Oman continues diplomatic efforts to contain escalation of Israel-Iran conflict
has ignited the current regional tension. Oman has reaffirmed its steadfast position rejecting military escalation and violations of state sovereignty, emphasizing that the
only way to address the crisis lies in a serious return to the diplomatic path, aiming to reach a just agreement and save the region from an abyss with unknown consequences
that could impact the entire world. In this context, His Excellency Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Al Busaidi, held phone calls on Wednesday with his Russian and Chinese
counterparts as part of a series of calls with various brotherly and friendly countries.
The discussions focused on the urgent need for an immediate cessation of hostilities, stressing
that Israel is the aggressor, violatin UN Carter and obstructing peace efforts, including the recent American-Iranian negotiations aimed at preventing nuclear proliferation. The
ministers agreed that a military solution is ineffective and that achieving an early ceasefire would pave the way for a return to the negotiating table to address the nuclear
issue in a manner that ensures stability and peace for all. During the call, the Minister and His Excellency Sergey Lavrov agreed that this
unprecedented escalation violates United Nations Charter, renewing their call for an immediate halt to these attacks and their expansion, as well as refraining from targeting
nuclear facilities to prevent the risks of nuclear radiation. The Russian Minister also expressed his country's deep appreciation for Oman's mediation efforts, affirming the
Russian Federation's support for these negotiations, diplomatic channels, political solutions, and their utmost importance in establishing international peace and security.
On the other hand, His Excellency Wang Yi, Chinese Foreign Minister, emphasized that the nuclear issue cannot be resolved outside the scope of diplomatic efforts and that Israel's
attacks on Iranian territory constitute a clear and blatant violation of UN Charter and the principles of international law. He also affirmed his agreement with Oman's position and highly valued the Sultanate's tireless efforts to promote peace and facilitate negotiation pathways.
2022 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
22 minutes ago
- The National
Israel can inflict even more damage if Hezbollah doesn't disarm
The Lebanese government's decision last Thursday to endorse the objectives of a US-drafted plan provoked a negative response from Hezbollah and, to an extent, its ally within the Shiite community, the Amal Movement. However, the two parties, realising the risk of isolating themselves further, did not withdraw their ministers from the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. The document presented to the Lebanese cabinet by the interim US envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, outlined, among other things, a process for Hezbollah's disarmament. Prior to its Thursday session, the Salam government had ordered the Lebanese army to prepare a plan by the end of August. This plan would implement the decision taken by the state to secure a monopoly over weapons by the end of this year. The legal basis for this process is UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which calls for the disbanding of all militias in Lebanon, Lebanese and non-Lebanese; as well as Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Lebanon war. Resolution 1701 had imposed a Hezbollah pullback to behind the Litani River, but also reaffirmed the provisions of Resolution 1559. It still remains unclear how the Lebanese government and army will be able to implement such decisions if Hezbollah continues to refuse to surrender its weapons. Both Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Mr Salam want to avoid violence at all cost, and seek to avert a rupture with the Shiite community, a majority of which supports Hezbollah and Amal. One aspect that has been left largely unmentioned in this context is what Israel might do if Hezbollah and Amal manage to derail the government's plan to disarm the party. Both parties, in their recklessness, have to grasp the real dangers if the Israelis resume their military campaign in Lebanon, especially given that they enjoy unconditional US support. Hezbollah finds itself very lonely in Lebanon today. Many people blame it for having carried the country into a war over Gaza that was unnecessary, highly destructive, and allowed Israel to reoccupy parts of Lebanon, after it had pulled its forces out of the country in 2000. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost on a daily basis. The Israelis also violated the ceasefire agreement by refusing to withdraw completely from Lebanon in January, as the agreement stipulated, a position supported by the Trump administration. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost daily A proposal by Mr Barrack subsequently tied an Israeli pull-out from the Lebanese areas that it still occupies to the demilitarisation of Hezbollah. By drawing this link, the US envoy effectively placed the burden of the continued Israeli presence on the party. The Israelis will certainly take this into consideration as they plan their strategy in Lebanon. If the Trump administration is willing to blame Hezbollah for the Israeli occupation, then this provides Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government several options for what to do next if the party continues to refuse to disarm. Israeli forces can occupy more Lebanese territory up to the Litani River, and proceed to destroy all Hezbollah infrastructure south of that – though this process has already begun under the Lebanese army. Israel's leaders can then make a condition for withdrawal that the Lebanese government disarm Hezbollah, or even sign a peace treaty with Israel. Barring Lebanese acceptance, an expansionist Israel could even permanently annex Lebanese land. A more ambitious plan would be for Israeli forces to occupy territory up to the Awwali River, at the level of the southern Lebanese city of Sidon, and make similar demands, or even contemplate annexation. This would empty the south of its Shiite population, while the ensuing humanitarian crisis would increase pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese state to comply with the Israeli government's demands. If the Lebanese fail to do so, Israel could use its new installations in southern Lebanon to mount a long campaign to destroy Hezbollah positions and arms depots around Lebanon, using aircraft, drones, or commandos flown in by helicopter, as they did against a Hezbollah missile factory in Masyaf, Syria, last September. Some observers feel that if the Israeli forces redeployed to southern Lebanon, this would provide a lifeline for Hezbollah, which could revive its resistance dimension by fighting the occupation. Perhaps, but the challenges are many. First, the party would be on its own in doing so, with many Lebanese wanting an end to the conflict with Israel. Second, without a regular arms supply line through Syria, the party's capacities to sustain such a military effort would suffer. And third, if Hezbollah tries to form a front against the Israeli presence, particularly along the Awwali, this would mean anchoring itself in non-Shiite areas, where local communities are deeply hostile to the group. Under such circumstances, Hezbollah would probably find it exceptionally difficult to mount an effective resistance struggle. The Shiite parties, above all Hezbollah, are certainly conscious of their vulnerabilities. Moreover, Hezbollah does not appear to have a credible plan B. It is now under direct Iranian control, since its leadership cadre was decimated last year, and has been reduced to trying to defend an untenable status quo. The possibilities open to Israel make such a strategy even less likely to succeed, while the potential outcomes are deeply alarming.
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
The man tipped to lead Gaza from the ashes of Israeli bombardment
Civilian transitional rule in Gaza may last up to a year, Palestinian businessman Samir Hulileh told The National, confirming reports he has been lined up to govern the territory after the war ends. After his name surfaced in media reports as a possible post-war candidate, Mr Hulileh said: "This is a transitional phase which might last for six months or a year and it's not going to be long. "The question of whether I can put the conditions in place to make this project succeed is something I'm working on." The broader plan for Gaza, which the Arab League adopted during a summit in Cairo in March, is for a technocratic committee to take over governing for six months, with Hamas relinquishing its authority. Mr Hulileh said the proposal to have him lead Gaza was raised even before the summit, during the Biden administration in Washington, before he continued talks with the Trump administration. "It has been going on since July 2024," he said. " They wanted someone who does not represent a specific party, or interests, and has previous governance experience," said Mr Hulileh, who previously served as secretary general of the Palestinian government and held other positions in the Ministry of Economy. The now-retired official said his willingness to take on the role is based on his feeling of empathy towards the misery in Gaza and his inability to "remain quiet" over the unfolding situation. More than 61,722 people have been killed by Israeli fire and hunger-related deaths due to Israel's siege reached 235 this week, including 106 children. Most difficult part Following a report by Israeli outlet Ynet on Mr Hulileh's potential role, the official Palestinian news agency Wafa said a governor has yet to be appointed. "The only entity authorised to administer the Gaza Strip is the State of Palestine, represented by the government or its agreed-upon administrative committee, headed by a government minister," Wafa reported, citing an unnamed source in the Palestinian Authority (PA). "They have been hiding for two years," Mr Hulileh said in response to the question of why he had been approached instead of the Palestinian government. The main issues that stand in the way of a civilian government now are political and security-related, he said. Conditions for him to implement his rule include a comprehensive ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. The matter, currently being discussed in Egypt in co-operation with Qatar and the US, is being complicated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterating plans to reoccupy Gaza and "allowing" Palestinians to leave the enclave. The enclave has become uninhabitable, with the majority of it destroyed, while bodies remain unreachable by emergency and rescue crews, and tens of thousands of Palestinians need medical assistance. Mr Hulileh said when the environment is ripe, the real work can begin and in the meantime he is looking at plans for the day-after scenario. But that moment may be further delayed, with US President Donald Trump casting doubt on the prospect of any deal to end the war, saying he did not believe Hamas would release Israeli hostages unless the situation in Gaza changed. Still, Mr Hulileh said he is prepared for the challenges ahead. "The beginning will be the most difficult part." The first six months are likely to focus on providing the 2.2 million Palestinians of Gaza with sufficient food, water and shelter, he added, after more than 80 per cent of the strip has been destroyed, and Israeli shelling and starvation continue to claim lives every day.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Syria and Turkey strike new military deal
Syria and Turkey have struck a deal on military training and consultancy during a high-level Syrian delegation's visit to Ankara on Wednesday, Turkey's Defence Ministry announced. The agreement was signed for the regular exchange of personnel to enhance military co-operation; specialised skills training; and a series of programmes in counterterrorism, mine clearance, cyber defence, military engineering, logistics and peacekeeping operations. The delegation included Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Al Shibani and Intelligence Director Hussein Al Salama. Before the agreement was signed, Turkish Defence Minister Yasar Guler met his Syrian counterpart Murhef Abu Qasra to discuss bilateral and regional defence as well as security issues. The ministry said the agreement underscored both countries' commitment to strengthening co-operation. The deal follows months of negotiations on a broader military co-operation pact, initiated after the ousting of former Syrian president Bashar Al Assad in December. During their meeting in the capital, Turkey's Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and Mr Al Shibani accused Israel of undermining Damascus's rule and fuelling sectarian strife by claiming to be protecting the Druze minority during violence in the south of the country. 'What is taking place in Syria is being created by Israel. Israel wants sectarian strife to take hold in Syria, but we want peace to prevail in the region,' Mr Al Shibani said. Israel last month carried out air strikes on Sweida in southern Syria and the Defence Ministry building in central Damascus after days of violence between Bedouin tribes, pro-government forces and members of Syria's Druze community. The religious minority is deeply embedded in Syria and Israel, as well as Jordan and Lebanon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government justified its strikes on grounds that combine national security with protection of the Druze. In the Turkish capital on Wednesday, Mr Shibani rejected the idea that the country's Druze community was being sidelined by Damascus and needed protection from an outside power. 'The Druze are part of Syrian society, and under no circumstances are we going to shut them out,' he said. 'We don't have any such intentions. This is being bandied about by Israel, but we reject those claims.' The meetings in Turkey came after Syria agreed to form a working group to sustain the fragile ceasefire in Sweida and assure long-term security, following talks in Jordan. Since the Assad regime fell in December, Israel has also taken territory in a UN-patrolled buffer zone in southern Syria's Golan Heights, a rocky plateau that has been occupied by Israel since the 1960s. The US, which has lifted sanctions on Syria, has called on Damascus to join the Abraham Accords, a set of agreements establishing relations with Israel. Syrian and Israeli officials have met in the Azerbaijani capital Baku but reports of a peace agreement with Israel were 'premature", Syrian state television said last month. Mr Fidan also accused Israel of attempting to destabilise Syria as part of what he described as 'expansionist' policies in the Middle East. 'Syria is but one leg of their policies and they're trying to undermine Syria,' Mr Fidan said. 'You should make sure that your neighbouring countries are prosperous and that they are secure,' he added, addressing the Israeli government and population. Acknowledging the security challenges that Syria faces and the recent violence in Sweida, Mr Fidan called on Middle Eastern and Arab nations to back Syria. 'We need to support these efforts, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, all the other countries in the region – we must join our forces and unite our forces and help Syria get back on her feet,' he said. Turkey, Syria's largest northern neighbour, has emerged as a key source of influence over the new government of President Ahmed Al Shara since the Assad regime's fall. This is the latest in a series of frequent face-to-face meetings between Turkish and Syrian officials, most recently when Mr Fidan met Mr Al Shara in Damascus last week. Over the course of the past 14 years, Turkey has hosted more than three million Syrians who fled the conflict in their home country and Ankara is under domestic pressure to see them return back across the border. Turkish contractors are also eyeing opportunities in Syria's reconstruction and last week the Turkey-Syria Business Council was re-established as the two countries seek closer trade ties. Mr Fidan said Syria's safety and security was Ankara's number one priority. 'Syria should exist in peace and in unity," he said. "As Turkey, we have been offering our advice to Syria. We have been supporting these endeavours, with our friends, with our partners in Syria.' Ankara is also concerned by slow progress on efforts to integrate Kurdish militias in Syria's north-east into security forces controlled from Damascus. Turkey views forces under the umbrella of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) as an extension of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which it designates as a terrorist organisation, as do the European Union and the US. In July, the PKK agreed to dissolve itself but Kurdish armed groups in Syria have said the move does not apply to them. The SDF signed an integration agreement with Damascus in March but the contours of actually doing so remain contentious. Mr Fidan, who has previously said he wants to see the elimination of PKK affiliates in Syria, said Turkey 'will have to take action' if its security demands are not met. 'We harbour good intentions, but that doesn't mean that we will turn a blind eye to mischievous or devious ways,' he said. Syria has rejected federal arrangements for Kurdish semi-autonomy. Damascus pulled out of talks scheduled to take place in Paris to mediate differences with Kurdish-led forces, after they hosted a meeting that called for a decentralised administration. 'They were trying to sow seeds of discord,' Mr Al Shibani said in Ankara, of the meeting that took place in Hasakah, in north-eastern Syria, last week.
