Russia Giving North Korea Shahed-136 Attack Drone Production Capability: Budanov
Budanov says the ability to produce the Shahed family of drones, in particular, which has been the most prolific long-range aerial threat to Ukraine for years, is being given to North Korea. Originally provided by Iran, Russia is now building about 2,000 per month with plans to increase that to 5,000 per month. Russia is continually improving their range, payload, connectivity and attack patterns. Between Sunday night and Monday alone, Russia launched 479 Shaheds and decoys of various types across Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian Air Force.
Having Shaheds will give North Korea the ability to hit targets anywhere in South Korea and potentially in huge volumes. They can overwhelm the South's air defenses, paving the way for attacks by other munitions. They could also be exported back to Russia to support the war in Ukraine.
Overnight, Ukraine successfully intercepted almost 500 Russian drones and missiles in what officials described as one of the largest and most intense attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion. The barrage included hundreds of Shahed-type drones, cruise missiles, and… pic.twitter.com/wUoODRo1JD
— TVP World (@TVPWorld_com) June 9, 2025
The first batch of KN-23s North Korea provided to Russia were woefully inadequate. According to a report from Ukrainian state prosecutors, around half of them — also known as Hwasong-11 — not only deviated from their trajectory but also exploded in midair. Since then, they have been dramatically improved thanks to Russian help, Budanov told us, now striking with deadly accuracy. This has given Russia a badly needed source of SRBMs.
These improvements could extend beyond the KN-23s. While Budanov did not specify what was changed, this is likely to boost the capabilities of its many other ballistic missiles, extending the dangers beyond the peninsula.
Russian aid to North Korea, Budanov suggests, will alter the balance of power on the peninsula.
With that background out of the way, here are the questions and answers pertaining to these issues from our interview, which have been lightly edited for clarity:
Q: What are the latest developments about North Korea and its assistance to Russia?
A: [There are] agreements on the beginning of the creation of capabilities to produce UAVs of the Garpiya and Geran [the Russian version of Iranian Shahed-136 drones] types on the territory of North Korea. It will for sure bring changes in the military balance in the region between North Korea and South Korea.
Q: How many of these drones will Russia help North Korea develop?
A: So they just agreed to start the organization of this production on the territory of North Korea.
Q: What else is Russia giving North Korea in turn for supplying troops and weapons?
A: It's more about technology transfer.
Q: What kind of technology?
A: One example is the technology for the production of UAVs. The other technological solution is, I told you before about the KN-23 ballistic missiles. Initially, with the beginning of the transfer to Russia, they were flying with a deviation of a few kilometers, but now they are exactly hitting the target. This is the result of the common work of Russian and North Korean specialists. Also, there is the modernization of the aviation means of engagement — long-range air-to-air missiles. Particular technologies on submarines. Unfortunately, ballistic missiles which are carriers of nuclear payloads.
Q: So Russia is helping North Korea improve its nuclear weapon system as well?
A: So let's say they had huge problems with the carriers of these missiles and the firing from their sea component. And Russians are helping them with this. And the great demonstration of this for everybody is, as I mentioned before, this famous KN-23 ballistic missile. The KN-23 missiles that were delivered in the very beginning, now it's an absolutely different missile in [terms] of their technical characteristics. The accuracy is increased many times.
Q: What's the latest on North Korean troops, weapons and equipment being delivered to Russia, and what is Russia giving in return? How many North Korean troops are in Russia, and is any new equipment going there?
A: The range of armaments provided by North Korea to Russia is quite wide, starting with [122mm] D-74 [howitzers] and 107mm infantry variant [multiple launch rocket systems] MLRS systems to 240mm MLRS and the 170mn M1989 [Koksan self-propelled artillery guns]. Unfortunately, this gun is demonstrating itself quite well in battle. It's firing from quite a long range, and it's quite good in terms of accuracy.
I was able to geolocate and thus confirm that the photo of North Korean M-1978/1989 Koksan 170mm SPGs was taken in Russia.
56.069386, 92.920244Krasnoyarsk, central Russiahttps://t.co/BOaR44uLeShttps://t.co/mC8solXVOvpic.twitter.com/LUHO2cllKZ
— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) November 14, 2024
Q: How many Koksans have they gotten and how many will they get?
A: We have data that the Russian Federation was provided 120 pieces. But I think that supply will continue because these guns are demonstrating themselves quite well. This is unfortunate for us because this is artillery for long-range firing.
Q: How many North Korean troops are there in Russia now?
A: There are about 11,000 North Korean troops in Kursk Oblast. But there is also the problem of the visit of [Sergei Shoigu], the Secretary of the National Security Council of the Russian Federation, to North Korea. And there he, among other things, agreed on the beginning of work of so-called labor migrants on the territory of Russia in order to partially replace the labor migrants from Central Asia that they consider as not stable for their state and vulnerable to recruitment by our special services and Western ones. But there is a big probability that people among this labor migrant, they will start to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense of Russia. And it wouldn't be the warriors from North Korea. It would be Russian warriors, but of North Korean nationality.
Q: How many of those migrant workers from North Korea do you anticipate will go?
A: So this agreement just happened recently. That's why we [are] just working on the specific numbers. And we would like to answer this question. We need to confirm the exact number that will come to Russia.
Stay tuned for our second installment from our most recent interview with Budanov that includes discussions about recent aid provided to Russia by China and Iran.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Rubio says peace agreement "a long ways off" after Putin summit
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that "we're not at the precipice" of a peace agreement after President Trump's Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ended without a deal on Russia's war in Ukraine. The big picture: Trump, who Axios previously reported set a ceasefire as the goal of the talks, said "we didn't get there" after the meeting. Rubio on Sunday said both sides would have to make concessions, but refused to name any that Putin agreed to. Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, joined by several European leaders, will travel to Washington for a potentially difficult meeting with Trump on Monday. Driving the news: Rubio, who made appearances across the Sunday political show lineup, told ABC's Martha Raddatz a ceasefire was not the aim, arguing, "You're not going to reach a ceasefire or peace agreement in a meeting" without Ukraine present. If an agreement isn't reached, Rubio said, there will be consequences — but he emphasized the administration is trying to avoid such measures. Late last month, Trump threatened to shorten Putin's deadline to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face heavy sanctions, which he said would include "secondary sanctions and tariffs." Yes, but: Rubio on Sunday argued that if the U.S. levies additional sanctions, the "talking stops." "If this morning the president woke up and said, 'I'm putting these terrible ... strong sanctions on Russia,' that's fine — [it] may make people feel good for a couple hours," he said on Fox's "Sunday Morning Futures." "But here's what you're basically saying ... talks are over for the foreseeable future." He reiterated that view on NBC's "Meet the Press," saying that he doesn't believe new sanctions would force Putin to accept a ceasefire. "We may very well wind up in that place," he said of new sanctions. "I hope not. Because that means that peace talks failed." The other side: Democrats on Sunday blasted the president over the meeting, which began with a red carpet rollout, and denounced the lack of immediate consequences for Russia. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) described the summit as a "great day for Russia" in an interview with NBC's Kristen Welker, saying Putin left with "his photo op with zero commitments made and zero consequences." His Democratic colleague, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), said on ABC's "This Week" that Trump "got played" by Putin and that "[a]ll the threatened sanctions ... apparently have been set aside." Van Hollen called for the Senate to move ahead on bipartisan legislation that would impose new sanctions on Russia. Catch up quick: Trump, in a Truth Social post after the summit, said the meeting — and a subsequent phone call with Zelensky and European leaders — went "very well." He wrote that it "was determined by all" that a peace agreement, rather than a "mere Ceasefire Agreement" would be the best solution. Zelensky had been adamant that there must be a ceasefire before peace talks, Axios' Barak Ravid reports. The terms that Putin laid out in the summit included that Ukraine cede two of the four regions to which Russia has laid claim and freeze the front lines in the other two, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler reported, citing two sources briefed on a call U.S. officials held with other allied leaders. Flashback: Zelensky's Monday trip to Washington comes around six months after Trump's February Oval Office meeting with the Ukrainian leader boiled over into a heated argument. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte are all expected to attend the meeting with Zelensky. Friction point: On CBS News' "Face the Nation," Rubio denied that those leaders were joining Zelensky as backup to protect him from being bullied into a deal. "This is such a stupid media narrative; that they are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal," he said. "We invited them to come," he added. "The president invited them to come."
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European leaders and the NATO Secretary General will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Monday's White House meeting, offering up a coordinated show of support for Kyiv after President Donald Trump failed to reach a ceasefire deal with Russia last week. Why It Matters European officials have looked on with concern as the Trump administration placed itself as the chief negotiator between Russia and Ukraine, jockeying to stay in the loop—and influential—as the Republican appears unwilling to strongarm Russia into concessions. European countries, many of which feel their own security is at stake with an agreement for Ukraine, have repeatedly echoed Kyiv's demands for a ceasefire deal that does not gift Russia territory recognized internationally as Ukrainian, and for Kyiv to have firm security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks. Ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, European leaders made it clear they did not support any change in borders by force. Trump had said in advance of the summit that both sides would need to cede territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. AP Photo What To Know British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron will be among the leaders making the trip to Washington. Also expected to attend are Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who has sought a tight relationship with Trump. Finnish President Alexander Stubb may attend, Politico reported on Sunday. The Finnish leader has broken the ice with Trump, bonding over a shared love of golfing while leading a country with a significant land border, and apprehension toward, Russia. Stubb is a "very good player," Trump previously said. Zelensky's previous visit to the White House in February ended in disaster, descending into a public show of fractured relations between Kyiv and Washington. "Most likely, there will be little mutual understanding between Trump and Zelensky," Oleg Dunda, a Ukrainian MP who is part of Zelensky's Servant of the People party, told Newsweek. "Zelensky has already firmly rejected any proposals regarding territories." Trump told European leaders after meeting Putin that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Reuters reported that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv giving up chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. Kyiv has said it will not reward Russia's invasion with territory, and to cede these areas would go against the country's constitution. Russia has tried to frame European nations as stumbling blocks to the peace agreement the Trump administration has pledged to broker. Following the Anchorage summit, Putin urged European politicians to "not make attempts to disrupt the planned progress through provocations and behind-the-scenes intrigues," or to become "obstacles." Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Sunday that despite the Alaska summit yielding no deal, Ukraine would have "Article 5-like" protections to ward off any future attempt by Russia to attack its neighbor. Article 5 is the provision in NATO's founding treaty that means that an attack on any member country in the alliance is treated as an attack on all. Moscow has insisted Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO, while Kyiv sees joining the alliance as a way to make sure Russia cannot attack the country again. "Now it is really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump told Fox News following the Alaska summit. "I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit." What People Are Saying Dominique Trinquand, a retired general who previously headed up France's military mission to the United Nations, told The Associated Press: "The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt." What Happens Next It's not clear how much concrete progress will be made in Monday's meeting, the Russian and Ukrainian demands remaining apparently irreconciliable.
Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Rubio says Russia-Ukraine ceasefire possible, but not close
'We're not at the precipice of an agreement, we're not at the edge of one,' he added. Rubio's comments appear at odds with special envoy Steve Witkoff's, who said on Sunday that the U.S. secured critical wins from the summit. Rubio refused to detail what was discussed at the high-stakes meeting between the two leaders, instead telling CBS's Margaret Brennan that the U.S. is not in a position to make any agreements or rejections on behalf of either of the warring nations. And despite Trump's threats of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if a ceasefire is not reached, Rubio said additional sanctions will not help the situation. 'The moment the president puts the additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks,' he said on 'Face the Nation.' 'You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death and destruction. We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there.' Still, he said, there were 'some concepts and ideas discussed that the Ukrainians could be supportive of.' 'Ultimately, there are things that were discussed as part of this meeting that are potentials for breakthroughs, potentials for progress,' he said. Those ideas, he added, will be discussed in Monday's meeting with European allies, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Rubio laid responsibility on both Russia and Ukraine for refusing to make enough concessions for a ceasefire. 'Both sides are going to have to give up something in order to get to the table, in order to make this happen. That's — that's just the way it is,' Rubio said. But Rubio sidestepped questions of the U.S. demanding the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukrainian land. 'Territories will have to be discussed. It's just a fact, and there are things that maybe Russia is holding now that they're going to have to give up. Who knows? The point is, we need to create a scenario where that becomes possible, and that's why this has been so hard, because neither side, up to now, has been willing to give on some of these things,' he said.
