of allocations. 'This disparity hampers Sabah's ability to develop key sectors such as agriculture, fisheries, livestock and basic infrastructure,' he said. 'If Sabah were given back the 40 per cent revenue as stated in the Constitution, we wouldn't have to keep begging for federal funds to build roads, hospitals, or develop our industries,' Madius added. He also cautioned that Malaysia's aspiration to become the world's 30th largest economy would remain a dream if the constitutional rights of Sabah continue to be sidelined. 'If Sabah prospers, Malaysia prospers. But if Sabah's rights continue to be denied, it is not only unjust, it also undermines the very foundation upon which Malaysia was formed. 'What we need is not more negotiations, but the political will to implement what is already enshrined in the Constitution, the highest law of the land,' he said. In the same debate, Madius also called for the immediate establishment of three national bodies – the National Agriculture Council, the National Fisheries Council and the National Livestock Council – to enhance coordination and policy coherence between the federal and state governments. He said the creation of these councils is crucial to align legislation, strategy, budgets and programme implementation, particularly in light of Sabah's autonomy in these sectors as guaranteed by the Federal Constitution and the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963. 'The aim is to close the development gap between regions, especially for Sabah, which has immense potential but remains left behind due to poor policy alignment and lack of federal support,' he stated. Citing examples, Madius said Sabah, despite being the largest fish producer in Malaysia contributing 25 per cent to national output, has only one fish landing facility built using state funds. 'In contrast, there are 42 such facilities in Peninsular Malaysia, five in Sarawak and one in Labuan, all developed by federal agencies such as the Malaysian Fisheries Development Authority (LKIM). Just imagine Sabah's potential if we received the proper budgetary support,' he remarked. In the livestock sector, Sabah has already achieved self-sufficiency in eggs and fresh milk but remains low in ruminant meat production. 'With vast and suitable land resources, Sabah could increase output significantly if strategic support and adequate funding are provided,' he said. Touching on agriculture, he noted that rice production in Sabah continues to lag due to inadequate irrigation systems, outdated drainage infrastructure, and a lack of processing facilities, all contributing to lower productivity compared to the Peninsula. Madius further reminded the Dewan Rakyat that the proposal to establish these three national councils had been included in Pakatan Harapan's 15th General Election manifesto, and urged the government to now honour that commitment. 'This is the right time for the government to act on this promise, to ensure national food security and promote equitable prosperity for all regions,' he said.
Borneo Post
12 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Masiung: Frequent government changes hindering Sabah's progress
Masiung (right) receiving a souvenir from Tongod District Officer, Mohd Yuseri Yusof. TONGOD (Aug 6): The frequent changes of government in Sabah are a major factor behind the state's underdevelopment, as they disrupt and hinder the implementation of planned or ongoing development programmes. Kuamut assemblyman Datuk Masiung Banah said political instability caused by government transitions often results in the failure or delay of important initiatives. He made the remarks during his keynote address at the 2025 Kuamut State Assemblyman Gathering held here recently. According to Masiung, Sabahans should emulate the Sarawakian mindset of prioritising political stability to ensure sustainable development. 'People in Sabah often compare our development progress with that of Sarawak. To match them, we must adopt their attitude of maintaining political continuity,' he said. 'Imagine a five-year development plan being disrupted midway because the government changes. Along with the Chief Minister, department heads and civil servants are replaced, and new policies are introduced. Before any progress can be made, another change happens, and we're back to square one. In the end, it's the people who suffer.' He noted that Sabah has had 16 Chief Ministers over the past 60 years due to frequent government changes, compared to just six in Sarawak. In Sarawak, he said, leadership changes typically occur only due to the end of a term or the passing of a Chief Minister, while the ruling coalition remains intact. Masiung cited the Pan Borneo Highway as an example. Although funds were allocated to both Sabah and Sarawak at the same time by the federal government, Sarawak has completed its portion, while Sabah continues to lag behind after the project passed through three different state governments. He stressed that such instability does not affect political leaders or elected representatives, who continue receiving their salaries regardless of the outcome. 'It is the people of Sabah who suffer the most — especially those who are quick to criticise and easily swayed by unverified social media reports,' he added.
