SGPC panel to visit Takht Patna Sahib to settle dispute
A row erupted after Takht Patna Sahib when Akal Takht, the highest temporal seat of Sikhism, pointed to defiance of its 2022 decree which had ordered an assessment of Patna Sahib jathedar Baldev Singh's Gurbani recitation skills and the transfer of granthi Gurdial Singh.
On May 21, the Panj Pyaras of Takht Patna Sahib declared acting Akal Takht jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib head Tek Singh Dhanaula 'tankhaiya' (guilty of religious misconduct) for actions that allegedly hurt the sanctity and dignity of the Takht Patna Sahib.
As the confrontation escalated, Panj Pyaras of three Punjab-based temporal seats— Akal Takht, Takht Kesgarh Sahib and Takht Damdama Sahib—passed resolutions against the move.
'SGPC president Harjinder Singh Dhami constituted a delegation, which includes SGPC's senior vice-president Raghujit Singh Virk, member Bhai Gurcharan Singh Grewal and Gurbachan Singh Karmuwala will visit Patna. SGPC assistant secretary Jaswinder Singh Jassi has been appointed as the coordinator of this delegation, the spokesperson added.
Providing further details, Satbir Singh, officer on special duty (OSD) to SGPC's chief secretary Kulwant Singh Mannan, said that the delegation would travel to Takht Sri Harmandar Ji Patna Sahib soon to hold discussions with its management committee and the Panj Pyaras.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM to visit China for SCO Summit
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China to attend the regional summit SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) in Tianjin city from August 31 to September 1 - signalling another step towards normalising ties between the two nations that had frayed after the Galwan clash of 2020. Modi's last visit to China was in 2019. But he had met Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan in October 2024. The visit comes amid the imposition of stiff tariffs from US president Donald Trump and increasing pressure on India regarding oil purchase from Russia. There is expectation that under the circumstances, India's recalibration of ties with China is expected to act as a balancing factor for the US. India's participation would also be in the backdrop of Chinese support for Pakistan and the shadow of Pahalgam attack. In June, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had refused to sign a joint statement at a defence minister's meet under SCO because it skipped any mention of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives and instead, mentioned Balochistan, tacitly accusing India of creating unrest there. Pahalgam's exclusion from the document appeared to have been done at the behest of Pakistan. The next month, though, China issued a strong statement against terror as the US designated The Resistance Front, a proxy of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, as a foreign terrorist organisation for its involvement in the Pahalgam attack. "China firmly opposes all forms of terrorism and strongly condemns the terrorist attack that occurred on April 22... China calls on regional countries to enhance counterterrorism cooperation and jointly maintain regional security and stability," said Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian. This time at the SCO, discussions with 10 member countries is expected to cover terrorism and regional security along with trade. Efforts will be made to restore stability and dialogue in India-China relations. There is a possibility that PM Modi will have bilateral meetings with Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the summit. In October 2024, PM Modi and Xi Jinping had met at the BRICS summit in Kazan. Following that, efforts to reduce border tensions between the two countries had gained momentum and the resumption of the Kailash-Mansarovar yatra had helped normalise ties to a great extent. Established in 2001, SCO aims to promote regional stability through cooperation. The bloc currently has 10 member states -- Belarus, China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
'Taking It Personally': Expert Points To Op Sindoor Ceasefire Row Amid Trump's Tariff Tantrums
Michael Kugelman was referring to India's repeated denial that the US President had a role to play in the ceasefire with Pakistan in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor US President Donald Trump's additional tariffs on India over the country's continued purchase of oil from Russia appear to be driven less by economic rationale and more by personal grievance, Washington DC-based South Asia analyst and foreign affairs expert Michael Kugelman has said, calling it the 'worst crisis" that the relationship has faced over the last two decades. In an interview with news agency ANI, Kugelman, Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Centre, said the censure of India seemed to stem from Trump taking India's firm and independent stance as a personal affront. Asked why the US President was not punishing China, but targeting India, Kugelman said: '…China has not stood out there and refused to let President Trump take credit for his role in the ceasefire. China has not had its leader have a long conversation with Trump on the phone and essentially dictate to him what's right and what's wrong. These are things that happened with India. So, I think that's why perhaps President Trump would reserve some of his greatest ire on the trade and tariff front for India and for the Indian government. Indeed, it's a double standard. It's hypocritical, whatever you want to say…" Kugelman was referring to India's repeated denial that the US President had a role to play in the ceasefire with Pakistan in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor—a claim Trump has repeated on several occasions, attributing the end of hostilities to trade offers made by America. While India, including foreign affairs minister S Jaishankar, had in the past too denied any external mediation in the ceasefire, it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi's assertion in Parliament during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor that seemed to seal the deal. 'We had said from day one that our action was non-escalatory. No leader in the world asked us to stop Operation Sindoor," the prime minister said, puncturing Trump's narrative. Kugelman's observations, however, did not sit well with former foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal, who questioned why PM Modi could not call out Trump's lies despite the US President's fallacious claims. Taking to X, Sibal wrote: 'Why play the charade of giving false credit for a ceasefire based on trade threats and one announced over the head of India's leader, creating thereby impression India was pressured to agree? Trump can keep assailing India as a tariff king, threaten tariffs, talk of his interest in mediating the Kashmir issue but Modi dare not tell him what's right and what's wrong? India has sovereign interests which it has to defend." Sibal also shifted focus to China's stand on the US and the hypocrisy displayed by Trump. 'Chinese spokespersons day in and day out speak disparagingly of the US, talk down at it, express defiance. Yet, Trump is delaying imposing tariffs on China." view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's tariff gamble puts America's ties with India at risk
Synopsis President Trump has threatened India with 50% tariffs for continuing to purchase Russian oil, aiming to pressure Russia to end the war in Ukraine. This move jeopardizes the strategic partnership between the U.S. and India, potentially pushing India closer to Russia and China. The tariffs could significantly harm India's economy, while the future of U.S.-India relations remains uncertain. President Donald Trump has staked enormous political capital on being the one to end the war in Ukraine, even asserting that he could do so "in 24 hours." In perhaps his biggest gamble yet to achieve that goal, he pledged Wednesday to punish India with tariffs of 50% for buying Russian oil. At stake is the relationship between the United States and an increasingly important strategic partner in Asia. India, the world's most populous democracy, and the United States, its most powerful one, have an unusual relationship. They are friendly but not close, brought together by mutual interests and shared values, especially in recent decades. On Wednesday, Trump seemed ready to ditch that relationship. He doubled already hefty tariffs on Indian exports to the United States for its steadfast refusal to stop buying oil from Russia, in an effort to pressure Russia to end the war. Trump has accused India of helping Russia finance its war on Ukraine through oil purchases; India has said it needs cheap oil to meet the energy needs of its fast-growing economy. India called the additional tariffs "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," pointing out that it was being punished for doing something -- buying Russian oil at a discounted price -- that other nations have done, although it didn't mention names. China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, and Turkey has also deepened its energy links with Russia since the start of the war in Ukraine, without incurring similar penalties. Analysts said Trump's pressure tactics could damage the long-standing ties between India and the United States. "We are better off together than apart," said Atul Keshap, a retired U.S. diplomat and president of the U.S.-India Business Council. "The partnership forged by our elected leaders over the past 25 years is worth preserving, and has achieved considerable mutual prosperity and advanced our shared strategic interests." It's difficult to quantify what exactly America would lose if its relationship with India cools. India is a valuable strategic partner for the United States, acting as a counterweight to China. It is also important to many American companies, including Apple, which has shifted some manufacturing of its products to India from China. Ajay Srivastava, a former trade official at the Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think tank, said the U.S. action "will push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China and many other countries." India and the United States, along with Japan and Australia, are part of a diplomatic partnership called the Quad, set up largely to counter China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. India is planning to host the Quad Leaders' Summit later this year. Trump was expected to attend, although it's now unclear if he will. For India, the costs of a damaged relationship may prove to be higher. Trump's move puts Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a bind. Russia is the source of 45% of its oil imports. If India stops buying Russian oil, accepting higher prices for consumers and domestic manufacturing, it would be politically damaging for Modi's government. If it ignores Trump's threat and continues buying Russian oil, the hit to India's economy will be far costlier. The higher tariffs could cut India's more than $86 billion in exports to the United States by half, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative, an Indian research group. The United States is India's biggest trading partner, and exports account for nearly 20% of India's economy. India ranks only 10th among American trade partners in goods. India has also come to value American backing for its bid to be recognized as a global superpower. Modi has touted his relationship with Trump, courting the U.S. president during his first term in office and calling him a "true friend." But that friendship, as many American allies have learned, may mean little when Trump's own priorities are at stake. In recent weeks, Trump announced that he had struck deals with Japan, Korea and the European Union, but even after months of negotiation, India had not reached an agreement. India was reluctant to make concessions on politically sensitive sectors like dairy and agriculture. India also publicly denied Trump's repeated claims that he helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a brief, four-day conflict between the two neighbors in May. India has maintained that the ceasefire was negotiated bilaterally with Pakistan, and Indian leaders bristled at Trump's willingness to insert himself into that bitter rivalry. It is not yet clear whether the punitive tariffs Trump has threatened will ever take effect. In the executive order he issued Wednesday, Trump said the tariffs would be implemented within a month, but he could modify the order if circumstances changed. The order included a provision that the United States would look at other countries' purchases of Russian oil as well. So far, there is no indication that Trump intends to take a similar approach to China, which is the biggest buyer of Russian oil. Chinese and U.S. officials are in the middle of sensitive negotiations about potential trade agreements after an initial round of retaliatory tariffs threatened to destabilize the global economy. With his tariff moves against India, Trump is keeping his eye on big strategic goals -- a deal with China, and keeping the pressure on Russia before a potential meeting with the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, which he disclosed Wednesday. Far from being "a dead economy," as Trump called it, India is the fastest-growing large economy in the world. But its place on the president's list of priorities may be much less certain.
