logo
N.L.'s public libraries are ditching X, while other groups weigh pros and cons of Musk-owned platform

N.L.'s public libraries are ditching X, while other groups weigh pros and cons of Musk-owned platform

CBC28-02-2025

As organizations consider leaving a controversial social media platform owned by Elon Musk, Newfoundland and Labrador Public Libraries (NLPL) is making the move as of March 1.
On Wednesday, the organization announced it was leaving X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, but would remain on Meta-owned Instagram and Facebook.
"As an organization, we no longer felt that it was a good fit for us," director of library operations Fred Whitmarsh told CBC Radio's The St. John's Morning Show.
There are a number of reasons behind the decision to leave X, he said, pointing to how the discourse on the platform has shifted and the drop off of user engagement the library has seen on its account.
For several years, he said the number of followers on NLPL's account hovered around 4,000, but in recent weeks it has dropped.
When the library posted its decision to leave X on that platform, he said they got 20 comments and shares as opposed to the same announcement on Facebook, which got more 100 comments and shares.
"As a community organization, we need to be where the community is," said Whitmarsh.
He said that level of engagement, compared to other platforms like Instagram, has helped the library determine where they could put their focus on.
"We're a lean organization. We don't have staff who are exclusively dedicated to social media and communications. These are other library staff who are doing this work in addition to their other assigned duties," Whitmarsh said.
City considering leaving X
The platform launched in 2012 and was bought by Elon Musk in 2022, who renamed it X soon after. Musk is now a member of U.S. President Donald Trump's inner circle and is accused of giving two Nazi salutes at the presidential inauguration in January.
In recent months other government bodies and organizations have either left X or are considering it.
St. John's Deputy Mayor Sheilagh O'Leary brought forward a motion to council on Tuesday, asking them to look into closing the city's X account.
"It has become a vessel certainly of vitriol," she told CBC News in a recent interview.
CBC News recently asked the provincial government if it was considering shuttering its multiple X accounts. Executive council spokesperson David Sorensen said it was a vital way to get information to the public.
When asked if he was planning to move away from X, Premier Andrew Furey gave a broad warning.
"I urge everybody, when making their decisions on what media platforms to use, what cars to buy, to look at what the people behind them actually represent — the values that they are very open about, the values that they espouse," Furey said.
"Do those values reflect who we are?"
Fighting disinformation
X has become a source of online misinformation, says Whitmarsh, and NLPL thinks about that problem.
"We want to meet that disinformation, or misinformation, with reliable, accurate and vetted resources," he said.
The library provides accurate information through its programs and collections, he said, like subscriptions to services like the worldwide newspaper database PressReader as well as OverDrive Magazine.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could Buying Tesla Stock Today Set You Up for Life?
Could Buying Tesla Stock Today Set You Up for Life?

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Could Buying Tesla Stock Today Set You Up for Life?

For many investors, buying Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has already set them up for life, but will that be true for anyone newly buying into the stock now? Here's a look at what you need to know before buying the stock. Understanding the investment thesis for Tesla stock Tesla is an unusual stock, known to most investors primarily as the leading electric vehicle (EV) company, but that isn't the primary value driver of the stock. Indeed, if you look at Tesla solely as a car company, you would likely avoid the stock. Let's put it this way: Tesla currently trades at a price-to-earnings multiple of 192, compared to single-digit multiples at car companies like Ford Motor Company and General Motors. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » The valuation discrepancy doesn't stem from Tesla's superior profit margins or its leading position in the electric vehicle market. Instead, it comes down to Tesla being able to do something that rival car companies haven't yet done or have abandoned trying to do: launch a robotaxi service. General Motors has already abandoned robotaxi development, and Ford (which had planned to have a robotaxi service in place by 2021) ended its investment (alongside Volkswagen) in robotaxi company Argo AI in 2022. Volkswagen plans to launch its robotaxi service in 2026. So, if Tesla's valuation isn't justified in terms of being a highly successful electric vehicle company, then how should it be viewed? The following key points apply, and they make Tesla a highly attractive stock for the speculative end of your portfolio: The value in Tesla lies in its robotaxi business; this is not purely a car company stock, or even an electric vehicle stock, and its valuation reflects that. The reliance on robotaxi/full self-driving (FSD) makes it a speculative growth stock. Tesla's installed base of vehicles gives it significant advantages over Waymo and others. Tesla is not your average speculative growth stock; it holds significant advantages over typical growth stocks. Why robotaxis matter and why Tesla isn't your average growth stock The robotaxi concept and the FSD that powers it are potentially a huge earnings driver for Tesla. One of Tesla's most vocal and visible supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, which expected a valuation of $2,600 per share for Tesla in 2029, relies on a model that prescribes 88% of the company's value from robotaxis, compared to just 9% from EVs. The opportunity to earn recurring revenue from selling unsupervised FSD subscriptions to Tesla owners wanting to use their vehicles as robotaxis is massive, as is the potential to generate recurring revenue on a ride-per-mile basis from robotaxis. Moreover, Tesla plans to mass-produce its dedicated robotaxi vehicle, Cybercab, next year. A speculative growth stock That said, the robotaxi launch hasn't even taken place yet (it's scheduled for June 12 in Austin), and it will only be on a small scale initially. As such, Tesla is a speculative growth stock, an observation that suggests Tesla stock should be filed on a long list of highly speculative investments to consider on a rainy day. Why Tesla deserves a place in a balanced portfolio However, there are differences -- in fact, many differences -- between Tesla and typical growth stocks. First, speculative growth stocks are usually not established leaders in the core business that underpins their growth. The Model Y is not only the best-selling electric vehicle (EV) in the world, but it's also the best-selling car in the world. In other words, Tesla already has a compelling brand and is the market leader in the growth area of the auto market. Second, this is not a struggling small-cap stock desperately trying to establish brand recognition and promote its new technology to a sceptical marketplace. Waymo has offered a robotaxi service since 2018, and there is little doubt that consumers want to use robotaxis. Third, Tesla isn't a growth stock struggling with its finances and seeking a larger partner to invest, which would dilute existing shareholders' claims on future cash flows. A quick look at its most recent balance sheet reveals $37 billion in cash and equivalents, alongside $7.5 billion in debt and finance leases, resulting in a net cash position of $29.5 billion. Finally, Tesla's position as a cost-effective automaker with the capacity and scale to ramp up production and the vehicles on the road means it can produce robotaxis (whether Cybercab or existing Tesla models) to support growth, and it has a vast bank of data from Tesla vehicles to use to improve its FSD capability. All told, Tesla is speculative because its robotaxis haven't even been launched yet, there's a lot more certainty around the company than in most growth stocks. That makes it worth buying for the risk-seeking end of a portfolio. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $367,516!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,712!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $669,517!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025

Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches
Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches

Winnipeg Free Press

time5 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Attorneys get more time to argue over contested copper mine on land sacred to Apaches

A U.S. district judge in Arizona has opened the door for the next round of legal wrangling as environmentalists and some Native Americas seek to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project. Judge Dominic Lanza in a ruling issued Monday denied motions that sought to halt the transfer pending the outcome of the case. However, he did preclude the U.S. Forest Service from proceeding with the land exchange until 60 days after the agency issues a required environmental review. Lanza said that would give the parties more time to analyze the environmental report and file amended complaints. He said granting a preliminary injunction now would be premature since the review will differ in some ways from the one that spurred the legal challenge four years ago. 'It is unfortunate that the result of this order will be to force the parties to engage in another stressful, abbreviated round of briefing and litigation activity' when the new review is issued, he said, acknowledging the unusual circumstances. Attorneys for the federal government and the mining company agreed during a recent hearing to the 60-day delay. That time frame also is specified in the legislation that Congress passed and then-President Barack Obama signed in 2014 authorizing the exchange. The group Apache Stronghold, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and others welcomed more time to fight for Oak Flat, an area they consider as holy. 'In this critical moment, we call on the Trump administration and Congress to halt the transfer to a Chinese-owned mine, and honor what is sacred,' said Wendsler Nosie Sr., leader of Apache Stronghold. 'As we continue to fight in court, know this: Nothing will turn us away from defending the spiritual essence of our people, the lifeblood that connects us to the creator and this land.' A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling is consistent with prior decisions and gives the parties time to review the final environmental impact statement that will be issued later this month. 'We are confident the project satisfies all applicable legal requirements,' said Resolution president and general manager Vicky Peacey. She added that years of consultation with tribes and communities resulted in changes to the mining plan to reduce potential effects. The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014. San Carlos Apache Chairman Terry Rambler said Monday that the bill was not in the best interest of the American people, Arizona or his tribe. He said concerns persist about the mine's use of groundwater and the pending obliteration of the culturally significant site. Apache Stronghold and the tribe sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand. The project has support in nearby Superior and other traditional mining towns in the area. The company — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs.

L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump
L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump

CTV News

time7 hours ago

  • CTV News

L.A. protests inch Elon Musk back to U.S. President Trump

Tesla CEO Elon Musk listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. (via CNN Newsource) Last week, Elon Musk was calling for U.S. President Donald Trump's impeachment. This week, Musk is back to praising the administration, softening his tone after the two powerful leaders' very public breakup. The whiplash came as protests erupted in Los Angeles over actions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and immigration raids. Over the weekend, Musk deleted some of his most incendiary X posts about the president, including the call for his impeachment and the allegation, without providing evidence, that Trump's name appeared in documents related to the crimes of convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk appeared to wholeheartedly support the Trump administration's stance on the situation in Los Angeles, adding American Flags to a post from Vice President JD Vance about how the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence.' Musk has long supported closed borders, stopping illegal immigration and deportations, in alignment with the Trump administration. The tech billionaire posted a screenshot of a Truth Social post from Trump that said California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'should apologize to the people of Los Angeles,' as clashes have broken out, cars have been set on fire and demonstrations intensify. He also wrote 'cool' to a video of Vance speaking in an interview, saying he thinks 'if Elon chills out a little bit everything will be fine.' And the Tesla CEO re-followed White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, considered one of the lead Trump administration officials on immigration policy, whom he had unfollowed on Thursday in the midst of his blow up with Trump. The move was especially notable considering Miller's wife, Katie Miller, had recently left the White House to work with Musk full time and the couple had regularly socialized with Musk outside of work. That lead to gossip among White House aides and rounds of speculation about how the fallout could impact the political fortunes of one of the most powerful couples in Trump's Washington. Katie Miller did not respond to a request for comment. Musk at one point fact checked his own AI chatbot Grok, which appeared to confirm as authentic a viral image that seemingly showed Musk writing a post that appeared to say 'Just like I took your wife' in response to Miller. 'No, it's fake ffs 🤦‍♂️ I never posted this,' Musk wrote in response to Grok. That doesn't mean it was all back to positive vibes from Musk this weekend. He continued to speak out – albeit in a more subtle manner – against Trump's domestic policy bill that passed the House and is now being considered in the Senate. On Sunday Musk replied 'Correct' to a user who wrote 'Musk's fight with Trump is neither a stunt nor distraction.' The same day he also reposted an article from the satirical site The Babylon Bee, titled 'Republicans Announce Plan To Keep Doing Opposite Of What Everyone Voted For Them To Do.' Musk had blasted the president's sweeping 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' last week, arguing it would undermine much of what his Department of Government Efficiency team had done to cut federal spending and the deficit. The Trump administration had denied that the bill would add to the deficit, despite numerous nonpartisan organizations saying it would add trillions of dollars to America's debt. But Wall Street analysts are so far breathing slightly easier – as they hope whatever delicate détente holds out. 'While we do not expect Trump and Musk to be back to their Mar-a-Lago connected at the hip days, it would not be a surprise to see Trump and Musk slowly mend the fences (with the help of intermediaries behind closed doors) over the coming months,' wrote WedBush analyst Dan Ives. '[A]t the end of the day Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons including a green light on a federal framework for autonomous [vehicles].' Tesla's stock has recovered somewhat but still remains well below where it started Thursday before the public breakup. Article by Hadas Gold.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store