Energy, rail and visa reforms at heart of SA's growth plan, says Ramaphosa
President Cyril Ramaphosa says the government's ambitious reform programme, Operation Vulindlela, is steadily unlocking South Africa's economic potential by addressing longstanding constraints to growth and investment.
In his weekly newsletter to the nation, Ramaphosa highlighted that the initiative is already delivering tangible results and ushering in a second wave of reforms to accelerate inclusive and sustainable development.
'We established Operation Vulindlela in the Sixth Administration to remove the binding constraints that have long held back our economy's growth: an unreliable energy supply, inefficient rail and ports, high data costs, and a visa system that had deterred investors and tourists,' he said
Ramaphosa noted that reforms in key sectors are already yielding positive outcomes. Load shedding has been significantly reduced, thanks to measures that opened electricity generation to private investment.
In the telecommunications sector, reforms have led to lower mobile data costs. Licensing processes for energy and water projects have been streamlined, and the visa backlog has been substantially cleared, with the eVisa system expanding.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
22 minutes ago
- The Citizen
BMA denies 'misleading claims it refused Russian war ship access to SA shores
The Smolny, carrying 300 sailors, arrived in Cape Town on 4 August 2025. The Border Management Authority (BMA) has denied claims that it refused access for sailors on board a Russian Baltic fleet training ship to disembark the vessel. The Smolny, carrying 300 sailors, arrived in Cape Town on 4 August 2025, reportedly to restock, replenish and resupply the ship. The MK party called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to intervene after the party claimed that the sailors were refused access and were denied the right to disembark. 'Misleading claims' BMA spokesperson Mmemme Mogotsi said they have taken note of the 'misleading claims' made regarding the arrival of the Russian vessel at the Port of Cape Town. 'The vessel in question arrived at Cape Town harbour on Monday, 4 August 2025. Prior to its arrival, the Border Management Authority and other government stakeholders held a meeting where procedures and processes were agreed upon. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa speaks to Putin on Ukraine crisis, bilateral issues Agreement In the meeting, it was agreed that: The sailors would remain on board, as they do not have passports in their possession, but only seafarers' identification. The vessel has received diplomatic clearance from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco). The reason for docking is replenishment, rest and recuperation. No application Mogotsi said no application to waive any document requirements was ever received by the Department of Home Affairs ahead of the visit from the Department of Defence, Dirco, or any other relevant stakeholder. 'The sailors subsequently wanted to undertake an excursion into Cape Town arranged by a private company. 'However, in terms of the law, the arrangements that had been agreed to and given the absence of any application for a waiver being submitted, the BMA could not allow them to disembark without passports,' Mogotsi said. Voyage According to the Baltic Fleet's press service, the Smolny called in at a number of ports, including Cuba's Havana, Venezuela's La Guaira, South Africa's Cape Town, Namibia's Walvis Bay, Angola's Luanda, Cameroon's Douala, and Benin's Cotonou. NOW READ: US ambassador Reuben Brigety refuses to be drawn into Russian ship Lady R saga
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
National Dialogue must inform policy, not only be a tool for venting: NPC
With ructions among participants only a week before the convention to usher in the planned National Dialogue, the advisory panel of experts within the National Planning Commission (NPC) has called for a focus on the goals of the process. 'We are conscious of the importance of ensuring implementation and hope the issues and concerns raised during the National Dialogue will be taken seriously enough to inform policy changes where necessary,' the entity said on Friday. The National Dialogue is slated as a process to bring together government, political parties, civil society, business, labour, traditional leaders, women, youth and community voices to find common ground and new solutions for the country. It was announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa as an opportunity to forge a new social compact that drives progress towards 'Vision 2030" and to lay the foundation for the next national development plan (NDP). The NPC, created in 2010, is the custodian of the NDP and advises government on the country's long-term plan to eliminate poverty, unemployment, and inequality by 2030. The agency said the National Dialogue comes amid a lack of faith and confidence in institutions of authority. 'In such a climate of mounting public cynicism, the process must honestly acknowledge the failings of the state, political parties and powerful individuals. It must also recognise the pain, suffering and sacrifices of those who are brave enough to express them at these gatherings. 'For the National Dialogue to be a success, leaders across the spectrum will need to demonstrate levels of maturity, altruism and commitment and act in the best interest of the people of South Africa to rebuild trust and ensure accountability.' The NPC said there also needs to be clarity and transparency concerning the roles and responsibilities of the roleplayers involved, and for citizens to be empowered with accurate and timely information to encourage their participation. Action points should flow from the process, the NPC said. 'We welcome the initiative and the opportunity to support the National Dialogue, [however] the NPC wants to caution against the process turning into what is colloquially referred to as a 'talk shop', a national catharsis and emotional ventilation with limited practical outcomes. 'While the need for change is easy to recognise, the effort that accompanies the change is much more difficult.' The statement came as the legacy foundations of former political leaders pulled out of the preparatory task team for the August 15 convention, citing concerns about government control over what should be a citizen-led initiative and funding of the processes. TimesLIVE
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Dialogue cannot be built on haste' — Key organisations withdraw from National Convention
Organisations, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, cited a litany of concerns such as the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, disagreements within the Preparatory Task Team and 'government control' as the reason for their withdrawal from the precursor to the National Dialogue. A week before the start of the National Convention, which is expected to set the agenda for the broader National Dialogue, key organisations behind the initiative have withdrawn, citing concerns over 'cutting corners', 'centralising power' and a rush to host the gathering on 15 August. 'It is with deep regret, but with unwavering conviction, that we have resolved to withdraw our participation from the structures of the Preparatory Task Team [PTT] and the First National Convention of the National Dialogue scheduled for 15 August 2025. 'This is due to our belief that core principles meant to underpin the whole National Dialogue have been violated in the rush to host a gathering on 15 August. 'We do so not out of apathy or disengagement, but because we remain committed to the belief that all aspects of the National Dialogue must be credible, principled and anchored in public trust,' the non-profit groups said in a joint statement on Friday, 8 August. The organisations include the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation and the Strategic Dialogue Group. They said that prior to making their announcement, they had informed both President Cyril Ramaphosa and the Eminent Persons Group of their position. Statement From the Foundations on the National Dialogue 8 Aug 2025 by on Scribd The groups said their decision to withdraw from participating in the PTT, and the First National Convention on 15 August, does not represent a withdrawal from the National Dialogue process itself. 'We remain committed to the principles under which we have been working – to its vision and its urgent necessity,' they stated. Ramaphosa announced the first National Convention in early June this year. A National Dialogue PTT was set up and began mobilising civil society and establishing various working committees. A second National Convention is planned for 2026, which will consolidate the proposals from the various engagements into a national vision and implementation programme, Daily Maverick reported. The initiative – meant to tackle a wide range of South Africa's pressing issues including unemployment, poor governance and gender-based violence – was met with immediate opposition, owing largely to its R740-million price tag, a figure the Presidency disputed. In June, Government of National Unity (GNU) partner, the DA, announced it would not participate in the National Dialogue following the axeing of party member Andrew Whitfield as deputy minister of trade and industry. Last month, former president Thabo Mbeki – whose organisation was among those that have withdrawn – warned that the National Dialogue process risked being meaningless, without capable leadership. 'Sake of expediency' The organisations, in their statement, have proposed that the National Convention be rescheduled to after 15 October, to allow for 'adequate preparation, coherence and participatory integrity'. Daily Maverick understands that the feeling among those in the organisations involved in the process is that the 15 August gathering would not constitute a meaningful engagement because there has not been adequate preparation. According to a source who spoke to Daily Maverick about the background to the issue, the groups are concerned that this will be a 'performative gathering' because the Presidency is set on the 15 August date. The source said concerns over the lack of critical resourcing, operations and systems had been flagged with the Presidency in the weeks leading up to the National Convention. However, the pursuit of the 15 August date appeared to override these concerns. 'We can't have the convention in its current form go ahead in our names, but if things change, we would support the endeavour of the National Dialogue. But it must be meaningful, citizen-led and build a platform that is transformative for the country,' the source said. The groups, in their statement, cautioned that the National Dialogue 'cannot be built on haste'. 'Deadlines cannot override substance,' they said. This is due to our belief that core principles meant to underpin the whole National Dialogue have been violated in the rush to host a gathering on 15 August. In their statement, the groups listed a series of reasons for their withdrawal from the PTT and the National Convention, including, what they called, the 'erosion of citizen leadership'. 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control. In pushing forward for a convention on 15 August at the will of government officials and against the advice of the sub-committee chairs, we believe that a critical moment in which citizens should be leading will be undermined. The principles and important nature of being a citizen-led process are being sacrificed for the sake of expediency,' read the statement. They said that the 'rushed timeline, constrained logistics and limited interactive design' meant that the convention no longer offers a platform for meaningful engagement. 'The structure risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive – more performance than participation. We cannot lend our names to a gathering that does not allow for genuine dialogue. Furthermore, the National Convention was envisaged as a kick-off event for the real heart of the National Dialogue – community, sectoral and citizen-led engagement. As yet, there is no agreed plan for the roll-out of the real Dialogue, and as such the National Convention is premature,' they added. 'Strategic misalignment within the PTT' According to the groups, the 'continued absence of a confirmed, approved budget allocation and a last-minute commitment of initial funds' has made adequate preparation for the gathering impossible. 'This raises real risks of a poorly organised and unaccountable process. The push to proceed has created pressure to engage in emergency procurement, which may violate the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA),' they said. They added that there were 'deep disagreements' within the PTT over the nature of the National Dialogue, readiness, governance and risks. 'Without shared clarity and alignment at the core of the process, moving ahead would be destabilising to the national effort. Unfortunately, this strategic misalignment revolves around the move away from a citizen-led National Dialogue to a government-led process,' the organisations said.
