Danes Reluctant To Embrace Retirement At 70
Denmark's parliament in May adopted a law raising the retirement age to 70 by 2040, from the current age of 67.
But Evans, a 53-year-old bank employee with a solid financial footing, said she plans to retire around 65 or 66 -- even if it means she won't earn a full pension.
"I think 70 is old," she told AFP. "You want to benefit on the other end and still have a good life afterwards," she said.
As many Western countries grapple with how to stretch pensions to cover ageing populations, Denmark indexed the official retirement age to life expectancy in 2006 and has revised it every five years.
In 2030, the retirement age will increase to 68 and in 2035, it will rise to 69.
But those born after December 31, 1970 -- including Evans -- will have to wait until age 70.
Few people actually work to the legal retirement age in Denmark.
In 2022, when the official retirement age was 67, the actual average retirement age was around 64, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
About 20 percent of retirees in Denmark retire because they can't find a job or are too sick to continue, according to Aske Juul Lassen, an ethnologist at the University of Copenhagen who specialises in senior working life.
"For those 20 percent, it makes a big difference whether the retirement age rises again," he said, stressing that "inequities are rising with age".
The gap risks widening between those able to retire early thanks to strong finances and others, said Damoun Ashournia, chief economist at the Danish Trade Union Confederation.
"Very few people actually retire at the official retirement age. But that is not an opportunity our members have," Ashournia said.
Camilla Rasmussen, a 37-year-old union member who works as a gastroenterology nurse at a Copenhagen hospital, is convinced that she will not be physically able to work until age 70.
"That would be really hard for me, walking 10,000 steps every day," she said.
"If I'm here when I'm 70, I think it's not fair for the patients," she added.
"Already today, we see that two-thirds of our members have retired prior to the official retirement age. And that's due to them being worn out and doing hard physical work," Ashournia said.
Denmark's pension system is made up of several parts. There is a universal public pension, currently set at 7,198 kroner ($1,130) per month, plus two complementary employer-funded pensions invested in pension funds--one mandatory and one optional.
Finally, some people also save money privately for retirement.
Ashournia said he believed that raising the retirement age to 70 was the only way to finance Denmark's cradle-to-grave welfare state.
"As the population ages and life expectancy increases, if we want to deliver the same public services we do today, we need to secure public finances," he said.
However, he criticized the automatic five-year increases in the retirement age, a practice in place since 2006.
Under these rules, the retirement age in 2070 will be 74.
For Erik Simonsen, deputy head of the Confederation of Danish Employers, this is the only way forward.
"It would be the most intelligent way to go on, to keep the system. So the older we get, then we have to work a little bit more," Simonsen said.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, 47, has said she believes a review of the system will be needed once the retirement age hits 70.
"We no longer believe that the retirement age should be increased automatically," she told daily Berlingske in August 2024.
In line with a review by a government-appointed working group, the Danish Trade Union Confederation said it would like to see a slowdown in the rate of increases.
"In the future, we can raise it by only half a year for every year that life expectancy increases," said Ashournia. Few people actually work to the legal retirement age in Denmark AFP About 20 percent of retirees in Denmark retire because they can't find a job or are too sick to continue AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a day ago
- DW
Israel-Hamas war: Gaza's humanitarian crisis in numbers – DW – 07/25/2025
The situation in the Gaza Strip is catastrophic: scant aid supplies are trickling in while international organizations warn of a famine. Here are the key numbers at a glance. Most of the buildings have been destroyed, hospitals have had to close and food is scarce. The reality in the Gaza Strip is catastrophic. Around 90% of the more than 2 million inhabitants have now fled within the territory, and some have already been forced to move several times. With the latest evacuation order for the city of Deir al-Balah, 87.8% of the Gaza Strip is now under evacuation orders or within the Israeli military's restricted military zones, according to the UN emergency aid office OCHA. The population is now crammed into 12% of the Gaza Strip, it said on Tuesday. International pressure on Israel is growing, with 28 states, including France, the UK and many other Western nations, calling for an end to the war. According to OCHA, 58,380 Palestinians (as of 15 July 2025) have died since the war started in the Gaza Strip in October 2023, including many women and children. OCHA, which is responsible for coordinating humanitarian affairs, cites data from the Health Ministry in Gaza. The ministry is run by Hamas, which Israel, the US, Germany, the EU and other organizations designate as a terrorist organization. The United Nations and Israeli intelligence officials deem the numbers reported by Gaza's health ministry as reliable. Given Israel's ongoing military operation in the small enclave, numbers cannot be independently verified. Several third-party studies have indicated the true death toll could be nearly twice as high. According to a study by an international research team, more than 80,000 Palestinians are said to have been killed by January of this year. The scientific journal reported on the study, which was conducted under the direction of Michael Spagat from Royal Holloway College, University of London, in late June 2025. The scientists worked closely with the research organization The Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR), which is funded by the European Union, among others. PCPSR staff surveyed 2,000 families about deaths within their household and then extrapolated the figures. A study published in the Lancet in January of this year also found that deaths in Gaza were being underreported. For this study, obituaries on social networks were compared with the Health Ministry's lists. The war in Gaza was triggered by a terrorist attack Hamas led on Israel on October 7, 2023. Around 1,200 people were killed, and Hamas abducted 251 people as hostages in the Gaza Strip. According to official Israeli information, 50 people kidnapped from Israel are still being held in the Gaza Strip, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive. According to the on Tuesday, 895 Israeli army personnel have also died in the war. After almost two years of war, the lack of basic goods entering the Gaza Strip has had dramatic consequences. Many Palestinians are suffering from hunger, often lacking most basic necessities. According to Welthungerhilfe, a German non-profit humanitarian assistance organization, the 25 remaining bakeries had to close at the beginning of April. Most of the 177 community kitchens have also run out of supplies, Welthungerhilfe told DW. Almost one in three people eat nothing for days on end, the UN World Food Program (WFP) told DW. For most of them, food aid is the only way to get any food at all. According to the latest IPC report from May 2025, which many aid organizations also refer to, according to DW research, the entire population of the Gaza Strip is now affected by acute food insecurity (IPC level 3). According to the definition, this means that the choice of food is limited, and people have to work extremely hard to get the calories they need. According to the IPC, 470,000 people in the Gaza Strip are at risk of catastrophic hunger (IPC level 5). This corresponds to acute danger to life due to hunger; there is an extreme lack of calories per person per day. The IPC system (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) is an internationally recognized instrument for measuring and classifying hunger and food security. Five levels are defined, ranging from phase one, "minimal," to "stressed," "crisis," "emergency," and phase five, "Famine." It is also forecast that more than 71,000 children and an estimated 17,000 mothers will require urgent treatment for acute malnutrition in the coming months. According to UNICEF, the UN's children's humanitarian agency, children are considered to be acutely malnourished if their weight is less than 80% of the appropriate weight for their age. Teams from the aid organization Doctors Without Borders also noted a sharp rise in cases of "acute malnutrition" in mid-July. According to the nongovernmental organization, hundreds of women and children with severe and moderate malnutrition are currently being treated in health centers, and the numbers are clearly on the rise. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, people are dying of hunger every day, most of them children. On Tuesday, for example, 15 people died of starvation. This cannot be verified independently. Providing medical care in Gaza is also becoming increasingly difficult. According to an assessment by the aid organization Doctors Without Borders in July 2025, no hospital is fully functional at the moment. The facilities that are still in operation are completely overburdened. According to the NGO, the conditions for treatment are catastrophic: most hospitals no longer have electricity or running water. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that 18 out of 36 hospitals were still partially operational at the end of June. Almost 40% of the points of contact for basic medical care — doctors' surgeries, outpatient clinics and aid offered by NGOs — were still operational. The field hospitals are also limited; only two are fully intact. Israel blocked humanitarian supplies to the Gaza Strip for 11 weeks in the spring, aggravating the situation even further. All supplies are increasingly scarce: food, water, medicine and fuel, which is necessary for the operation of hospitals and public community kitchens. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which Israel and the US support, has been distributing food at a few distribution centers since the end of May. However, there have been repeated reports of fatal incidents near the GHF distribution points, including in recent days. For a long time, aid organizations have been pressing to be allowed to resume their provision of relief supplies to the region. In an interview with DW, the World Food Program explained that since the end of the aid blockade on May 21, an average of 20 to 30 WFP trucks with food have reached the Gaza Strip every day. The amount delivered is only a small fraction of what the more than 2 million people in the Gaza Strip need to survive. During the ceasefire, 600 to 700 trucks crossed the border every day.
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
New Cryptocurrency May Be Aiding Russia To Dodge Sanctions
Russia could be turning to a new cryptocurrency called A7A5 to allow money to flow in and out of the country and avoid Western sanctions, experts have told AFP. Multiple rounds of international sanctions have been imposed on Moscow since its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine seeking to ramp up economic pressure to halt the war. But the launch of A7A5 in February this year opened up an alternative payment method for Russian businesses and individuals to sidestep sanctions when trading with foreign partners, the UK-based non-profit Centre for Information Resilience (CIR) said in a report. A7A5 is a stablecoin -- a form of cryptocurrency backed by traditional assets -- in this case pegged to the ruble, making it harder for Western authorities to monitor than dollar-based alternatives. It was launched by a pro-Russian Moldovan oligarch and a Russian state-owned bank as "the first ever ruble-pegged stablecoin," George Voloshin from anti-money laundering group ACAMS told AFP. While it is not widely used yet, experts say its creation marks a significant step in Russia's efforts to reduce its dependence on major crypto companies -- many of which cooperate with Western governments. Since Russia was kicked out of the international banking system SWIFT and hit with asset freezes and investment bans, Moscow has already turned to crypto to sidestep financial restrictions imposed by the United States and its allies. Stablecoins are especially attractive because they are less volatile than other cryptocurrencies. People have also used cryptocurrency to donate directly to both the Ukrainian army and Russian militias, according to several analytics firms such as Elliptic. But Russia has faced a problem: USDT, the most popular stablecoin, is tied to the US dollar and controlled by a company called Tether, which cooperates with US and European authorities. Earlier this year, Tether blocked $28 million in USDT held in wallets on Garantex, Russia's largest crypto exchange, which was shut down following a global crackdown on illegal transactions. "That was a real wake-up call" for Russia, said Elise Thomas, senior investigator at CIR. "It made them think that they need their own stablecoin, they need something that they control," she added. Just before Garantex was shut down, tens of millions of dollars were moved from USDT into A7A5, according to data from crypto tracking firm Global Ledger. A7A5 is backed by deposits in Promsvyazbank, a Russian bank under sanctions for its ties to the government and the military. The coin is traded on Grinex, a crypto exchange based in Kyrgyzstan -- a country seen as friendlier to Russian interests and less vulnerable to Western pressure. A7A5 is also registered in Kyrgyzstan rather than Russia because the country offers a crypto-friendly legal environment and is less exposed to "sanctions and other economic pressures," project director Leonid Shumakov said in an interview posted online. Less than six months after its launch, around $150 million is now held in A7A5. These transactions are not necessarily illegal, but they could become problematic if used by sanctioned individuals or entities to reconnect with the global financial system, warned ACAMS's Voloshin. The man behind the A7 group, which developed A7A5, is Ilan Shor, a Moldovan businessman and politician now living in Russia. Investigators found links between A7A5 and Shor's political activities in Moldova, including websites related to both sharing the same IP address. These findings have suggested that the cryptocurrency could be used as a tool for political influence. Shor and his company have already been sanctioned by the UK, and more recently by the European Union, which accused them of trying to meddle in Moldova's 2024 presidential election and its referendum on joining the EU -- all while keeping close ties with Moscow.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Turns Up Pressure With Trump Trade Deal 'In Reach'
With the contours of a hard-fought EU-US trade deal taking shape, the European Union is flexing its muscles in a bid to squeeze concessions from US President Donald Trump in the run-up to his deadline of August 1. Brussels and Washington appear to be inching towards a deal with a baseline 15-percent US levy on EU goods, and potential carve-outs for critical sectors, multiple diplomats told AFP. The EU's 27 countries have largely let the European Commission focus on seeking a deal to avoid hefty US tariffs -- as Trump repeatedly upped the stakes, finally threatening them with 30-percent levies without an accord by month's end. But since the US leader's latest ultimatum, the tone has hardened from key EU capitals Paris and Berlin: they say it is time for Brussels to show its mettle and willingness to respond forcefully if needed. Reflecting the toughened stance, EU states Thursday backed a package of retaliation on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of US goods -- to kick in from August 7 if talks fall short. The counter-tariffs are "intended to support negotiations, not escalate tensions", an EU diplomat emphasised. Economist Eric Dor said the EU would be "capitulating" by accepting a 15-percent baseline. He warned it would harm businesses with profit margins too small to absorb the tariff hike, and drive relocations to the United States. Most states prefer a deal to no deal -- even with undesirable levies of 15 percent -- but exemptions are key, with aircraft, steel, lumber, pharmaceutical products and agricultural goods under discussion, diplomats said. The approaching deadline comes with a sense of deja-vu: before Trump's 30-percent threat on July 12, EU officials also believed they were on the cusp of a deal following months of difficult talks. "The final decision is in the hands of President Trump," stressed another EU diplomat -- even if Japan securing an agreement with 15-percent flat levies has boosted expectations of a European deal. The mood music seems different this time, however. Trump Wednesday said Washington and Brussels were in "serious negotiations". "If they agree to open up the union to American businesses, then we will let them pay a lower tariff," the US leader added. EU trade spokesman Olof Gill Thursday reiterated the "twin tracks" approach: "Negotiation, and preparation for the event that the negotiations don't lead to the outcome we want." The thought now in many European capitals is that if the EU does not get a deal, "retaliation must be significant", Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank told AFP. Trump takes umbrage at the EU's surplus in goods trade, but in fact, for services, the bloc had a trade deficit of 109 billion euros with the United States in 2023. Brussels is already drawing up a list of services to potentially target. Beyond that, France has been most vocal in calling for the EU to bring out the "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. Paris says it has Berlin's support, following talks this week between President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Under the instrument, the EU can curb imports and exports of US goods and services as well as intellectual property rights, and impose restrictions on access to the EU market, including public procurement. But it's an open question whether the bloc would have the stomach to escalate the fight by deploying the potent tool, described by Gill as the EU's "most powerful deterrent". And even if it did, retaliation would not be swift. Under the rules, the commission would usually have four months to investigate the third country it accuses of detrimental trade policies -- then EU states would have eight to 10 weeks to back any action. Only then would the commission have a green light to prepare measures within six months. Experts seem unconvinced the EU would opt for this "nuclear" option, especially when Europe wants to keep Trump's support for Ukraine and the US security umbrella intact. "It is questionable whether all EU members would ever agree to such drastic action against their principal security provider," wrote Daniel S Hamilton of Brookings Institution in a paper published this week.
