logo
Being a bully on trade won't work longer term, Lagarde warns

Being a bully on trade won't work longer term, Lagarde warns

Time of Indiaa day ago

Live Events
There's no longer-term advantage to being a bully on global commerce, according to European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde 'Coercive trade policies are not a sustainable solution to today's trade tensions,' she said Wednesday in a speech at the People's Bank of China in Beijing.Lagarde, who served as French trade minister early in her career, spoke just hours after the US and China agreed to a preliminary plan to ease tensions in cross-border commerce, which are near an all-time high — primarily due to President Donald Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs.'To the extent that protectionism addresses imbalances, it is not by resolving their root causes, but by eroding the foundations of global prosperity,' she said. 'And with countries now deeply integrated through global supply chains — yet no longer as geopolitically aligned as in the past — this risk is greater than ever. Coercive trade policies are far more likely to provoke retaliation and lead to outcomes that are mutually damaging.'While Lagarde's speech didn't name Trump specifically, the ECB president — who headed the International Monetary Fund during most of his first term — warned that his return to the White House may lead to tariffs for Europe and has recently said trade will be changed forever by the levies.'If we are serious about preserving our prosperity, we must pursue cooperative solutions — even in the face of geopolitical differences,' she said. 'And that means both surplus and deficit countries must take responsibility and play their part.'The US-China trade negotiations in London over the past days showcased the growing role of export controls in modern trade warfare, where access to rare minerals or tiny microchips can give one economy a big edge over a rival. China controls much of the world's supplies of raw materials used to make magnets and other inputs for advanced manufacturing like electric vehicles, lasers and mobile phones.'Given national security considerations and the experience during the pandemic, a certain degree of de-risking is here to stay,' Lagarde said. 'Few countries are willing to remain dependent on others for strategic industries.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anthropic says looking to power European tech with hiring push
Anthropic says looking to power European tech with hiring push

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Anthropic says looking to power European tech with hiring push

American AI giant Anthropic aims to boost the European tech ecosystem as it expands on the continent, product chief Mike Krieger told AFP Thursday at the Vivatech trade fair in Paris. The OpenAI competitor wants to be "the engine behind some of the largest startups of tomorrow... (and) many of them can and should come from Europe", Krieger said. Tech industry and political leaders have often lamented Europe's failure to capitalise on its research and education strength to build heavyweight local companies - with many young founders instead leaving to set up shop across the Atlantic. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo Krieger's praise for the region's "really strong talent pipeline" chimed with an air of continental tech optimism at Vivatech. French AI startup Mistral on Wednesday announced a multibillion-dollar tie-up to bring high-powered computing resources from chip behemoth Nvidia to the region. Live Events The semiconductor firm will "increase the amount of AI computing capacity in Europe by a factor of 10" within two years, Nvidia boss Jensen Huang told an audience at the southern Paris convention centre. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Among 100 planned continental hires, Anthropic is building up its technical and research strength in Europe, where it has offices in Dublin and non-EU capital London, Krieger said. Beyond the startups he hopes to boost, many long-standing European companies "have a really strong appetite for transforming themselves with AI", he added, citing luxury giant LVMH, which had a large footprint at Vivatech. 'Safe by design' Mistral - founded only in 2023 and far smaller than American industry leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic - is nevertheless "definitely in the conversation" in the industry, Krieger said. The French firm recently followed in the footsteps of the US companies by releasing a so-called "reasoning" model able to take on more complex tasks. "I talk to customers all the time that are maybe using (Anthropic's AI) Claude for some of the long-horizon agentic tasks, but then they've also fine-tuned Mistral for one of their data processing tasks, and I think they can co-exist in that way," Krieger said. So-called "agentic" AI models - including the most recent versions of Claude - work as autonomous or semi-autonomous agents that are able to do work over longer horizons with less human supervision, including by interacting with tools like web browsers and email. Capabilities displayed by the latest releases have raised fears among some researchers, such as University of Montreal professor and "AI godfather" Yoshua Bengio, that independently acting AI could soon pose a risk to humanity. Bengio last week launched a non-profit, LawZero, to develop "safe-by-design" AI - originally a key founding promise of OpenAI and Anthropic. 'Very specific genius' "A huge part of why I joined Anthropic was because of how seriously they were taking that question" of AI safety, said Krieger, a Brazilian software engineer who co-founded Instagram, which he left in 2018. Anthropic is still working on measures designed to restrict their AI models' potential to do harm, he added. But it has yet to release details of its "level 4" AI safety protections foreseen for still more powerful models, after activating ASL (AI Safety Level) 3 to corral the capabilities of May's Claude Opus 4 release. Developing ASL 4 is "an active part of the work of the company", Krieger said, without giving a potential release date. With Claude 4 Opus, "we've deployed the mitigations kind of proactively... safe doesn't have to mean slow, but it does mean having to be thoughtful and proactive ahead of time" to make sure safety protections don't impair performance, he added. Looking to upcoming releases from Anthropic, Krieger said the company's models were on track to match chief executive Dario Amodei's prediction that Anthropic would offer customers access to a "country of geniuses in a data centre" by 2026 or 2027 - within limits. Anthropic's latest AI models are "genius-level at some very specific things", he said. "In the coming year... it will continue to spike in particular aspects of things, and still need a lot of human-in-the-loop coordination," he forecast.

Explained: Why The Israel-Iran Conflict Just Escalated And What Role The US Is Playing
Explained: Why The Israel-Iran Conflict Just Escalated And What Role The US Is Playing

News18

time43 minutes ago

  • News18

Explained: Why The Israel-Iran Conflict Just Escalated And What Role The US Is Playing

Last Updated: With missiles flying, nuclear talks hanging by a thread, and top commanders possibly dead, this is the moment the Israel-Iran conflict stopped being shadow war, and turned real Israel's June 13 airstrikes on Iranian soil have sharply escalated the long-running confrontation between the two arch-rivals. Codenamed Operation Rising Lion, the operation involved dozens of Israeli fighter jets targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure, missile factories, and top military personnel. Explosions were reported in Tehran and at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility. 'We are at a decisive moment in Israel's history," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a recorded video message. Prime Minister Netanyahu:'Moments ago, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." — Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) June 13, 2025 Meanwhile, Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, announced a 'special situation' as some military officials there confirmed attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. According to Israel's Channel 12, Iran's Armed Forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri and several senior nuclear scientists may have been killed, though Iran has not officially confirmed the casualties. Why Now? What Triggered The Strike The strike followed months of rising tensions. Israeli officials cited intelligence that Iran had amassed enough enriched uranium to produce multiple nuclear weapons. A senior Israeli military official told Reuters that Iran could make up to 15 bombs within days. Israeli leadership framed the operation as a necessary step to counter an existential threat amid stalled diplomacy. Iran, for its part, has denied pursuing nuclear weapons and accused Israel of aggression and sabotage. It has built deep regional networks through proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas—groups Israel considers direct threats to its security. The immediate context includes not just military build-up but also failed diplomacy: US-Iran nuclear talks, scheduled for June 15 in Oman, were hanging by a thread before the airstrikes. It is now unclear whether they will go forward. What Role Has The US Played? Although a staunch Israeli ally, the United States has officially distanced itself from Operation Rising Lion. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Israel acted unilaterally, saying: 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region." 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel," he added. Just a day before the Israeli strike, US President Donald Trump had said an Israeli strike on Iran 'could very well happen" but reiterated his hopes for a peaceful resolution. The US withdrew non-essential personnel from its missions in Iraq, Jordan, and several Gulf countries. The State Department issued updated travel advisories, and military assets were repositioned across the region in anticipation of possible fallout. However, Washington's role goes beyond military posture. While publicly disavowing military involvement, the US remains deeply invested in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and in managing the broader fallout from Israeli actions. Its long-standing diplomatic support for Israel, layered sanctions on Iran, and simultaneous pursuit of backchannel diplomacy highlight Washington's complex and often contradictory position in the conflict. In short, the US is not a neutral bystander, it is a strategic actor balancing alliance, deterrence, and diplomacy. What Is the Israel-Iran Conflict Really About? The Israel-Iran conflict is a decades-long power struggle rooted in ideology, security threats, and competing visions for the Middle East. Israel sees Iran as its most dangerous enemy, primarily due to Tehran's pursuit of nuclear capabilities, its calls for Israel's destruction, and its sustained support for armed groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. Israel believes that a nuclear-armed Iran would permanently alter the strategic balance in the region and pose an existential threat to the Jewish state. Iran, on the other hand, positions itself as a leader of the anti-Israel resistance and frequently uses its state media and proxy forces to denounce Israel's legitimacy. It funds and arms militias across Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Gaza that frequently launch attacks on Israeli territory. Until recently, both countries operated through proxies, cyberattacks, and covert strikes. But the shift to open, direct attacks—including Iran's unprecedented missile strike on Israel in April and Israel's latest bombing of Iranian soil—marks a dangerous new phase: state-on-state warfare, with fewer restraints and higher stakes. How Did We Get Here? A Timeline Of Escalation October 7, 2023: Hamas, backed by Iran, launched a deadly attack in southern Israel, killing over 1,100 people. Israel began a major military campaign in Gaza. October 17, 2023: Iran's Supreme Leader warned of broader regional conflict if Israel continued its campaign. Hezbollah opened a second front in northern Israel. Dec 2023 – Mar 2024: Israel escalated strikes on IRGC operatives in Syria, killing several senior commanders. April 1, 2024: Israel bombed Iran's consulate annex in Damascus, killing Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi. Iran vowed revenge. April 13–14, 2024: Iran launched its first-ever direct attack on Israel, firing 300+ drones and missiles. Nearly all were intercepted. April 19, 2024: Israel responded by bombing a radar site near Isfahan. July 31, 2024: Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Tehran. Oct 1, 2024: Iran fired 200 ballistic missiles at Israel. Oct 26, 2024: Israel launched 'Days of Repentance,' striking 20+ Iranian-linked sites. Jan–Mar 2025: Fighting intensified across multiple proxy fronts—Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthis in Yemen, and militias in Syria/Iraq. Apr–Jun 2025: Israel accused Iran of crossing the nuclear threshold. The IAEA reported declining transparency. June 13, 2025: Israel launched Operation Rising Lion. Key nuclear and military targets hit. Iran may have lost top officials. The world watches to see what comes next. What Happens Now? top videos View all All eyes are on Iran. Retaliation is expected—whether through direct missile strikes, proxy attacks, or cyber retaliation. The risk of wider regional war is at its highest in decades. This is no longer a shadow conflict. With both nations striking at each other's core assets and threatening escalation, the Middle East stands on the edge of a multi-front war. Whether diplomacy can still avert catastrophe remains to be seen. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump Israel-Iran tensions Middle East Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 13, 2025, 08:06 IST News explainers Explained: Why The Israel-Iran Conflict Just Escalated And What Role The US Is Playing

IOC, BPCL, Other OMC Stocks Tank Up To 6% As Brent Crude Tops $75 On Israel-Iran Tensions
IOC, BPCL, Other OMC Stocks Tank Up To 6% As Brent Crude Tops $75 On Israel-Iran Tensions

News18

time43 minutes ago

  • News18

IOC, BPCL, Other OMC Stocks Tank Up To 6% As Brent Crude Tops $75 On Israel-Iran Tensions

Last Updated: Shares of OMCs tumbled on Friday as geopolitical tensions flared in the Middle East after Israel launched an airstrike on Iran Shares of oil marketing companies (OMCs) tumbled on Friday as geopolitical tensions flared in the Middle East after Israel launched an airstrike on Iran. The development sent Brent crude futures soaring by over $6 to $75.36 per barrel, marking their highest level in several months. Fears of potential supply disruptions, especially through the strategic Strait of Hormuz—a key global oil transit route—triggered sharp selloffs in OMC stocks. Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL) led the decline, plunging 6.1% to Rs 299.20. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (HPCL) fell 5.3% to Rs 371.35, while Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL) dropped 3.9% to Rs 137.40. Early Friday, the Israeli government confirmed it had carried out airstrikes on Iran, with explosions reported in the capital city of Tehran. The strikes were aimed at damaging Iran's nuclear facilities and weakening its ballistic missile capabilities, as part of Israel's broader strategic offensive. In response, Iranian state media reported a state of heightened alert, amid growing fears of further military escalation between the two nations. The attack sent shockwaves through global energy markets. Oil prices surged as investors factored in a risk premium, anticipating potential disruptions to supply routes and heightened geopolitical instability in the region. At last count, Brent futures were trading at $78.48, up 13.16 per cent. Emkay Global said oil prices continue to be volatile, with geopolitical risks (US-Iran, Russia-Ukraine) and trade developments (US-China) driving Brent currently from $60 a barrel a month ago, while OPEC+ continues to raise production. ICICI Securities said strong GRMs and retail margins in June quarter imply robust earnings prospects for the OMCs for FY26 if these trends hold. 'Refining market still has demand and supply as broadly balanced, but H1FY26 is seeing strength owing to closures of large refineries across Europe and the US (see exhibit 3-4). The sudden tightness in supplies of key transport fuels has driven unexpected strength in margins for gasoline/diesel and ATF, which in turn has driven theoretical GRMs for Indian refiners to multi-month highs in May," it said. Additionally, retail fuel margins continue to benefit from a combination of lower crude prices and limited pressure to cut fuel prices domestically, it said. 'This, coupled with sharply lower LPG loss estimated in FY26, drives our renewed optimism for the OMCs. Reiterate BUY on all three names," the brokerage said. Emkay Global said fundamental factors would prevail as it does not see any reason for upping FY26E Brent assumption of $70 per barrel. 'Despite shifting sentiments, the year so far has been solid for OMCs, with diesel-petrol marketing margin at Rs 9-13 per litre, LPG under-recoveries down to Rs 176m per cylinder (from Rs 247 in Q4FY25), and gasoline cracks moving up by over $2 per barrel QoQ," Emkay Global said. Against this, lower oil prices would create inventory losses though BPCL-HPCL should not see more than a $1.5-2.0 per barrel impact if crude price closes at $70 a barrel. 'IOCL, due to an extended cycle, is likely to record a loss of up to $4 a barrel. Nevertheless, Q1FY26E reported PAT for HPCL/BPCL/IOCL is likely to be 49 per cent/42 per cent/33 per cent of our full year estimate, with Q2 also looking good given that LPG losses would fall further to Rs 150 per cylinder," Emkay Global said. The currency has also been stable, and any LPG subsidy or further fall in international LPG prices grants further upside potential for OMCs' earnings. 'We favor HPCL, followed by BPCL, and IOCL in that order, and reiterate BUY with TP of Rs 500/Rs 400/ Rs 170, respectively," it said. First Published: June 13, 2025, 09:39 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store