Scientists use the JWST to study an extremely ancient galaxy piercing through the Cosmic Dark Ages
Astronomers have caught an immensely ancient galaxy piercing the veil of darkness that shrouded the early universe.
It's surprising any light from distant galaxy JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA reached Earth at all. Photons coming from the realm that recently landed on the James Webb Space Telescope's mirrors existed when the universe was just 330 million years old — and, at that point in its adolescence, the universe was foggy and dim. A dense haze of gas suffused the space between stars, and even between galaxies, absorbing starlight and muffling the whole universe in darkness.
Astronomers call this period the Cosmic Dark Ages, and JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA is the earliest light we've seen (so far) piercing that cosmic fog.
More than 13.5 billion years ago, JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA blazed brightly in ultraviolet light — but as that light crossed billions of light-years between its home galaxy and the Milky Way (which were moving farther apart the whole time, thanks to the fact that the universe is still expanding in the wake of the Big Bang, so everything is still getting farther apart from everything else), its waves stretched out.
As a result, the distant galaxy's ultraviolet light had become infrared light by the time it reached the Milky Way.
Infrared is invisible to humans, but it's indeed visible to the sensitive instruments aboard the JWST, like the Near-Infrared Camera, Near-Infrared Spectrometer, and Mid-Infrared Instrument.
University of Copenhagen astrophysicist Joris Witstok and his colleagues used data from those instruments to shed light on a mysterious period in our universe's distant past: the Epoch of Reionization. Also known as Cosmic Dawn, this was the moment when the light of the first galaxies began to clear away the dense fog that had filled the universe — and absorbed ultraviolet light — around 400,000 years after the Big Bang.
JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA is right on the cusp of that crucial moment in our universe's history. It's among the pioneers of reionization and one of the oldest galaxies we can actually see. And that means it can teach physicists about how that process happened and how the earliest galaxies evolved.
"I think one of the most intriguing questions about reionization is whether we can pinpoint the very first moment it started across the Universe," Witstok told Space.com, "which should coincide with the formation of the first generation of stars."
By around 300 million years after the Big Bang, the first stars had coalesced from the universe's primordial cloud of matter. Nuclear fusion deep inside these stars was churning out the very first starlight of the cosmos. At the same time, a dense fog of hydrogen gas with a little helium mixed in filled the universe and absorbed the starlight.
The Cosmic Dark Ages were in full swing.
The all-pervading fog formed as the universe slowly cooled down from the tremendous heat and pressure of the Big Bang. At first, all the matter that had burst into existence with the Big Bang was bouncing around in the form of positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons (well, the protons had probably started as quarks, which eventually stuck together to make protons).
Those particles eventually slowed down enough to catch hold of each other and form atoms. Together, those atoms made up a thick haze of hydrogen and helium, exhibiting no electrical charge. That dense, neutral fog absorbed ultraviolet light and acted like a cosmic blackout curtain hung between the galaxies. But ultraviolet radiation changed the cloud itself in the process, knocking electrons off atoms and giving the gas an electric charge (or ionizing it, as physicists would say).
Ionized gas, also called plasma, absorbs energy differently than neutral gas does, so galaxies' light at that time had begun to pierce the veil.
Light from JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA would have created a bubble of reionized plasma around itself. And, by the time the light passed beyond the bounds of that bubble — about 650,000 light-years, according to Witstok — its wavelengths would have stretched enough that at least some of it would have been able to pass through the intergalactic cloud.
University of Melbourne astrophysicist Michele Trenti, who was not involved in the study, tells Space.com she's curious about how those bubbles of plasma grew and overlapped over time during the Epoch of Reionization, until the whole universe was eventually reionized — and transparent.
Witstok and his colleagues noticed that the light from JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA looked bluer than they expected (meaning that more of it came from the shorter-wavelength end of the electromagnetic spectrum). The galaxy is also giving off a surprising amount of a type of light called Lyman-α radiation. This Lyman-α radiation happens when neutral hydrogen gets a blast of ultraviolet radiation, which excites its electron. As the electron settles back down, it lets off that energy as Lyman-α radiation.
The presence of so much Lyman-α in the galaxy's spectrum suggests it's bombarding the surrounding hydrogen with a lot of ultraviolet radiation.
"These two facts combined make the galaxy unique (and therefore surprising)," says Trenti, "and [they're] inconsistent with expectations from typical galaxies we see at the end of reionization [around 0.8 billion to 1 billion years after the Big Bang]."
Explaining the galaxy's surprisingly energetic glow requires something else surprising: Either JADES-GS-Z13-1-LA is bustling with unusually massive, hot blue stars, or it has an unusually huge supermassive black hole at its center that's actively gobbling up gas.
If we're seeing the light from the galaxy's billions of stars, those stars would have to be huge and hot: about 15 times hotter than the sun, and more than a hundred times more massive.
On the other hand, if we're seeing the light from a voraciously feeding supermassive black hole, it would have to be even more massive than the one at the heart of our Milky Way, which boasts the mass of about 4 million suns. For most of the models of how galaxies (and the supermassive black holes at their centers) formed and grew, that's a shocking idea: so early in our universe's history, no supermassive black hole should have had time to grow to such a gargantuan size.
"There are certain theoretical models where this would be expected though, so if this were the case it could have very important implications for such theories for early black hole formation," says Witstok.
For Trenti, this is one of the most interesting questions about the Epoch of Reionization: "What are the sources of radiation that contribute to reionization? Is the process driven by normal stars, exotic stars, or accreting black holes?"
The answer could tell us something about how early galaxies formed and evolved into ones like our Milky Way and its thoroughly modern neighbors.
But Witstok and his colleagues still don't have enough information to solve that particular mystery.
"This discovery starts shining some light on when reionization started, but it is just a preview that stirs curiosity, it is hard to do science with a sample of only one object," said Trenti.
Witstok agrees, but he's optimistic about finding more galaxies from the cusp of the Epoch of Reionization – and so far, JWST has been pushing the boundaries of how far back in time astronomers can see.
Related Stories:
— James Webb Space Telescope finds a wild black hole growth spurt in galaxies at 'cosmic noon'
— Has the James Webb Space Telescope discovered a 'missing' supermassive black hole? (video)
— Is our universe trapped inside a black hole? This James Webb Space Telescope discovery might blow your mind
"I'm sure over the next years we will find examples of even more distant galaxies with similar characteristics,' Witstok said. "The next steps include investigating this galaxy in more detail, with new observations already having been obtained and more scheduled to be taken in the near future, but also finding more examples of galaxies with very bright Lyman-α radiation very early on."
If astronomers can get more detailed measurements of the spectrum of light coming from the galaxy, they may be able to measure how much helium, oxygen and carbon are involved in producing the light. That will let them compare JWST's measurements to computer models of the physics involved and see which explanation best matches the data.
The study was published on March 26 in the journal Nature.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
TRAPPIST-1d isn't the Earth-like planet scientists had hoped it to be, according to JWST data
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There's bad news for our hopes of habitable planets existing around TRAPPIST-1, with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) finding no evidence for an Earth-like atmosphere on a third world orbiting the red dwarf. However, that still leaves four other planets in orbit around TRAPPIST-1 that could be habitable, with at least two or three of them in what is regarded as the "habitable zone" where temperatures would be suitable for liquid water to exist —- assuming an Earth-like atmosphere that can retain heat. Previously, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) had failed to find evidence for an atmosphere around the two innermost planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, world TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c. Now, we can add the next planet out, TRAPPIST-1d, to the list. "Ultimately, we want to know if something like the environment we enjoy on Earth can exist elsewhere, and under what conditions," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb of the University of Chicago and the Trottier Institute for Research on Exoplanets (IREx) at Université de Montréal, said in a statement. "At this point, we can rule out TRAPPIST-1d from a list of potential Earth twins or cousins." All seven planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system are seen transiting, or passing in front of, their star. Although not even the JWST can see the silhouette of the transiting planet, it can detect where the star's light has been absorbed by molecules in the planet's atmosphere during the transit. This is called transmission spectroscopy. Yet, despite using the JWST's sensitive Near-Infrared Spectrometer, or NIRSpec, astronomers led by Piaulet-Ghorayeb found no evidence for water, methane or carbon dioxide, all of which are common in Earth's atmosphere and which act as natural greenhouse gases to retain heat and keep a planet warm enough for liquid water. "There are a few potential reasons why we don't detect an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "It could have an extremely thin atmosphere that is difficult to detect, somewhat like Mars. Alternatively, it could have very thick, high-altitude clouds that are blocking our detection of specific atmospheric signatures — something more like Venus. Or, it could be barren rock, with no atmosphere at all." The problem that the TRAPPIST-1 planets collectively face is their star. Red dwarfs, small and cool, seem at first glance to be unthreatening, but in reality they are tumultuous with frequent violent outbursts of radiation. These repeated flares can strip an atmosphere from a world a piece at a time. It is quite possible that this is the fate that has befallen TRAPPIST-1b, c and d. In particular, planet d seems like a real blow to our hopes of finding a world with an Earth-like atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1 because it resides on the inner edge of the system's habitable zone. That said, so does Venus in our solar system, and a Venus-like planet is still on the table. And there are four other planets still to go. "All hope is not lost for atmospheres around the TRAPPIST-1 planets," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "While we didn't find a big, bold atmospheric signature for planet d, there is still potential for the outer planets to be holding onto a lot of water and other atmospheric components." Planets e and f are definitely in the star's nominal habitable zone, g is at the outer edge like Mars is in our solar system, while planet h is beyond the habitable zone and will be almost certainly too cold to support an Earth-like atmosphere. However, probing whether any of these outer planets has an atmosphere is more difficult. Their greater distance from their star means any spectral signature is weaker, perhaps too weak even for the JWST to detect. RELATED STORIES — TRAPPIST-1: A guide to the system with 7 Earth-size exoplanets — Why the 7 worlds of TRAPPIST-1 waltz in peculiar patterns — TRAPPIST-1 Worlds Are Rocky and Rich in Water, New Research Uncovers But even if all the worlds around TRAPPIST-1, which is 40 light-years away, prove to be a bust, there are many more fish in the sea. Red dwarf stars are by far the most common type of star, making up about three-quarters of all stars in the Milky Way galaxy, and there are numerous other interesting planets around other red dwarfs, such as Teegarden's Star b, LHS 1140b and even Proxima Centauri b, even though the latter does not transit. And the search continues for rocky planets in the habitable zone of more sun-like stars — a search that the European Space Agency's PLATO mission, currently set to launch in December 2026, will accelerate. The latest news regarding the search for an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d was published on Aug. 13 in The Astrophysical Journal. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Webb telescope's look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak
As scientists delve deeper into a star system with seven rocky worlds, the prospect of one being a habitable planet seems to be quickly fading. Researchers who used the James Webb Space Telescope, a joint partnership of NASA and its European and Canadian counterparts, determined the third planet from the TRAPPIST-1 star is unlikely to have air. For anyone keeping count, that's strike three for the system, which lies about 40 light-years away from Earth in space. The new findings on exoplanet TRAPPIST-1d, published in The Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, mirror similar results for TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c, which orbit closer to their red dwarf host, a tiny-yet-violent type of star found throughout the galaxy. "On a personal level, of course, there's a part of me that would have loved to see signs of air on TRAPPIST-1d," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a University of Chicago fellow and lead author of the paper, told Mashable. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real. So here we've learned that TRAPPIST-1d is not an Earth twin." Astronomers discovered the TRAPPIST-1 system about eight years ago with the now-retired Spitzer Space Telescope. Soon they made the swarming exoplanets a priority for investigating their potential for life, with all seven roughly the size of Earth. Scientists were particularly interested in finding out whether the TRAPPIST planets have atmospheres, because red dwarfs are the most ubiquitous kind of star in the Milky Way. If these planets can retain atmospheres, even while subjected to close-range blasts of stellar radiation, perhaps an abundance of other worlds out there could, too. When TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c didn't appear to have atmospheres, the research community wasn't deterred, as neither sibling planet was predicted to have one, given how close they are to the star. But TRAPPIST-1d, which circles the star every four days, is a different story. This exoplanet is on the cusp of the star's theorized habitable zone — the region of space where worlds might be able to have lakes and oceans on their surfaces. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real." Webb observed TRAPPIST-1d with a method called transmission spectroscopy. When a planet crosses in front of its host star, starlight should shine through its atmosphere, if there is one. Molecules within an atmosphere absorb certain light wavelengths, or colors, so astronomers can look for missing segments of the rainbow to figure out chemicals in its composition. The researchers looked for things like water vapor, methane, carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. But first, the team had to account for so-called "stellar contamination." Just like the sun, red dwarfs can get sunspots, so their starlight isn't completely uniform. Variability in the light signals can obscure or even imitate signals coming from a planet. After correcting for this problem in the data, the researchers found no clear signs of gases. That means scientists can rule out certain types of atmospheres, like the thick hydrogen-rich atmosphere of Neptune, or a cloud-free atmosphere akin to that of early Earth. But a few other potential scenarios could explain the results without the planet having to be a barren rock. It could have an extremely thin atmosphere, sort of like Mars, that would be difficult to detect with this method, Piaulet-Ghorayeb said, or it could have thick, high-altitude clouds blocking atmospheric signatures, perhaps like Venus. "We also learned something about what the best way to even look for water in the atmosphere of these temperate planets might be," she said. "Maybe transmission spectroscopy isn't it." Whether red dwarf stars, sometimes called M-type, can harbor planets with atmospheres is a key question for Webb to answer. The observatory has begun a massive study of rocky worlds, first reported by Mashable, specifically to figure out if planets orbiting closely around them could have air. Rather than transmission spectroscopy, the survey will rely on a different method, called the secondary eclipse technique, which avoids some of the stellar contamination issues. The team says not to give up on the TRAPPIST system just yet. After all, planets E, F, G, and H could have a better chance of holding onto their atmospheres because they're farther from the star's flares, which can strip away a planet's atmosphere. In particular, TRAPPIST researchers are looking forward to studying E, the fourth planet from the star. The challenge for Webb will be overcoming the planets' more extreme distance and colder environments, which make atmospheric readings more difficult. What makes Piaulet-Ghorayeb hopeful about the continued quest for rocky worlds with water and air is the milestone achieved. "For the first time, if there had been an Earth-like atmosphere on a temperate terrestrial planet, we could have found it," she said. "And I don't think that in any study before, with any instrument that we had before, we could really get to that level of precision." Solve the daily Crossword


New York Times
9 hours ago
- New York Times
The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far
In the search for signs of life on what seemed like a promising little exoplanet, astronomers' hopes have dimmed. Living things, as we understand them, seem to flourish best in an atmosphere like the one on Earth. But scientists who have been using the James Webb Space Telescope to examine the planet known as Trappist-1 d have found no sign of an earthlike atmosphere, according to a study published on Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal. Exoplanets revolve around stars other than our sun. And the exoplanet in question is the third of seven that orbit Trappist-1, a star some 40 light-years from our place in the Milky Way. It is a red dwarf, so named because this type of star emits reddish light and tends to be small. In the search for life elsewhere in the galaxy, the discovery of the Trappist-1 planetary system was a big deal. Researchers announced in 2017 that the seven planets around Trappist-1 seemed to have excellent potential as hosts for living things. But in the years since, astronomers have not detected habitable atmospheres on the two innermost planets. They are still examining the outer ones. The star Trappist-1, which was named for a telescope in the Atacama Desert of Chile, is just a little bigger than Jupiter. Red dwarves are the most common stars in our galaxy, but this particular star and its planets are a bit easier to study than other known planetary systems. The system is fairly close to Earth, and the seven planets follow a tight, fast orbit. That makes them good candidates for a method of observation called transmission spectroscopy. When light from a star shines through a planet's atmosphere on its way to the Webb telescope, scientists can find clues about the chemical makeup of that atmosphere by determining which wavelengths of light it absorbed. The third world from the Trappist-1 star, a rocky planet, had appeared promising, according to Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago and the study's lead author. But the starlight that passed the exoplanet before reaching the Webb telescope did not appear to have been filtered through the kinds of atmospheric molecules that are essential to life on Earth, like water or carbon dioxide. The research of Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb and her team did not completely rule out the possibility of an atmosphere there, she said. But it did suggest that cool red dwarves — or, at least, this cool red dwarf — might be too volatile to support life. 'Maybe that tells us that it's going to be harder than we thought to find atmospheres on these rocky planets,' she added. Astronomers may need to turn their attention to planets that circle brighter stars, like our sun. Those planets are more difficult to observe and will probably require another telescope, said Jacob Bean, an astronomer at the University of Chicago who advises Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb but was not involved in the study. 'We still have this burning question: Can life develop elsewhere?' he said. Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb agreed that other planets might be better candidates for life than Trappist-1 d, but she was not ready to give up on the exoplanet just yet. 'There are different ways of figuring out whether these planets have atmospheres,' she said. 'Transmission spectroscopy is just one of them.' Based on the results of her study, she said, 'our job is going to be a little bit harder.' 'But it definitely doesn't kill our prospects,' she added. Dr. Bean called the Trappist-1 system 'a fantastic laboratory for studying terrestrial planets around other stars,' and said that the research so far had yielded plenty of interesting data despite the largely negative result of the latest study. 'If we go look, sometimes we come up disappointed,' Dr. Bean said. 'But if we hadn't looked, we wouldn't know. And it's always better to know.'