Church of England votes to remove outdated document on sexuality from clergy selection, World News
The document, titled "Issues in Human Sexuality," described "homosexual practice as especially dishonourable" and called on homosexual Christians to lead a life of abstinence.
The mother church of 85 million Anglicans worldwide said the decision, which marks another step towards making the Anglican faith more inclusive for the LGBTQ+ community, was independent of the ongoing "Living in Love and Faith" process that is exploring sexuality and marriage.
The CoE's decision to allow blessings for same-sex couples in 2023 deepened divisions both at home, where it is the established church, and in Anglican strongholds in Africa and Asia, where homosexuality remains illegal in some countries.
The motion to change the vocations process was passed overwhelmingly at a meeting of the General Synod, made up of bishops, clergy and laity, the CoE said. It added that the move does not alter the Church's doctrine.
The paper was originally intended as a teaching document, but had assumed a more definitive role to set out expected conduct within the Church's discernment and vocations process.
The 48-page document states that "homophile orientation and its expression in sexual activity do not constitute a parallel and alternative form of human sexuality as complete within the terms of the created order as the heterosexual."
"A paper introducing the item to Synod members noted that the tone, language, and some of the assumptions in 'Issues' are now contextually inappropriate, and appear prejudicial and offensive to many people," the CoE statement said.
Charles Bączyk-Bell, an openly gay Anglican priest from London, said the document was dated even at the time of publication, and that it had been used to screen people out of the ordination pathway.
"Now it has gone... it opens the way for liberalisation of the church's policy on same sex relationships and means we can stop using it as a kind of reference text," he told Reuters.
[[nid:719634]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
5 days ago
- Independent Singapore
RDU's Ravi Philemon speaks out on Singapore's market-centric mobility system
SINGAPORE: In a scathing public statement that reads as both personal witness and political indictment, Red Dot United's (RDU) Ravi Philemon has reignited debate over Singapore's Certificate of Entitlement (COE) system, describing it as a prime example of 'boomer economics'—a worldview he claims worships markets, shuns moral judgment, and outsources justice to the highest bidder. His words are timely. Just days earlier, former Prime Minister (PM) Lee Hsien Loong delivered a speech at the Economic Society of Singapore dinner, where he defended the COE auction system as the most efficient way to allocate a limited resource. However, to Philemon, this entire framing misses the point. 'Letting the market decide is not a neutral act. It is a choice,' he wrote. 'It is choosing to let wealth be the measure of worth.' 'Latin in the church, economics in the state' Ravi Philemon begins his piece with a powerful analogy: the idea that economic jargon has replaced sacred language as the modern gatekeeper of power. Just as Latin once barred laypeople from interpreting scripture, economic complexity now shields policymaking from public scrutiny. Phrases like 'auction dynamics' and 'price signals' are used, he argues, to speak over everyday Singaporeans when they ask why cars, homes, and dignity seem increasingly out of reach. His critique is more than rhetorical. Philemon points to data showing a booming luxury economy: Singapore is now home to 240,000 millionaires. Sales at Marina Bay Sands' high-end Shoppes are projected to hit S$14 billion this year. Meanwhile, ordinary families are told that COEs must remain high—because this is what 'efficiency' looks like. The case against market fundamentalism While Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow has justified the current COE allocation as 'efficient,' particularly for private hire vehicles that serve more riders per car, Philemon turns that logic on its head: efficiency for whom? He highlights those who are left behind by this model—the single mother taking her child to therapy, the elderly man going for dialysis, the hawker loading goods before sunrise. In these cases, cars aren't a luxury; they're a lifeline, but the auction system, Philemon argues, doesn't account for need—only purchasing power. 'This is not pragmatism. It is abdication,' he writes of Mr Lee's choice to defer COE decisions to market logic. 'It is the clearest example of boomer economics.' See also COE premiums rise again, breaching S$150,000 for Cat B Philemon's use of the term 'boomer economics' isn't just a generational swipe. It's a critique of a system that, in his view, prioritises abstraction over empathy, and market purity over moral responsibility. Jamus Lim, rebutted While careful not to discredit Jamus Lim's parliamentary proposals—which include more flexible COE durations and separate categories for private hire vehicles—Philemon argues that these are merely 'tweaks,' not structural reform. 'If you begin with the belief that cars should be allocated by market price, then of course these tweaks make sense, but if you begin with the belief that access should reflect need, then the entire mechanism has to be redesigned.' In doing so, he draws a clear line between policy adjustment and policy transformation. For Philemon, justice isn't a matter of gentler rules—it's a matter of replacing the machine. Mobility as dignity, not just movement What emerges is a deeper question about what public policy is meant to serve. To Philemon, transport is not just a technical problem of demand and supply. It is a social contract issue: a reflection of what—and who—society values. 'We are not just being priced out of cars,' he warns. 'We are being priced out of mobility. Of time. Of choice. Of dignity.' And that, he argues, is the real cost of a system that mistakes price for fairness.
Independent Singapore
5 days ago
- Independent Singapore
SM Lee vs Jamus Lim on COE and the ‘best way to meet people's needs and take care of them'
Photos from Facebook SINGAPORE: In a social media post on Wednesday (Jul 16), Workers' Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim described Senior Minister (SM) Lee Hsien Loong as 'a mighty fine economist.' He explained, however, that he does not share the former Prime Minister's perspectives on everything, giving the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) and access to car ownership in Singapore as an example of where their beliefs differ. Car ownership in the city-state is arguably the most expensive in the world, and the COE, the document allowing someone to own and operate a private vehicle for ten years, starts at around S$100,000. SM Lee had acknowledged in a dialogue at the Economic Society of Singapore 's annual dinner, which the WP MP, an Associate Professor of Economics, had attended, that certain households may have a greater need for a car than others, such as those with elderly or disabled family members. Assoc Prof Lim wrote, 'But instead of saying that there was a reasonable way to adjudicate between these competing needs, he then pivoted to how competitive bidding represented the best way to allocate between these claims.' His post received a lot of attention on Facebook, including a comment from SM Lee himself, who provided further clarification of the remarks he had made, saying that the government has ensured that Singaporeans have an efficient public transport system, and that there are possibilities for families who need a vehicle to apply for grants to help them pay for a COE. SM Lee put it this way in his comment: 'Where we disagree is not over who cares more for our fellow Singaporeans, but what is the best way to meet people's needs and take care of them.' In response, Assoc Prof Lim thanked SM Lee for his comment, but added that he favours 'a more targeted mechanism, because it would not only better channel behaviour toward a specific social objective, but also signal more directly as to how the government is helping certain groups out (while also blunting the transactional nature of the system).' He then reiterated SM Lee's point regarding the difference between them, which speaks to their divergent views on the 'behaviour of people and the efficacy of markets.' Many other Facebook users have since also commented on Assoc Prof Lim's post, with some saying they agree with him, and others seeming to side with SM Lee. Some commenters, however, expressed their appreciation for the exchange between the two. 'I see this as a respectful dialogue between two fine economist-minded gentlemen who both have put in their best to serve the nation. Genuinely grateful for this!' one wrote. /TISG Read also: Jamus Lim: COE system is broken; time to implement changes () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
CNA
5 days ago
- CNA
Israel strike on Gaza Catholic church kills two: Patriarchate
GAZA CITY: The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem said an Israeli strike on Gaza's only Catholic church killed two people on Thursday (Jul 17), as Israel said it "never targets" religious sites and was investigating what happened. "With deep sorrow the Latin Patriarchate can now confirm that two persons were killed as a result of an apparent strike by the Israeli army that hit the Holy Family Compound this morning," the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem said in a statement. "We pray for the rest of their souls and for the end of this barbaric war. Nothing can justify the targeting of innocent civilians," it added. The spokesman for Gaza's civil defence agency, Mahmud Bassal, told AFP that "two citizens from the Christian community were killed as a result of injuries sustained in an Israeli strike" on the church in Gaza City. Israel said it expressed "deep sorrow over the damage to the Holy Family Church in Gaza City and over any civilian casualty", adding that the military was investigating. "Israel never targets churches or religious sites and regrets any harm to a religious site or to uninvolved civilians," the foreign ministry said on X. Out of the Gaza Strip's population of more than two million, about 1,000 are Christians. Most of them are Orthodox but according to the Latin Patriarchate, there are about 135 Catholics in the territory. The deaths at the church compound came as Gaza's civil defence agency reported at least 20 people dead in other Israeli strikes around the Palestinian territory.
