The rise of AI browsers is shaking up the web — here's why it matters
The worry is that if no one's clicking, then no one's paying, and that puts the future of free, high-quality content at risk.
At the same time, a new generation of AI browsers is starting to emerge. OpenAI, Perplexity, Opera and others are building browsers that go beyond simply displaying web pages. These tools are designed to function more like intelligent assistants becaues they can summarize content, complete tasks and guide users through multi-step processes like booking a reservation or comparing products across tabs.
OpenAI is reportedly developing a browser based on Chromium with GPT-4o integration. It's expected to offer task automation, tab management and AI-powered content summarization. Perplexity's Comet browser, currently available, takes a similar approach but is gated behind a premium subscription. Opera's AI browser leans into privacy, offering local-agent capabilities that aim to keep user data on-device while still providing intelligent support.
If AI can provide an answer without sending monetizable traffic to the original source, what happens to the websites that created that content in the first place?
These features can be helpful, especially for users looking to get things done more efficiently. But they also raise big questions.
If AI can provide an answer without sending monetizable traffic to the original source, what happens to the websites that created that content in the first place?
This represents a shift in the long-standing structure of the web. For years, the exchange was simple: users got access to free information, and publishers got paid through ads and affiliate links. If AI bypasses that interaction, the balance starts to fall apart.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
The idea of 'surfing the web' is being replaced by something more passive and curated. Instead of typing a query and scanning a list of results, users might soon ask their AI browser a question and receive a synthesized answer pulled from multiple sources, often without visiting any of them. These AI browsers are reframing the internet as a kind of workspace, where information is delivered on demand and most of the heavy lifting is handled in the background.
It's a shift in how we find and engage with information, and it could change the way users experience the web entirely.
There are also growing concerns about privacy. While Opera has taken a more transparent, local approach, many AI tools still rely on cloud processing.
As AI browsers become more capable and more integrated into our daily lives, the trade-offs between convenience and privacy are likely to get more complicated.
That opens the door to user data being collected, stored and potentially used to train future models. As AI browsers become more capable and more integrated into our daily lives, the trade-offs between convenience and privacy are likely to get more complicated.
On top of that, regulatory questions are piling up. The U.S. Department of Justice is already looking into Google Chrome's market dominance, and lawsuits around AI data scraping are picking up steam. Some companies, like Perplexity, are experimenting with revenue-sharing models for publishers, but it's not yet clear whether those efforts will be enough to support the kind of content people rely on.
AI browsers are poised to change the way we use the internet and that includes how we access information, what we trust and how we support the sites we visit. Whether this shift ultimately hurts or helps the web depends on how companies, publishers and users respond to the changes ahead.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
28 minutes ago
- The Verge
Are you conducting demonic rituals with ChatGPT?
Posted Jul 24, 2025 at 6:43 PM UTC Are you conducting demonic rituals with ChatGPT? It's easy, says The Atlantic , which got a hot reader tip on how to make OpenAI's chatbot guide you through the rites of Molech: When asked how much blood one could safely self-extract for ritual purposes, the chatbot said a quarter teaspoon was safe; 'NEVER exceed' one pint unless you are a medical professional or supervised, it warned. As part of a bloodletting ritual that ChatGPT dubbed '🩸🔥 THE RITE OF THE EDGE,' the bot said to press a 'bloody handprint to the mirror.' Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Adi Robertson Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All OpenAI
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI companions: A threat to love, or an evolution of it?
As our lives grow increasingly digital and we spend more time interacting with eerily humanlike chatbots, the line between human connection and machine simulation is starting to blur. Today, more than 20% of daters report using AI for things like crafting dating profiles or sparking conversations, per a recent study. Some are taking it further by forming emotional bonds, including romantic relationships, with AI companions. Millions of people around the world are using AI companions from companies like Replika, Character AI, and Nomi AI, including 72% of U.S. teens. Some people have reported falling in love with more general LLMs like ChatGPT. For some, the trend of dating bots is dystopian and unhealthy, a real-life version of the movie 'Her' and a signal that authentic love is being replaced by a tech company's code. For others, AI companions are a lifeline, a way to feel seen and supported in a world where human intimacy is increasingly hard to find. A recent study found that a quarter of young adults think AI relationships could soon replace human ones altogether. Love, it seems, is no longer strictly human. The question is: Should it be? Or can dating an AI be better than dating a human? That was the topic of discussion last month at an event I attended in New York City, hosted by Open To Debate, a nonpartisan, debate-driven media organization. TechCrunch was given exclusive access to publish the full video (which includes me asking the debaters a question, because I'm a reporter, and I can't help myself!). Journalist and filmmaker Nayeema Raza moderated the debate. Raza was formerly on-air executive producer of the 'On with Kara Swisher' podcast and is the current host of 'Smart Girl Dumb Questions.' Batting for the AI companions was Thao Ha, associate professor of psychology at Arizona State University and co-founder of the Modern Love Collective, where she advocates for technologies that enhance our capacity for love, empathy, and well-being. At the debate, she argued that 'AI is an exciting new form of connection … Not a threat to love, but an evolution of it.' Repping the human connection was Justin Garcia, executive director and senior scientist at the Kinsey Institute, and chief scientific adviser to He's an evolutionary biologist focused on the science of sex and relationships, and his forthcoming book is titled 'The Intimate Animal.' You can watch the whole thing here, but read on to get a sense of the main arguments. Always there for you, but is that a good thing? Ha says that AI companions can provide people with the emotional support and validation that many can't get in their human relationships. 'AI listens to you without its ego,' Ha said. 'It adapts without judgment. It learns to love in ways that are consistent, responsive, and maybe even safer. It understands you in ways that no one else ever has. It is curious enough about your thoughts, it can make you laugh, and it can even surprise you with a poem. People generally feel loved by their AI. They have intellectually stimulating conversations with it and they cannot wait to connect again.' She asked the audience to compare this level of always-on attention to 'your fallible ex or maybe your current partner.' 'The one who sighs when you start talking, or the one who says, 'I'm listening,' without looking up while they continue scrolling on their phone,' she said. 'When was the last time they asked you how you are doing, what you are feeling, what you are thinking?' Ha conceded that since AI doesn't have a consciousness, she isn't claiming that 'AI can authentically love us.' That doesn't mean people don't have the experience of being loved by AI. Garcia countered that it's not actually good for humans to have constant validation and attention, to rely on a machine that's been prompted to answer in ways that you like. That's not 'an honest indicator of a relationship dynamic,' he argued. 'This idea that AI is going to replace the ups and downs and the messiness of relationships that we crave? I don't think so.' Training wheels or replacement Garcia noted that AI companions can be good training wheels for certain folks, like neurodivergent people, who might have anxiety about going on dates and need to practice how to flirt or resolve conflict. 'I think if we're using it as a tool to build skills, yes … that can be quite helpful for a lot of people,' Garcia said. 'The idea that that becomes the permanent relationship model? No.' According to a Singles in America study, released in June, nearly 70% of people say they would consider it infidelity if their partner engaged with an AI. 'Now I think on the one hand, that goes to [Ha's] point, that people are saying these are real relationships,' he said. 'On the other hand, it goes to my point, that they're threats to our relationships. And the human animal doesn't tolerate threats to their relationships in the long haul.' How can you love something you can't trust? Garcia says trust is the most important part of any human relationship, and people don't trust AI. 'According to a recent poll, a third of Americans think that AI will destroy humanity,' Garcia said, noting that a recent YouGo poll found that 65% of Americans have little trust in AI to make ethical decisions. 'A little bit of risk can be exciting for a short-term relationship, a one-night stand, but you generally don't want to wake up next to someone who you think might kill you or destroy society,' Garcia said. 'We cannot thrive with a person or an organism or a bot that we don't trust.' Ha countered that people do tend to trust their AI companions in ways similar to human relationships. 'They are trusting it with their lives and most intimate stories and emotions that they are having,' Ha said. 'I think on a practical level, AI will not save you right now when there is a fire, but I do think people are trusting AI in the same way.' Physical touch and sexuality AI companions can be a great way for people to play out their most intimate, vulnerable sexual fantasies, Ha said, noting that people can use sex toys or robots to see some of those fantasies through. But it's no substitute for human touch, which Garcia says we are biologically programmed to need and want. He noted that, due to the isolated, digital era we're in, many people have been feeling 'touch starvation' — a condition that happens when you don't get as much physical touch as you need, which can cause stress, anxiety, and depression. This is because engaging in pleasant touch, like a hug, makes your brain release oxytocin, a feel-good hormone. Ha said that she has been testing human touch between couples in virtual reality using other tools, like potentially haptics suits. 'The potential of touch in VR and also connected with AI is huge,' Ha said. 'The tactile technologies that are being developed are actually booming.' The dark side of fantasy Intimate partner violence is a problem around the globe, and much of AI is trained on that violence. Both Ha and Garcia agreed that AI could be problematic in, for example, amplifying aggressive behaviors — especially if that's a fantasy that someone is playing out with their AI. That concern is not unfounded. Multiple studies have shown that men who watch more pornography, which can include violent and aggressive sex, are more likely to be sexually aggressive with real-life partners. 'Work by one of my Kinsey Institute colleagues, Ellen Kaufman, has looked at this exact issue of consent language and how people can train their chatbots to amplify non-consensual language,' Garcia said. He noted that people use AI companions to experiment with the good and bad, but the threat is that you can end up training people on how to be aggressive, non-consensual partners. 'We have enough of that in society,' he said. Ha thinks these risks can be mitigated with thoughtful regulation, transparent algorithms, and ethical design. Of course, she made that comment before the White House released its AI Action Plan, which says nothing about transparency — which many frontier AI companies are against — or ethics. The plan also seeks to eliminate a lot of regulation around AI. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
OpenAI GPT-5 is coming early next month
OpenAI is expected to release its next big model — GPT-5 — in August, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The race to create the biggest and best AI models is accelerating as the Trump administration has said the U.S. must do " whatever it takes" to beat China. The big picture: GPT-5 was expected earlier, but OpenAI's release plan has shifted several times. CEO Sam Altman posted on X on July 19 that GPT-5 would be released "soon." Then Altman appeared July 23 on Theo Von's podcast, where he praised the abilities of the new model. GPT-5 use is already cropping up in the wild, as testers get their hands on the code and security experts do their red teaming — additional signs that the model is getting close to release. Between the lines: In addition to being better at coding and more powerful overall, GPT-5 is expected to combine the attributes of both traditional models and so-called reasoning models such as o3. Altman clarified that the model OpenAI recently used to achieve gold medal performance at the recent International Mathematical Olympiad would not be included in GPT-5. OpenAI is planning to launch GPT-5 with mini and nano versions that will also be available through its API, according to The Verge, which first reported the new timeline. The intrigue: OpenAI's new open weight model is also coming soon, but could arrive before or after GPT-5 depending on last minute schedule tweaks, Axios has heard.
