Tennessee lawmakers postpone pesticide bill until 2026

Yahoo

09-04-2025

Nearly 170,000 lawsuits have been filed against Bayer, parent company of the weedkiller Roundup, over claims the product causes cancer. (Photo Illustration by)
Chemical companies seeking legal immunity from Roundup-related lawsuits will have to wait a year to get their way in Tennessee.
The House Judiciary Committee opted Tuesday to postpone legislation until 2026 enabling Bayer/Monsanto to avoid liability in lawsuits connected to cancer claims. Republican Rep. Clay Doggett of Pulaski called for the delay less than a week after the full Senate passed its version of the bill.
'I felt like there was a lot of stakeholders, there was a lot of questions that we had that didn't get answered,' Doggett said Tuesday.
Tennessee bill would expand weed-killer manufacturers' legal immunity
Germany-based Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, recently agreed to pay nearly $2.1 billion to a man who claimed he contracted non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from Roundup. Some 170,000 similar lawsuits have been filed against the chemical company.
Under the legislation, though, as long as a pesticide manufacturer's federally-approved label doesn't warn of a disease, they couldn't be held liable for causing an illness.
Farmers in his rural Middle Tennessee district supported the bill, Doggett said. Yet lawmakers were overwhelmed with information about the bill, making it difficult to bring it to a vote this year, he said.
For instance, Republican Rep. Gino Bulso, a Brentwood attorney, told lawmakers a provision in state law gives people standing to sue in federal court. Doggett also added that he favors an amendment to the measure that dropped a 'blanket immunity' provision for the companies involved.
Doggett conceded that farmers could be 'more prone' to contract illnesses from spraying the pesticide/herbicide. Yet he said farmers in his district support the legislation and use of the chemical, and he added that other lawmakers said foreign countries will continue using the product on their crops even if it vanishes in America.
Farmers and the Farm Bureau testified previously that the Roundup used in modern agriculture enables no-till farming on larger tracts, which is considered a more efficient method.
The House bill's sponsor, Republican Rep. Rusty Grills of Newbern in West Tennessee, called the outcome 'part of the legislative process.'
'There's lots of questions people have that they didn't feel like they got adequate answers to, so knowing that, we're at the end of the session now, so there's not a whole lot of time to get answers,' Grills said.
The bill can be brought back for consideration in 2026 since it wasn't voted down.
Critics have said they believe it gives Bayer and Monsanto blanket immunity to lawsuits.
But Grills said rather than a giveaway to the company, the legislation would put an end to frivolous lawsuits and stave off a day when farmers can't use preferred products because of the threat of legal action against manufacturers.
'I'm one of those farmers. We use these products, and because we use those products, we're able to make a living,' Grills said.
A Tennessee Farm Bureau lobbyist testified recently that the Senate bill would avert only cases involving product labels approved by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Opponents of the legislation say it will remove people's constitutional rights to a jury trial when they're diagnosed with deadly illnesses caused by the product.
Legislatures in Iowa, Missouri, Idaho, Wyoming and Mississippi have turned down similar bills, yet Bayer-Monsanto hasn't pulled products from shelves, leaving opponents to say the chemical maker is more concerned with increasing earnings than protecting people.
The Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association testified in the Senate that opponents don't believe the products should be banned, only that customers should maintain their right to take legal action.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE