logo
The Taliban Is Back In The International Spotlight

The Taliban Is Back In The International Spotlight

Gulf Insider4 days ago

Al Jazeera recently published a detailed piece about how India, Pakistan, and Iran are all nowadays wooing the Taliban, which is true, but they left out how Russia and China are as well while also making no mention of the newfound pressure that the US is placing upon the group.
In the order that they were mentioned, Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar held an historic call with his Afghan counterpart in late May, the first between officials of their level in over a quarter century.
He thanked him for condemning April's Pahalgam terrorist attack that led to the latest Indo-Pak conflict and for not falling for fake news meant to stir trouble between them. They also discussed expanding bilateral ties. India and Afghanistan have shared threat perceptions of Pakistan, the first due to the Kashmir Conflict and the second as regards Islamabad's alleged attempts to subordinate Kabul. Closer cooperation between them thus advances their interests but prompts deep suspicion from Pakistan.
Segueing into that country's interests, Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of harboring terrorist groups, which the Taliban denies. The improvement of their ties upon alleviating their resultant security dilemma could pioneer a Central Eurasian Corridor from Pakistan to Russia and beyond. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi organized a meeting between their top diplomats in Beijing in late May to that end, but it's unclear whether any tangible progress will be achieved. Mutual mistrust might ultimately prove insurmountable.
Moving along to Iran, that country had long-standing tensions with the Taliban over water rights and migration, but its Foreign Minister just visited Tehran in an attempt to help resolve them. Whether or not that happens is another story, but Iran has an interest in sincerely doing so due to the newfound pressure that the US is placing on the Taliban, which will be touched upon later on in this analysis. The point is that ties appear to be thawing, and at the very least, tensions might remain manageable for now.
Iran's ties with Afghanistan sharply contrast with Russia's, which recently removed the Taliban's terrorist designation, just hosted a delegation at the recent Russia-Islamic World Forum in Kazan where they signed several agreements, and has a grand geo-economic vision for Afghanistan that was detailed here. The aforesaid overlaps with Pakistan's earlier mentioned connectivity plans, which partially explains their rapprochement in recent years and could position Russia to mediate between it and Afghanistan.
On that topic, China is already mediating as was written above, but Russia objectively seems to be closer to the Taliban nowadays than they are given the latest agreements that were just signed. In any case, China is poised to play a major role in Afghanistan's reconstruction, though continued security threats stemming from ISIS-K appear to have thus far hampered the implementation of its plans. Nevertheless, these plans still remain in place, and it's possible that they could be speedily implemented in the future.
That's precisely what the US wants to prevent, however, thus explaining the newfound pressure that it's placing upon the Taliban through Trump's demand to reobtain control over Bagram Airbase and Rubio's implied threat to redesignate the group as a 'Foreign Terrorist Organization' (possibly only if it refuses). Pakistan's possible collusion with the US will be pivotal in determining what happens. If the US succeeds, then it could reshape South Asian geopolitics, much to India's detriment and possibly also China's.
Given the renewed interest that major stakeholders – India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China, and the US – have in Afghanistan, the Taliban's return to the international spotlight might portend a new era of cooperation and competition between them. The main variable is whether or not the Afghan-Pakistani security dilemma is soon alleviated and on what terms if so, such as Eurasian-mediated (Russia and/or China) or American-coerced, which will in turn place these dynamics on very different trajectories.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Resurgent ISIS? Terror Cells Launch Deadly Attacks On Syria's Kurds
Resurgent ISIS? Terror Cells Launch Deadly Attacks On Syria's Kurds

Gulf Insider

timea day ago

  • Gulf Insider

Resurgent ISIS? Terror Cells Launch Deadly Attacks On Syria's Kurds

At least three members of the Kurdish Asayish security forces were killed on Sunday in northeastern Syria, according to the group. They said they were targeted by an ISIS cell during a patrol on the road between Raqqa and Hasakeh. The patrol was targeted with a landmine, according to some sources. The official statement from Asayish also reported one person wounded in the attack, who is still receiving medical treatment. ISIS has been launching an escalating number of attacks against northeast Syria, mostly targeting the Kurdish SDF and other Kurdish forces. It has been reported that they carried out 104 attacks so far in 2025. Regional media details the following recent developments: The resurgence is not limited to Kurdish-administered areas. On May 30, ISIS claimed responsibility for its first attack on the forces of Syria's new transitional government, which took power following the ouster of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024. That attack, in Suwayda province, involved an improvised explosive device targeting a patrol from the Syrian Army's 70th Division, killing one soldier and injuring three others. The SITE Intelligence Group and SOHR confirmed the operation as ISIS's first publicly acknowledged assault on the new regime. Asayish said that 'sweep operations and investigations' are being launches in the area to try to find those responsible for the latest attack. Operations against ISIS have also been on the rise in recent weeks, with the HTS government joining in on some operations targeting them. The SDF reported that late last week they captured an ISIS cell in Deir Ezzor Governorate. They also reported that they had thwarted an ISIS attempt to plant a landmine in that area, killing one 'ISIS mercenary.' ISIS has claimed two attacks in the past two weeks targeting Syrian government forces, which are being presented as the first ISIS attacks against the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) government since they took power in December. Meanwhile, HTS itself is not much removed from ISIS… The current Syrian government are mix Isis with Al Qaeda (Bin Laden soldiers) that declared war on the west many times before they took overBut now they will deceive the west and play moderate to lift sanctions and get funding to build themselves and prepare for offensive — Bob (@Shariakill) February 23, 2025 ISIS said the first attack was in Suwayda Governorate, and that it killed or wounded seven soldiers. The second attack was near the first one but a week later, and targeted the US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA), killing one and wounding three.

Pakistan's Fatah-I missile turned out to be Dud: Indian officials
Pakistan's Fatah-I missile turned out to be Dud: Indian officials

Daily Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Daily Tribune

Pakistan's Fatah-I missile turned out to be Dud: Indian officials

TDT | AFI Pakistan's Fatah-I missile program, touted as a critical component of the country's defense strategy, has encountered substantial setbacks due to persistent quality issues, according to officials cited by The guided missile system, intended to serve as a counter to India's growing conventional capabilities and its Cold Start Doctrine, has reportedly underperformed in multiple test launches and real-world combat scenarios, raising serious doubts about its reliability and effectiveness. The Fatah-I missile, designed to enhance Pakistan's precision strike capabilities, was considered a milestone in the nation's defense modernization efforts. Positioned as a response to India's advancements in missile technology and strategic doctrines, the system was expected to deliver accurate and effective strikes. However, reports indicate that the missile has consistently failed to meet expectations. During multiple test launches, the Fatah-l has exhibited a range of critical failures, including veering off course, falling short of intended targets, or crashing outright. Most alarmingly, Indian officials have observed instances where the missiles disintegrated mid-air, pointing to severe structural or design deficiencies. These failures were particularly evident during recent conflicts with India, where the Fatah-I was deployed in combat situations. Rather than demonstrating the precision and reliability expected of a modern guided missile system, the Fatah-l's performance was marked by catastrophic malfunctions. The mid-air disintegration of missiles, as observed by Indian officials, suggests fundamental flaws in the system's engineering, potentially compromising Pakistan's deterrence capabilities. The Fatah-I's issues are a significant setback for Pakistan, which has heavily promoted the missile as a cornerstone of its defense strategy. The system was intended to counter India's Cold Start Doctrine-a military strategy that emphasizes rapid, limited conventional strikes to achieve strategic objectives before escalation. However, the missile's poor performance in combat has undermined its strategic value, leaving Pakistan's defense planners grappling with questions about the program's viability. The challenges facing the Fatah-l program highlight broader issues in Pakistan's defense industry, including potential limitations in quality control, manufacturing processes, and technological expertise. While Pakistan has made strides in developing indigenous defense systems, the recurring failures of the Fatah-I suggest that significant improvements are needed to ensure operational reliability. For India, the Fatah-l's shortcomings provide a strategic advantage, reinforcing confidence in its own missile and defense systems. However, the situation also underscores the volatile nature of the regional arms race, where technological advancements and reliability are critical to maintaining deterrence.

US Is 'Major' Cause Of Ukraine War: Beijing Goes On Attack
US Is 'Major' Cause Of Ukraine War: Beijing Goes On Attack

Gulf Insider

time3 days ago

  • Gulf Insider

US Is 'Major' Cause Of Ukraine War: Beijing Goes On Attack

China is pushing back hard against new Western criticisms of its foreign policy, as French President Emmanuel Macron and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth went on the attack, hurling sharp criticisms at Beijing during the ongoing Shangri-La Dialogue security summit in Singapore, which noticeably China's Defense Minister Dong Jun chose to skip. A fresh, strident Chinese denunciation was formulated at the United Nations in New York. Beijing typically is very careful with its Ukraine war statements, seeking to present itself as an outside, neutral and objective mediator, urging peace. But now Chinese officials are blistering angry over the ramped-up anti-China messaging coming from Washington and Europe. The rhetoric is clearly getting less restrained on all sides, as increasingly hot spots in Eastern Europe get closely linked to Asian flashpoints. Geng Shuang, China's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations blasted the United States for playing proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, saying Washington bears 'major responsibility' for the outbreak of the conflict. China's ambassador to UN further underscored that Beijing 'has never provided lethal weapons' to any side US should 'stop boring blame game' and instead focus on achieving peace. 'It is not conducive to achieving a cease-fire and ending the war, and runs counter to the common expectations of the international community,' he told the Security Council. French President Emmanuel Macron called on Indo-Pacific nations to establish a 'new coalition' to counter the 'constraints and side effects' stemming from the growing U.S.-China rivalry. –CNBC 'We urge all parties to actively forge an atmosphere conducive to peace talks by creating conditions and providing support. We also call on the parties to the conflict to work collectively toward de-escalation and a political solution, rather than persisting with military confrontations and attacks.' 'Just now, the US Representative, once again, spread misinformation and smeared China. This is utterly unacceptable,' said Geng, according to Xinhua. Hegseth's message in Asia was apparently coming through loud and clear via US representatives in New York on Friday. The Trump administration has of late held the threat of further sanctions over both Moscow and Beijing, given the export of 'dual-use' (military/industrial) Chinese items to Russia. The occasion of the Shangri-La Dialogue conference has only served to heighten tensions between the US and China globally, and in the Indo-Pacific region. Click here to read more…

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store