High Court grants Palestine Action bid to challenge terrorist ban
The protest group's co-founder Huda Ammori sought to challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision, which came into effect this month.
Mr Justice Chamberlain approved the application on two grounds: first, that the proscription order " amounts to a disproportionate interference with the claimant's and others' rights to freedom of expression, and freedom to protest". Second was that Ms Cooper had not consulted the group before making the proscription order, in breach of "natural justice" and of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Planes damaged
The move to proscribe Palestine Action was announced after members of the group damaged two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton late last month.
Police said about £7 million ($9.3 million) worth of damage was caused. The group claimed the planes had been involved in supporting Israel's military action in Gaza via the Royal Air Force base at Akrotiri in Cyprus.
But the decision to designate the group was made as early as March, over some of its previous protests.
Mr Justice Chamberlain rejected Ms Ammori's claims that the move was unlawful because it was influenced by "the views of pro-Israeli lobby groups", or that the group seeks "to prevent conduct which many regard as amounting to genocide".
'Reasonably arguable'
However, he accepted other points. 'As a matter of principle, I consider that it is reasonably arguable that a duty to consult arose,' he said.
'Having considered the evidence, I also consider it reasonably arguable that there was no compelling reason why consultation could not have been undertaken here.'
After Wednesday's ruling, Ms Ammori said: 'This landmark decision to grant a judicial review, which could see the Home Secretary's unlawful decision to ban Palestine Action quashed, demonstrates the significance of this case for freedom of speech, expression and assembly, and rights to natural justice in our country, and the rule of law itself.'
Judges had previously denied Ms Ammori's legal challenge for an injunction on July 4 that would have postponed the proposed ban, citing a strong public interest in bringing the order into force.
The latest ruling was welcomed by campaign groups, who fear the terror designation could have an adverse effect on the wider pro-Palestine protest movement.
A representative for Defend Our Juries, the group organising the protests, said: 'Yvette Cooper has no one to blame for this crisis but herself. We are confident the High Court will soon strike down this absurd and repugnant order.'
Any ban would mean support for, or membership of, Palestinian Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in jail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Witkoff and Putin meeting 'highly productive', Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin was "highly productive". He added that "great progress was made" and that he had updated some European allies on the details of the meeting. "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come," he said on his Truth Social platform. But Washington still expects to impose secondary tariffs on Moscow's trading partners on Friday, a senior administration official told The National. In July, the US set a 50-day deadline for Moscow to stop hostilities, threatening to impose secondary tariffs on trading partners importing Russian fuel. Mr Witkoff's visit is viewed as a last-ditch effort to end the conflict ahead of a deadline on Friday. The administration official added that 'the Russians are eager to continue engaging with the United States'. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser said that the two men had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on Ukraine as well as 'prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation between the US and Russia '. Mr Trump, who campaigned on ending the war that has raged since early 2022, has become increasingly frustrated with his counterpart as Moscow's forces advance in Ukraine and its bomb and missile strikes killed hundreds of civilians. Overnight on Tuesday, Russian forces hit a recreational centre in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region, killing two people and injuring 12, including two children, according to local authorities. On entering office, Mr Trump attempted a more conciliatory tone with his Russian counterpart, in contrast to his predecessor Joe Biden, who enacted punishing sanctions against Moscow over the conflict. But relations frayed following a series of meetings with Ukrainian and Russian officials that failed to bring the war to a halt.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Palestine Action claims 200 arrested supporters have not been charged
None of the 200 demonstrators arrested in the UK for supporting Palestine Action in recent weeks have been charged, campaigners have claimed, as they sought support for a protest on Saturday. The direct action protest group was designated a terrorist organisation in July after it claimed to be behind millions of pounds worth of damage at a Royal Air Force base. The High Court has agreed to review the decision in November. Until then, the ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. But Tim Crosland, a spokesman for the campaign group Defend Our Juries, said the group believes potential legal claims against police should proscription be deemed unlawful lay behind the lack of prosecutions. 'Nobody has been charged. It's important to say, and there's a sense that there aren't going to be any charges till the other side of the judicial review,' Mr Crosland said at a press briefing on Wednesday. More than 500 people have committed to holding a sign saying 'I Support Palestine Action' in Central London on Saturday, he said. Mr Crosland, who is organising the protest alongside Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori, said they had received advice from solicitors that those arrested would be able to make legal claims against the police for 'unlawful arrest' if the proscription order is eventually struck down. 'We've specifically asked them: if the order is struck down in November, does that open up the possibility for legal claims against the police for unlawful arrest and for trespass to people's property? And the answer to that was yes,' Mr Crosland said. Ms Ammori said she was hopeful the decision would be overturned by then, but acknowledged there was a 'substantial risk' in showing support for the group. 'Obviously there is a substantial risk, but you know, we do hope to be successful in this legal challenge,' she said. The British activist, of Palestinian and Iraqi heritage, sought an injunction to delay the proscription in early July, which was denied by the High Court. Last week, she was granted her bid to challenge the ban, though the terrorism designation will remain in place until then. Further demonstrations are being planned for the coming months until the High Court ruling. 'If arresting and prosecuting more than 500 people is an absurd waste of public resources, that's not on us. We're not the ones who made this law. We're not the ones doing the arresting. We will keep going as long as people keep wanting to take part in this action,' Mr Crosland said. The proscription has caused outcry, particularly from veteran campaigners who say that direct action has a long history in British politics, going all the way back to the Suffragettes. Among those arrested was 83-year-old priest Sue Parfitt and an 81-year-old former magistrate. Angie Zelter, a veteran peace protestor, said there was visible 'discomfort' among the police making arrests at demonstrations supporting Palestine Action. 'There's a lot of discomfort amongst the police, because they are making a mockery of the definition of terrorism,' she said, adding that she plans to attend the demonstration on Saturday. Discussing the arrests, Mr Crosland said that in Derry, Edinburgh, Kendal and Chichester, police did not act. "It shows they can exercise common sense if they want to," he said. "In London, people have been arrested under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which is the lesser of the two possible charges, and somewhere between six and 12 hours after a police interview in the police cells, people have been arrested without charge. "In Cardiff, people were arrested under Section 12, which is an offence punishable with 14 years' imprisonment - doing exactly the same thing, holding the same sign, quietly sitting - they were held in police custody beyond the 24-hour maximum. The time was extended under the terrorism laws while those people's houses were raided." The Metropolitan Police have been contacted by The National over the claims it is holding back on bringing charges. However, it has warned it would arrest demonstrators on Saturday and suggested that they were attempting to put the UK's overcrowded criminal justice system under further pressure. 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system,' a representative of the force said. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying the vandalism of the planes was "disgraceful" and the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: Former Sharjah expat killed in UK bike crash to be repatriated ahead of funeral
The mortal remains of an Indian youngster who died in a London accident will be buried in the UAE on Thursday. 'We are grateful to the government of Sharjah and the UAE embassy in London for helping us expedite the process of bringing Jefferson's body here,' his father Justin told Khaleej Times. 'His funeral will be held in Sharjah on Thursday morning. We would like to keep the service extremely private with only close family and friends in attendance. We are grateful to everyone who prayed for us.' It was on July 25 that 27-year-old Jefferson Justin died when a bike he was riding skid and crashed into a wall. The incident happened when Jefferson was trying to negotiate a turn on the way back from work to his house. 'We have been trying to get the paperwork sorted and it finally came through today,' social worker Ashraf Thamarassery said. 'Jefferson's body will be flown to the UAE on a flight early tomorrow morning. His funeral will be held at the Sharjah Cremation center in Juwaza tomorrow itself.' The middle child of three brothers, Jefferson grew up in Sharjah. All of them completed their schooling at the Emirates National School in Sharjah. The family has been living in the UAE for over three decades. Earlier, his brother Juvin Justin had shared that Jefferson loved Sharjah and visited his family every year. 'He loved being here and was planning to come back to settle here sooner or later,' said Juvin.
