Keir Starmer to recall cabinet from summer break for emergency meeting on Gaza crisis
Ministers, who are in a summer recess until September 1, are expected to reconvene this week to discuss the situation in the Middle East.
It comes after peace talks came to a standstill last week after Washington and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a 'lack of desire' to reach an agreement.
Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians.
But the UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, has said that access to supplies must be 'urgently' widened.
Sir Keir is meeting with US president Donald Trump in Scotland on Monday and is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas during the talks.
The prime minister will travel to Ayrshire, where the US president is staying at his Turnberry golf resort, for wide-ranging discussions on trade and the Middle East as international alarm grows over starvation in Gaza.
The two leaders have built a rapport on the world stage despite their differing political backgrounds, with Mr Trump praising Sir Keir for doing a 'very good job' in office ahead of their talks on Monday.
But humanitarian conditions in Gaza and uncertainty over US import taxes on key British goods in America threaten to complicate their bilateral meeting.
In his talks with Mr Trump, Sir Keir will 'welcome the President's administration working with partners in Qatar and Egypt to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza', Number 10 said.
'He will discuss further with him what more can be done to secure the ceasefire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long.'
The leaders will also talk 'one-on-one about advancing implementation of the landmark Economic Prosperity Deal so that Brits and Americans can benefit from boosted trade links between their two countries', it said.
Speaking to Sky News on Monday, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds could not say whether the RAF would be directly involved in plans to airdrop aid into Gaza but warned that the delivery of aid 'cannot wait'.
'We know the only way to get sufficient quantities of aid into Gaza is for that blockade to end, for those vehicles to get on the ground. The point about the air drops is that we cannot wait. We've got to do something. It's an unconscionable situation.
'We can all see the lapse in humanity on display, and we've got to do things to do that.'
He added: 'I don't know about the operational implementation, but on the air drops, as a country, we're always standing by.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
4 minutes ago
- Spectator
France is turning against the EU
When Donald Trump won a second term in the White House last November the response in Europe was one of barely disguised horror. 'The European Union must stand close together and act in a united manner,' declared Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Emmanuel Macron posted a message on X: 'The question we, as Europeans, must ask ourselves is, are we ready to defend the interests of Europeans?' The president of France got his answer on Sunday evening. No. The trade deal agreed between Ursula von der Leyen, the EU Commission president, and Donald Trump has not gone down well in much of Europe. Scholz's successor, Friedrich Merz forecast that Germany's economy would suffer 'significant' damage because of the deal. EU exports will have a tariff of 15 per cent, which is superior to the customs duties before Trump's re-election, but much lower than his threatened 30 per cent tariff. Additionally, von der Leyen has promised the bloc will purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments. According to Hungary's Viktor Orban: This is not an agreement… Donald Trump ate von der Leyen for breakfast.' The most strident criticism of the deal came from France, where in a rare display of unity the terms of the agreement were savaged across the political spectrum. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said that 'it is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to assert their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission.' Trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin described the deal as unbalanced and said the government should not accept 'what happened yesterday because that would be accepting that Europe is not an economic power.' It was telling that Saint-Martin said 'Europe' and not 'France'. For centrists like Saint-Martin – he was one of the first to join Macron's fledging En Marcheparty in 2016 – France and the EU are indistinguishable. Macron's predecessor (and mentor), Francois Hollande once accused him of 'believing in nothing and having no conviction'. That is not true. Macron has one unshakeable conviction and that is the EU. It is why he won't let Brexit go, taking every opportunity to savage Britain's decision to leave the bloc. Twice during his recent state visit he went on the attack. Britons were 'sold a lie' over Brexit he said at one point, adding on another occasion that the country 'was stronger when part of the EU.' As yet there has been no response the Elysee to von der Leyen's trade deal. Perhaps Macron is still working out how best to spin the fact that Britain's tariff rate with the USA is 10 per cent. Marine Le Pen lost little time in pointing this out, posting on X that the EU 'has obtained worse conditions than the United Kingdom.' The leader of the National Rally described the deal as 'a political, economic and moral fiasco' and said that that 'this form of globalisation, which denies and destroys sovereignty, has been outdated for many years.' The majority of the French agree with her. In an interview with the BBC in 2018, Macron admitted that if given the choice his people would probably follow Britain out of the EU. This is one reason why he has been so determined to make life difficult for post-Brexit Britain: pour encourager les autres. Macron's strategy has been partially successful. A poll last year revealed that 62 per cent of the French are opposed to Frexit. The bad news for the president is that 69 per cent of them have a bad opinion of the EU. The poll was conducted a month before the European elections, which resulted in a resounding victory for Le Pen's Eurosceptic party and a humiliating defeat for Macron's Europhile movement. When Le Pen reached the second round of the 2017 presidential election it was with a promise to quit the EU. Two years later she abandoned that position and vowed to reform the bloc from within. Her party won't return to Frexit but it will increase its Euroscepticism between now and the 2027 election. The same goes for the hard-left's Jean-Luc Melenchon, who loathes Brussels as much as Le Pen. Bruno Retailleau, the leader of the centre-right Republicans, is also a long-standing critic of the EU's ambition and voted against the EU Constitution in France's 2005 referendum. That result, he said in a 2020 interview, along with Brexit, 'have shown one and the same thing: Europeans do not want a federal Europe.' Across France enmity towards the EU has strengthened in the last year. The Mercosur trade deal agreed with South America in December is widely unpopular and France's failure to control its borders is blamed on Brussels. The French are demoralised and angrier than ever with their ruling elite. A citizens' collective called 'Bloquons tout!' (Block everything) is using social media to mobilise people for a day of protest on September 10. 'Boycott, disobedience, and solidarity' is their rallying cry and they are urging people to take to the streets across France. Will it achieve anything? Probably not. After all, what's the point of protesting in Paris when all the big decisions about France's future are made in Brussels.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK car market set for strongest year since before Covid pandemic
The UK's car market is on track for its strongest year since before the coronavirus pandemic, according to new analysis. Online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader said it expects two million new and 7.75 million used cars to be sold across the whole of 2025, as older, budget-friendly models drive growth. The total of 9.75 million would be a 3% increase on last year's figure of 9.5 million (1.9 million new and 7.6 million used). It would also be the highest annual total since 10.3 million (2.4 million new and 7.9 million used) in 2019, before the virus crisis began. Auto Trader said there was a surge in demand for used cars aged five to 10 years. It predicted that by the end of the year there will be 10.1 million of these cars on UK roads, up from 8.7 million in 2017. Vehicles at least a decade old are expected to make up 26% of the 32.8 million cars licensed in the UK, compared with 23% in 2019. Auto Trader said disruption to new car production caused by the pandemic means there is a shortage of cars aged three to five years. Ian Plummer, Auto Trader commercial director, said: 'UK car sales are on course to reach their highest level for six years, which is testament to the underlying strength of consumer demand. 'We've seen more than half a billion visits to our website in the first half of this year – an all-time high. 'What's particularly striking is the surge in appetite for older, budget-friendly vehicles – especially those aged five to 10 years – which are now the fastest-selling part of the market. 'The Covid effect is still playing through the UK car market and will continue to do so for years to come.' Nearly a third of all Auto Trader advert views are for cars priced under £7,000. Sales of used cars in 2025 are up 2% year-on-year but the full-year for new car registrations is forecast to be flat.
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Why Super League's expansion encourages mediocrity, not greatness
IT WAS nice to get a dose of early festive spirit yesterday as Super League clubs voted to expand the competition to 14 clubs from next season. For this really did have the air of turkeys voting for Christmas. 2 The last year or so has been dominated by talk of IMG, you know the global broadcasting giant that has negotiated contracts worth billions of pounds? The firm whose recommendations on grading brought visible improvements to the environment the sport is played in. To me, this decision screamed: 'What do they know? We're rugby league people.' Well, 'rugby league people', you have opened the door to mediocrity being rewarded. Run the club you own like it's an unwanted toy? Have almost 20,000 empty seats at your home matches? Your stadium has one seated and covered stand? Hey, you're welcome to try and join us in 2026. The only saving grace is that 12 of the clubs will be decided by IMG's grading scheme, even then there's a huge flaw. An independent panel will put forward the other two clubs – and to think, 'rugby league people' moaned about the demise of traditional promotion and relegation previously. Set criteria will be made clear. Er, they should be crystal clear already. Time is not exactly of the essence. 'It gets rid of loop fixtures,' is seen as one excuse. Fair enough, but what have they been replaced with, more humdrum matches as the gap between top and bottom grows? What should have happened is contraction rather than expansion. 10 top teams going at it week after week – now that will be something people will want to watch. Broadcasters want to show the best, not one good side easing past a mediocre one while not getting out of second gear. I can almost hear the, 'It's not enough matches for us,' argument from here. Well, make more of what you have. 2 There have been welcome strides in making matches into events at the clubs that get it. However, not enough have realised it. Being able to read the writing in the stands during a match does not exactly scream 'Must see.' Will having more clubs, diluting the talent pool further, change that? I don't think so. Maybe, just maybe, England – you know, the team that should be big everywhere and not an afterthought – could have a game or two as the top flight has been reduced. Still, we are where we are and to quote a phrase heard all too often from 'rugby league people,' it is what it is. And do not even get me started on the away fans argument.
