logo
Lawmakers tout progress on crime at halfway mark but want to do more

Lawmakers tout progress on crime at halfway mark but want to do more

Yahoo23-02-2025
As she raced to her office on the fourth floor of the state Capitol early Thursday, Linda Trujillo barely had time to talk.
Trujillo, a Santa Fe Democrat, granted a reporter an interview, but it was in motion and over in 40 seconds.
"They're going fast and furious," she said when asked about the first 30 days of the 60-day session.
Trujillo's assessment sums up the first half of this year's session, which officially reached its midway point Thursday.
Even longtime lawmakers say the session is unlike any other New Mexico has experienced, at least in recent memory.
"Every session is different, but it feels like this year we're doing two 30-day sessions back-to-back," Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, said Friday.
"Our decision to prioritize the behavioral health [bills] and a crime package in the first 30 days has had everybody just all hands on deck to get that across the line," he said.
Amid a self-imposed deadline to get the two packages to the governor by the session's midway point, lawmakers on Friday debated — and passed — bills to crack down on crime and improve the state's behavioral health system.
"I feel like we have met our targets," Wirth said ahead of Friday's Senate floor session. "It'll be a big accomplishment."
House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, agreed, saying the Legislature has made "tremendous progress" in the first half of the session.
"We promised the people after the special session [in July] that we would deliver on competency and public safety and behavioral health in the first 30 days, and we are about to fulfill that promise," he said Friday evening. "The behavioral health bills are well underway. The governor will be able to sign them. Promises made, promises kept."
Crime, behavioral health bills headed to governor
A special session called by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham last summer ended after lawmakers adjourned in five hours without giving any of her proposals a hearing, saying they weren't ready for consideration. While the governor harshly criticized lawmakers, Wirth said they were able to work on proposals to reform the state's criminal competency laws and building a behavioral health framework in the interim.
"By prioritizing those issues, I'm very encouraged that we're going to deliver a good product to the citizens of our state," he said.
This legislative session brought a new strategy, said House Minority Leader Gail Armstrong, R-Magdalena.
"The Legislature front-loaded a lot of bills, which hasn't been done in the past … so we're navigating that, and I think we're navigating it pretty well," Armstrong said in an interview.
This year, lawmakers came to the Roundhouse ready with a trio of behavioral health proposals and a raft of bills that would eventually become House Bill 8, a public safety package dealing with criminal competency reforms, drunken driving, fentanyl trafficking and more.
Legislative leadership promised to expedite the behavioral health and public safety packages, with the goal of having them ready for the governor's signature at the midway point. On Saturday, the House approved some minor Senate amendments to House Bill 8, sending it to the governor, and two of the three behavioral health bills have passed both chambers.
GOP wants more on crime
Many of those proposals secured bipartisan support, with each of the three bills in this year's behavioral health package — Senate Bills 1, 2 and 3 — sponsored by a combination of Democratic and Republican leaders.
But the public safety package will be a sticking point for Republicans, with even some who voted for it arguing it doesn't go far enough to curb crime in the state. Armstrong noted Republicans offered changes to the proposed public safety package on the House floor but they weren't incorporated into the bill.
"I saw a quote today that said, you know, the crime package that passed [the House] is an appetizer," Armstrong said. "Well, we want the full meal deal. New Mexico wants the full meal deal."
Martínez said lawmakers will continue to make public safety a priority over the next 30 days and that it has been a priority of both chambers over the last several years, though Republicans may disagree with his assessment.
"This package of bills that are about to go up to the governor are the result of months of hard work," he said. "It is not the end-all, be-all. Just like the last four sessions, they have not been the end-all, be-all. And I suspect that there's a lot more work that will be happening over the next 30 days and also over the next few legislative sessions. This is similar to our work around early childhood. It's similar to our work around infrastructure. It's work in progress."
Changes to New Mexico's juvenile delinquency statutes are of particular concern to House Republicans in the coming days, with two House Republican-backed delinquency bills currently awaiting committee hearings.
"We would really like to see that get across the finish line. ... It's about getting these kids help and sending them in the right direction," Armstrong said.
Another thing that hasn't yet made much headway this session: an overhaul of New Mexico's medical malpractice system, which GOP leaders identified as a priority this legislative session.
In addition to sponsoring other pieces of legislation pertaining to medical malpractice, Armstrong signed on to co-sponsor Senate Bill 176, a proposal backed by the think tank Think New Mexico to make significant changes to the medical malpractice process. Though the bill now has 10 Democratic and 10 Republican sponsors, many of them arguing the proposal would make it easier for doctors to practice in New Mexico, it had yet to get a hearing as of Saturday.
"I'm not saying that everyone's perfect, and I'm not saying that they're not making mistakes out there — but we are losing our doctors," Armstrong said.
'We've been working'
As she reflected on the first 30 days of the session, Rep. Andrea Romero, D-Santa Fe, said she, like many of her colleagues, is already feeling "quite exhausted."
And that's a good thing, she said; it's a sign of productivity.
"We really have been in the deliberative process of seeing what's best for our state moving forward," Romero said.
"When you see the bags under our eyes, that means we've been working," she added.
Wirth said "there's no question" lawmakers have had "the pedal to the metal" in the first half of the session, noting it was the last 60-day session for Lujan Grisham, who is more than halfway through her second term.
"I want to make sure we make the most of this and really deliver for New Mexicans, so yeah, I'm going to push," he said, adding the Legislature will need to take a little break after this weekend.
"We will need to back off a little bit here so folks get some sleep because I think the second 30 days is going to be another real push to the end," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?
Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?

New York Post

time30 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?

'Destroying democracy' — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many ways. How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains? So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court? Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster — though only when they hold a Senate majority? Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators? Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate 'The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?' Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president? So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of 'collusion' to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump's first term? Who prompted a cabal of '51 former intelligence officials' to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a 'Russian intelligence operation?' Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social-media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign? Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate? Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there? Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him? Who coordinated four local, state and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else? Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor's efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid? Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice? Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen? When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign? Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens? Who created 600 'sanctuary jurisdictions' for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy? Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists and violent protesters over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity? How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60% to 70% approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion? How does a president 'destroy democracy' by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents? So what is behind these absurd charges? Three catalysts: One, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power. Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth and Independents. Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them. So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.

Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims
Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims

Newsweek

time31 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Melania Trump's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked speculation over whether the first lady used AI to pen a missive to the Kremlin chief. In a message posted to the first lady's social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to "singlehandedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children caught up in the nearly three and a half years of full-scale war in Ukraine. Why It Matters President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska on Friday with relations soured by Russia's refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine. Although no deal was reached in Anchorage, Trump described the summit as "useful" and pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal. Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday, said on Saturday that Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation." First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, To Know The message sent by the first lady, dubbed a "peace letter" on her official Instagram account, quickly prompted online commentators to question whether the letter had been generated using AI. Democrat strategist, Keith Edwards, said in a post to X the letter "says a whole lot of nothing," and "may have been written by AI." Chris Jackson, a long-time supporter of former president Joe Biden and Democrat activist, said in his own social media post that he had run the letter through AI, which had deemed the message to the Kremlin AI-generated. Grok, a tool developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said the letter "shows strong signs of AI generation" with "minor human edits for tone." There is no concrete evidence that the letter published on the first lady's accounts was generated using artificial intelligence. Newsweek has reached out to Melania Trump's office for comment. As tools improve, it becomes harder to work out when AI is responsible for published writing. When Newsweek asked AI's opinion on the letter, it said it had "qualities that resemble AI writing," including a lofty, idealistic style. "Words like purity, innocence, humanity, love, possibility, dignity are stacked densely without much concrete policy or detail. AI models tend to default to these universal values when asked to 'sound inspirational,'" according to one AI response. But AI also said the letter did not feature the types of tonal shifts or awkward phasing often associated with content generated using artificial intelligence. Zelensky Thanks The First Lady for 'Sincere Attention' President Trump hand-delivered a letter from his wife to Putin during the summit, which focused on the fate of Ukrainian and Russian children, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed White House officials. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha said in a post to social media that Zelensky had "conveyed his gratitude" to Trump during a conversation on Saturday for the first lady's "sincere attention and efforts to bring forcibly deported Ukrainian kids back." The version of the letter published by the first lady on her social media does not directly mention Ukrainian children taken to Russia. Ukraine has consistently said Russia has abducted thousands of Ukrainian children throughout its full-scale invasion of the country and relocated them to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. Kyiv has called this a war crime. The International Criminal Court in March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's children's rights commissioner, for being "allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation." Moscow has said children were moved away from conflict areas to protect them. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said earlier this year that children had been subject to "summary executions, arbitrary detention, conflict-related sexual violence, torture and ill-treatment" in the four regions of Ukraine Russia claimed to have annexed in fall 2022. The Kremlin declared Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014. The first lady has released an audiobook touted as "created entirely with artificial intelligence audio technology." The seven-hour-long audiobook is narrated by Melania Trump's "official AI voice." Melania Trump faced accusations in 2016 that she had plagiarized a previous address given by Michelle Obama during a section of her own speech to the Republican National Convention. Trump's team at the time said Melania Trump had used "common words" and not copied Michelle Obama's speech. The First Lady's Letter in Full "Dear President Putin, Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time."

Vladimir Putin 'Got Everything He Wanted' at Trump Alaska Summit—Senator
Vladimir Putin 'Got Everything He Wanted' at Trump Alaska Summit—Senator

Newsweek

time31 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Vladimir Putin 'Got Everything He Wanted' at Trump Alaska Summit—Senator

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, did not hold back on his assessment of the Trump-Putin summit that took place last week, saying in a Sunday appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that the meeting was a "disaster" that gave Russian President Vladimir Putin "everything he wanted." Newsweek reached out to the White House by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday morning for comment. Why It Matters President Donald Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for a summit during which they spoke for two-and-a-half hours and addressed various aspects of a potential ceasefire deal that would end Russia's assault on Ukraine, which started with its invasion of the Eastern European country in February 2022. The two leaders took no questions immediately after their talk, and Trump walked away from the high-stakes summit without a deal, leading many to criticize the entire meeting, which included a lavish red-carpet ceremony, a gift to Putin, a shared ride between the two leaders in Trump's armored limousine, and a military flyover. What To Know Prior to the talks, Trump told Fox News that he would consider the meeting a failure if he did not secure a deal, and Putin walked away from the meeting saying he found it "constructive and useful," emphasizing a desire for a long-term resolution that must not be obstructed by Europe. Murphy gave a harsh assessment of the meeting, telling NBC News' Kristen Welker that he saw the meeting as a "disaster" and "an embarrassment for the United States." "It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted," Murphy said, adding that Putin "wanted that photo op" and "to be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world." "He was invited to the United States: War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America," Murphy said. "He is intentionally murdering civilians, he's kidnapping children, and now he got to stand next to the president of the United States, legitimized in the view of the world." However, the senator focused most on the outcome of the meeting, saying Putin "didn't have to give up anything" and that "it appears the ceasefire wasn't even seriously discussed." "Trump said, 'If I don't get a ceasefire, Putin is going to pay a price,' and then he walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire, I didn't get a peace deal, and I'm not even considering sanctions,'" Murphy said. "You heard Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio downplay sanctions. And so, Putin walks away with his photo op with zero commitments made and zero consequences. What a great day for Russia." Further talks are planned, with Putin inviting Trump to Moscow. President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15 in Anchorage, Alaska. Inset: Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, is seen on February 8, 2024, in... President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15 in Anchorage, Alaska. Inset: Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, is seen on February 8, 2024, in Washington, D.C. More//What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday: "It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me. There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me. I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!" Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, wrote on X on Saturday: "Trump marvels at Putin's statement that the 2020 election was rigged, and that Trump really won. Can Trump really be so gullible as to think Putin is doing anything more than telling him what he wants to hear? Yes he can. And yes he is." What Happens Next? Trump has discussed plans to secure a trilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky, which he is likely to discuss with the Ukrainian leader when he visits the White House on Monday along with some European leaders.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store