A Man Asked 4 Little Girls to Help Him Find Their Mom. Then They Watched Him Shoot Her in the Back of the Head: Police
A Missouri man is accused of murdering a mother and her unborn child in front of five children, including her four daughters.
On the afternoon of April 23, Vanier T. Jones allegedly approached the four young daughters of 35-year-old Christina Lynn Rentchler and asked them if they knew where he could find their mother, according to a probable cause affidavit filed in the case and obtained by PEOPLE.
The affidavit says that the four girls — and one other child who was at the home — then allegedly watched Jones pull out a gun and shoot their mother in the back of the head.
St. Louis Metropolitan Police arrived to find Rentchler "not conscious and not breathing," the agency said in a release.
Soon after, emergency responders pronounced both Rentchler and her unborn child dead on the scene, said the release.
Det. Scott Peniston of the SLMPD writes in the affidavit that Rentchler "was shot multiple times, and in the back of the head."
He also notes that the medical examiner later determined that Rentchler had been in the second trimester of her pregnancy at the time of her death.
Missouri Department Of Corrections Vanier Jones
Vanier Jones
Related: He Confronted the Boy Who Allegedly Assaulted His Daughter. The Boy Then Beat Him to Death With a Bat, Prosecutors Say
Jones also allegedly shot another woman, whom SLMPD said was "conscious and breathing" when they arrived on the scene.
The victim is not named in the affidavit or the release, but both note that she told police Jones had been staying with her prior to the shooting.
"She stated [Jones] had gotten angry and shot her. She stated that she then played dead, and heard [Jones] ask [Rentchler's] children where their mother was prior to [Jones] killing [Rentchler]," the affidavit reads.
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for PEOPLE's free True Crime newsletter for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
Jones has "multiple prior felony convictions" and was convicted of second-degree assault in 2023, but had "absconded from his federal supervised release at the time of the homicide," per the affidavit.
He is now being held without bail and facing 17 charges in total, including: two counts of first-degree murder, five counts of endangering the welfare of a child, eight counts of armed criminal action and a single count of both attempted murder and unlawful possession of a firearm.
Jones does not have a lawyer at this time and will make his next court appearance on May 12.
Meanwhile, a GoFundMe has been created to help Rentchler's two young daughters.
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jonathan Joss's Husband Has Said The Man Who Shot Jonathan Was 'Laughing' And Shouting 'Homophobic Slurs' As He Died
This article includes graphic descriptions of gun violence that some readers may find distressing. On Monday, the sad news broke that actor Jonathan Joss had died at age 59 years old after he was shot and killed in what his husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, alleged was an anti-gay hate crime on Sunday, June 1. People previously reported that the couple's neighbor Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, 56, confessed to shooting Jonathan as he was detained and has been charged with first-degree murder. He was released from police custody under full house arrest on a $200,000 bond on June 2. Later that same day, Tristan posted a statement to Jonathan's official Facebook page where he alleged that Jonathan had been killed because of his sexuality. He added that he and Jonathan had been 'harassed regularly' by their neighbors in San Antonio, Texas, for being a gay couple, and that their home had recently burned down after repeated threats. Related: People Are Talking About The Most Shocking Celebrity Deaths That Don't Get Enough Attention Tristan, 32, said that the shooting occurred when he and Jonathan returned to the remains of their home to check for mail and became distressed when they found their dog's skull at the site, which had been 'placed in clear view.' 'My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done,' the statement began. 'Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic,' Tristan went on. 'When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw.' 'While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired,' he alleged. 'Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life.' Related: 21 Times Celebrities Revealed Wildly Juicy, Shady, Or Even Disturbing Things In Interviews And Tristan has bravely shared some more details from his husband's death in a devastating new interview with People, where he alleged that the gunman was 'laughing' at them as Jonathan died. He also opened up about immediately knowing that 'there was no hope of saving' Jonathan due to the severe damage caused by the 'really, really close range' shot to his head. 'He was struggling so hard, trying to stay alive,' Tristan recalled. 'I held my husband's face together as best I could, and I told him how much I loved him, and that none of this was his fault. I told him he needed to cross over easy. He didn't need to keep fighting.' 'I told him that no matter what, and in some way, shape, or form, we'll always be together, and he'll always be my husband,' Tristan continued. He also claimed that the alleged gunman 'still had the gun pointed over' him while his husband lay dying, adding: 'He was laughing. He mocked me for telling my husband that I loved him and used the same homophobic slurs.' Tristan told the publication that he finds it hurtful 'whenever people try to say that it wasn't a hate crime,' which is no doubt a reference to the San Antonio Police Department saying that they had 'found no evidence to indicate that Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation' just one day after his murder. On Thursday, SAPD police chief William McManus admitted that he regretted making this statement, and said that it was 'way too soon' for a hate crime to be ruled out. 'That was way, way, way, premature,' he said. 'We shouldn't have done it. It was way too soon before we had any real information. And I will own that… I want to apologize to the LGBTQ+ community for the tragic loss of Mr. Joss, which has been heavily felt." 'Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in this case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss,' McManus added during a press conference. McManus also addressed Tristan's claims that their home was burnt down in an anti-gay hate crime, saying that they were 'working closely' with the fire department's arson investigators, and that 'the investigation is still active.' He went on to confirm that law enforcement had received 'approximately 70 calls over the past two years' from both Jonathan and his neighbors over 'neighborhood-type disturbances.' If you or someone you know has experienced anti-LGBTQ violence or harassment, you can contact the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs hotline at 1-212-714-1141. Also in Celebrity: 14 Celebrities Who Have So Many Kids, They're Basically Running Their Own Daycare, And 11 Who Said "Hmm, Hard Pass" Also in Celebrity: Keke Palmer's "Sickening" Dress Has The Internet In Shambles Also in Celebrity: 24 Strange, Gross, And Totally Surprising Facts About Red Carpet Outfits
Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
Jonathan Joss Gunman "Laughed As He Died," Husband Says
On Monday, the sad news broke that actor Jonathan Joss had died at age 59 years old after he was shot and killed in what his husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, alleged was an anti-gay hate crime on Sunday, June 1. People previously reported that the couple's neighbor Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, 56, confessed to shooting Jonathan as he was detained and has been charged with first-degree murder. He was released from police custody under full house arrest on a $200,000 bond on June that same day, Tristan posted a statement to Jonathan's official Facebook page where he alleged that Jonathan had been killed because of his sexuality. He added that he and Jonathan had been 'harassed regularly' by their neighbors in San Antonio, Texas, for being a gay couple, and that their home had recently burned down after repeated threats. Tristan, 32, said that the shooting occurred when he and Jonathan returned to the remains of their home to check for mail and became distressed when they found their dog's skull at the site, which had been 'placed in clear view.' 'My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done,' the statement began.'Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic,' Tristan went on. 'When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw.''While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired,' he alleged. 'Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life.' And Tristan has bravely shared some more details from his husband's death in a devastating new interview with People, where he alleged that the gunman was 'laughing' at them as Jonathan died. He also opened up about immediately knowing that 'there was no hope of saving' Jonathan due to the severe damage caused by the 'really, really close range' shot to his head. 'He was struggling so hard, trying to stay alive,' Tristan recalled. 'I held my husband's face together as best I could, and I told him how much I loved him, and that none of this was his fault. I told him he needed to cross over easy. He didn't need to keep fighting.''I told him that no matter what, and in some way, shape, or form, we'll always be together, and he'll always be my husband,' Tristan continued. He also claimed that the alleged gunman 'still had the gun pointed over' him while his husband lay dying, adding: 'He was laughing. He mocked me for telling my husband that I loved him and used the same homophobic slurs.' Tristan told the publication that he finds it hurtful 'whenever people try to say that it wasn't a hate crime,' which is no doubt a reference to the San Antonio Police Department saying that they had 'found no evidence to indicate that Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation' just one day after his murder. On Thursday, SAPD police chief William McManus admitted that he regretted making this statement, and said that it was 'way too soon' for a hate crime to be ruled out. 'That was way, way, way, premature,' he said. 'We shouldn't have done it. It was way too soon before we had any real information. And I will own that… I want to apologize to the LGBTQ+ community for the tragic loss of Mr. Joss, which has been heavily felt."'Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in this case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss,' McManus added during a press also addressed Tristan's claims that their home was burnt down in an anti-gay hate crime, saying that they were 'working closely' with the fire department's arson investigators, and that 'the investigation is still active.'He went on to confirm that law enforcement had received 'approximately 70 calls over the past two years' from both Jonathan and his neighbors over 'neighborhood-type disturbances.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Toronto man had to fight GoFundMe to get paid after organizer gambled away funds for his brother's funeral
In the aftermath of his younger brother's sudden death last year, Allan Oliver says he was surprised when a family friend set up a GoFundMe to help pay for the funeral. "My first thought was like, 'Wow, I can't believe someone would do this for our family,' " Oliver told CBC News. His brother, Aidan, a well-known figure in their community of Shelburne, Ont., was just 23 years old when he died after a medical episode on Oct. 30. Oliver watched as donations from the community poured in — eventually, more than $15,000 was raised. He says his family then planned a larger funeral to make sure everyone could pay their respects. "Through this fundraiser, there were hundreds of people helping us through it," he said. "And that was just really comforting." Those feelings of comfort turned to anxiety in the months that followed, when he encountered repeated challenges trying to obtain the remaining balance of donations from the organizer. On Nov. 11, the day of his brother's funeral, the organizer gave the family $7,000 of the $15,200 raised. But the remaining $8,200 had not been paid to him, and he had an outstanding bill from the funeral home to worry about. "I was giving the organizer the benefit of the doubt," Oliver told CBC News. His feelings of anxiety turned out to be warranted — months later, the organizer admitted to him in a text message that she had withdrawn the remaining money and gambled it way. After public pressure from community members, Oliver says a relative of the organizer returned the funds to him this week — nearly seven months after his brother's funeral. CBC News is not naming the organizer as the funds have since been repaid. Oliver is still pushing for policy changes at GoFundMe, and says the company needs to do more to ensure the intended beneficiaries receive the money that is raised for them. A spokesperson for GoFundMe defended its current policies in a statement, saying misuse of funds is "rare." In the statement, GoFundMe also said it acted quickly to investigate Oliver's case and noted that it does have a Beneficiary Guarantee, which aims to ensure money gets to the intended recipients. In January, Oliver reached out to the organizer via text to ask about the remaining funds so he could pay the rest of the funeral home bill. Texts reviewed by CBC News show the organizer responded and said she had "lots of things going on," but that she'd call him. Oliver says that call never happened, and the organizer didn't respond to multiple messages he sent after that. At the end of February, he asked the organizer if he could take over the GoFundMe account, and she responded that she would reach out to GoFundMe to try to arrange that. WATCH | Toronto man pushes for GoFundMe changes to ensure people get funds: In March, after receiving no further texts from the organizer, Oliver reached out to the fundraising platform through an online portal. In an emailed response reviewed by CBC News, GoFundMe told him they couldn't share information without permission from the organizer — who was CC'd on the note — and that they couldn't move forward in helping him. Oliver again attempted to contact the organizer via text, but she didn't respond to the e-mail chain from GoFundMe. In May, he says the funeral home told him interest would start accruing on his account at the end of the month if the remaining balance wasn't paid. "It was stressful, it was frustrating," he said. "It's tough to really move on if you have this bill over your head that you have to pay." Then, on May 30, Oliver received an email from GoFundMe stating that they'd been told his family "may not have received the funds raised." The email encouraged him to submit a claim with GoFundMe, which he did, also submitting proof that he was the intended beneficiary. After that, he says GoFundMe confirmed that the organizer had started withdrawing money from the funds raised on Nov. 6, and by Nov. 13 — just two days after his brother's funeral — the entire balance had been withdrawn. "My heart was in my stomach," said Oliver. "It confirmed everything that I was most fearful of." Oliver confronted the organizer with this information via text. In a subsequent message, she apologized and admitted she had "a very bad gambling problem." She said she wanted to pay him back but could only do so in bi-weekly instalments of $500. In a June 2 email, after Oliver made GoFundMe aware of the organizer's admission, a company representative told him that its policy requires people to first try to remedy the situation directly with the organizer. They told him that in his case, since the organizer had offered to create a payment plan to recover the funds, he should speak with her before the company took any further steps. They also told him that if the organizer didn't comply with the payment plan, he could then file a claim under their Beneficiary Guarantee. Oliver questions why the company would make him responsible for recovering the funds — especially from someone who'd already demonstrated that she wasn't trustworthy. "I just think that's unacceptable because they have all the proof that the organizer has misused the funds," he said. "And the onus shouldn't be on myself to trust the organizer for a payment plan." Oliver says his focus now is on the actions taken by the fundraising platform itself. "I think GoFundMe has handled this poorly, to be honest," he said. He wants to know why the company didn't flag an irregularity when he reached out to them in March about dispersing the remainder of the funds, especially if they knew the money had been withdrawn months early. "That should have flagged something within their internal investigation or fraud team to say, 'Hey, this guy is the intended beneficiary and he's saying that he hasn't received the money,' " said Oliver. There have been other high-profile instances of money from GoFundMe campaigns being misused. After the 2018 Humboldt Broncos tragedy, a man was sentenced to jail in part for setting up a GoFundMe for the victims, then depositing the funds into his own bank account and spending the money. The challenge, according to one legal expert, is that it can be difficult to hold companies like GoFundMe liable when donations are misused because it would have to be proven that the company was aware the funds were going to be misappropriated before they were released. "If you knew, or you should have known, that the funds were not being used for the intended purpose, then you would have liability," said Tanya Walker, a Toronto-based lawyer who has handled many fraud cases. To try to prevent misuse of funds, Walker says GoFundMe could consider alternative measures — such as ensuring the funds are deposited directly into the account of the intended beneficiary, or introducing a third-party guarantor in instances where the organizer is raising funds for another person. In Oliver's case, a GoFundMe spokesperson told CBC News that the company had "removed the fundraiser, and the organizer's account has been banned from using our platform for any future fundraisers." More broadly, the spokesperson said, "beneficiaries are protected by the GoFundMe Beneficiary Guarantee, which offers protection in the rare case that an Organizer does not deliver funds to the intended recipients of a fundraiser." But Oliver says that's not good enough, and that he doesn't believe he should have been asked to enforce a payment plan before becoming eligible for support from GoFundMe. He says more needs to be done to prevent something like this from happening again. "I think this is a huge gap in their systems and their policies of how to actually ensure money is being sent to the intended recipient," Oliver said.
