'It was rubbish': Ricky Ponting slams India's bowling effort at Old Trafford, shares what went wrong
India were bowled out for 358 in their first innings of the 4th Test at Old Trafford, with Ben Stokes leading England's bowling effort with a brilliant five-wicket haul, which was his first in Tests since 2017.
But what followed next was a frustrating passage of play for the visitors, as the English opening pair of
Zak Crawley
and
Ben Duckett
gave their team a strong and steady start. The Indian bowlers failed to take early wickets, allowing England to build momentum without much resistance.
Former Australia captain
Ricky Ponting
didn't mince words while analysing India's performance, echoing sentiments expressed earlier by former India head coach and legend Ravi Shastri.
'I think we heard it when we were waiting to come out just before the break, what Ravi Shastri said. It was rubbish. They just missed their areas," Ricky Ponting said on Sky Sports
Cricket
.
"I'm not sure what they were expecting out of the surface, but I was surprised that they actually went with (Anshul) Kamboj ahead of (Mohammed) Siraj with the new ball to start with, knowing what impact Siraj has had on this series so far, and knowing how important the start of England's batting innings is.
You know they're going to come out and play their shots."
How and why Rishabh Pant's England tour could come to an abrupt end due to toe fracture
Ponting was particularly critical of India's line and length early in the innings.
"I think they had to go to their best and most experienced bowlers. They got off to a flyer — way too straight to Duckett, so many boundaries square of the wicket on the leg side. You know you can't bowl there.
So they've got some work to do now. They've got to get together at the break and work out how they're going to bowl to try and slow the scoring down, but then also work out how they're going to get these two out," added the veteran.
India's bowling options were already under strain going into this Test, with injuries ruling out Nitish Kumar Reddy and pace duo Akash Deep and Arshdeep Singh.
Poll
What was the key factor in India's struggle during the first innings?
Poor bowling line and length
Strong batting from England
Injuries to key players
That left the team with no choice but to hand a debut to uncapped Haryana pacer Anshul Kamboj. The youngster nearly picked up a wicket in his first over but was denied by fine margins — moments India would go on to rue as England's openers took full advantage.
As the second session drew to a close with no wickets in the bag, India's hopes now rest on their bowlers striking back in the final phase of the day.
Both Crawley and Duckett scored half-centuries, frustrating the Indian bowlers, as they continue their search for the first wicket.
For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the
India vs England Test match
here.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Dale Steyn slams Washington Sundar - Ravindra Jadeja for chasing ‘free milestones', backs Ben Stokes in handshake row
A new-look Team India fought their way through the last two days of the Manchester Test to secure a draw and keep the five-match series alive going into the Oval. While there was plenty of talk about the grit and determination shown by the Indian batters, a fresh controversy emerged in the final hour of play on Day 5 when English skipper Ben Stokes offered to end the game with a handshake, only for the Indian batters to refuse as they were closing in on their respective centuries. After Stokes' offer was turned down, the English captain tried to persuade Ravindra Jadeja by asking if he really wanted to score a century against the likes of Harry Brook and Ben Duckett. Zak Crawley also jumped into the exchange, urging Jadeja to shake hands with Stokes and leave the field. While much of the cricketing fraternity—including former England captains Alastair Cook and Nasser Hussain—backed India's decision to keep batting, others criticised the move as going against the 'spirit of the game'. Former South Africa pacer Dale Steyn has now weighed in on the debate, siding with the English camp and accusing Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja of chasing 'free milestones.' He said their decision to continue batting was not the most gentlemanly thing to do. Steyn was replying to a post by Proteas spinner Tabraiz Shamsi, who wrote on X (formerly Twitter): "Why is there such a big deal being made about the Indians choosing not to accept the offer to end the game in a draw immediately? The offer was made. The offer was rejected, and they were fully entitled to make their choice. They got their 100s, which they worked hard for. Game over," Steyn replied to that post stating, 'Shamo this onion has many layers to it, and each one will make someone cry. The only issue I see here is the one thing people aren't realizing, the batters weren't playing for 100s, they were batting for a DRAW. That was the goal. Draw the game. Once that was accomplished, and a result was out of the question a handshake was offered, that's the gentlemanly thing to do right? It's not then the time to realize they safe and now say no we'd prefer some free milestones… although within the rules, just seems a little, well, odd. That said, they did bat well, and maybe with the last hour approaching they should have been more aggressive in reaching those milestones, at least then, we could all agree, no team tried to out do the other in this weird situation,'
NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
Ex-India Skipper Issues Stern Warning For Pakistan Clash In Asia Cup: "Everyone Is Aware..."
As the much-anticipated India vs Pakistan clash in the Asia Cup approaches, former India captain Mohammad Azharuddin has expressed serious reservations about the timing and context of the match, given the situation between the two countries. India and Pakistan are placed in Group A of the T20 tournament scheduled to be held in the UAE from September 9 to 28. The high-octane group-stage encounter is slated for September 14 at the Dubai International Stadium. "Looking at the current situation in the country, we shouldn't be playing this match. Everyone is aware of the issues we are facing," Azharuddin told IANS, referring to the recent spike in cross-border tensions, including the Pahalgam terror attack and India's subsequent Operation Sindoor. Azharuddin stressed that if sporting ties were to continue, they should not be selective. 'And if we have to play, then we should play every sport — not just by picking and choosing,' he added, alluding to the absence of bilateral series and inconsistent sporting engagements between the two countries since 2012. The veteran cricketer clarified that while he holds strong personal views, the final decision rests with the government and the BCCI. 'In the end, it's the government that will decide whether we should play or not. The decision made by the board, the government, and BCCI will be final.' He further added, 'Until the problem is resolved, we shouldn't move forward,' reiterating his belief that India should not engage in cricketing ties with Pakistan until the political and security tensions ease. 'No matter how much we say, ultimately, only what the government and BCCI want will happen. Whatever I am saying today, I'm saying it after careful thought and understanding,' Azharuddin concluded. Despite no bilateral cricket between India and Pakistan since 2012–13, the two teams continue to meet in ICC and ACC tournaments at neutral venues. Owing to the political sensitivities, the entire Asia Cup will be played in the UAE, with Dubai and Abu Dhabi serving as host cities. The BCCI remains the official host of the 19-match tournament, with both nations agreeing not to play on each other's soil until at least 2027. India will begin their campaign against the UAE on September 10, with a potential second face-off against Pakistan in the Super Four stage on September 21, depending on group outcomes. Group A features India, Pakistan, UAE, and Oman, while Group B includes Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Hong Kong. Teams will be allowed to field 17-member squads for the event.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Divya Deshmukh's FIDE win at FIDE Women's World Cup and a turning point in Indian women's chess
Over the span of 25 days in Batumi, little cracks started to appear in China's dominance of women's chess. A nine-woman contingent made its way from China to the Georgian city to try and win the FIDE Women's World Cup, only to see two Indians — the 19-year-old champion Divya Deshmukh and the 38-year-old finalist Koneru Humpy — fighting it out for the title at the end. The contrast in India and China's fortunes was most visible during the final: While Divya fought against Humpy for the title, the Chinese duo of Tan and Lei were fighting for the third place. 'Indian chess is just unbelievable!' wrote chess legend Judit Polgar in a post on her X account. Having two Indian women fighting in the finale was a moment that could be an indicator of a seismic shift in the world of women's chess. After all, this comes on the back of the Indian women's team claiming the Chess Olympiad gold medal just last year. China has been a dominant force in women's chess for decades now. While they have not had a World Cup winner in three editions, their prowess in women's chess is strongly reflected in women's world championships, the pinnacle of women's chess. Six out of the 17 women's world champions in history have been from China. The first of these was Xie Jun, who became the first-ever women's chess champion from Asia when she claimed the title in 1991. After claiming the title thrice more, she passed the torch to Zhu Chen and Xu Yuhua. Then came the era of Hou Yifan, who won the title four times starting from 2010. The 15 years since that title from Yifan have seen three women from China claim the women's world champion's crown — Tan Zhongyi and Ju Wenjun being the other two. This reign of China on the women's world champion's throne since 2010 was only briefly interjected twice. 'Divya's win is a great thing for India because of the way the country's players dominated the World Cup. Women's chess especially was always dominated by Russia and China, two very strong countries,' points out grandmaster Abhijit Kunte, who was the captain of the Indian women's team at the Olympiad last year where the first blow to China's dominance was struck by Indian women. At the Olympiad, a team event, China had sent a second-string team without stars like women's world champion Ju Wenjun, Tan Zhongyi and Lei Tingjie. At the Women's World Cup, though, it had one of the strongest contingents, missing only two top stars: World No 1 Hou Yifan, who is semi-retired at this point, and women's world champion Ju. China's nine-player contingent was matched in numbers by India's nine players among the 107 contenders from 46 countries. 'The way India dominated the World Cup, it showed that our players are ready to take on everybody. China cannot take India lightly now, because we have gold and silver medals in the World Cup, we won a silver medal at the Asian Games and we were gold medalists in the Chess Olympiad. Having two India versus China semi-finals shows how stiff the competition between the two countries is,' says Kunte. What makes the one-two finish by Indian players even more remarkable is that the FIDE Women's World Cup is the trickiest format in the sport to navigate. It's a minefield where each round involves one-on-one battles in the two-game mini matches in the classical format. If the two classical games do not yield a winner, the battle enters a third day where there are skirmishes in the rapid format and then blitz if necessary until there's a winner. On paper, it should have been an exhausting format for someone like Humpy. And a daunting one for someone as inexperienced as Divya. But eventually, the grizzled veteran and the tenacious teenager were left standing to fight for the title. Away from the two players too, there are plenty of positives: Be it Woman International Master Priyanka K outlasting Women's Grandmaster Zsoka Gaal in tense tiebreaks, or I M Vantika Agrawal taking out former women's world champion Anna Ushenina, or India having more players in the quarter-finals (four) than China (three). 'Our Olympiad team members, Vaishali Rameshbabu and Harika Dronavalli, also made it to the quarter-finals. So if you look at the bench strength of the Indian women's players in this World Cup, we can say that for the very first time in women's chess, we sort of outperformed the Chinese players. That in itself is a show of dominance. Along with the fact that we are better, we also have players that are currently improving. Divya, for example, is far away from reaching her peak,' says Kushager Krishnater, who has been Humpy's second since August 2022. The Olympiad victory, coupled with the one-two at the World Cup, have raised hopes that the final frontier — the women's world championship title — can also be breached by an Indian woman soon. 'Chess in India was ruled by Humpy and Harika for almost 20-25 years. Humpy recently became a World Rapid Champion, her second title in the format. Humpy and Harika have performed very well at the international level. But the Women's World Championship title has always been missed by Indian players. And now the way Gukesh has come and won the World Championship title, we expect that Divya will also follow the same path. This new generation will bring these titles back to India. They are not just ensuring that the legacy of Humpy and Harika continues, they will take that flag even higher,' predicts Kunte.
