logo
Merck Stock (MRK) Bulls Cheer $10Bn Verona Pharma Gamble

Merck Stock (MRK) Bulls Cheer $10Bn Verona Pharma Gamble

Merck & Co. (MRK) is betting on acquisitions to offset the looming revenue loss from the upcoming patent expiration of Keytruda (pembrolizumab). Its latest move— the $10 billion acquisition of Verona Pharma (VRNA) —adds a promising blockbuster candidate for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a market worth an estimated $23 billion.
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
By broadening its pipeline beyond oncology, Merck aims to regain investor confidence, especially as its stock has lagged behind the broader market in recent years.
In my view, Merck's latest bet is likely to pay off, making me cautiously Neutral about its stock ahead of Keytruda's 2028 primary U.S. patent expiration date.
The 'Keytruda Cliff' Represents Merck's Greatest Challenge
Merck's biggest challenge is no secret—the looming patent expiration of Keytruda is the clearest example of the broader 'patent cliff' many pharmaceutical giants face. We're talking about blockbuster drugs generating over $10 billion annually, like Eliquis, Stelara, and Humira. In Merck's case, Keytruda brought in $29.5 billion last year —nearly half of the company's total revenue of $64.17 billion. That level of dependence makes the eventual decline in Keytruda sales a major concern.
Given that Keytruda is a biologic, the impact of biosimilar competition tends to be less abrupt than with traditional generics. Analysts expect sales to decline more gradually, potentially falling to around $15 billion within four to five years of the patent's expiration. Still, declining revenue is never a good look for a company, and Merck now faces the critical task of replacing that lost income.
One part of Merck's strategy is to introduce a subcutaneous version of pembrolizumab, which offers the convenience of shorter treatment times for both patients and healthcare providers. If it proves to be as effective as the intravenous version, it could gain traction for its ease of use. However, while this could help extend Keytruda's commercial life, it's unlikely to fully bridge the revenue gap. Payers may not be willing to pay a premium for convenience alone, especially once lower-cost biosimilars hit the market.
Merck Bets Big on Ohtuvayre as It Looks Beyond Keytruda
As part of its broader strategy, Merck is also leaning heavily on acquisitions and promising pipeline assets. Its recent interest in Verona Pharma's Ohtuvayre came as little surprise. Approved by the FDA in June 2024, Ohtuvayre has quickly gained traction. It's considered a 'first-in-class' treatment for COPD, uniquely combining non-steroidal anti-inflammatory effects with bronchodilation in a single molecule—an important innovation, given that many COPD patients continue to struggle with symptoms despite multiple existing therapies.
In the first quarter of 2025, Ohtuvayre generated $71.3 million in sales, beating analyst expectations. Forecasts now suggest the drug could achieve peak annual sales of over $4 billion. In addition, it's being explored for other respiratory conditions, including non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and asthma, potentially broadening its commercial impact even further.
Further Strategic Acquisitions Bolster Merck's Pipeline
Before Verona, Merck had been active in expanding its pulmonary and oncology portfolio. Think back to the $11.5 billion purchase of Acceleron Pharma in 2021 for its pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy, Winrevair. This asset generated $419 million in sales last year. In another example, Merck's more recent $680 million acquisition of Harpoon Therapeutics bolstered its immunotherapy pipeline.
That's the nature of big pharmaceutical companies like Merck—blockbuster drugs eventually run their course. The real challenge is building a sustainable 'flywheel effect,' where profits from a hit like Keytruda are reinvested into developing the next wave of blockbuster therapies. When internal R&D falls short, companies often turn to acquisitions—but that's typically a more expensive route.
For instance, developing a drug like Ohtuvayre in-house would likely have cost Merck a fraction—perhaps less than 10%—of the $10 billion it paid to acquire Verona Pharma. That said, Merck has the financial flexibility to make such moves. With a debt-to-assets ratio near historical lows, the company is well-positioned to pursue strategic investments without overextending itself.
Judging by its Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of just 12.2, which trades 55% lower than its sector median (26.98), the market isn't confident in Merck's ability to replace Keytruda. This is, at least in part, owed to Merck's underwhelming near-term revenue growth prospects. Its forward year-over-year revenue growth of 4.4% is 45% lower than the sector median of 8%.
Certainly, Merck's ability to resolve these 'growing pains' will determine the future direction of its stock.
Is Merck a Buy, Sell, or Hold?
On Wall Street, Merck sports a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on 10 Buy, seven Hold, and zero Sell ratings in the past three months. MRK's average stock price target of $103.60 implies an upside potential of almost 24% over the next twelve months.
Last week, analyst Terence Flynn from Morgan Stanley issued a Hold rating on MRK with a price target of $98. Regarding Ohtuvayre's immediate and long-term impact on Merck's financials, the analyst noted that 'The company expects the acquisition to become accretive to earnings by 2027, and fully accretive by 2028.'
The strategic fit of Ohtuvayre within Merck's existing cardio-pulmonary portfolio and the potential for synergies further support the Hold rating, as the long-term benefits are balanced by the short-term financial adjustments required.'
Bold $10Bn Bet on Verona Isn't Enough to Dislodge Neutral Outlook
Merck's acquisition of Verona Pharma is part of its broader strategy to offset the looming revenue hit from Keytruda's patent expiration. While Ohtuvayre offers a promising blockbuster opportunity with relatively low development risk, it came at a steep price, making the deal something of a double-edged sword, especially since the drug's long-term success is not guaranteed.
That said, Merck's current valuation suggests the market may be underestimating its potential. For investors who believe in the upside of recent initiatives—like the launch of subcutaneous pembrolizumab and the addition of Ohtuvayre—this skepticism could represent an opportunity. In the meantime, Merck's solid 3.86% dividend yield offers a cushion if the stock continues to lag.
Neutral.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should You Forget Pfizer and Buy This Magnificent Dividend Stock Instead?
Should You Forget Pfizer and Buy This Magnificent Dividend Stock Instead?

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Forget Pfizer and Buy This Magnificent Dividend Stock Instead?

Key Points Pfizer stands as one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. Although it has an attractive 7.1% yield, it has a big blemish in its dividend past. Investors looking at drug stocks would be better off with this lower-yielding competitor. 10 stocks we like better than Pfizer › One of the big reasons to like Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) today is its huge 7.1% dividend yield. To put that yield into context, the S&P 500 index is yielding roughly 1.3% and the average healthcare stock a bit over 1.7%. Pfizer competitor Merck (NYSE: MRK) is yielding a little more than 4%, yet dividend investors will probably be better off with Merck. Here's why. Pfizer and Merck have similar business models While Pfizer's dividend yield is clearly much higher than Merck's, both have relatively attractive yields today. And you could easily make the argument that the two pharmaceutical companies basically do the same thing. Thus, you might as well buy the higher-yielding stock here. That isn't an unreasonable position to take. Essentially, these two industry giants make drugs. They make different drugs, of course, but both are focused on conducting research intended to create new blockbuster drugs that they can sell exclusively until the patents run out. Both have massive and well-funded research and development teams. Both have global distribution systems and strong marketing groups. And both have the scale to buy smaller competitors with promising drugs, if they need to. In the short term, there will be differences between the two with regard to the drugs they have. So at times Pfizer will be better positioned than Merck, and vice versa. Given their vastly different yields, it is pretty clear that Wall Street believes Merck is better positioned right now. The problem with Pfizer is the dividend, not the yield Right now, Pfizer has a streak of 15 consecutive dividend increases. Merck's streak is also 15 years long. The issue is what happened roughly 15 years ago. As the chart below shows, Pfizer cut its dividend and Merck did not. That was a long time ago, of course, and the business environment was much different. The cut came in the middle of the Great Recession, when there were very real concerns that global financial systems would collapse. Notably, Pfizer cut the dividend at the same time it made a large acquisition. And yet Merck didn't cut its dividend; it has also made large acquisitions in the past, including its own sizable merger in 2009. To be fair, Merck's dividend was static for a long period of time, but going without a dividend increase is much more attractive for an income investor than suffering through a dividend cut. Why investors buy Pfizer and Merck If you are like me, you are not a healthcare specialist. Buying small drugmakers with novel products that are still in the testing phase is likely a non-starter. I just don't know enough to understand what is going on at such companies. And I certainly don't know how to analyze the likelihood that a new drug will get approved. Pfizer and Merck both have portfolios of already approved drugs. So there's a core business supporting their research efforts. On that front, they have both proven over time that they can successfully perform the R&D needed to find new drugs. And if their drug pipeline is soft, they have proven that they will go out and buy smaller companies to bolster it. In essence, Pfizer and Merck let you own a pharmaceutical company without having to spend a huge amount of time and effort trying to dig deeply into the drug business. But if you are trusting a company in this way, which is perfectly fine to do, you need to make sure you can trust it in other ways, too. If you are a dividend investor, Pfizer's dividend cut during the deep 2007 to 2009 recession just doesn't provide the same level of trust that Merck's steadily, though not annually, growing dividend does. Most investors will probably be better off erring on the side of caution here and buying Merck over Pfizer. Should you invest $1,000 in Pfizer right now? Before you buy stock in Pfizer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Pfizer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Merck and Pfizer. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Forget Pfizer and Buy This Magnificent Dividend Stock Instead? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Does This Move Make Merck Stock a Buy?
Does This Move Make Merck Stock a Buy?

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Does This Move Make Merck Stock a Buy?

Key Points Merck is seeking ways to prepare for a significant upcoming patent cliff. The company has just announced another acquisition that will help it achieve that goal. With its newer products, strong dividend, and reasonable valuation, Merck still looks attractive. 10 stocks we like better than Merck › Merck (NYSE: MRK), a leading pharmaceutical company, generates consistent revenue and profits. However, the stock has been under pressure over the past year due to its reliance on Keytruda, its famous cancer medicine. It might be the best-selling drug in the world, but Keytruda will experience a patent cliff by the end of the decade -- a significant risk investors have to take into consideration. Merck has been looking for ways to mitigate the risk of competition, and the drugmaker just made a move that could help along those lines. Should investors consider buying the stock? Merck dishes $10 billion to expand its lineup On July 9, Merck announced that it would acquire Verona Pharma, a U.K.-based biotechnology company specializing in the development of medicines for respiratory diseases. Merck will pay $10 billion in cash for this transaction, allowing it to add Ohtuvayre -- which treats chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) -- to its portfolio. First approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last year, Ohtuvayre is a treatment for COPD that looks highly promising. It has so far had a successful launch, and it is still being investigated across other conditions, which could later lead to label expansions. Though estimates vary (as always), some analysts think Ohtuvayre sales could peak at around $4 billion. So, it seems the company has yet another blockbuster on its hands. But will that be enough to replace Keytruda? Merck's multipronged approach Merck has entered into several such agreements in recent years. In 2021, it acquired Acceleron Pharma for $11.5 billion. This deal eventually allowed it to launch Winrevair, a medicine for pulmonary arterial tension. Winrevair is yet another promising therapy, with projected peak sales at around $3 billion. Between Ohtuvayre and Winrevair, that's at most $7 billion in peak annual revenue, though, much lower than the $29.5 billion in sales Keytruda generated last year. Merck will need far more than that, but the company does have a plan. Some of its acquisitions have yet to yield approved products with blockbuster potential. In 2023, the company paid $10.8 billion for Prometheus Biosciences and its promising candidate for ulcerative colitis, MK-7240. That could be another great addition to the company's portfolio, provided it aces enough clinical trials to land regulatory approval from the FDA. Merck isn't just relying on buyouts to plan for its post-Keytruda life, though. One of the company's most important internally developed projects is a subcutaneous (SC) version of its crown jewel. SC Keytruda recently aced a phase 3 clinical trial in which it proved noninferiority compared to the original, intravenous version of the medicine in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one of Keytruda's most important markets. The newer version of the cancer therapy does have some advantages over the old, though, including significantly cutting the time patients spend in the treatment room and the time physicians spend preparing the therapy, administering it, and monitoring patients afterward. SC Keytruda should attract plenty of business across many of the original's indications once all is said and done. And, together with the newer therapies Merck now has under its banner, should allow the company to smooth out the losses once biosimilar competition for Keytruda enters the market. The stock could perform well post-Keytruda Merck currently has more than 80 programs across its phase 2 and phase 3 pipeline. So, even beyond the candidates mentioned, the company should be able to find new gems. Putting aside label expansions for existing medicines, even a 25% success rate on brand-new clinical compounds should translate to several novel launches over the next five years. Not all will be blockbusters, but Merck's deep pipeline and recent moves show that it is capable of moving beyond Keytruda. Additionally, there are other reasons to consider buying the stock. First, Merck's shares look incredibly cheap right now. The company is trading at 9.3 times forward earnings estimates. The average for the healthcare sector is 16.2. Second, Merck is a solid dividend stock. The company's forward yield sits around 4%, and it has increased its payouts by 88.8% in the past decade. Merck's shares have lagged the market over the past year, but the company's prospects are still strong, at least for those willing to hold onto the stock for a while. Should you buy stock in Merck right now? Before you buy stock in Merck, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Merck wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Merck. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Does This Move Make Merck Stock a Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store