Gauteng underspends budget but says R1.8bn not lost
Gauteng underspent R1.8 billion, mostly in health and education, but the province says funds are not lost and may be reallocated.
Gauteng Finance and Economic Development MEC Lebogang Maile provided a broad overview of the Gauteng Provincial Government's state of finances and expenditure. Picture: Facebook/Lebogang Maile
The Gauteng Provincial Treasury has confirmed that about R1.8 million was returned to the National Treasury due to underspending in its annual budget, mainly from the health and education departments.
Gauteng Finance and Economic Development MEC Lebogang Maile confirmed on Monday that the total underspending amounted to R1.799 billion; however, the notion that this money is lost is a 'misunderstanding'.
'The concern that the underspent resources will no longer be available or that they are lost by the Gauteng Provincial Government is a misunderstanding that necessitates clarification,' he said.
Gauteng underspent R1.8 billion
The Gauteng Provincial Government's final budget for the 2024/2025 financial year was R168.76 billion. By year-end, it had spent R166.97 billion, which is 99% of the budget.
The total underspending was R1.799 billion, of which R1.041 billion (58%) came from the Departments of Health and Education. The remaining R769 million (42%) came from all other departments combined.
Conditional grants accounted for R381.51 million of the R1.799 billion underspent, while the Provincial Equitable Share (PES) accounted for R1.418 billion.
ALSO READ: 'Not clearly defined' — What ANC leaders are saying about Mashatile's 'assassination' attempt
Conditional grants are funds given by the National Treasury to provinces or municipalities for specific projects or services. Conditional grants must be used according to detailed conditions outlined in law.
Provincial Equitable Share (PES) is a portion of the national revenue shared with all nine provinces based on factors like population and poverty levels. Provinces use it to fund services like health, education, and social development.
Unlike conditional grants, this money can be spent more freely within the province's responsibilities.
Most departments used 95% or more of their budget
Most departments utilised 95% or more of their budget, according to the department's expenditure breakdown.
Departments like Infrastructure, Roads and Transport, the Office of the Premier, and Department of Education spent 100% of their budgets. The Gauteng Provincial Legislature had the lowest spend at 93% of its allocated funds.
Breakdown of expenditure by departments:
Source: Gauteng Provincial Treasury
Source: Gauteng Provincial Treasury
The Gauteng Provincial Treasury says that once the financial year ends, it reviews all unspent funds to decide what can be kept and used in the next year.
ALSO READ: Maile earmarks 60% of Gauteng procurement for local businesses
This includes verifying how much has been spent and how much remains as of 31 March 2025; identifying which of the unspent funds are committed to specific projects and which are unallocated; addressing any outstanding payments or invoices with appropriate documentation; and for infrastructure projects, providing clear details regarding tenders, costs, and payments that are still due.
If conditional grants are not spent by year-end, they usually return to the National Treasury.
However, the province can apply for a rollover (permission to keep the money for the next year) — but only if they provide solid proof that the funds are committed to ongoing projects.
R295.67m underspent conditional grants funds applied for rollover
Of the R381.51 million underspent in conditional grants, R295.67 million was applied for rollover, and R85.85 million will go back to the National Revenue Fund because the departments couldn't justify keeping it.
In terms of PES funds, the R1.418 billion underspent here will undergo a strict internal process in Gauteng to determine whether it should be rolled over.
'Above all else, this process aims to ensure that service delivery imperatives are realised,' the department said.
ALSO READ: Nasi iSpani: Teacher assistant programme to be relaunched
The Gauteng Provincial Treasury says it must legally pay all service providers within 30 days of getting an invoice, as required by the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).
This rule helps ensure that businesses, especially small and medium enterprises (SMMES), are paid on time and can continue to run smoothly.
9 of 14 departments paid invoices on time
At the end of the 2024/2025 financial year, nine out of 14 departments paid 100% of their invoices on time.
These include the Office of the Premier, Roads and Transport, Community Safety, Human Settlements, Economic Development, e-Government, Sports and Culture, Cooperative Governance, and the Provincial Treasury.
Social Development paid 98% on time, Infrastructure Development paid 88% (excluding client departments), Agriculture and Rural Development paid 71%, Education paid 80%, and Health paid a mere 21% of its invoices within 30 days.
The government recognised the issue and committed to improving tools and systems to enhance payment times. It aims to comply with the law, bolster the economy, and support businesses that rely on these payments.
ALSO READ: Constitution drafters 'did not foresee' coalition governments, says Maile
The Gauteng Provincial Treasury concluded that if a department fails to properly account for its funds, it must return the money to the Provincial Revenue Fund, though this money is not lost.
The provincial government keeps all provincial income, such as taxes and national transfers, in the Provincial Revenue Fund (PRF), its main account. Money from this fund can only be used following strict rules and legal procedures.
'Service delivery is a top priority for the Gauteng Provincial Government. For this reason, we remain committed to ensuring that underspent funds are reallocated to crucial programmes and projects in order to ensure that the residents of our province continue to receive the necessary public services needed to alleviate the triple challenges of poverty, unemployment and structural inequalities,' the department said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Back to drawing board for 2026 revised SASSA SRD grant
Parliament sent back the revised SASSA SRD grant to the Department of Social Development this week. It's touted to become a Basic Income Grant for the unemployed in 2026. However, the working group wants to see urgent changes before it is approved. As such, a draft policy for the revised SASSA SRD grant was initiated with the committee for Social Protection, Community and Human Development back in November 2024. However, the committee sent it back to the DSD on Wednesday this week, citing 'affordability and economic opportunities for beneficiaries.' The none-permanent COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress grant has been extended every year since 2020. Image: File Before the new-look stipend is approved, it must survive various engagements. Like with the Office of the Presidency, National Treasury and Department of Employment and Labour. The South African Social Security Agency believes this will be concluded within a few months. From there a draft will be published for public comment. Policymakers from the DSD were told to 'better integrate pathways from income support to employment.' Currently, the grant pays out R370 each month to roughly 9-million beneficiaries living below the poverty line. However, the committee wants to see it become better 'aligned with broader economic objectives,' like jobs … South Africa's unemployment rate has only been increasing in the last decade, forcing many to exist in the informal sector. Image: File Essentially, the 2026 Basic Income Grant will be for those without jobs, but not to the point of creating long-term dependency on the grant. Therefore, the DSD and SASSA have to improve their data systems and align government programmes to make it work efficiently. Government is concerned that if and when they make the grant permanent, it must be budgeted for every year to remain viable (unlike the current R370 SRD which isn't permanent). While the department sets to work 'tightening' the revised SASSA SRD grant, it has requested that the National Treasury extend SRD for two more years. However, the Treasury has only approved the continuation of the current SRD grant until March 2026. There's simply not enough taxpayer money to ensure everyone who applies for a SASSA grant will be approved for one. Image: File In response to yet another delay to the revised SASSA SRD grant, many MPs were scathing of the DSD's work. The EFF's Noluvuyo Tafeni noted the policy has been in development for over two decades and was still not ready. Likewise, the DA's Alexandra Abrahams questioned whether the revised SASSA SRD grant policy would ever see the light of day. Finally, the MK's Nhlanhla Gcwabaza argued that SASSA should work to help people exit the grant system, not make them dependent on it … Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Mashatile, Ministers under fire for R200 million travel bill, including R900,000 Japan stay
The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) has thrown its support behind a new bill aimed at reining in unchecked benefits for ministers. Image: Supplied Ministers in the Government of National Unity (GNU) have spent more than R200 million in travel expenses since assuming office last year, ActionSA revealed. The party said this figure was compiled through its GNU Performance Tracker, following the latest replies to our parliamentary questions submitted to every Minister, including the President, Deputy President, and the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture. This painted a damning picture of executive indulgence at a time of deep economic crisis, ActionSA said in a statement. This week, the party revealed that Deputy President Paul Mashatile and his staff have incurred over R2 million in travel-related expenses for transport and accommodation since last year This included spending over R900,000 on just four nights' accommodation in Japan. In a written reply, Mashatile said all these occurred due to his international trips: to Ireland, Botswana, Zimbabwe, and, recently, Japan. He stood in for President Cyril Ramaphosa on other trips. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In addition to this, Sports Minister, Gayton McKenzie, and his department have spent about R6.6 million on international travel. Among the most shocking items is a R164,556 payment for a trip to Burkina Faso that never took place. 'Not only is this spending exorbitant, but it is riddled with red flags, gaps, and inconsistencies,' it added. ActionSA said the public paid for flights and accommodation for an event that was ultimately abandoned, a textbook case of wasteful expenditure, as defined by the Public Finance Management Act. Defending his ministry, McKenzie said it would not be right to expect ministers not to fly business class on long flights. In a statement, ActionSA MP Alan Beesley condemned these as wasteful expenditures, saying that it was enough to build a decent home for a family in need for each night they spent in luxury. 'South Africans deserve leadership that puts people before perks and not an R200 million travel spree by the world's largest cabinet,' Beesley said.
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Illicit financial flows are derailing Africa's future
Illicit financial flows (IFFs) continue to undermine the future of Africa, hampering the ability of governments to adequately fund education, healthcare and development projects essential for lifting people out of poverty and fostering sustainable economic growth. As business leaders, politicians, academics and citizens, we cannot sit back. We must help curb the illegal flow of money out of our country through a cohesive effort by all stakeholders, both local and international, to ensure safeguards are put in place, laws are harmonised, and all enforcement agencies work together to address the problem. At the same time, we must not do anything that will deter investment. Ahead of G20 summit in Johannesburg in November, as well precursor meetings — such as the G20 finance ministers' and central bank governors' meeting and the T20 midterm conference held this month — we must formulate proposals that integrate the perspectives of public and private sector institutions, nonprofit organisations, think-tanks and universities. Together we can make valuable policy recommendations, such as using AI to turn vast amounts of data into information for developing strategic interventions. Working alongside each other, we can identify gaps in current legal frameworks and areas where greater co-operation is required. We must seek ways to stem illicit money flows. When individuals or companies evade their tax obligations, deliberately falsify import or export documents, or misappropriate funds intended for development projects, they are not committing victimless crimes. These outflows not only weaken our reputation in the eyes of the international markets, but also make it harder for the government to raise capital at manageable interest rates. We already owe too much: the National Treasury predicts that debt on our national balance sheet will be 77% of GDP this year. IFFs directly undermine economic growth, costing the South African economy the equivalent of almost 5% of annual collected tax revenue — losses of about R92.5bn. On the African continent, the numbers are more alarming, with between $50bn (about R889bn) and $90bn stolen annually, according to the UN. A 2020 report from a UN conference on trade and development states that IFFs represent as much as 3.7% of Africa's GDP. This figure has almost certainly grown since then, given that those who break laws will keep doing so if they are not held accountable. We recently convened a G20 multi-stakeholder dialogue to better understand this challenge, quantify its impact, assess current solutions, and identify new ones . One of our speakers, deputy minister of international relations and co-operation Alvin Botes, spelt out what this theft means: countries with high IFFs spend at least 25% less on healthcare and 50% less on education compared with their peers. IFFs wipe out any good the $65bn in aid Africa receives each year might do. They reduce progress made in making people's lives better. There are initiatives under way to address IFFs. For example, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) collaborates with the UN to strengthen countries' financial systems and prevent illicit outflows. While South Africa's inclusion on the FATF's grey list is viewed by some as an embarrassment, it enables us to strengthen our legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as enhance our anti-money-laundering capabilities. While South Africa's inclusion on the FATF's grey list is viewed by some as an embarrassment, it enables us to strengthen our legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as enhance our anti-money-laundering capabilities. We are also seeing prosecutions of high-level fraudsters, especially those who use dubious accounting methods to move money around and avoid paying their fair share of taxes. It is gratifying to see that action has been taken in this regard. Other UN entities have developed discussion platforms and measurement systems. There are 10 asset-recovery inter-agency networks that have 178 member countries, allowing illicit money flows to be traced across borders. In addition, Interpol supports national and international law enforcement agencies to investigate, trace and prosecute those responsible for these crimes. We must all strive towards expanding such interventions, as well as advocate for and enable closer alignment between government departments and between local law enforcement agencies and their international counterparts. However, our solutions must not cause more harm than good by discouraging legitimate investment. We should not, for example, implement unfair tax regimes that could result in capital flight. We must also not inhibit international investment inflows by making it nearly impossible to comply with legislation and regulations. Such a state of affairs would merely encourage companies to operate businesses in sectors such as import and export under the radar. Through working together by sharing data, harmonising laws and holding those responsible for IFFs accountable, we can strengthen the economy by plugging the holes through which money leaks and encouraging investment. Our people deserve nothing less.
