China and the Philippines launch selfie war over disputed reef
China and the Philippines are engaged in a war of selfies over a tiny disputed sand bank in the South China Sea, as the United States conducts military exercises in the region.
Both countries have released rival photographs of coastguard personnel holding national flags on Sandy Cay Reef, to which each claims sovereignty. After posing for the camera, both parties left the island, leaving nothing behind on the featureless expanse of 167 sq metres of broken coral.
The active assertion of territorial claims further raises tension in the region, where 14,000 US and Philippines troops are taking part in exercises described by commanders as a 'full battle test'.
The row began on Saturday when Chinese state media published the photograph of four black-clad personnel holding up a flag on what Beijing calls Tiexian Reef in was described as a 'show of sovereignty'.
Because it projects above the sea at high tide, a nation with sovereignty over Sandy Cay can claim the 12 km (7.5 miles) of territorial sea around it. This would overlap with the Philippines which has an airstrip and military base on Thitu island, 5 miles to the east.
• China accuses Lammy of raising tensions with South China Sea visit
The Phillipines should have detected the Chinese landing, but responded only after it was made public with a landing of five personnel and a flag photograph of their own.
'During the operation, the teams observed the illegal presence of China Coast Guard [vessel] 5102, approximately 1,000 yards east of Cay-2 as well as seven Chinese maritime militia vessels,' the Philippines coastguard said.
'This operation reflects the unwavering dedication and commitment of the Philippine government to uphold the country's sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea.'
After their departure, the Chinese coastguard made another landing 'to verify and deal with the situation in accordance with the law [and to] immediately stop its infringement', according to a statement.
So far, both sides appear to be taking pains to prevent symbolic assertions of sovereignty turning into a physical confrontation. But they add to the tension during the fortnight-long Exercise Balikatan, in which the US is simulating anti-ship missile attacks intended against Chinese vessels.
James Hewitt, spokesman for the US National Security Council, said: 'Actions like these threaten regional stability and violate international law. We are consulting closely with our own partners and remain committed to a free and open Indo-Pacific.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Libyan Express
09-05-2025
- Libyan Express
Pakistan says India 'weaponising water' in dangerous escalation
Ambassador Shafqat Ali Khan Pakistan's foreign ministry spokesperson has issued strong statements regarding India's recent conduct and its implications for regional stability, AFP reports . Speaking at a press briefing in Islamabad, Ambassador Shafqat Ali Khan declared: 'It is most unfortunate that India's reckless conduct has brought the two nuclear-armed states closer to a major conflict.' 'India's jingoism and war hysteria should be a source of serious concern for the world,' Khan added, highlighting Pakistan's perspective on the deteriorating bilateral relationship. The diplomatic tensions have prompted the Chinese embassies in both India and Pakistan to issue travel advisories. According to Reuters, amid what it describes as the worst fighting in the region in nearly three decades, Chinese diplomatic missions have urged their citizens in both countries to 'closely follow the situation and enhance security measures.' Ambassador Khan specifically addressed India's recent position on the Indus Water Treaty, a longstanding agreement that has regulated water sharing between the two nations since 1960. 'The Indus Water Treaty had been a successful water-sharing arrangement between India and Pakistan, withstanding the test of wars and standoffs,' he noted. 'However, the current Indian dispensation is bent on weaponising water… holding in abeyance of the Indus Water Treaty is unilateral and illegal, there are no such provisions in the treaty.' Khan characterised India's actions regarding the treaty as demonstrating 'blatant disregard for international treaties' and setting 'a dangerous precedent,' describing the decision as 'an attack on the people of Pakistan and its economy.' The ambassador firmly stated Pakistan's position that 'the treaty remains in force and fully binding on the parties,' dismissing India's announcement as having 'no legal consequence.' He also rejected Indian claims that Pakistan had refused diplomatic engagement, asserting: 'The Indian allegation of Pakistan's refusal to enter into government to government negotiations is also incorrect… Pakistan has been continuously engaged with India on the subject.' These developments come against a backdrop of historical tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, whose relations have been marked by periods of conflict and diplomatic strain since their independence in 1947.
Times
29-04-2025
- Times
Our writers' 100-word verdicts on Trump's first 100 days
Donald Trump re-entered the White House on January 20 and immediately set about changing America and the world. As he marks his 100th day back in office, here is how five columnists for The Times analyse his performance, in precisely 100 words apiece. Napoleon's whirlwind 100-day comeback in 1815 shook up the world order before his defeat at Waterloo. Trump's running start could have a more lasting impact. The big questions: will he run out of steam, will he embed his changes before the 2026 midterms, will the courts thwart him, will Musk's shimmering self-invention as a techno Robespierre become a liability? Focus will shift to all-out trade war with China. Is that winnable? Will it spill into a military conflict? The Chinese assessment is
Irish Daily Star
28-04-2025
- Irish Daily Star
Anthony Scaramucci says Donald Trump has 'already declared WW3'
Donald Trump's former communications director Anthony Scaramucci says people need to "understand" the President has "already triggered a war" - it's just not in the form people might have expected. Scaramucci, who has become an outspoken critic of Trump since his time in office was cut short in a matter of days for criticizing cabinet members, is now a the Rest is Politics US host. Speaking to Saxo on behalf of the Irish Star, the 61-year-old explained despite Trump saying he wants to see a permanent ceasefire in Russia after his previously lax stance, the world war is already underway. Read More Related Articles Karoline Leavitt's presser with new media overshadowed by 'disgusting' comment on English-speaking Uber drivers Read More Related Articles Russia accuses World of Tanks developer of 'extremist activities' as assets seized Scaramucci said: "He's already triggered a war. So you have to understand something - he's triggered tariff war one. And so he's Admiral Yamamoto, he's the one who declared war on the United States by attacking Pearl Harbor. And so he's now declared a world war." Risks are high the global economy will slip into recession this year, according to a majority of economists in a Reuters poll, in which scores said Trump's tariffs have damaged business sentiment. Just three months ago, the same group of economists covering nearly 50 economies had expected the global economy to grow at a strong, steady clip. Anthony Scaramucci at "The ABC News Presidential Debate: Race for the White House" held at the National Constitution Cente (Image: Getty Images) As China leads the way while the rest of the globe scrambles to make sense of the tariffs, Trump's supposed enemy number one looks to come out on top. Scaramucci said: "It is an economic war. And we are now in tariff war one, but will it go kinetic? I don't think it needs to go kinetic. I think that there are very smart adversaries in this war. The Chinese don't need to go kinetic. I think Trump has missized the Chinese. "If you study the famine that took place in the 1960s during the Cultural Revolution and you study the history of Xi Jinping, he doesn't care." Indeed, as China reacted to the latest round of Trump's inflation of Tariffs to 125 per cent, now 145 per cent, on all American goods, vice president of the Beijing-based Center for China and Globalization, Victor Zhikai Gao, told Channel 4's Cathy Newman : 'We don't care! China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no US, and we survived.' Scaramucci said: "His people will hold tight. If anything, what Trump is doing to China, even though there's weakness economically in China, what he's doing to China will galvanise those people. "So Trump has managed to **** off the Canadians, the Chinese, the Europeans, the citizens of the UK, and most industrial countries by declaring tariff war. But I don't see a reason why it would have to go kinetic. For Scaramucci, the threat is not in a physical war, but a cyber war. He said: ""If you're telling me that there's a missile strike in Iran and they attack one of the eastern, western European cities or something like that, could there be a regional war? "I don't see why, because remember, you can fight cyber war, you can fight an economic war, you could shut down each other's electrical information grids. It's not clear to me that we need to be dropping nuclear bombs on each other at this point to gain whatever the interests are for the various state leaders."
