logo
SM Lee vs Jamus Lim on COE and the ‘best way to meet people's needs and take care of them'

SM Lee vs Jamus Lim on COE and the ‘best way to meet people's needs and take care of them'

Photos from Facebook
SINGAPORE: In a social media post on Wednesday (Jul 16), Workers' Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim described Senior Minister (SM) Lee Hsien Loong as 'a mighty fine economist.' He explained, however, that he does not share the former Prime Minister's perspectives on everything, giving the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) and access to car ownership in Singapore as an example of where their beliefs differ.
Car ownership in the city-state is arguably the most expensive in the world, and the COE, the document allowing someone to own and operate a private vehicle for ten years, starts at around S$100,000.
SM Lee had acknowledged in a dialogue at the Economic Society of Singapore 's annual dinner, which the WP MP, an Associate Professor of Economics, had attended, that certain households may have a greater need for a car than others, such as those with elderly or disabled family members.
Assoc Prof Lim wrote, 'But instead of saying that there was a reasonable way to adjudicate between these competing needs, he then pivoted to how competitive bidding represented the best way to allocate between these claims.'
His post received a lot of attention on Facebook, including a comment from SM Lee himself, who provided further clarification of the remarks he had made, saying that the government has ensured that Singaporeans have an efficient public transport system, and that there are possibilities for families who need a vehicle to apply for grants to help them pay for a COE.
SM Lee put it this way in his comment: 'Where we disagree is not over who cares more for our fellow Singaporeans, but what is the best way to meet people's needs and take care of them.'
In response, Assoc Prof Lim thanked SM Lee for his comment, but added that he favours 'a more targeted mechanism, because it would not only better channel behaviour toward a specific social objective, but also signal more directly as to how the government is helping certain groups out (while also blunting the transactional nature of the system).'
He then reiterated SM Lee's point regarding the difference between them, which speaks to their divergent views on the 'behaviour of people and the efficacy of markets.'
Many other Facebook users have since also commented on Assoc Prof Lim's post, with some saying they agree with him, and others seeming to side with SM Lee.
Some commenters, however, expressed their appreciation for the exchange between the two.
'I see this as a respectful dialogue between two fine economist-minded gentlemen who both have put in their best to serve the nation. Genuinely grateful for this!' one wrote. /TISG
Read also: Jamus Lim: COE system is broken; time to implement changes document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Mission complete': What's in the US-Japan trade deal?
'Mission complete': What's in the US-Japan trade deal?

CNA

time10 minutes ago

  • CNA

'Mission complete': What's in the US-Japan trade deal?

US President Donald Trump has struck a trade deal with Japan that lowers tariffs on auto imports and spares Tokyo from punishing new levies on other goods, in exchange for a US$550 billion package of US-bound investment and loans. Trump on Tuesday (Jul 22) hailed the "massive" deal with Japan as "perhaps the largest deal ever made". "#Mission Complete," Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa wrote on X following a meeting with Trump at the White House. Trade between the two countries totalled nearly US$230 billion in 2024, with Japan running a trade surplus of nearly US$70 billion. Japan is the fifth-largest US trading partner in goods, US Census Bureau data shows. Here's what we know about the deal so far. WHAT'S IN THE DEAL? Trump, in a post on Truth Social, said Japan would "open" its economy to American autos and rice. Crucially, Japanese autos, which account for more than a quarter of the country's exports to the US, will see existing tariffs cut to 15 per cent from levies totalling 27.5 per cent previously. Duties that were due to come into effect on other Japanese goods from Aug 1 will also be cut to 15 per cent from 25 per cent. "We are the first (country) in the world to reduce tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, with no limits on volume," Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters. Japan will keep its existing tariffs on imports of US agricultural products, but agreed to import more rice from the US within the existing tariff-free quota. Steel and aluminium, subject to a separate 50 per cent tariff, were not included in the deal, said Japan's Akazawa. The trade deal also does not cover spending on defence - something Trump had pressed for. The US$550 billion of investment into the US is part of a new Japan Investment America Initiative. It is aimed at boosting investment in economic security sectors including semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, steel, shipbuilding, critical minerals, energy, autos and AI technologies. The sum was the upper limit of loan investments and guarantees that Japanese government state banks and agencies would make available to promote Japanese corporate investment in the US. According to Akazawa, the agreement follows the idea of "investment over tariffs" proposed to Trump by Ishiba at their meeting in February. WHAT WERE THE STICKING POINTS? A contentious point in trade negotiations had been US rice exports to Japan. Trump had previously threatened tariffs on the country over what he called Japan's reluctance to accept rice exports. On Wednesday, a consensus was finally reached, with Japan agreeing to import more rice from the US – but within the tariff-free quota. Under a World Trade Organization (WTO) "minimum access" framework introduced in 1995, Japan imports about 770,000 metric tons of rice tariff-free every year. Last fiscal year, the US accounted for 45 per cent of the total. Ishiba said Japan would import more US grain within this framework. In agreeing to the deal with the US, Ishiba stressed Tokyo's success in protecting the agricultural sector. 'We made absolutely no sacrifice in the agricultural sector," Ishiba told reporters. Rice imports are a sensitive issue in Japan, and Ishiba's government - which lost its upper house majority in elections on Sunday - had previously ruled out any concessions. HOW HAVE MARKETS REACTED? Tokyo stocks surged to a one-year high on news that a trade deal had been reached. The Nikkei jumped nearly 4 per cent, led by stocks in automakers with Toyota up more than 14 per cent and Honda nearly 11 per cent. Even with tariffs, the US remains by far the most important market for many Japanese automakers. At Toyota and Hyundai alone, North America accounts for at least 40 per cent of the revenue, filings show. The US is also Toyota's biggest market in terms of vehicles. Besides Japan, the auto industry is also a crucial sector for South Korea. The sector in both countries provides major exports, millions of manufacturing jobs and is a deep source of national pride. Japan's trade deal also stoked optimism in South Korea on hopes Seoul would clinch a similar deal. Shares of South Korean automakers gained, with both Hyundai Motor and Kia rising more than 7 per cent. IMPACT OF THE TRADE DEAL? Analysts were cautiously optimistic about the impact of the trade deal. Kazutaka Maeda, an economist at Meiji Yasuda Research Institute, said that he expects the Japanese economy to avoid recession with the new 15 per cent tariff rate. But Hinrich Foundation's head of trade policy Deborah Elms noted that while the reduced levy is better than the earlier threatened 25 per cent duty, it is still a "significant escalation" in tariffs overall compared to US tariffs of about 2 per cent on Japan heading into April. She also cautioned that while Japan's lower tariff rate would give it a competitive advantage compared to other foreign producers of automobiles shipped to the US, the levy on autos is not the only challenge for Japan. 'Many of the vehicles that Japan manufactures for the United States market are made in the US - and so what matters to them is also auto parts tariffs, and crucially, things like metals, so steel, aluminium and all of the derivatives,' Elms told CNA's Asia First. Steel and aluminium exports to the US are still subject to 50 per cent tariffs. Still, Jared Mondschein, director of research at the United States Studies Centre noted that Japan's auto relationship with the US is "huge and should not be underestimated". 'This is a sensitive point for Japan, and this could very well be a huge opportunity for them to sort of provide some balance and stability to a pretty unwieldy economic relationship with the United States,' he told CNA's Asia Now, though noting it was still too early to tell the impact of lowered tariffs with details still forthcoming. WHAT'S NEXT? So far, the US has also announced framework agreements with the UK, Vietnam, Indonesia and paused a tit-for-tat battle with China. Countries that have yet to strike a deal with the US will be looking to Japan's trade deal as a potential example before the Aug 1 deadline. Seoul, for example, is taking a close look, according to the South Korean industry minister. The country heads into high-level talks with the US on Friday.

Cat A COE prices remain unchanged in second bidding exercise for July 2025, Lifestyle News
Cat A COE prices remain unchanged in second bidding exercise for July 2025, Lifestyle News

AsiaOne

time40 minutes ago

  • AsiaOne

Cat A COE prices remain unchanged in second bidding exercise for July 2025, Lifestyle News

Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices slightly increased across most categories in the second bidding exercise for July 2025, with Cat A premiums remaining the same from earlier this month. Cat A COEs, which are used for cars with internal combustion engines (ICEs) of up to 1,600cc in capacity and have a power output of less than 130hp, as well as electric cars with a power output of up to 110kW, saw no change to end the bidding exercise at $101,102. Cat B COEs, which are used for ICE cars that exceed 1,600cc in capacity or have more than 130hp, and electric cars with over 110kW, saw premiums going down by $499 to end at $119,101. Cat C, which are for goods vehicles and buses, saw prices went up by $1,911 to end the bidding exercise at $68,600. Cat D, which are reserved for motorcycles, went up by $122 to close at $9,511. Finally, Cat E, which is open to all vehicles except motorcycles, saw premiums go up by $1,500 to finish the exercise at $120,000. Here's a summary of the second COE bidding exercise for July 2025: Category Current COE Previous COE Difference PQP* A $101,102 $101,102 $0 $99,643 (July) $100,473 (Aug) B $119,101 $119,600 -$499 $116,909 (July) $117,542 (Aug) C $68,600 $66,689 +$1,911 $64,427 (July) $64,678 (Aug) D $9,511 $9,389 +$122 $9,036 (July) $8,986 (Aug) E $120,000 $118,500 +$1,500 Not applicable *PQP, or Prevailing Quota Premium, is the moving average of COE prices in the last 3 months, and denotes the amount payable in order to renew a car's COE at the end of its tenure. No part of this article can be reproduced without permission from AsiaOne.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store