logo
5 years after Britain left the EU, the full impact of Brexit is still emerging

5 years after Britain left the EU, the full impact of Brexit is still emerging

Arab News31-01-2025

LONDON: Five years ago Friday, two crowds of people gathered near Britain's Parliament — some with Union Jacks and cheers, others European Union flags and tears.
On Jan. 31, 2020 at 11 p.m. London time – midnight at EU headquarters in Brussels — the UK officially left the bloc after almost five decades of membership that had brought free movement and free trade between Britain and 27 other European countries.
For Brexit supporters, the UK was now a sovereign nation in charge of its own destiny. For opponents, it was an isolated and diminished country.
It was, inarguably, a divided nation that had taken a leap into the dark. Five years on, people and businesses are still wrestling with the economic, social and cultural aftershocks.
'The impact has been really quite profound,' said political scientist Anand Menon, who heads the think-tank UK in a Changing Europe. 'It's changed our economy.
'And our politics has been changed quite fundamentally as well,' he added. 'We've seen a new division around Brexit becoming part of electoral politics.'
A decision that split the nation
An island nation with a robust sense of its historical importance, Britain had long been an uneasy member of the EU when it held a referendum in June 2016 on whether to remain or leave. Decades of deindustrialization, followed by years of public spending cuts and high immigration, made fertile ground for the argument that Brexit would let the UK 'take back control' of its borders, laws and economy.
Yet the result — 52 percent to 48 percent in favor of leaving — came as a shock to many. Neither the Conservative government, which campaigned to stay in the EU, nor pro-Brexit campaigners had planned for the messy details of the split.
The referendum was followed by years of wrangling over divorce terms between a wounded EU and a fractious UK that caused gridlock in Parliament and ultimately defeated Prime Minister Theresa May. She resigned in 2019 and was replaced by Boris Johnson, who vowed to 'get Brexit done.'
It wasn't so simple.
A blow to the British economy
The UK left without agreement on its future economic relationship with the EU, which accounted for half the country's trade. The political departure was followed by 11 months of testy negotiations on divorce terms, culminating in agreement on Christmas Eve in 2020.
The bare-bones trade deal saw the UK leave the bloc's single market and customs union. It meant goods could move without tariffs or quotas, but brought new red tape, costs and delays for trading businesses.
'It has cost us money. We are definitely slower and it's more expensive. But we've survived,' said Lars Andersen, whose London-based company, My Nametags, ships brightly colored labels for kids' clothes and school supplies to more than 150 countries.
To keep trading with the EU, Andersen has had to set up a base in Ireland, through which all orders destined for EU countries must pass before being sent on. He says the hassle has been worth it, but some other small businesses he knows have stopped trading with the EU or moved manufacturing out of the UK
Julianne Ponan, founder and CEO of allergen-free food producer Creative Nature, had a growing export business to EU countries that was devastated by Brexit. Since then she has successfully turned to markets in the Middle East and Australia, something she says has been a positive outcome of leaving the EU.
Having mastered the new red tape, she is now gradually building up business with Europe again.
'But we've lost four years of growth there,' she said. 'And that's the sad part. We would be a lot further ahead in our journey if Brexit hadn't happened.'
The government's Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts that UK exports and imports will both be around 15 percent lower in the long run than if the UK had remained in the EU, and economic productivity 4 percent less than it otherwise would have been.
Brexit supporters argue that short-term pain will be offset by Britain's new freedom to strike trade deals around the world. Since Brexit. the UK has signed trade agreements with countries including Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
But David Henig, a trade expert at the European Center for International Political Economy, said they have not offset the hit to trade with Britain's nearest neighbors.
'The big players aren't so much affected,' Henig said. 'We still have Airbus, we still have Scotch whisky. We still do defense, big pharmaceuticals. But the mid-size players are really struggling to keep their exporting position. And nobody new is coming in to set up.'
A lesson in unintended consequences
In some ways, Brexit has not played out as either supporters or opponents anticipated. The COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine piled on more economic disruption, and made it harder to discern the impact of Britain's EU exit on the economy.
In one key area, immigration, Brexit's impact has been the opposite of what many predicted. A desire to reduce immigration was a major reason many people voted to leave the EU, yet immigration today is far higher than before Brexit because the number of visas granted for workers from around the world has soared.
Meanwhile, the rise of protectionist political leaders, especially newly returned US President Donald Trump, has raised the stakes for Britain, now caught between its near neighbors in Europe and its trans-Atlantic 'special relationship' with the US
'The world is a far less forgiving place now than it was in 2016 when we voted to leave,' Menon said.
Can Britain and the EU be friends again?
Polls suggest UK public opinion has soured on Brexit, with a majority of people now thinking it was a mistake. But rejoining seems a distant prospect. With memories of arguments and division still raw, few people want to go through all that again.
Labour Party Prime Minister Keir Starmer, elected in July 2024, has promised to 'reset' relations with the EU, but has ruled out rejoining the customs union or single market. He's aiming for relatively modest changes such as a making it easier for artists to tour and for professionals to have their qualifications recognized, as well as on closer cooperation on law enforcement and security.
EU leaders have welcomed the change of tone from Britain, but have problems of their own amid growing populism across the continent. The UK is no longer a top priority.
'I completely understand, it's difficult to get back together after quite a harsh divorce,' said Andersen, who nonetheless hopes Britain and the EU will draw closer with time. 'I suspect it will happen, but it will happen slowly and subtly without politicians particularly shouting about it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran
Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran

Saudi Gazette

time4 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Alarmed European leaders urge immediate de-escalation between Israel and Iran

BRUSSELS — European leaders are voicing alarm over the military attacks launched overnight between Israel and Iran and calling for immediate de-escalation to avoid an all-out war that could spiral across the Middle East and beyond. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was one of the first heads of government to react, urging "all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently". "Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate," Starmer said on social media. "Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy." His Dutch counterpart, Dick Schoof, issued a similar message. "Alarming attacks in the Middle East," Schoof said. "The Netherlands calls on all parties to remain calm and to refrain from further attacks and retaliation. In the interest of stability in the region, immediate de-escalation is necessary." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz convened his security cabinet after speaking by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who informed him about the objectives behind the military operation. The Iranian nuclear program "violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel," Merz said in a statement as he warned against regional instability. Merz cited the recent conclusion by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that found Iran was not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years. Germany stands ready "to exert influence on the parties to the conflict using all diplomatic means at our disposal. The goal must remain to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons," the chancellor added. French President Emmanuel Macron also gathered his defense and security team to assess the escalation of hostilities and implement "all necessary steps" to protect French nationals, diplomats and military officials deployed across the region. In a post on X he condemned Iran's ongoing nuclear program and reaffirmed Israel's right to defend itself and ensure its security, while echoing political calls for "maximum restraint" and immediate de-escalation. "Peace and security for all in the region must remain our guiding principle," Macron said. As part of his diplomatic outreach, Macron spoke with US President Donald Trump, with whom he is believed to be in regular contact, as well as with Merz, Starmer and the leaders from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Jordan. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was highly critical of Israel, denouncing the military strikes as a "clear provocation that disregards international law". "The Netanyahu administration is trying to drag our region and the entire world into disaster with its reckless, aggressive and lawless actions," Erdoğan wrote in Turkish, also posted on X. "The international community must put an end to Israeli banditry that targets global and regional stability," he went on. "The attacks of Netanyahu and his massacre network, which are setting our entire region on fire, must be prevented." In Brussels, the leaders of the European Union institutions weighed in on the "deeply alarming" chain of events. "Europe urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate immediately and refrain from retaliation," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in a statement that did not mention Israel or Iran by name. "A diplomatic resolution is now more urgent than ever, for the sake of the region's stability and global security," von der Leyen added. High Representative Kaja Kallas described the situation as "dangerous" and said that "diplomacy remains the best path forward". Earlier on Friday, Kallas spoke with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Sa'ar, and her team was in touch with Tehran. "We're speaking to both sides and channels are open," her spokesperson said. Asked if the Commission was ready to evacuate its diplomatic presence on the ground, which is considered to be limited in scope, the spokesperson said: "Appropriate measures have been taken to reinforce the security of our staff and to mitigate risks." Other capitals offered their initial reactions through their foreign affairs ministries. "The situation in the Middle East is deeply concerning, and the cycle of military escalation must be brought to an end," said Finland's Elina Valtonen, noting the staff of the Finnish embassy in Tehran was "safe" and continued to operate "normally". Austria's Beate Meinl-Reisinger said her country and its partners should prepare "for all possible scenarios," as Ireland's Simon Harris cautioned that "further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover". "This would be disastrous for all the peoples in the region," Harris said. Meanwhile, the Kremlin's spokesperson said Vladimir Putin was receiving "real-time updates" on the "sharp escalation in tensions" adding that "Russia is concerned and condemns the sharp escalation in tensions between Israel and Iran." Russia is a close ally of Iran, which is under sanctions for providing military supplies to support the invasion of Ukraine. The renewed conflict between Israel and Iran comes two days before the leaders of the Group of Seven (G7) are set to meet for a two-day summit in Canada. The summit's agenda was intended to focus on Russia's war on Ukraine and the international trade system, but the latest developments are expected to alter that agenda. — Euronews

Pakistan urges EU to continue GSP+, raises alarm over India's water treaty violations
Pakistan urges EU to continue GSP+, raises alarm over India's water treaty violations

Arab News

timea day ago

  • Arab News

Pakistan urges EU to continue GSP+, raises alarm over India's water treaty violations

KARACHI: A high-level Pakistani delegation visiting Brussels on Thursday urged European Union officials to support the continuation of Pakistan's preferential trade access under the GSP+ scheme, while also raising concern over India's alleged violations of the Indus Waters Treaty. The delegation, led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, met with Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's International Trade Committee, to discuss regional tensions following a recent military escalation with India, the worst confrontation between the nuclear-armed neighbors in decades. The group previously visited Washington and London as part of a broader diplomatic effort to rally international support after the conflict in which the two nations exchanged drones, missiles, and artillery strikes between May 7-10 before a ceasefire was announced. Since then, both countries have launched diplomatic offensives to present their narratives on the conflict and its causes. 'We just had a meeting with their [EU] trade representative, where we conveyed Pakistan's message of peace,' Bhutto Zardari told reporters after the meeting. 'In that context, we specifically raised the decisions related to the Indus Waters Treaty, which are violations of international law, and in the EU context, they strongly believe in respecting treaties and adhering to international law. So, in that context, we pitched our case.' The 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, brokered by the World Bank, governs the distribution of water from the Indus River system between India and Pakistan. Islamabad has expressed alarm in recent months over what it sees as India's unilateral actions affecting river flows, warning that any withdrawal from or violation of the treaty could destabilize water access for millions of people in the region. Bhutto Zardari emphasized that Pakistan seeks engagement over confrontation with India, citing terrorism, the longstanding Kashmir territorial dispute, and water issues as areas that require dialogue. 'There should be engagement with India, whether on the issue of terrorism, the Kashmir dispute, or, of course, the critical issue of water, so that solutions can be found,' he said. Bhutto Zardari also thanked the European Union for expressing condolences over Pakistani casualties in the recent clashes with India and praised the bloc's commitment to international norms. 'If you look at this recent conflict, the violation of international law has been committed by one side, and that side is not Pakistan,' he said. Musadiq Malik, Pakistan's federal minister for water resources and another member of the delegation, warned EU officials of the wider implications of undermining water treaties. 'If India is given the right to exit the Indus Waters Treaty, then 70 percent of the world's countries that are lower riparian, whose populations depend on drinking water, agriculture, and life itself, will face destruction,' Malik said. He urged the international community to preserve a rules-based global order. 'Because if we do not, remember, in the Wild West, the one with the faster gun ruled,' he added. Former ambassador Jalil Abbas Jilani, also part of the delegation, said the team had requested continued EU support for Pakistan under the Generalized Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+), which allows duty-free or low-duty access for developing countries to the European market in exchange for progress on human rights, labor standards, environmental protection, and good governance. 'We requested them to continue their support for GSP+, as they have in the past,' Jilani said. 'We hope the European Union will take into consideration Pakistan's need for the GSP+ status and will play a role in its continuation.' The current GSP+ arrangement, which has significantly boosted Pakistan's textile exports to the EU, is due for review as the bloc finalizes the next phase of its trade preference program. The scheme has played a key role in supporting Pakistan's exports, particularly in the garment sector, which employs millions. Pakistan GSP+ benefits were extended last year until 2027.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store