
Arizona's rural groundwater deal stalls as legislative session nears end
AP Image
Arizona's governor and the GOP-controlled Legislature are at odds over regulating groundwater pumping in the state's rural areas - and time is running out.
Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs stood with local Republican leaders at the start of this year's session, optimistic that Republicans in the Legislature would embrace her proposal to create rural groundwater management areas.
But almost four months later, talks have stalled and frustration has mounted as both sides try to find a solution to conserve water that's increasingly becoming more scarce amid a prolonged drought.
Negotiators have not met since early April, Hobbs' office said. Around the same time, Republicans and some interest groups grew frustrated with a separate proposal by the Arizona Department of Water Resources to slash overdraft in the Willcox Basin by a percentage that is "unattainable," said Sen.
Tim Dunn, one of the Republican negotiators.
Overdraft refers to when groundwater extraction exceeds what is being replenished.
Hobbs has said that if lawmakers adjourn - typically in the summer - with no deal, she will take matters into her own hands.
Disagreements as water supplies dwindle Water basins in rural Arizona are largely unregulated, and Democrats and Republicans have different visions on how to slow depletion.
Negotiators, including staff from the governor's office and bipartisan lawmakers, have clashed over proposed mandates for reducing groundwater pumping from aquifers. Republicans who introduced their own plan say the one from Democrats is too high. Democrats say the GOP proposal isn't high enough.
Both sides also disagree on the makeup of local councils that would govern groundwater usage, the water basins that would be included and the pathway for future regulation.
Meanwhile, underground water supplies continue to shrink to the point that some wells in rural areas have gone dry. Residents are faced with the choice of drilling deeper, hauling water or moving, said Sarah Porter, director of the Arizona State University Kyl Centre for Water Policy. Managing the groundwater won't reverse the decline but can slow it, she said.
Arizona's regulatory framework for managing groundwater was first enacted in 1980 and largely centres on the state's most populous areas, including Phoenix and Tucson.
Porter said the active management areas were designed to apply to growing cities and are too burdensome to replicate in rural areas where agriculture is at the heart of local economies.
The Arizona Department of Water Resources has proposed a separate reduction in overdraft in the Willcox Basin, which caused uneasiness among Republicans and others who say that could jeopardize businesses in rural Arizona.
For years, legislators on both sides of the aisle have failed to get proposals to manage groundwater in rural Arizona to the governor's desk or signed into law.
In 2022, voters approved a ballot measure to establish an active management area in Douglas, a rural city on Arizona's south-eastern edge. In recent months, Hobbs used executive authority to create another in the Willcox Basin, another rural community north of Douglas.
'Negotiations are going nowhere' Bipartisan negotiators have not met in several weeks on a framework that would significantly broaden the scope of the Groundwater Management Act, according to multiple people.
"I think it's pretty clear that the rural groundwater negotiations are going nowhere," said Democratic state Sen. Priya Sundareshan, one of the legislative negotiators.
In a Tuesday statement, Hobbs accused GOP legislators of refusing to come to the negotiating table.
Emails obtained by The Associated Press show frustration from Hobbs' office over what the deputy chief of staff, Jennifer Loredo, describes as a "unilateral" move by Republicans to decide who is invited to the negotiating table.
"After zero response for a month, you have now proposed to significantly increase the number of stakeholders, and instead of reciprocating our request for input, you sent out a calendar invite to this group of external parties," Loredo said in an email addressing the GOP negotiators.
Dunn said since the last negotiating meeting he's been meeting regularly with people on what language they might find agreeable despite sour moods over the water resources proposal for the Willcox Basin and the little time lawmakers have left to make a deal.
He said he would like to call another meeting with Hobbs' office and Democratic legislators soon but said the water resource's proposal doesn't bode well for talks in the Legislature.
"If that's their end game, we can't get there," Dunn said.
Philip Bashaw, CEO of the Arizona Farm Bureau, which has been involved in crafting the GOP rural groundwater bills the past two years, said the water resources' proposal further frustrated negotiations on the bills and fuelled anxiety.
"It definitely took a lot of the air out of the balloon, that's for sure," Bashaw said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
'That's way out of my lane': FBI chief Kash Patel steers clear of Trump-Musk feud, Epstein files
Patel said that he didn't know how Musk would know about the details of the Epstein files and clarified that he won't participate in the conversation read more Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has refused to wade into the public spat between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, saying he won't participate in this conversation. Patel was speaking at the 'Joe Rogan Experience" podcast on Thursday (June 5) when he learnt about Musk's allegations regarding Trump's involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein files. 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and Trump," said Patel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rogan: Jesus Christ. That's a crazy thing to say. How does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access? Patel: I'm not participating in any of that conversation. That's way out of my lane. Kash clearly uncomfortable. — Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) June 6, 2025 Musk's 'big bomb' Elon Musk on Thursday dropped what he said 'a big bomb ' on X when he claimed Trump was sitting over Epstein files and not releasing them because his name is mentioned in them. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT." In another post on X, Musk stated, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Soon after Musk's claim, Democrats too demanded the list be released. House Democrats reportedly pressed the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate Musk's. Joe Rogan's reaction to Musk's remarks Podcaster Joe Rogan said it was 'crazy' for Musk to say such a thing on X. 'That's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Or does he have access to the Epstein files?" Meanwhile, Patel added that he didn't know how Musk would know about the details of the Epstein files. 'I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing; that's way outside my lane. I know my lane, and that ain't it," Patel said. Ahead of the 2024 presidential elections, Trump declared he wouldn't have any problem releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files. However, the US president has not fulfilled this promise yet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In February 2025, the Justice Department, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, released approximately 200 pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs, a redacted contact book, and an evidence list from investigations into his crimes. These documents, described as 'Phase 1,' largely contained previously leaked material, such as pilot logs from Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and Epstein's 'black book,' but offered no major new revelations. Bondi later claimed that the FBI's New York Field Office was withholding thousands of additional pages related to Epstein's investigation and indictment.


Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
How the cybertruck came to embody Tesla's problems
The bromance between Elon Musk and President Trump is ending at a difficult time for Tesla. The electric-vehicle maker lost roughly $150 billion of market value Thursday—its biggest ever drop—after the Tesla CEO and Trump traded insults. Sales of Teslas have slumped this year. Tariffs could disrupt the supply of key components. The sprawling Republican tax-and-spending bill would end tax credits for EV buyers. And Tesla's Cybertruck has been a disappointment. Musk set high expectations for the Cybertruck, telling investors it would be Tesla's 'best product ever." The angular, stainless steel pickup was supposed to generate buzz for Tesla by showcasing new technology and unlocking the lucrative truck market. Instead, it has become synonymous with Musk's polarizing stint in politics, exposing some owners to graffiti or middle fingers from other drivers. And its reputation has been tarnished among Tesla fans because of a spate of recalls and manufacturing issues that have resulted in cycles of repairs. In the U.S., the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks in 2024—well below Musk's ultimate goal of 250,000 a year. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla sold around 7,100 Cybertrucks in the U.S., according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility. Ford's F-150 Lightning pickup outsold it. In an effort to boost sales, Tesla has rolled out lower-price versions of the truck and started offering buyers incentives such as 0% financing and free upgrades. Almost as soon as the $100,000 Cybertruck hit the road, quality problems began to multiply. Reports on social media cited cracked windshields and spotting from so-called rail dust, orange discoloration similar to rust. In its first year, Tesla recalled the truck seven times to fix dangerous defects. In March, with large metal panels falling off the trucks, the tally rose to eight. Some of the quality problems were known and documented internally before the truck went on sale, including issues with the accelerator pad and windshield wiper that later triggered recalls, said former employees who worked on the Cybertruck. But there was pressure inside Tesla to get the truck to market quickly, according to these employees. Tesla didn't respond to requests for comment. 'Elon Musk will tell you the biggest professional mistake was the falcon doors on the Model X," said David Fick, a longtime Tesla owner who got his Cybertruck in March. He referred to the complex door design that opens upward and hinges at the roof. 'I believe that the Cybertruck is going to go down as an even bigger corporate stumble." The retired banker in Boynton Beach, Fla., chose to wait more than a year to buy his Cybertruck, hopeful that many of the biggest issues would be identified before he drove his off the lot. 'They do a lot of bleeding-edge stuff where they rush to the market and then you're a beta tester as an owner," Fick said. He paid about $72,000 for the car, plus $7,300 for window tinting and a custom wrap for exterior trim panels known as cant rails, covering his new car in a metallic maroon color. Soon after, Tesla recalled cant rails because they could become unglued. 'I've had tons of recalls on my Teslas over the years," said Fick, who added that the cars are worth the hassle. 'Eighty percent were fixed by [software] updates, but these are physical things we are dealing with now." Musk unveiled the prototype for the Cybertruck in 2019. At the time, he said it would cost $39,900, with a battery range of up to 500 miles—an ambitious combination that would be a stretch for any EV maker. Work on the vehicle was delayed a couple of years, leaving engineering and manufacturing teams with only a few months to do final testing before the trucks went to customers, former employees said. Musk tried to temper expectations around how quickly Tesla could increase production, given its unique design. 'There is always some chance that Cybertruck will flop, because it is so unlike anything else," he wrote on social media in July 2021. Still, he promoted some of its most unusual features, including his dream of making the car amphibious. Former employees said they took Musk's social posts as orders, but the engineering proved difficult. By 2022, it was clear internally that Cybertruck wouldn't be able to meet all Musk's criteria, so engineers scrapped an early design and started over—developing a smaller, landlocked version of the truck, the people said. After about a year and a half of testing, Tesla delivered the first Cybertrucks to a dozen or so customers in late November 2023. An early version of the truck started at $100,000 and had an estimated range of 318 miles. Two months later, Tesla issued its first recall on the vehicle: a software update that required the company to increase the size of the font on a warning system used across its fleet. It was the first of three recalls that Tesla addressed on the Cybertruck through over-the-air updates to its software. Cybertruck's problems couldn't be fixed by software updates alone. In April 2024, Tesla issued a recall for the accelerator pedal. The company had received a notice from a customer complaining that the accelerator had gotten stuck. Tesla found that the pad attached to the long pedal could dislodge and get stuck in the trim above the pedal, causing the car to accelerate. An internal investigation found the issue was the result of an 'unapproved change," in which Tesla employees used soap as a lubricant to attach the pad, according to the recall notice. Inside Tesla, the accelerator pad had been a known issue starting with the prototype, according to an employee who worked on the part. The manufacturing team also identified the part as problematic, this person said. Tesla also had problems with the Cybertruck's expansive windshield, which measured nearly 6 square feet. Sometimes the heavy glass would break, two employees said. The glass either arrived cracked from the supplier in Mexico or from handling at the Austin, Texas, facility, they said. Some owners took to social media to describe the glass cracking as soon as they drove off the lot, or while they wiped the inside of their windshield. The windshield required a large windshield wiper measuring 50 inches long. In June 2024, Tesla issued a recall on the wipers, whose motors Tesla found had been overstressed by testing. The wiper had been flagged nearly a year before, two people who worked on the Cybertruck said. It was one of the first issues identified on the vehicles, at which point it was classified as a 'gating issue," which meant that it needed to be resolved before production could move forward. Reid Tomasko, a 25-year-old YouTube creator, took his Cybertruck on a cross-country trip, during which it performed perfectly, he said. Then came winter in New Hampshire. He was driving near his home in Lebanon, N.H., in February when a metal panel flew off the side of his truck. In March, Tesla issued a recall affecting most of the Cybertrucks it had produced—more than 46,000. The problem involved adhesive that could become brittle in extreme weather, causing exterior trim panels called cant rails to dislodge. Inspecting his truck, Tomasko said he found loose connections on almost every panel that used the adhesive, including the large pieces of stainless steel over the rear wheels, the front fender and the front doors. 'I was wondering, why are they not recalling the other panels?" Tomasko said. After replacing several panels, Tesla offered to buy back Tomasko's truck for nearly all of the $102,000 that he paid, he said. He accepted. 'I am planning on getting a newer one for cheaper soon," he said. Write to Becky Peterson at


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk to launch the America Party amidst Trump feud: How many political parties exist in the US?
They might have parted ways, but thanks to the bitter (sans the 'sweet') ending, Elon Musk isn't ready to back down. America's most prominent power couple has called it quits – and that's all anyone is talking about for the last few days, courtesy, Elon Musk and Donald Trump 's very public fallout. Post the breakup, Musk is not only calling out Trump on social media like a hurt teenager, but he is also washing the dirty laundry out in the open. However, instead of charting the road most taken and asking for alimony, Musk is setting up shop for his own venture – his latest being a new political party. The America Party. What is the America Party? The Tesla CEO, in a surprising and bold move, has floated a new party – 'The America Party' – following his public feud with the US President, after his poll on X received support from at least 80% of respondents. After Musk and Trump engaged in a heated spat, the Tesla CEO created a new poll on his X platform, asking whether it was time to create a new political party in America. He revealed the results recently, showing 80% support from respondents. To start it from the top, the idea for the America Party was first introduced by Musk on his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), where he conducted a poll asking his followers if it was time to create a new political party that represents the 80% of Americans in the political center. The poll garnered over 5.6 million responses, with more than 80% supporting the initiative. Musk has time and again expressed dissatisfaction with both the Democratic and Republican parties, suggesting that they no longer serve the interests of the majority of Americans. In that context, it is clear that Musk envisions the America Party as a centrist alternative that prioritizes pragmatic solutions over partisan ideologies. Needless to say, if the idea of the America Party is actualized, this could signal a potential shift in the American political landscape. Moreover, the timing of this proposal is significant, coinciding with an escalating feud between Musk and Trump. The conflict began when Musk criticized Trump's $2.4 trillion tax and spending bill, labeling it fiscally irresponsible. In response, Trump threatened to cut federal contracts with Musk's companies, leading to a public exchange of barbs between the two. Musk has since suggested that the America Party could serve as a viable alternative to the current political establishment. How many political parties are there in the US? Beyond the bipartisanship of the Democratic and Republican parties, the United States boasts a diverse array of political parties. According to Ballotpedia, there are at least 55 distinct ballot-qualified political parties across the nation, with a total of 238 state-level parties. These parties vary in size, influence, and geographic reach. While the Democratic and Republican parties are recognized in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., several other parties have established significant presences in multiple states: Libertarian Party: Recognized in 38 states, the Libertarian Party advocates for minimal government intervention in both personal and economic matters. Green Party: With recognition in 23 states, the Green Party emphasizes environmental issues, social justice, and anti-corporate policies. Constitution Party: Present in 12 states, this party promotes a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and advocates for limited government. These parties often serve as alternatives for voters seeking options outside the traditional two-party system. In addition to the major third parties, numerous other political organizations operate within specific states or on a national level: Alliance Party: A center-left party formed in 2019, the Alliance Party focuses on anti-corruption, electoral reform, and social justice issues. Natural Law Party: Founded in 1992, this party advocates for policies based on Transcendental Meditation and holistic health principles. American Solidarity Party: Established in 2011, the American Solidarity Party promotes Christian democracy, emphasizing social justice and environmental stewardship. These parties, while smaller in scale, contribute to the political diversity of the United States. Challenges faced by the third parties Despite their presence, third parties encounter significant challenges in gaining electoral success. The US electoral system, characterized by single-member districts and a "first-past-the-post" voting method, tends to favor a two-party system. This structure makes it difficult for third-party candidates to win elections and secure legislative representation. Moreover, third parties often face obstacles such as limited media coverage, reduced access to campaign financing, and restrictive ballot access laws. These barriers can hinder their ability to compete effectively in elections. However, Musk's party – if he chooses to form one – might chart a different path for itself. Given his massive wealth at disposal for political campaigns, his grasp over social media and its technological tools, the America Party – if formed – might actually succeed to leave its footprints, although the success of such an initiative would depend on overcoming significant structural and logistical barriers, as well as garnering widespread support across the political spectrum. As the United States has a complex electoral system, with ballot access laws varying significantly from state to state, making it to the electoral politics right at this moment might not be a possible feat to achieve, even for Musk. Elon Musk's Big Warning In Retaliation To Trump; 'SpaceX Will Decommission Dragon Spacecraft'