
Michael Saylor Bets on a $100 Billion Bitcoin ‘Credit' Dream
Over the years, Saylor has urged followers to pour their savings into Bitcoin, mortgage their homes, even 'sell a kidney.' To admirers, he's a prophet with a balance sheet; to skeptics, a showman with an obsession. Either way, he's turned a once-obscure software company into the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, playing the markets with a conviction most executives would never dare.
Now, Saylor is asking for a different kind of leap of faith: embracing an unorthodox financing instrument — perpetual preferred stock — to shift away from common stock sales and convertible bonds that helped build a $75 billion Bitcoin war chest. The twist: these securities never mature and some can skip dividend payments, making them flexible for the issuer but unnerving for investors.
Branded 'Stretch,' the latest issuance pays dividends with a variable rate and offers no voting rights. This kind of security is neither debt nor common equity, but Saylor hopes it combines advantages of both, giving him fresh cash to keep buying Bitcoin without heavily diluting shareholders. Over the next four years, he plans to retire billions in convertible notes, curtail common stock sales, and issue more preferred offerings as his main funding source.
The gamble is audacious: to create, as the firm puts it, a 'BTC Credit Model,' where a volatile asset underpins a stream of income securities. If there's big demand, he speculates it could even raise '$100 billion… even $200 billion' in theory. If not, Strategy, as MicroStrategy now calls itself, could be left juggling payouts with no buyers. Selling Bitcoin is a near-taboo, given Saylor's 'hold on for dear life' gospel that coins are sacred. Supporters see the preferreds as a clever way to keep crypto buying; critics warn that the payouts are costly and could become a burden if Bitcoin's price turns.
So far this year, the company has raised around $6 billion across four perpetual preferred offerings. The latest, a $2.5 billion 'Stretch' tranche, ranked among the largest crypto capital raises this year, eclipsing Circle's high-profile IPO. Nearly a quarter of the sale went to retail buyers, per a firm presentation, cementing Saylor's devoted following as a key funding source.
'I have no past knowledge of any company doing this the way that MicroStrategy has just to capitalize on the retail fervor,' said Michael Youngworth, head of global convertibles and preferred strategy at Bank of America.
That retail tilt stands out in the corporate preferred market, dominated by investment-grade utilities and banks. Strategy is unrated, making its preferreds junior in the structure and outside the comfort zone of many fixed-income investors. If retail appetite fades, Saylor would need to win over insurers and pensions — the buyers he says he hopes to attract — or risk falling short of his blockbuster-fundraising ambitions.
Since the start of 2024, Saylor has raised over $40 billion through a mix of stock and bonds — $27 billion from common equity sales, $13.8 billion from fixed-income securities — transforming Strategy into a Bitcoin proxy for Wall Street. Part of the pivot is practical: the convertibles market excludes retail.
Strategy CEO Phong Le framed the shift as a way to build a more resilient capital structure — a contrast to 2022's 'crypto winter,' when the company was burdened by a Bitcoin-backed loan from Silvergate and other debt. 'Over time, we may not have convertible notes,' he said, 'we will be relying on perpetual preferred notes that don't ever come due.'
Yet the plan depends on paying large, ongoing dividends in perpetuity, using an asset — Bitcoin — that produces no income and has historically lost half its value in months. If Bitcoin prices fall and investors lose interest, the company could be stuck with big bills and no easy way to raise fresh cash.
Perpetual preferreds don't mature, and in some cases, dividends can be deferred without triggering default. Under current terms, Strategy can pay some obligations in cash or shares and certain payouts are non-cumulative, meaning missed payments don't have to be made up. For now, payouts are financed largely by selling common stock through its at-the-market program — a stream Saylor has vowed to slow, but not shut off entirely. Still, the company has said it could sell shares even below its typical 2.5 net asset-value threshold, if needed to cover debt interest or preferred dividends.
Perpetual preferreds never have to be repaid, unlike convertibles, which either dilute shareholders if they convert or must be repaid in cash if they don't. That matters because one of Strategy's quietest advantages has been its ability to sell stock at prices well above the value of its Bitcoin holdings. It's a gap Saylor himself dubbed the 'mNAV premium' - a multiple of net asset value, helping Saylor raise cash and buy Bitcoin at a discount.
'With their mNAV premium compressing in recent weeks, I think management is rightfully concerned about creating too much dilution,' said Brian Dobson, managing director for Disruptive Technology Equity Research at Clear Street.
Still, the funding model brings its own hazards. 'These are high-yielding instruments,' said Youngworth. 'Paying coupons of 8% to 10% in perpetuity could be quite challenging.' Liquidity, a concern for any company with little operating revenue beyond security sales, could tighten sharply in a Bitcoin downturn.
To short seller Jim Chanos, the non-cumulative variety of preferreds are 'crazy' for institutions to buy — perpetual, non-redeemable, with dividends paid only at the issuer's discretion. 'If I don't pay the dividends, they are not cumulative. I don't have to pay them back,' he told Bloomberg TV in June. Chanos says Strategy's effective leverage has plateaued and sees the preferred push as another way to juice it. He's suggested shorting the stock while long Bitcoin, betting the premium will collapse.
In Strategy's capital structure, these units sit above common stock but are subordinate to convertible bonds, lacking the protections of regular debt. Wall Street managers have tended to favor those convertible bonds, which are easier to hedge through market-neutral trades. The preferreds are typically harder to hedge, and retiring convertibles would remove a popular arbitrage vehicle.
The whole approach works only if Bitcoin stays valuable and investor confidence holds. If he's right, Bitcoin could inch closer to being treated as mainstream financial collateral. If he's wrong, his balance sheet will be a cautionary tale: what happens when you try to turn a volatile asset into an income stream — and the market stops believing.
Still, the danger may come from the broader market as digital-asset treasury companies pile on risk.
'I think there are some indications of a bubble in crypto treasury companies,' said Yuliya Guseva, who directs Rutgers Law School's Blockchain and Fintech Program. 'If the market appetite dries up, then the model will no longer persist.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Apple Watch 2025 lineup: What to expect from Series 11 and Ultra 3
The next generation of products from Apple will also include the Apple Watch, which will launch in a few weeks. Although the Series 11 is the most probable option, there is growing speculation that Apple may also introduce the Apple Watch Ultra 3. The flagship (Series 11) and the Apple Watch Ultra 3 are in development. Mark Gurman, an Apple analyst for Bloomberg, mentioned that the possibility of a new SE model is also likely, though unconfirmed. While the Apple Watch Ultra and the more affordable SE series haven't followed a regular update cycle, their absence last year might indicate that all three will be available again in 2025. Gurman predicts that the SE may get a new design, but the Ultra and Series 11 are expected to look largely the same. This summary covers what we know, suspect, and can reasonably expect from Apple's wristwatch lineup for 2025. Although Apple's new Corning partnership suggests that all display protection glass will be made in the US, the Series 11 is expected to keep the sleek, flat-edged design introduced with the Series 10 (42mm and 46mm). Furthermore, if replacement glass is sourced domestically, it could mean enhanced durability, sustainability benefits, and perhaps quicker repair times. MacRumors reports that the Apple Watch might get a more energy-efficient display, such as an LTPO panel with improved brightness and sharper resolution, potentially helping to extend battery life. This aligns with the latest information about the Ultra 3. It might feature a slightly larger screen with a resolution of 422×514 pixels, assuming the leaked iOS 26 images are accurate. Apple's new S11 chip promises better efficiency and possibly longer battery life, and is expected to debut in the Series 11 and Ultra 3. MacRumors mentions that the Apple Watch could feature a more energy-efficient display, such as an LTPO type with better brightness and resolution, possibly extending battery life. This might be reserved for the more premium Ultra 3, which likely will retain its original design. As is typical with each new smartwatch, Apple usually upgrades the processor, so the Series 11 and Ultra 3 are expected to feature the Apple S11 chip. Gurman notes that although satellite connectivity and 5G features are also rumoured for the Ultra 3, these are unlikely to be included in the Series 11 One of the main reasons for wearing an Apple Watch is for fitness and health tracking. Additionally, Apple is expected to launch a notable new health feature this year. The Series 11 is said to include the capability to detect high blood pressure. New sensors integrated into the Watch will enable this feature, alerting users to possible hypertension. Detecting hypertension could greatly improve awareness of a critical medical condition. This feature closely aligns with existing health functions on current Apple Watches. The Apple Watch currently only supports 4G LTE, despite the company's rollout of 5G on its iPhones and iPads. This year, according to Bloomberg, that is set to change. 5G cellular capabilities are expected to be introduced with the Ultra 3, and the Series 11 is anticipated to follow. 5G will be delivered through a specialised '5G RedCap' service aimed at wearables and other low-power devices. This transition coincides with Apple switching its cellular modem supplier from Intel to MediaTek for the Apple Watch.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why US Fed decided to stop crypto-focused supervision of banks introduced after Silicon Valley Bank collapse
In a fresh boost for cryptocurrency popularisation in America, the US Federal Reserve on Friday withdrew its Novel Activities Supervision Program which was unveiled in the aftermath of the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX and its domino effect on three lenders — Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature Bank and Silvergate Bank in 2023. The Fed on Friday announced that it will 'sunset its novel activities supervision program and return to monitoring banks' novel activities through the normal supervisory process.' The move follows a series of pushes from the Trump administration — from the GENIUS Act to promote stablecoins (dollar backed cryptocurrencies) to an executive order allowing the investment of 401K retirement corpus in alternative assets including crypto coins. Bitcoin prices stood in red down over 1 per cent to $117,720.50 apiece on Saturday at 11:32 am IST. Ethereum's price was also down 4.55 per cent to $4,428.47 apiece from the previous day's close, according to data from Bitcoin and Ethereum prices neared record highs on Wednesday after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview to Bloomberg that the Fed should cut rates by around 50 basis points in September, since economic analysis indicates they should have been already cut by 150-175 basis points. Analysts stated that the rally in the two leading cryptocurrencies may taper off on potential profit booking by participants. The US Fed stated it had started the novel activities supervision programme to gain knowledge of banks' crypto-related and fintech activities. 'Since the Board started its program to supervise certain crypto and fintech activities in banks, the Board has strengthened its understanding of those activities, related risks, and bank risk management practices,' it said. The US central bank decided to scrap this specialised supervision and merge it with its 'standard supervisory process' for banks and financial institutions, the Fed added. This marks a change in stance from 2023 when the Fed in a joint statement with the US Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) — which backstops bank deposits — said 'the agencies believe that issuing or holding as principal crypto-assets that are issued, stored, or transferred on an open, public, and/or decentralised network, or similar system is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices.' Apart from the above order, the Fed also withdrew a joint guidance with FDIC flagging risks to banks from crypto-related deposits, in which they stated that crypto-related entities and stablecoin-related reserves were vulnerable to the confidence in these assets and susceptible to rapid outflows, making them highly volatile deposits. Previous orders requiring banks to seek the Fed's permission for dealing in crypto assets and stablecoin issuance were also withdrawn on Friday. The Fed's intervention focused on how banks deal and interact with cryptocurrencies was prompted by the collapse of the crypto exchange FTX led by Sam Bankman Fried (SBF), which triggered the collapse of three lenders, most importantly, Silicon Valley Bank. To be sure. SVB's decline was primarily guided by risky investments in short-term securities. However, along with Signature Bank and Silvergate Bank, SVB had exposure to crypto investors, which prompted the Fed's specific supervision of banks. The FTX exchange collapse, in which SBF was accused of channelling depositors' funds to invest in the cryptocurrency Luna which was used to prop up the TerraUSD stablecoin. Amid a mass Terra USD sell off, FTX and related entities gradually caved in owing to a loss of liquidity as well as allegations of fraud. Signature Bank and Silvergate Bank collapsed owing to their balance sheet exposure to FTX which led to a liquidity crunch amid panicked withdrawals by customers. These lenders also faced significant market sell offs, further squeezing their liquidity sources, leading to a bank run. SVB sold short-term Treasuries at a loss which squeezed its balance sheet amid a rise in withdrawals. It issued bonds to raise funds for meeting customer withdrawals, which triggered a spiral as spooked investors sold its stock and customers doubled down on withdrawals, leading to a bank run. SVB's practices were guided by funding requirements from the tech and crypto sector which turned to banks after funding from venture capital and private equity firms drifted up post pandemic, according to University of Washington Law Professor Anita Ramasastry.


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Airbus set to break Boeing's long-held aviation record: Details here
(Bloomberg) -- In 1981, the year Airbus SE announced it would build a new single-aisle jetliner to take on Boeing Co., the 737 ruled the roost. The US-made narrowbody, already in use for more than a decade, had reshaped the airline industry by making shorter routes cheaper and more profitable to operate. By 1988, when Airbus began producing its upstart A320, Boeing had built a formidable lead by delivering some 1,500 of its cigar-shaped best-seller. It's taken the better part of four decades, but Airbus has finally caught up: The A320 series is poised to overtake its US competitor as the most-delivered commercial airliner in history, according to aviation consultancy Cirium. As of early August, Airbus had winnowed the gap to just 20 units, with 12,155 lifetime A320-family shipments, according to the data. That difference is likely to disappear as soon as next month. 'Did anyone back then expect it could become number one – and on such high production volumes?' Max Kingsley-Jones, head of advisory at Cirium Ascend, wrote of the A320 in a recent social-media post. 'I certainly didn't, and nor probably did Airbus.' The A320's success mirrors the European planemaker's decades-long rise from fledgling planemaker to serious contender, and finally Boeing's better. By the early 2000s, annual deliveries of the A320 and its derivatives had surpassed the 737 family; total orders eclipsed the Boeing jet in 2019. But the 737 stubbornly remained the most-delivered commercial aircraft of all time. At the outset, Airbus faced an uphill battle. The European planemaker, an assemblage of aerospace manufacturers formed in 1970 with backing from European governments, didn't yet offer a full aircraft lineup. Infighting hindered everything from product planning to manufacturing, and leadership decisions had to finely balance French and German commercial and political interests. Yet it was clear even then that Airbus needed a presence in the narrowbody segment to firmly establish itself as Boeing's top rival. Those aircraft are by far the most widely flown category in commercial aviation, typically connecting city pairs on shorter routes. Higher fuel costs and the deregulation of the US aviation industry in the late 1970s had given the European planemaker an opening with American airline executives, who clamored for an all-new single-aisle, according to a history of Airbus written by journalist Nicola Clark. To set the A320 apart, Airbus took some risks. It selected digital fly-by-wire controls that saved weight over traditional hydraulic systems, and gave pilots a side-stick at their right or left hand instead of a centrally mounted yoke. The aircraft also sat higher off the ground than the 737 and came with a choice of two engines, giving customers greater flexibility. Airbus's gamble paid off. Today, the A320 and 737 make up nearly half of the global passenger jet fleet in service. And the A320's success contrasts with strategic blunders like the A380 behemoth that proved short-lived because airlines couldn't profitably operate the giant plane. Boeing maintained that smaller, nimbler planes like the 787 Dreamliner would have an edge — a prediction that proved right. Yet the longtime dominance of the two narrowbody aircraft raises questions about the vitality of a duopoly system that favors stability over innovation. Both airplane makers have repeatedly opted for incremental changes that squeeze efficiencies out of their top-selling models, rather than going the more expensive route of designing a replacement aircraft from scratch. Airbus was first to introduce new engines to its A320, turning the neo variant into a huge hit with airlines seeking to cut their fuel bill. Under pressure, Boeing followed, but its approach proved calamitous. The US planemaker came up with the 737 Max, strapping more powerful engines onto the aircraft's aging, low-slung frame. It installed an automated flight-stabilizing feature called MCAS to help manage the higher thrust and balance out the plane. Regulators later found MCAS contributed to two deadly 737 Max crashes that led to a global grounding of the jet for 20 months, starting in 2019. More recently, Airbus has been bedeviled by issues with the fuel-efficient engines that power the A320neo. High-tech coatings that allow its Pratt & Whitney geared turbofans to run at hotter temperatures have shown flaws, forcing airline customers to send aircraft in for extra maintenance, backing up repair shops and grounding hundreds of jets waiting for inspection and repair. With both narrowbody families near the end of their evolutionary timeline, analysts and investors have begun asking about what's next. China, for its part, is seeking to muscle into the market with its Comac C919 model that's begun operating in the country, but hasn't so far been certified to fly in Europe or the US. Boeing Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg said in July that the company is working internally toward a next-generation plane, but is waiting for engine technology and other factors to fall into place, including restoring cash flow after years of setbacks. 'That's not today and probably not tomorrow,' he said on a July 29 call. Airbus's healthier finances give it more flexibility to explore design leaps. CEO Guillaume Faury toyed with rolling out a hydrogen-powered aircraft — potentially with a radical 'flying wing' design — in the mid-2030s but has since pushed back the effort to focus on a conventional A320 successor. The Toulouse, France-based company is considering an open-rotor engine that would save fuel through its architecture rather than the current jet turbines that push the limits of physics to eke out gains. Speaking at the Paris Air Show in June, Faury called the A320 'quite an old platform' and affirmed plans to launch a successor by the end of this decade, with service entry in the mid-2030s. 'I have a lot of focus on preparing that next-generation of single aisle,' Faury said. 'We are very steady and very committed to this.' --With assistance from Jinshan Hong.