‘No country is safe': deadly Nordic heatwave supercharged by climate crisis, scientists say
Norway, Sweden and Finland have historically cool climates but were hit by soaring temperatures, including a record run of 22 days above 30C (86C) in Finland. Sweden endured 10 straight days of 'tropical nights', when temperatures did not fall below 20C (68F).
Global heating, caused by the burning of fossil fuels, made the heatwave at least 10 times more likely and 2C hotter, the scientists said. Some of the weather data and climate models used in their analysis indicated the heatwave would have been impossible without human-caused climate breakdown.
The heat had widespread effects, with hospitals overheating and overcrowding and some forced to cancel planned surgery. At least 60 people drowned as outdoor swimming increased, while toxic algal blooms flourished in seas and lakes.
Hundreds of wildfires burned in forests and people were reported fainting at holiday-season events. In the last major heatwave in the region, in 2018, 750 people died early in Sweden alone, and scientists anticipate a similar toll once the data is processed.
Wildlife was also affected, especially the Scandinavian peninsula's famous reindeer. Some animals died in the heat and others entered towns seeking shade. Drivers were warned that reindeer could seek to cool down in road tunnels.
Much of the northern hemisphere has experienced heatwaves in recent weeks. This includes the UK, Spain and Croatia, where wildfire destruction is almost double the 20-year average, and the US, Japan and South Korea. Scientists are certain that the climate crisis has intensified this extreme weather.
Prof Friederike Otto, a climatologist at Imperial College London who leads the World Weather Attribution (WWA) collaboration, which did the Nordic analysis, said: 'Even relatively cold Scandinavian countries are facing dangerous heatwaves today with 1.3C of warming – no country is safe from climate change.
'Burning oil, gas, and coal is killing people today. Fossil fuels are supercharging extreme weather and to stop the climate from becoming more dangerous, we need to stop burning them and shift to renewable energy.'
Heatwaves such as the one in Scandinavia will become another five times more frequent by 2100 if global heating reaches 2.6C, which is the trajectory today.
Maja Vahlberg, a Swedish expert at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, said: 'This July reminded us that in the north, heat is not a distant threat but is seeping into hospitals, care facilities and homes. Our infrastructure was not built to withstand these extreme temperatures and our ageing population is increasingly susceptible to dangerous heat.
'I watched a reindeer stay in the same patch of shade for three days straight without grazing, a quiet sign of the strain the heat was causing,' she said.
The rapid WWA study on the role of human-caused global heating in the Nordic heatwave compared the likelihood of the high temperatures in today's hotter climate with that in the cooler preindustrial period, focusing on the hottest two-week period in each country.
It found that even the relatively small 0.2C rise in global temperature since 2018 had doubled the chance of such heatwaves, showing that every fraction of a degree mattered, the scientists said. 'Climate change is fundamentally reshaping the world we live in,' said Dr Clair Barnes, at Imperial College London.
A striking aspect of the heatwaves was the number of tropical nights. 'At one station in northern Sweden, we had 10 of these days at the end of July, which is extraordinary,' said Prof Erik Kjellström, at the Swedish Meteorological Institute.
Amalie Skålevåg, at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, said: 'Hot nights can be dangerous when the body does not get a chance to rest and recover after a hot day, and this is particularly true for people with underlying health conditions.'
The effects of the heatwave on reindeer threaten the livelihoods of Indigenous Sámi communities, which have herded them for more than 1,000 years. 'Such disruptions also threaten [the Sámi's] health and their right to sustain a way of life – this makes climate change a human rights issue,' said Vahlberg.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Spain battles 20 major wildfires amid scorching heat, deploys more troops
VILLARDEVÓS, Aug 17 (Reuters) - Scorching heat hampered efforts to contain 20 major wildfires across Spain on Sunday, prompting the government to deploy an additional 500 troops from the military emergency unit to support firefighting operations. In the northwestern region of Galicia, several fires have converged to form a large blaze, forcing the closure of highways and rail services to the region. Southern Europe is experiencing one of its worst wildfire seasons in two decades, with Spain among the hardest-hit countries. In the past week alone, fires there have claimed three lives and burned more than 115,000 hectares, while neighbouring Portugal also battles widespread blazes. Temperatures are expected to reach up to 45 degrees Celsius (113 Fahrenheit) in some areas on Sunday, Spanish national weather agency AEMET said. "There are still some challenging days ahead and, unfortunately, the weather is not on our side," Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez told a news conference in Ourense, one of the most affected areas. He announced an increase in military reinforcements, bringing the total number of troops deployed across Spain to 1,900. Virginia Barcones, director general of emergency services, told Spanish public TV temperatures were expected to drop from Tuesday, but for now the weather conditions were "very adverse". "Today there are extremely high temperatures with an extreme risk of fires, which complicates the firefighting efforts," Barcones said. In the village of Villardevos in Galicia, desperate neighbours have organised to fight the flames on their own with water buckets as the area was left without electricity to power water pumps. "The fireplanes come in from all sides, but they don't come here," Basilio Rodriguez, a resident, told Reuters on Saturday. Added Lorea Pascual, another local resident: "It's insurmountable, it couldn't be worse". Interior ministry data show 27 people have been arrested and 92 were under investigation for suspected arson since June. In neighbouring Portugal, wildfires have burnt some 155,000 hectares of vegetation so far this year, according to provisional data from the ICNF forestry protection institute - three times the average for this period between 2006 to 2024. About half of that area burned just in the past three days. Thousands of firefighters were battling eight large blazes in central and northern Portugal, the largest of them near Piodao, a scenic, mountainous area popular with tourists. Another blaze in Trancoso, further north, has now been raging for eight days. A smaller fire a few miles east claimed a local resident's life on Friday - the first this season.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mystery of ancient DNA marker rewrites story of how humans first reached the Americas
One of the world's greatest genetic mysteries is how a DNA marker present in Europe reached North America, leaving no clear trail through Siberia or Alaska. Scientists have been baffled by how Haplogroup X arrived more than 12,000 years ago, raising new questions about how the Americas were first populated. Haplogroup X is a rare maternal DNA lineage, passed down from mother to child, found in both Europe and North America. Its unusual presence suggests that early Americans may have arrived in multiple waves, challenging the traditional view that all Native American maternal lineages came solely from Siberia via the Bering Land Bridge. Today, the X2a branch of Haplogroup X is found in several Indigenous groups across North America, including the Ojibwe, Sioux, Nuu-chah-nulth, Navajo, and Yakama. It is also found in Europe and Western Asia, hinting at a far more complex migration history than previously thought. Dr Krista Kostroman, a genetic medicine specialist and Chief Science Officer at The DNA Company, told the Daily Mail: 'Haplogroups are like family seals. 'They are distinctive genetic marks passed down over thousands of years, connecting us to ancestors who lived in entirely different landscapes, climates, and cultures. Because they rarely change, they serve as identifiers for tracing ancient migrations.' Haplogroups A, B, C, and D are the most common maternal lineages among Native American populations. They each have distinct genetic signatures that trace back to different regions of East Asia and reflect separate waves of migration into the Americas during the late Ice Age. For example, haplogroup A is widespread among populations in North, Central, and South America, while B is more frequent in the Pacific Northwest and parts of Central and South America. Haplogroup C is concentrated in northern and western Indigenous groups, and D is found across North and South America but is particularly common in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. Together, these haplogroups provide a clear picture of the Asian origins of most Native American maternal lineages, which makes Haplogroup X's unusual distribution all the more striking. X2a appears among Indigenous groups in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions, while X1 is found primarily in North Africa, the Near East, and parts of the Mediterranean, though it remains rare even there. 'That rarity makes it a powerful clue for tracing human history,' Kostroman said. 'When an uncommon marker appears in distant, disconnected regions, it signals a shared connection in the deep past.' Despite speculation, Haplogroup X does not prove Native American ancestry nor a direct European migration. Haplogroup X is rare in Siberia and Alaska, with some researchers suggesting that it represents an earlier migration, possibly via a coastal route. The most widely accepted theory is that X2a arrived in North America during the late Ice Age as part of migrations across the Bering Land Bridge from Northeast Asia, arriving alongside other maternal lineages. 'Other possibilities are more speculative,' Kostroman noted. 'Small groups carrying Haplogroup X may have arrived earlier, or it may have entered the Americas in multiple waves alongside other lineages.' When Haplogroup X was first identified in the 1990s, its presence in Europe and among some Indigenous North Americans sparked controversy. Some researchers proposed a direct Atlantic crossing, known as the Solutrean hypothesis, though this has largely been dismissed. The X2a lineage differs from European and Near Eastern branches, reflecting a more complex migration history. Parallels with other rare haplogroups further illustrate the complexity of human migration. Haplogroup C1b, found in North and South America but rare in Asia, provides clues about secondary migration waves. Haplogroup B2a, present in some Amazonian populations, shows deep diversification within the Americas. And Haplogroup U5, a rare European maternal lineage dating to the Ice Age, demonstrates how rare lineages can survive in isolated populations, much like X2a did in North America. Some groups have speculated that Haplogroup X supports religious or pseudoscientific claims, including theories linking Native Americans to Hebrew ancestry or the Book of Mormon. Others suggest Europeans may have crossed the Atlantic during the last Ice Age. Kostroman cautions against overinterpretation: 'Over the past two decades, Haplogroup X has shifted from being the centerpiece of bold trans-Atlantic theories to a subtle but powerful clue in understanding human prehistory. 'It tells us that human migration was complex, involving multiple waves, exploratory groups, and connections across Eurasia long before people reached the New World.'
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Study finds medication lowers risk of dangerous behaviors in people with ADHD
ADHD affects around five per cent of children and 2.5 per cent of adults globally and is linked increased risks of suicidal behaviors, substance abuse, transport accidents, and criminality if people do not seek treatment. An international team of researchers wanted to fin out if taking medication would mitigate these risks. Researchers from the University Of Southampton, UK and the Karolinska Institute in Sweden found that during two years of treatment with ADHD medication, people who took the drugs were less likely to experience these harmful incidents than those weren't medicated. Around 22 million Americans are estimated to have ADHD and just over half of these are prescribed medication to manage their symptoms. Medications are classified into two main categories: stimulants and non-stimulants. Stimulants, the most common type, include methylphenidate and amphetamine-based medications that improve the transmission of the brain chemical dopamine which affects mood, motivation and movement. Non-stimulant options like atomoxetine, clonidine, and guanfacine can also be used, if stimulants are not effective or well tolerated. These help improve the transmission of norepinephrine, a hormone that helps with alertness and focus. Exactly why the condition occurs is not completely understood, but ADHD tends to run in families, suggesting genes may play a part. In the new study, researchers examined multiple population and health records in Sweden. The team used a novel study design called a 'trial emulation' to simulate a trial using existing real-world data from 148,581 people with ADHD. Comparing those who had started any type of ADHD medication within three months of diagnosis with those who hadn't, they looked at the records over the following two years. They found any form of medication reduced the first occurrence of four of the five incidents (with accidental injury being the exception) and all five outcomes when considering recurring incidents. Those taking stimulant medication were associated with the lowest incident rates, compared to non-stimulant medications. Methylphenidate was the most commonly prescribed drug, the researchers found. The likelihood was most reduced amongst people exhibiting a recurring pattern of behavior, such as multiple suicide attempts, numerous drug relapses or repeat offending. Medication didn't reduce the risk of a first-time accidental injury, but did reduce the risk of recurring ones. The study is the first of its kind to show the beneficial effect of ADHD medication on these broader clinical outcomes using a novel statistical method and data representative of all patients in routine clinical care from a whole country. Dr Zheng Chang, senior author of the study from the Karolinska Institute said: 'This finding is consistent with most guidelines that generally recommend stimulants as the first-line treatment, followed by non-stimulants. 'There is an ongoing discussion regarding whether methylphenidate should be included in the World Health Organization model list of essential medications, and we hope this research will help to inform this debate.' Co-senior author on the paper Samuele Cortese, a National Institute For Health And Care Research (NIHR) Research Professor at the University of Southampton added: 'The failure form clinical services to provide timely treatments that reduce these important outcomes represents a major ethical issue that needs to be addressed with urgency, with the crucial input of people with lived experience.'
