
Hyundai set to debut ambitious high-performance electric sedan. Will the Ioniq 6 N make a big statement?
Hyundai set to debut ambitious high-performance electric sedan. Will the Ioniq 6 N make a big statement? The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N pushes the envelope for the South Korean automaker in performance EV space.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' aims at cutting EV tax credits
President Donald Trump's tax bill includes a measure to kill an Obama-era electric vehicle tax credit.
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N is set to debut in July after the Ioniq 5 N captured the attention of auto enthusiasts.
The Ioniq 5 N's design language and performance specs hint at what's to come.
Hyundai's new electric sedan has the potential to be its boldest move yet as far as performance electric vehicles.
Hyundai Motor North America is producing some of the most competitive electric vehicles on the market. Between the Ioniq 5, 6, and 9 models, the South Korean automaker has something for families of all sizes. Additionally, the brand has been working on developing more performance-oriented models.
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has garnered plenty of attention due to its impressive specs. It has racetrack capability, according to Hyundai. Now, the automaker is preparing to debut an even more ambitious project: a high-performance electric sedan.
Hyundai readies its first-ever high-performance electric sedan for debut
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N will "disrupt the high-performance EV segment to deliver exciting driving experiences" said Joon Park, Vice President and Head of Hyundai's N Management Group. The company aims to build on the momentum created by the shock and awe of the Ioniq 5 N's incredible performance.
Though Hyundai is keeping plenty of details regarding the new electric vehicle under wraps, there are several clues about its performance and appearance that auto enthusiasts can derive from the Ioniq 5 N.
What to expect from the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N starts at $66,200. It produces a whopping 641 horsepower and 568 pound-feet of torque. The high-performance EV accelerates from 0-60 miles per hour in just 2.8 seconds according to testing by MotorTrend.
The Ioniq 6 N will boast impressive performance specs, taking cues from its larger cousin, the Ioniq 5 N. Furthermore, the 6 N will be a lighter vehicle as a sedan, so it could be quicker than the larger Ioniq 5 N SUV.
Expect the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N to feature a bold exterior styling with N-badging and performance parts including tires and brakes. The Ioniq 6 N is also likely to have a significantly higher starting price than the base model. Hyundai's 2025 Ioniq 6 electric sedan starts at $37,850 and tops out at $51,100 for the Limited final configuration.
The 2025 Ioniq 5 Limited costs $54,300 compared to the Ioniq 5 N's $66,200-sticker price. If there is a similar price difference of $11,900 between Limited and N trims for the Ioniq 6, the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N could cost around $63,000, making it slightly more affordable than the larger Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. A starting price north of $60K is hardly considered affordable to the average driver, even compared to rising new car prices (nearly $50,000 according to CNBC). That said, the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N is anything but average.
What the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N means for the electric vehicle space
Hyundai's upcoming high-performance EV is more than just a niche performance trim to fill a gap in the company's portfolio, it's a statement. Hyundai is proving that it can produce more than just practical all-around electric vehicles like the base Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 6 models. It has nailed the basics based on several awards for its EV nameplates. Now, the South Korean automaker is aiming to earn style points, and target market share once dominated by Tesla's performance models.
Electric vehicles were once considered impractical. Today, automakers are proving these vehicles can function as daily drivers and even track-ready performance models, capable of breaking acceleration records. Hyundai is helping to change the narrative surrounding EVs from inconvenient and lackluster to capable and exciting with models like the Ioniq 6 N.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bad ‘vibes' may be having a bigger impact on the economy now
There has been a disconnect in recent years between the so-called soft economic data and the hard data as weak readings on consumer confidence didn't always translate to lower payrolls or GDP. But that may be changing as key buffers that propped up spending are disappearing, according to NerdWallet senior economist Elizabeth Renter. Americans used to say one thing about their feelings on the economy and do something else with their actual dollars. But that may be changing. The disconnect between weak readings on consumer confidence versus solid employment, income and GDP data was previously described as a 'vibecession' by economist Kyla Scanlon, who first used the term in her 2022 Substack post. The last vibecession hit as inflation was at the highest levels in more than 40 years, while an aggressive rate-hiking campaign from the Federal Reserve spiked borrowing costs, making auto loans and mortgages more expensive. But consumers continued to spend as the labor market remained robust. And aside from a brief dip in GDP, the economy avoided a recession. Confidence surveys also increasingly reflected partisan differences more than the actual economy. Fast forward to 2025. Consumer sentiment collapsed after President Donald Trump launched his trade war, and GDP shrank again, skewed by a rush to buy imported goods ahead of higher tariffs. Still, payrolls have held up, and inflation hasn't been as affected by tariffs as feared. But while sentiment recovered a bit after Trump postponed his highest tariff rates, it's still 20% below December 2024 levels. 'Despite this month's notable improvement, consumers remain guarded and concerned about the trajectory of the economy,' the most recent University of Michigan survey said. At the same time, the Trump administration is slashing spending and jobs, with ripple effects reaching contractors and even certain real estate markets. Businesses that are uncertain about the economy and the direction of tariffs have slowed hiring. Student-loan delinquencies are up, and AI is eliminating many entry-level jobs that once went to newly minted college graduates. Then there's oil prices, which have jumped since Israel launched airstrikes on Iran. The cumulative effect is taking a toll. 'I don't think the U.S. consumer has grown numb or blind to the headlines and economic risk—over the past month we've seen some sentiment scores rise slightly, but we have to think about where they were rising from,' Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet, said in a note on Friday. 'A little bit better doesn't necessarily mean good, even if it might mean hopeful.' As a result, it's getting harder to dismiss the so-called soft data on the economy and focus instead on the hard data. That's as Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has said he and his fellow policymakers won't act on rates until the hard data on unemployment and inflation gives them a clear reason to. But the soft stuff may be leaking into the hard stuff. 'Unlike a few years ago, the 'vibes' now stand to have a greater impact on behavior, and thus the health of the economy,' Renter wrote. 'That's because unlike a few years ago, people don't have the luxury of easily stumbling into a better job or relying on excess savings and debt payment forbearances.' In fact, household debt is rebounding to pre-pandemic levels and beyond, eroding the ability to absorb an unexpected expense or job loss, she added. Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank, similarly drew a direct line between consumer sentiment and actual spending. Digging into the May retail sales report, he noted that consumers didn't just pull back on durable goods like electronics and cars, which fell after an earlier jump to get ahead of tariffs, they also reined in spending on daily expenses like groceries and restaurants. Spending at building material and garden supply stores also saw big drops, suggesting less residential investment in home improvements. 'With declines visible in unrelated categories, it looks like weak consumer confidence was to blame for the pullback in consumer spending last month,' Adams wrote. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Europe Is Finally Ready to Spend More on Defense. The Hard Part Is How.
Around the globe, growth has been slowing, trade and investment have been falling, and now, escalating Middle East tensions are shaking up markets. But governments across Europe and in Britain face an additional economic stress — significantly raising military spending. These peacetime economies have to figure out how to deter Russia, a belligerent foe that is already on a wartime footing and spending an estimated 7.5 percent of its national income on its military. The debate has intensified in the run-up to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's annual summit meeting this week at The Hague, where the security alliance will set new spending goals. President Trump has demanded that the other 31 NATO members devote 5 percent of their total economic output to defense, up from the current 2 percent target. He has also made clear that the United States will reduce its financial and troop commitments, though it is unclear by how much. This is a 'global reset,' Lt. Gen. Sean Clancy, the new chief of the European Union's military committee, said at a security conference in Brussels this month. But 'we haven't even defined what the transition looks like.' Money, though, is far from the only issue Europe confronts now that it has reluctantly accepted the reality that it must be able to protect itself without help from the United States. Formidable political, strategic and regulatory hurdles remain. E.U. leaders must maintain public support for common military spending and joint weapons procurement, even as right-wing nationalist sentiments oppose giving the bloc more power. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The latest inflation data is in. Here's how Utahns are feeling about family costs since Trump took office
After hitting a four-year low in April, prices on U.S. goods and services inched up last month, with annual inflation coming in at 2.4%, according to a Wednesday report from the Labor Department. On a monthly basis, inflation ticked up 0.1% from April to May, suggesting a raft of new import tariffs have yet to impact consumer prices. A new Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics survey finds Utahns are decidedly mixed when it comes to their feelings about President Donald Trump's game plan for controlling rising costs. Core inflation, a measure that excludes volatile food and energy prices, also moved up 0.1% on a monthly basis in May, with overall prices moving up 2.8% over the last 12 months. The group of Mountain West states, which include Utah, saw an annual inflation rate of 1.7% in May, among the lowest regional rates in the country but up 0.5% from April. The latest Consumer Price Index readings show declines in energy costs and vehicle prices helped offset continued increases in the cost of groceries, eating at restaurants and housing-related costs. The cost of groceries and buying food away from home both increased by 0.3% from April to May with annual rates last month at 2.9% and 2.2%, respectively. Shelter-related costs in May, computed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics utilizing data from new rents, existing lease agreements and a rent-equivalent calculation for owner properties, were 3.9% higher over the last year and up 0.3% from April. The Labor Department says housing cost increases were the 'primary factor' behind rising inflation in May. Overall energy costs declined by 3.5% since this time last year and gasoline prices moved down by 2.6% from April to May and were 12% lower on an annual basis. Inflation figures for May came in lower than were widely expected, but some economists predict tariff-related increases are still in play and simply haven't trickled down the checkout aisles yet. 'Today's below-forecast inflation print is reassuring — but only to an extent,' Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, told CNBC. 'Tariff-driven price increases may not feed through to the CPI data for a few more months yet, so it is far too premature to assume that the price shock will not materialize.' U.S. inflation has marched down, albeit erratically, since hitting a 40-year high of 9.1% in June 2022, but rates have remained stubbornly above the Fed's target annual rate of 2% since then. And while Trump made addressing inflation issues a forward message in his successful campaign for a second term in office, Utahns have mixed opinions about the job he's done so far. The reviews however, perhaps not surprisingly, break sharply along partisan lines. In a statewide online survey conducted May 16-21 of 805 registered Utah voters, HarrisX asked respondents 'Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing handling inflation?'. Overall results were essentially split with 50% of poll participants saying they somewhat or strongly approve and 43% falling into the somewhat or strongly disapprove camp. But that apparent equanimity dissolves when the responses are parsed by political affiliation. Some 70% of Republican respondents versus 19% of Democrats weighed-in as somewhat or strongly approving of Trump's work on inflation. On the flip side, only 22% of Republicans said they somewhat or strongly disapproved of Trump's inflation tactics, against 81% of Democrats who participated in the poll. The responses when asked 'Has inflation during the Trump Administration gotten better, worse or stayed the same?' were, again, nearly evenly disbursed among the poll participants, outside the lens of politics. Overall, 31% of respondents said inflation has gotten better since Trump took office, 36% said worse and 33% said inflation was about the same. When flying their party colors, 41% of Republicans versus 14% of Democrats said inflation was better so far in Trump's second term, while 19% of Republicans next to 70% of Democrats believe inflation has become worse. For those who told surveyors that inflation from their perspective has stayed the same since Jan. 20, 40% were Republicans and 17% were Democrats. Data from the Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics polling comes with a plus or minus 3.5% margin of error. So, what does the data say about how inflation has changed so far under President Trump? Last December, ahead of Trump's inauguration, annual CPI inflation was 2.9%, according to Labor Dept. data. In January of this year, that rate bumped up to 3%. February, March and April all saw incremental declines with annual readings of 2.8%, 2.4% and 2.3%, respectively.