New e-commerce laws in the works
PUTRAJAYA: Updated legislations aimed at better protecting consumers and strengthening oversight of e-commerce platforms are expected to be brought to Parliament next year, says Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali (pic).
The Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister said a study into existing legislation is underway and should be completed by next month.
Among the areas being assessed is the need to amend the Electronic Commerce Act 2006 (Act 658), he added.
Explaining further, he said Act 658 was first introduced as an enabling law to recognise and facilitate e-commerce trade, and there have been several suggestions on whether to repeal the Act or introduce an improved version.
'These are among the issues that will be finalised once the study and engagement sessions are completed.
'The findings will then be presented to the Cabinet and the Attorney-General's Chambers,' he told a press conference ahead of a town hall session with e-commerce traders yesterday.
'I would prefer for it to be tabled by the end of this year, but due to factors beyond our control, it will be brought, at the latest, during Parliament's first sitting next year,' he added.
Armizan said there is a need to revisit Act 658 to create consistent regulations that not only protect consumers but also support continued growth in the sector.
'There was a review conducted in 2012 on how complaints are channelled alongside consumer protection.
'However, the decision was made to retain it as consumer protection regulations would be covered under the Consumer Protection Act.'
Armizan said the ministry is also studying mechanisms to regulate e-commerce platforms based abroad that have products entering the local market.
Among the options being explored are establishing an act that provides extra-territorial jurisdiction and pursuing government-to-government (G2G) cooperation.
On another matter, he said the ministry is exploring possible mechanisms to require e-commerce platforms to consult the authorities before introducing any additional charges on sellers.
Armizan acknowledged that current regulations do not give his ministry any regulatory powers.
'To me, what the platform did is not timely, as there was a review last year and now there is another review.
'To halt this 100% is difficult but we are looking at how we can get platforms to have an engagement with the authorities before coming to any decision,' he said.
This comes after an e-commerce platform introduced a revised fee for all completed orders.
The fee is directly deducted from each order before the sales proceeds are transferred to the seller's account.
On July 11, MCA's economic and SME affairs committee chairman Datuk Lawrence Low said the revised fee structure would affect nearly every stage of a seller's operations.
While some of the charges may seem small individually, Low warned that this would cumulatively place a significant financial strain on sellers and ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Azalina: Whistleblowers should follow procedure, not go straight to the media
KUALA LUMPUR: Whistleblowers should report through official channels, not the media, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said warned, saying bypassing procedures risks national security and prosecution. "I want to address something here, many people ask why whistleblowers are prosecuted when they go to the media. "There are procedures in place where whistleblowers should not go directly to the media. The information must first be brought to the responsible agency so that its authenticity can be verified. "One of the reasons for this is to prevent abuse of the system. Secondly, we want to ensure that state secrets are not disclosed by whistleblowers, especially in matters of national security. "It is also to ensure that due legal process is followed. If information is disclosed to the media, it creates a premise of 'trial by media', where the public forms judgments on guilt or wrongdoing and this is unfair to the country's legal system," she said in reply to Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong (BN-Ayer Hitam) during the oral question-and-answer session in Dewan Rakyat. Wee had asked about the government's decision to amend the definition of eligible whistleblowers under the law, so that restrictive conditions or criteria cannot be used as grounds to exclude them from protection under the Act. Azalina said the government aims to encourage whistleblowers to come forward to the appropriate agencies for assessment. "Wrongdoing is wrongdoing, but there are times when whistleblowers must be given protection. The second premise is to place them under the witness protection programme. "That is the framework we are working towards in handling whistleblower cases in this country," she said. She added that it is the government's responsibility to ensure whistleblower safety is protected under the law. "To uphold this initiative, in terms of confidentiality, Section 8 of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) will continue to apply automatically to all individuals recognised as whistleblowers under the Act. "The identity and information relating to whistleblowers are protected and cannot be disclosed without consent, except for investigation or legal proceedings, as clearly stated in the Act," she said.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Many pilgrims decline Haj subsidy as awareness grows
KUALA LUMPUR: The number of Malaysian pilgrims opting out of Haj subsidies has risen over the past two years, reflecting increased awareness of financial readiness as a key requirement for the pilgrimage. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Dr Mohd Na'im Mokhtar revealed the trend in Parliament today, noting a decline in subsidy uptake among B40 and M40 groups. 'Tabung Haji (TH) is making efforts to explain to Muslims the link between Haj and the condition of affordability. 'Beginning in 2022, the subsidies provided by TH to B40 and M40 pilgrims have been decreasing... this is an effort to educate Muslims on the obligation of Haj,' he said. A total of 396 pilgrims declined subsidies in 2023, followed by 263 in 2024. Mohd Na'im attributed this shift to a growing understanding that performing Haj should only be undertaken when financially capable. The trend has also benefited TH's financial health, with dividend payouts rising to 3.25 per cent last year. On Haj costs and quotas, Mohd Na'im confirmed no price increase for Muassasah pilgrims this year, with fees remaining at RM33,300 per person. Malaysia's official Haj quota, set at 31,600 annually by Saudi Arabia, has been fully utilised from 2020 to 2025. However, in 2022, pandemic restrictions reduced the quota to 14,306 pilgrims. - Bernama
Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
Vape bans: Slippery slope for legal governance
LETTER | In July 2024, the High Court ruled that the Kedah state government's move to ban gaming licences, effectively shutting down Sports Toto operations in the state, was unconstitutional. The court found that state authorities had overstepped their powers by refusing to renew licences issued under federal law, thereby infringing on the rights of a legally licensed business and violating the Federal Constitution. This landmark ruling is more than just a win for the gaming industry; it underscores a critical principle: state governments cannot override federal law at will. Yet just months later, we are seeing the same pattern emerge again, this time with the vape industry. Kedah has announced it will no longer renew licences for vape-related businesses, with the goal of a complete ban by 2026. Other states such as Pahang, Terengganu and Perlis are following suit. This trend raises urgent questions about the balance of power in our federal system. What started with gaming licences is now extending to vape. Tomorrow, will it be food and beverages? Or wellness and lifestyle services? If states are allowed to selectively shut down federally regulated sectors, Malaysia risks descending into legal fragmentation, where trade and commerce depend more on local politics than national law. Act 852: A necessary legal anchor Rather than allowing states to adopt unilateral bans, the federal government must focus on fully enforcing Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852) across the country. Act 852 was passed after years of consultation and debate. It represents a balanced and structured approach to regulating smoking and vaping products, protecting youth, ensuring product safety, and reducing public health risks while allowing regulated access to adults. Its successful enforcement is not just a health issue; it is a legal imperative. If states are allowed to disregard it through political or moralistic motivations, the Act's legitimacy will be compromised. From a legal standpoint, only a consistent, centralised framework can ensure that public health regulations are enforced uniformly, fairly, and in accordance with constitutional principles. Legal uncertainty hurts rule of law, public confidence One of the hallmarks of a sound legal system is predictability. Businesses, consumers, and civil society should be able to rely on a stable set of laws and policies. When that stability is undermined by states choosing to selectively ban certain industries, it weakens the rule of law and opens the door for selective enforcement, politicisation of trade, and judicial overload from legal disputes. This also affects the very communities the bans claim to protect. Instead of driving behaviour change, bans often push products into illicit channels, where there is no age restriction, no safety oversight, and no taxation. This undermines the public health objectives of Act 852 and increases enforcement burdens. The way forward: Uphold the law, not politicise it The lesson from the Sports Toto ruling is clear: state governments do not have the authority to override federal laws with blanket bans. Vape should not be the next legal battleground. The federal government must assert the supremacy of laws passed by Parliament and ensure that public health policies are governed by national interest, not fragmented by state agendas. Act 852 provides the legal tools to regulate the vape industry effectively. What's needed now is not more bans but better enforcement. Malaysia must decide whether it wants to be governed by clear laws or discretionary bans. The answer will determine whether our legal system continues to uphold constitutional order or gives way to a patchwork of conflicting state policies. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
