Odisha government lifts curbs on night shifts for women
Night shifts for women were earlier prohibited under the Odisha Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1956, on safety grounds. However, the state government, in a bid to increase employment opportunities for women, has exempted all the shops and commercial establishments from the applicability of Section 23 of the Odisha Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1956.
This section prohibited the employment of women during the night in any establishment, whether as employees or otherwise. The provision was to ensure their safety and well-being by restricting their work hours during the night. The government has allowed the employment of women during the night hours provided, they are willing to work at night and give their consent in writing.
Additionally, there must be a minimum of three women employees present during the shift, and a female supervisor must be on duty to oversee operations. Pick-up and drop services must use GPS-enabled vehicles, and all drivers must undergo police verification,as read in a notification by the Labour Department.
Workplaces have to prominently display emergency helpline numbers including 181 (state women's helpline) and 1800-345-6703 (Labour department helpline), both within the premises and inside the transportation vehicles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
a day ago
- News18
US inflation unchanged last month, though core prices accelerated
Agency: Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 20:00 IST Representational image (Image: News18) Washington, Aug 12 (AP) US inflation was unchanged in July while a measure of underlying inflation rose to its highest level in five months as tariffs push the price of imported goods higher while gas and grocery prices cooled. Consumer prices rose 2.7 per cent in July from a year earlier, the Labour Department said Tuesday, the same as the previous month and up from a post-pandemic low of 2.3 per cent in April. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices rose 3.1 per cent, up from 2.9 per cent in June. Both figures are above the Federal Reserve's 2 per cent target. The figures suggest that slowing rent increases and cheaper gas are offsetting some impacts of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Many businesses are also absorbing some of the cost of the duties. Tuesday's figures likely include some impact from the 10 per cent universal tariff Trump imposed in April, as well as higher duties on countries such as China and Canada. Still, stubbornly high inflation puts the Federal Reserve in a difficult spot: Hiring slowed sharply in the spring, after Trump announced tariffs in April. The stalling out of job gains has boosted financial market expectations for an interest rate cut by the central bank. Chair Jerome Powell has warned that worsening inflation could keep the Fed on the sidelines — a stance that has enraged Trump, who has defied traditional norms of central bank independence and demanded lower borrowing costs. Gas prices fell 2.2 per cent from June to July and have plunged 9.5 per cent from a year earlier, the government's report said. Grocery prices slipped 0.1 per cent last month, though they are still 2.2 per cent higher than a year ago. Restaurant meals continued to get more expensive, however, rising 0.3 per cent in July and 3.9 per cent from a year earlier. Tariffs appeared to raise the cost of some imported items: Shoe prices jumped 1.4 per cent from June to July, though they are still just 0.9 per cent more expensive than a year ago. The cost of furniture leapt 0.9 per cent in July and is 3.2 per cent higher than a year earlier. Clothing prices ticked up 0.1 per cent in July, after a larger rise in June, though they are still slightly cheaper than a year ago. Tuesday's data arrives at a highly-charged moment for the Labour Department's Bureau of Labour Statistics, which collects and publishes the inflation data. Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, then the head of BLS, after the Aug. 1 jobs report also showed sharply lower hiring for May and June than had previously been reported. The president posted on social media Monday that he has picked E.J. Antoni, an economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a frequent critic of the jobs report, to replace McEntarfer. 'E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE," Trump said on Truth Social. Adding to the BLS's turmoil is a government-wide hiring freeze that has forced it to cut back on the amount of data it collects for each inflation report, the agency has said. UBS economist Alan Detmeister estimates that BLS is now collecting about 18 per cent fewer price quotes for the inflation report than it did a few months ago. He thinks the report will produce more volatile results, though averaged out over time, still reliable. Americans are likely to absorb more trade-war costs in the coming months as Trump begins to finalize tariffs. Once businesses know what they will be paying, they are more likely to pass those costs to customers, economists say. Trump has insisted that overseas manufacturers will pay the tariffs by reducing their prices to offset the duties. Yet the pre-tariff prices of imports haven't fallen much since the levies were put in place. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that foreign manufacturers have absorbed just 14 per cent of the duties through June, while 22 per cent has been paid by consumers and 64 per cent by US companies. Based on previous patterns, however — such as Trump's 2018 duties on washing machines — the economists expect that by this fall consumers will bear 67 per cent of the burden, while foreign exporters pay 25 per cent and US companies handle just 8 per cent. Many large US companies are raising prices in response to the tariffs, including apparel makers Ralph Lauren and Under Armour, and eyewear company Warby Parker. Consumer products giant Procter & Gamble, maker of Crest toothpaste, Tide detergent and Charmin toilet paper, said late last month that it would lift prices on about a quarter of its products by mid-single-digit percentages. And cosmetics maker e.l.f. Beauty, which makes a majority of its products in China, said on Wednesday that it had raised prices by a dollar on its entire product assortment as of Aug. 1 because of tariff costs, the third price hike in its 21-year history. 'We tend to lead and then we will see how many more kind of follow us," CEO Tarang Amin said on an earnings call Wednesday. Swipe Left For Next Video View all Matt Pavich, senior director of strategy and innovation at Revionics, a company that provides AI tools to large retailers to help them evaluate pricing decisions, says many companies are raising prices selectively to offset tariffs, rather than across the board. 'Up until now we haven't seen a massive hit to consumers in retail prices," Pavich said. 'Now, they are going up, we've seen that." (AP) GSP (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments News agency-feeds US inflation unchanged last month, though core prices accelerated Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Read More
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
All pain, no gain: Labour's odd strategy
All politics is about pain. Governing is a matter of deciding who is hit and how hard. Sometimes this can be a virtue. 'If it isn't hurting, it isn't working," was the mantra of John Major, a former Conservative prime minister, who embraced high interest rates and high unemployment in order to bring down inflation during the early 1990s. Ronald Reagan opted for a similar slogan when suffering the same ailment: 'No pain, no gain." Today in Britain Labour has a different approach: all pain, no gain. Under Sir Keir Starmer, the party spends its political capital in places where it generates the lowest return. Whether it comes to winter fuel or welfare reforms or even dishing out cash to northern mayors, the government has an unnerving ability to endure the maximum amount of pain for the smallest possible gain. Under this government, fiscally irrelevant savings provoke uproar. Scrapping the universal winter-fuel allowance to save an annual £1.1bn ($1.5bn, or 0.04% of gdp) was a totemic policy. It was deeply unpopular (pensioners liked receiving £300 for nothing) when announced by Rachel Reeves, the chancellor. What Labour would suffer in political pain was worth it for what it would gain: a reputation for pursuing sound policy, even if voters squealed. Now, the government has back-pedalled. All but the richest pensioners will receive the handout. A cost-saving measure will save practically no cost. Pain? Plenty. Gain? Almost none. Labour has long stuck by the two-child benefit cap, citing its £3.5bn cost to remove. That left 540,000 or so children in poverty and made backbench MPs furious. Nearly a year on, Sir Keir is thinking of reversing course. What kind of Labour prime minister wants to oversee a rise in child poverty? Labour could be a party of fiscal prudence or one committed to lowering child poverty. Somehow, it has managed to come across as neither. Even where Labour has stuck to its plans, it has done so in a way that maximises punishment and limits reward. In the spring Ms Reeves reduced disability benefits by £5bn. The cuts were deep enough to upset a base which sees any reduction in disability benefit as a sin. Yet they were nowhere near enough to placate bearish investors who see welfare spending going up for ever. (They are right: these benefits are forecast to rise by 0.2% of GDP by 2030, even with Labour's stricter criteria.) Labour has taken to threatening a chainsaw and then wielding a scalpel and wondering why everyone, across the spectrum, is annoyed. The timing and size of the welfare cuts were not due to an ideological belief that fewer people should be on benefits. It was to ensure that Ms Reeves would not break her fiscal rules. A £5bn hole had appeared in the Treasury's spreadsheet and £5bn was found to fill it. Labour's fiscal rules are supposed to hurt. But they are meant to guarantee stable policymaking. Increasingly they guarantee the opposite. Fiscal policy becomes a recurring drama, whereby Treasury officials amend spending today to hit a forecast—and almost certainly wrong—number in four years' time. Labour has to fiddle with its fiscal position so often because it will not think big on tax. By ruling out increases to the broadest taxes, such as income tax and vat, Ms Reeves has focused on steep rises to less lucrative ones. An inheritance tax on farms raises barely £2bn but guaranteed tractors turning up in Whitehall and blasting their horns outside Downing Street. All pain, no gain is the guiding principle of even the party's more radical flank. Angela Rayner, supposedly the most left-wing member of the cabinet, came up with a plan to target the relatively rich, which helpfully ended up in the newspapers. Pensions could be raided and dividends taxed more heavily. It amounted to £4bn. For context, the British government hoovers up £1.3trn in tax revenues. Middle England would squeal, naturally, yet the public finances would hardly look healthier. Less soak the rich; more squirt them with a water pistol. Where there is a case for collective sacrifice, such as when it comes to defence spending, the government refuses to make it. Instead it promises no pain, just gain. After the cold war, countries slashed defence spending, allowing them to splurge on welfare without having to raise taxes. It was called the peace dividend. Now the government faces the inverse: defence spending will have to rise from 2.3% of gdp to at least 3%. Rather than admit that this will be painful, Sir Keir insists it will be pleasant. It will be a 'defence dividend", says the prime minister, bringing jobs and investment. He promises it 'will be felt in the pockets of working people". Voters will indeed feel it in their pockets. But not in the way the prime minister thinks. No pain, no gain? No! Pain. No gain Back in July, when Labour should have enjoyed a post-electoral glow, Ms Reeves promised only pain. The chancellor made a show of pausing a slew of planned infrastructure projects when she arrived in office. 'If we cannot afford it, we cannot do it," was the chancellor's mantra. It turned what should have been a deluxe honeymoon into a wet weekend in Wales. Almost a year later, on June 4th, Ms Reeves gave these projects the green light once more. Almost a year has been wasted. For a government whose only hope of re-election relies on people feeling better off than they did five years ago, this is not time they could afford to lose. Pain without a purpose is pointless. Policy without any pain is simply a lie. The restraint in day-to-day spending that Labour will unveil in its spending review on June 11th will not be popular. It never is. But it could be accepted as necessary. If this often rather vague government has a project, it is making Britain accept that it must consume less and invest more. That means there will be short-term pain, for long-term gain. There is a case that the government could make. It will hurt. But it might just work. Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.
Fibre2Fashion
2 days ago
- Fibre2Fashion
UK retail footfall falls 0.4% in July, BRC urges rate cuts
UK retail footfall has declined by 0.4 per cent year-on-year (YoY) in July, showing an improvement from June's 1.8 per cent drop, according to British Retail Consortium (BRC)-Sensormatic data. UK retail footfall fell 0.4 per cent YoY in July, improving from June's 1.8 per cent drop, BRC-Sensormatic data shows. High Streets were down 1.7 per cent, shopping centres 0.3 per cent, while retail parks rose 1.7 per cent. Wales saw growth; other nations fell. BRC's Helen Dickinson urged deeper business rates cuts to revive empty shops, as sentiment stays cautious despite signs of improvement. High Street footfall fell by 1.7 per cent YoY, easing from a 3 per cent decline in June. Retail Parks recorded a 1.7 per cent YoY increase, rebounding from a 1.1 per cent fall in the previous month. Shopping Centres saw footfall dip by 0.3 per cent YoY, improving from June's 1.6 per cent drop. Regionally, Wales was the only nation to post growth, with a 0.4 per cent YoY rise in footfall. England saw a 0.3 per cent decline, Scotland dropped 1.3 per cent, and Northern Ireland recorded the steepest fall at 3 per cent, BRC said in a release. Persistent shop vacancies—with around one in seven stores empty—remain a barrier to revitalising shopping destinations, according to Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium. While welcoming the government's plan to reduce business rates, she called for a substantial cut to deliver meaningful benefits for communities and revive empty shops. She also stressed that many smaller retailers depend on larger anchor stores to draw visitors, cautioning that upcoming reforms must ensure no store faces higher costs to avoid potential closures or price increases. 'July failed to bring about the summer boost in shoppers many retailers had hoped for. Instead, footfall dipped in July for the second consecutive year. There were bright spots, with Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds all showing an improvement in numbers of store visits. Retail parks continued to outperform other destinations with some seeing big brands opening new outlets,' Dickinson said. 'The early-July heatwave, following a scorcher in June, may have lifted leisure footfall more than retail, while one year into a new Labour government, consumer sentiment remains cautious. The underlying footfall trend may be improving, but this is still negative growth on negative 2024 figures - raising the question: are shoppers returning, or simply shopping around more as they try to spend less? Either way, retailers who can offer value, experience, and convenience may be best placed to convert tentative footfall into lasting growth,' Andy Sumpter, retail consultant EMEA for Sensormatic, commented. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)
