
The Best Growth Mutual Funds To Fuel Long-Term Capital Growth
In investing, patience is rewarded.
Mutual funds can deliver on several investment goals, with capital appreciation being near the top of the list. Growth mutual funds consolidate fast-moving companies into one portfolio, which can yield exciting results.
The funds highlighted below cover a range of exposures and include both active and passive management styles. Despite the strategy differences, they align on the objective of delivering above-market returns for their shareholders.
Methodology Used For These Mutual Fund Picks
This list of growth mutual fund picks includes options targeting a range of exposures, from up-and-coming domestic small caps to foreign multinationals. They additionally meet these criteria:
6 Best Growth Mutual Funds For Capital Growth
The table below highlights six top growth mutual funds that meet the noted parameters. Reviews of each fund follow.
1. Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX)
FECGX by the numbers:
Fidelity's small cap growth fund tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The index includes Russell 2000 companies that outperform peers on EPS growth and sales per share growth. The average five-year EPS growth for the group is 18.66%, about 50% higher than the 12.29% growth average among broader Russell 2000 companies.
Historically, small caps have provided important diversification for stock portfolios. Smaller companies are riskier and more volatile, because they can have less predictable business performance and reduced access to capital. But smaller companies can grow faster than bigger ones, as they did between 2000 and 2012. While large caps have been dominant in recent years, many analysts believe this is a cyclical trend that will reverse itself. A conservative position in small caps prepares you for that reversal.
2. Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX)
FMDGX by the numbers:
The Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund replicates the performance of the Russell Mid Cap Growth Index. The index isolates the growth-oriented companies of the Russell Mid Cap Index. These fast-movers are identified by high price-to-book ratios, two-year growth outlooks and historic sales per share growth.
High-growth mid caps are poised to become the next large caps. Companies to watch in this portfolio include the AI darling Palantir Technologies (PLTR) and crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN).
Middle-sized companies are more nimble than large caps and more stable than small caps. They can outpace large companies when the economy is expanding and they hold up better than small companies when the economy is contracting. Mid caps can also offer cheaper valuations than large caps—though Palantir is a notable exception.
3. Schwab US Large-Cap Growth Index (SWLGX)
SWLGX by the numbers:
Schwab's large-cap growth fund invests in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The index includes growth stocks that are also among the 1,000 largest U.S. companies by market capitalization.
In five of the last six years, SWLGX has produced annual returns from 27.53% to 42.66%. 2022 was the exception; a broad technology sell-off in that year pushed SWLGX to a 29.16% decline.
SWLGX has more than 50% concentration in the Magnificent Seven stocks: Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) and Tesla (TSLA). The group earned the name by driving much of the S&P 500 gains in recent years. Given their collective performance, it's hard not to prioritize them in a growth portfolio.
Beyond the Magnificent Seven, SWLGX also includes payment processor Visa (V), pharma stock Eli Lilly (LLY), club store Costco (COST) and Home Depot (HD)—solid performers in their own right.
4. American Funds New Perspective Fund (ANWPX)
ANWPX by the numbers:
The New Perspective Fund invests in stocks that benefit from growing global trade. Portfolio companies are multinationals, each with a significant business presence outside their home country. About 53% of the fund's assets are U.S. equities, 43% is in foreign stocks and the remainder is held in cash.
ANWPX is an actively managed fund, meaning the fund managers are making strategic trading decisions—rather than relying on an index to define the portfolio. Active funds can and sometimes do beat the market but they also charge a higher expense ratio than index funds. ANWPX has made the trade-off worthwhile in recent years, outperforming the MSCI All Country World Index and the Morningstar Global Large-Stock Growth category average in the prior 10-year and five-year periods.
The portfolio includes many recognizable names in a composition you won't find in an index fund. Top holdings include Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) and French eyewear company EssilorLuxottica (ESLOF).
5. Vanguard International Explorer Fund (VINEX)
VINEX by the numbers:
The Vanguard International Explorer Fund invests in smaller growth companies located outside the U.S. The focus is on developed markets in Europe and the Pacific, though emerging markets stocks comprise 7.4% of the assets. The portfolio's median market capitalization is $4 billion, and its earnings growth rate is 14.6%.
VINEX provides diversified exposure to foreign small caps—about 350 companies spread across 20 countries. The fund can be volatile, but the portfolio has strongly outperformed U.S. small caps in the last year, returning 12.52% compared to FECGX's 3.5% return.
Due to its volatility, you would hold this fund in a relatively small proportion alongside larger positions in domestic and foreign large caps.
6. Vanguard International Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWIGX)
VWIGX by the numbers:
VWIGX invests in non-U.S. large caps with growth characteristics. Portfolio companies are primarily located in Europe (48.6%), emerging markets (21.1%), the Pacific (17.2%) and North America (12.2%). The fund's median market cap is $90.4 billion and the earnings growth rate is 25.3%.
Vanguard's international large-cap growth fund holds interesting companies that may be too volatile for most investors to hold as individual positions. Examples include ecommerce giant MercadoLibre (MELI), Chinese tech company BYD (BYDDY) and Dutch semiconductor company ASML Holding NV.
VWIGX earned a Silver rating from Morningstar in 2025, for excelling in process, performance, people, parent and price. The fund has a long-term focus, but its managers occasionally make opportunistic moves into stocks with trend-driven upside or those with underestimated potential.
The fund can be volatile, so most investors will hold it as a diversifier rather than a core position.
Bottom Line
Growth investing is high risk and high reward. You can mitigate some risk through diversification and long holding periods. The diversification limits your dependence on one company, industry or economy. And long holding periods prevent you from realizing losses created by short-term volatility. In investing, patience is rewarded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markets Gain on Muted Response from Iran
Monday, June 23, 2025Market participants took today's global headline of a thwarted attack from Iran on a U.S. Air Force base in the small country of Qatar as a form of good news for equities today. Calls for peace in the region from President Trump look to have been taken to heart — if not by the mullahs in charge of Iran, then by traders in today's stock Dow closed up +384 points on the session, +0.90%, while the S&P 500 performed marginally better, +0.96%. The Nasdaq gained +224 points, +1.03% today, and the small-cap Russell 2000 rose +1.05%. All indexes ended regular trading at or near session highs. Bond yields remained steady (10-year +4.34%) or lower (2-year +3.85%).Oil prices ratcheted down considerably today, helping equities improve their performance. At this point, any warlike shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz — which passes 20 million barrels of petroleum products per day, or nearly 30% of the world's oil trade — do not appear to be on the table. As a result, WTI spot crude prices fell -8% to $67.67 per barrel and Brent dropped -6.3%, to $67.73 per of Los Angeles-based homebuilder KB Home KBH are down -3.4% in late trading today, directly following a five-cent beat on its bottom line to $1.50 per share (though down from $2.15 per share in the year-ago quarter) on $1.53 billion in quarterly sales, higher than the $1.50 billion in the Zacks consensus. Deliveries were slightly ahead of estimates, with the average price per home $488, full-year revenues (ending November) for the Zacks Rank #4 (Sell)-rated KB Home were reduced to a range of $6.30-6.50 billion from the $6.64 billion analysts were anticipating. The homebuilder has now outperformed on earnings estimates in nine of the last 10 quarters. Shares are now down roughly -20% year to date. S&P flash Services PMI for June came in a smidge ahead of expectations this morning, registering 53.1 versus a 53.0 consensus. This is down from the unrevised 53.7 headline for May but notably higher than the 50.8 reported for April. Strong growth momentum stemmed from plenty of domestic demand for services.S&P flash Manufacturing PMI, also for June, slightly outpaced estimates this morning as well: 52.0 matches the previous month's unrevised level and comes in half a point higher than analysts were looking for. Factory production rose for the first time in four months, and higher prices managed to be passed on to Home Sales for May also surpassed forecasts earlier today, with 4.03 million seasonally adjusted, annualized units ahead of the expected 3.95 million. This follows a downwardly revised 3.95 million units. Gains came from the Northeast first, +4.2%, followed by +2.1% in the Midwest and +1.7% in the South. Only the West posted a negative figure: -5.4%.Questions or comments about this article and/or author? Click here>> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report KB Home (KBH) : Free Stock Analysis Report Invesco QQQ (QQQ): ETF Research Reports SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY): ETF Research Reports SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio


CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
THC advocates praise Gov. Greg Abbott's veto of bill banning products in Texas
THC business owners applaud Texas governor's veto of bill that would have banned product THC business owners applaud Texas governor's veto of bill that would have banned product THC business owners applaud Texas governor's veto of bill that would have banned product Those who market and sell THC-based products are praising Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's veto of the bill that would have banned those products in the state. Late Sunday night, Abbott vetoed Senate Bill 3, after it passed in both the House and Senate during the 89th legislative session. Eddie Velez restocked his shelves inside Oak Cliff Cultivators on Monday, replacing the in-demand edibles, mints and other items set for state-imposed elimination. Velez leads the Texas Hemp coalition, the group of CBD shop owners at the heart of the political fight against the legislature's approved ban of all THC-laced products. "There's no reason to ban this, it's not harmful," said Velez. "It does not kill people." He thanked the governor for vetoing that ban. "I think the governor heard loud and clear from the citizens of Texas, they don't want a ban," said Velez. "They want these products, responsible access to these products." Velez and thousands of others sent letters to the governor, saying better regulation of THC products was needed, but a ban would shut down over 8,000 businesses. In northeast Dallas, House of Healing CBD shop operators also faced potential shutdown until the governor's veto. Manager Patrick Neeley accused conservative lawmakers of having one goal regarding THC. "Control, 100%," said Neeley. "There are lawmakers that just don't want this. They are trying to control Texans, and that's who I think today was a huge victory for." Abbott said he will call a special session of the legislature on Monday, July 21, to address SB 3 and other issues.


Fast Company
41 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Public sector AI will succeed (or fail) based on context
Public servants today face a double burden: They're simultaneously charged with running our most important community functions—like disaster preparedness and administering elections—while the technology at their disposal is outdated and ill-fitted to the job. The rise of AI has upended how private companies operate, but public servants across agencies lack AI tools designed specifically with government work in mind. In a perfect world, public servants could trust mass-market AI. But provisioning critical services requires a high bar. Quickly deploying technology prone to generating inaccuracies is an unacceptable tradeoff for those solving society's hardest problems. Few of us would be happy to get our mail a day earlier if it meant 10% of our mail never came. The tradeoff is more acute when public servants are working to end homelessness or reinvigorating economic development. AI is more accurate and useful for government employees when it's built atop core data assets like documents and emails and the contextual metadata around those assets—information like who shared documents, when they were shared, and the conversations that surrounded them. Public sector AI requires context The massive opportunity to empower public servants and improve government operations with functional, reliable AI tools comes not from training larger, smarter models, but ensuring AI has context. Context is everything because government operations depend upon the local partners, procedures, history, and regulations of a community of practitioners. For AI to work for public servants, it must understand the context well enough to generate accurate information. Today's AI tools fall short because they lack contextual metadata. Without this information, AI is not fit for purpose. Public servants cannot sacrifice accuracy for speed. Siloed technology destroys context Government work is inherently collaborative. Cybersecurity officials work with state and federal counterparts, and homelessness coordinators work with public health departments. But there is a fundamental mismatch between the collaborative nature of government work and the silos of most technology. Today's AI tools generally serve single organizations, lacking functionality to enable cross-agency collaboration. When FEMA responds to disasters, utilities, hospitals, shelters, and community organizations all play key roles. Public servants coordinate these nongovernment partners, but isolated AI systems can only access information within their own agencies—missing the context that lives across organizations. And the work doesn't happen in siloed agency folders. It happens in email threads, texts, unshared working documents, and view-only, versioned, and immediately outdated shared documents. These disconnected digital workspaces destroy context. But this is a technology problem—what does a context-rich technology look like? The government operations tech stack Effective government AI must be attentive to the different technology layers that underpin the work of public servants. We can visualize the government operations tech stack in four layers: Layer 1: Systems —The first, foundational, layer comprises the file storage systems: OneDrive, SharePoint, local folders, Outlook, and other repositories. While this is where key information often lives, it is rarely well-organized or accessible to outside partners. Layer 2: Resources —This refers to the resources themselves. Think individual files like memos, spreadsheets, SOPs, and more. While enterprise AI systems can access one organization's documents, they miss the critical context of how and why these resources were shared, who created them, and what discussions they generated. Layer 3: Coordination — The coordination layer encompasses emails, texts, events, direct messages, and video communications. This is where cross-organization collaboration happens and where ongoing discussions shape decisions. It contains the three sentence email from the 30-year department veteran, who succinctly explained where an internal policy originated, why it was created, and which parts no longer apply. This is institutional knowledge shared in real-time. AI tools without access to the coordination layer are set up for failure. Layer 4: Interface —The interface layer is where public servants make use of the data across layers. And this is where purpose-built AI can make an impact. Government officials should be able to get immediate answers without needing to recall whether information lives in a shared drive, email, video call, or calendar event. And the interface layer doesn't end with a search — it should enable the next step, whether that's drafting a policy, connecting with a subject matter expert, or reaching out to partners. Atop digital layers are public servants making decisions and taking action. This is where policy meets practice, where coordination becomes execution, and where community needs are met. Only context-rich AI can reliably scale public impact An AI interface with the full contextual metadata of government operations—the systems, resources, and coordination layers—becomes transformative. An elections official searching for polling center volunteers finds not just the sign-up sheet in their drive, but also the follow-up email from a facilities manager identifying the correct entrance, the text from a sick volunteer needing replacement, and the recent listserv discussion correcting the record about the polling location entrance. AI with this context provides a complete operational picture, not isolated documents that become outdated as soon as they're created. During emergency response, an AI with contextual access can connect FEMA policies with real-time partner communications, community feedback, and operational updates. Instead of just knowing what documents exist, the AI understands who shared critical information, when situations changed, and why certain decisions were made, enabling more effective coordination and faster response times. This contextual AI doesn't just provide information—it provides traceable, auditable insights that public servants can trust and act upon. It connects users not only to the right documents but to the right people and the right conversations, embedded within their specific community and operational context. The vision is clear: AI that lives where government work happens, with access to the full collaborative environment across organizations. When deployed with complete contextual metadata, AI can empower public servants to make a bigger impact while maintaining the accuracy and accountability needed. Government operations are fundamentally about coordination and context, and AI must reflect this reality to succeed in the public sector.