Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Melania Trump's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked speculation over whether the first lady used AI to pen a missive to the Kremlin chief.
In a message posted to the first lady's social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to "singlehandedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children caught up in the nearly three and a half years of full-scale war in Ukraine.
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska on Friday with relations soured by Russia's refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine.
Although no deal was reached in Anchorage, Trump described the summit as "useful" and pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal.
Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday, said on Saturday that Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation."
First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025.
First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025.What To Know
The message sent by the first lady, dubbed a "peace letter" on her official Instagram account, quickly prompted online commentators to question whether the letter had been generated using AI.
Democrat strategist, Keith Edwards, said in a post to X the letter "says a whole lot of nothing," and "may have been written by AI." Chris Jackson, a long-time supporter of former president Joe Biden and Democrat activist, said in his own social media post that he had run the letter through AI, which had deemed the message to the Kremlin AI-generated.
Grok, a tool developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said the letter "shows strong signs of AI generation" with "minor human edits for tone."
There is no concrete evidence that the letter published on the first lady's accounts was generated using artificial intelligence.
Newsweek has reached out to Melania Trump's office for comment.
As tools improve, it becomes harder to work out when AI is responsible for published writing.
When Newsweek asked AI's opinion on the letter, it said it had "qualities that resemble AI writing," including a lofty, idealistic style.
"Words like purity, innocence, humanity, love, possibility, dignity are stacked densely without much concrete policy or detail. AI models tend to default to these universal values when asked to 'sound inspirational,'" according to one AI response.
But AI also said the letter did not feature the types of tonal shifts or awkward phasing often associated with content generated using artificial intelligence.
Zelensky Thanks The First Lady for 'Sincere Attention'
President Trump hand-delivered a letter from his wife to Putin during the summit, which focused on the fate of Ukrainian and Russian children, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed White House officials.
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha said in a post to social media that Zelensky had "conveyed his gratitude" to Trump during a conversation on Saturday for the first lady's "sincere attention and efforts to bring forcibly deported Ukrainian kids back."
The version of the letter published by the first lady on her social media does not directly mention Ukrainian children taken to Russia.
Ukraine has consistently said Russia has abducted thousands of Ukrainian children throughout its full-scale invasion of the country and relocated them to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. Kyiv has called this a war crime.
The International Criminal Court in March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's children's rights commissioner, for being "allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation."
Moscow has said children were moved away from conflict areas to protect them.
UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said earlier this year that children had been subject to "summary executions, arbitrary detention, conflict-related sexual violence, torture and ill-treatment" in the four regions of Ukraine Russia claimed to have annexed in fall 2022.
The Kremlin declared Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014.
The first lady has released an audiobook touted as "created entirely with artificial intelligence audio technology." The seven-hour-long audiobook is narrated by Melania Trump's "official AI voice."
Melania Trump faced accusations in 2016 that she had plagiarized a previous address given by Michelle Obama during a section of her own speech to the Republican National Convention.
Trump's team at the time said Melania Trump had used "common words" and not copied Michelle Obama's speech.
The First Lady's Letter in Full
"Dear President Putin,
Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger.
As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded.
A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology.
Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter.
In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today.
It is time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump blows past the Senate to put loyalists in charge of prosecutorial offices across the country
Around the country, President Donald Trump is circumventing the Senate to install top federal prosecutors, using loopholes to keep loyalists in place. In U.S. attorney's offices in Los Angeles, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico and upstate New York, the administration has effectively sidestepped or overridden both the Senate confirmation and judicial appointment processes for selecting U.S. attorneys. When Trump's nominees can't get confirmed by the Senate, as required by federal law, the administration installs them on a temporary basis as 'interim' U.S. attorneys, who are legally allowed to serve for 120 days. And when district judges have then rejected Trump's choices by exercising a 160-year-old power allowing them to appoint someone to the office after an interim U.S. attorney's term ends, the administration has in a few cases taken an extraordinary step: voiding the judges' decision and reinstalling Trump's desired prosecutor as an 'acting' U.S. attorney, who can serve for an additional 210 days beyond the initial 120-day interim period. In two instances, the Trump administration preempted the judges' votes, appointing the interim U.S. attorneys as acting U.S. attorneys before the judges could have their say. And in at least one district, the administration's attempt to sidestep the Senate and district judges is being challenged in court. Though the law doesn't explicitly forbid the Trump administration's approach of appointing people to successive temporary stints, 'the intent [of the law] was always for Senate confirmation,' said Jennifer Selin, a professor at Arizona State University law school. 'The Trump administration has been very strategic in using the law in this particular way,' Selin said. A spokesperson for the Justice Department didn't respond to a request for comment. The nation's 93 U.S. attorneys are the top federal law enforcement officials in their geographic districts. While they are nominated by the president, the Justice Department has historically sought to insulate them from political influence. And the president's selections are expected to have the blessing of another branch of government — either the Senate or the courts. Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law school professor, said the workarounds are alarming because they eliminate the vetting process conducted by the Senate, calling it 'a perversion of what the Constitution seems to require.' Critics worry that the lack of oversight on some of Trump's picks could create a perception — if not a reality — that those prosecutors are simply doing the White House's bidding and using their offices for political purposes. For instance, Trump's pick in New Jersey, Alina Habba, has been criticized for prosecuting a Democratic member of Congress who was attempting to conduct an oversight visit at an immigration detention center. Trump's strategy of overriding the other branches could also create tension between U.S. attorney's offices and the district courts in which they operate. 'Senatorial influence over selection has really been a critical aspect of the U.S. attorney's system, and so has the relationship between the U.S. attorney and local institutions like the district court bench, local governments and local communities,' said Daniel Richman, a Columbia Law School professor and former federal prosecutor. 'And when you start ramming people down into these offices without any consideration of local communities, and in particular of the district court bench, bad things happen.' Richman pointed to a recent ruling in Manhattan denying the DOJ's effort to unseal secret materials in the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein as an example of 'judges looking askance at an effort by Washington to circumvent the district.' 'District judges really care about the integrity, and, to some extent, the autonomy of the U.S. attorney's offices that appear before them,' he said. 'They, like any actor, like to help shape the quality of justice that's done in their courtroom, and they do that not just through their rulings, but through the influence they have on the U.S. attorney's offices. And U.S. attorney's offices that have any desire to be effective tend to their relationship with the local bench.' The most dramatic fight over a U.S. attorney post in the second Trump administration has been in New Jersey, where earlier this year Trump picked Habba, one of his former personal defense attorneys and a vocal supporter, to serve as U.S. attorney on an interim basis while also nominating her to take the job permanently. Habba, who had never worked as a prosecutor, is a controversial figure who opened a number of politically charged cases in her first few months on the job. Her office charged Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) with assaulting federal agents after she clashed with immigration officials while attempting to visit an immigration detention center; she is seeking to get the case dismissed. Habba's office also arrested Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democrat, but later dropped the case. And shortly after Habba took office, she opened an investigation into Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, over the state's immigration policies. It quickly became clear that Habba could not win Senate confirmation. So when her term as interim U.S. attorney was about to expire last month, district judges in New Jersey voted to determine who should occupy the post indefinitely until the Senate could confirm someone to the job. The judges declined to keep Habba in office, voting instead to install longtime career prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace. But Trump quickly bypassed that selection, reinstalling Habba on a longer-term but still temporary basis as acting U.S. attorney. He did so by having the Justice Department fire Grace while simultaneously withdrawing Habba's nomination in the Senate. The withdrawal was important because nominees for a full-time U.S. attorney post generally cannot also serve in an 'acting' capacity, per federal law. But once Habba was no longer a nominee before the Senate, the Trump administration argued, she could remain in the job for another 210 days, or about seven months. What will happen after that remains unclear. Trump's workaround to keep Habba in the job for now is contested. A defendant in a drug and gun case in New Jersey is arguing that the administration's maneuvering was irregular and unconstitutional and is challenging Habba's authority. Habba's office didn't respond to a request for comment. Slightly different scenarios have played out in other U.S. attorney's offices. In the Northern District of New York, which covers Albany and Buffalo, Trump's interim choice for the job was John Sarcone III, a Republican lawyer who has run for office unsuccessfully several times and, like Habba, had no apparent prosecutorial experience. Sarcone had a tumultuous start to his tenure that included listing his address on a police affidavit as a location that was actually a boarded-up building. When Sarcone's 120-day interim period expired, the district judges in northern New York declined to appoint him to continue in the job. But unlike in New Jersey, the judges did not select a substitute — they simply didn't appoint anyone. The Justice Department responded by giving Sarcone an appointment of 'special attorney' with an 'indefinite' term so that he could return to the job. The office didn't respond to a request for comment. A similar sequence occurred in New Mexico last week. The district judges in the state declined to extendTrump's pick for interim U.S. attorney, Ryan Ellison. So the Justice Department converted him to the 'acting' head of the office under a federal vacancies law. As with Habba, that maneuver allows Trump to chain together the 120-day interim period and the 210-day acting period — potentially allowing the non-confirmed official to remain on the job for nearly a full year. New Mexico's Democratic senators, Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján, said the decision exemplified 'this administration's continuing willingness to trample the role of the Judiciary and Congress.' Ellison embraced the move, saying in a statement: 'I applaud New Mexico's federal district judges for declining to appoint someone other than the Trump Administration's choice to lead the United States Attorney's Office as they had the discretion to do at the end of my interim appointment.' He added that 'the appointment of a U.S. Attorney is a process that should be sorted out in a collaborative and professional manner between the executive and legislative branches of government.' In one powerful district — the Southern District of New York, which is based in Manhattan — Trump's interim U.S. attorney pick did not run into resistance from judges. On Monday, the judges there voted to retain Trump's choice, former Securities and Exchange Commission chair Jay Clayton. The vote allows Clayton to continue running the office indefinitely, even though Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) blocked Clayton's confirmation in the Senate. In the Central District of California, which is based in Los Angeles, Trump's interim choice was Bill Essayli, a Republican who had been serving in the California State Assembly. In his early months on the job, Essayli drew scrutiny for reportedly pushing prosecutors to bring cases desired by the Trump administration but unsupported by sufficient evidence. As his interim period was coming to an end, the Trump administration converted Essayli's title from interim to acting. It's not clear if the district's judges ever held a vote on the post. The court didn't provide an answer when asked about it. A spokesperson for Essayli's office declined to comment. And the administration deployed the same tactic in Nevada to keep in place Sigal Chattah. In the final days of her temporary tenure as interim U.S. attorney, a group of more than 100 retired federal and state judges wrote to the chief federal district judge in Nevada to object to voting to install Chattah after her appointment expired. The group said her history of 'racially charged, violence-tinged, and inflammatory public statements' disqualified her. Instead of waiting for the judicial vote, the Trump administration simply made her the acting U.S. attorney. The office didn't respond to a request for comment. While Trump may be getting his way on U.S. attorney choices for now, the strategy may ultimately come back to haunt him. Retired U.S. District Judge John S. Martin predicted that the practical effect of the maneuvers is that a U.S. attorney who is installed over the objections of the local bench will lose credibility with the judges, not necessarily because of any actions they take, but simply by virtue of the process. That may jeopardize cases in court for prosecutors, Martin said, because it 'means that when the government comes in and asserts something a little bit unusual, it's going to get a very skeptical view from the court.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK Drops Apple Backdoor Mandate After Talks With U.S. Spy Chief Gabbard
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Monday the U.K. agreed to drop its order requiring Apple (AAPL, Financials) to create a back door to access encrypted data of American citizens. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with NXST. Gabbard said on X she worked for months with President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and British officials to secure the deal. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was in Washington on Monday for talks with Trump and other European leaders. The U.K. mandate, issued earlier this year, had forced Apple to suspend its Advanced Data Protection feature for British users in February. The iPhone maker challenged the order at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, warning that backdoors could be exploited by hackers and authoritarian regimes. U.S. lawmakers argued the demand could have violated the CLOUD Act, which restricts governments from ordering access to the encrypted data of another country's citizens. Gabbard had raised the concern in a February letter to Congress. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump: Smithsonian should portray nation's 'Brightness,' not 'how bad Slavery was'
President Donald Trump on Tuesday confirmed the White House is conducting a review of the Smithsonian museums and expressed frustration over their portrayal of dark parts of America's history, including slavery. "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been -- Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future," Trump wrote on his social media platform. MORE: White House to conduct review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions to ensure they fit with Trump's view of American history "We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made," Trump added. "This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums." The Smithsonian declined to comment. ABC News reported last week that the White House planned to do a wide-ranging review of the Smithsonian Institution's exhibitions and operations ahead of America's 250th anniversary next year. In a letter sent to Lonnie Bunch, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the White House wrote that it wants to ensure that the museums "reflect the unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story." When Trump visited The National Museum of African American History and Culture in 2017, he had a different opinion about the discussion of slavery in the museum. In his remarks that day he praised Bunch, the current secretary of the Smithsonian who was then the founding director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Trump referred to the museum as "incredible," "done with love," and a "truly great museum." He praised abolitionist figures Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass. He even recounted a story he'd learned about a runaway slave. He called the tour of the museum "a meaningful reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance and hatred in all of its very ugly forms." MORE: Smithsonian removes references to Trump's impeachments from 'Limits of Presidential Power' exhibit -- for now The White House review is said to be focused on eight museums, including The National Museum of African American History and Culture, The National Museum of American History, The National Museum of Natural History, The National Museum of the American Indian, The Smithsonian American Art Museum, The National Air and Space Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and The Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Trump signed an executive order back in March directing Vice President JD Vance and Interior Department Secretary Doug Burgum to "remove improper ideology" from all areas of the Smithsonian. Last week, ABC News visited the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History and National Museum of African American History and Culture, and took photographs of multiple exhibits displayed information and historical artifacts about slavery, segregation and the civil rights movement. ABC News' Averi Harper, Hannah Demissie and Emily Chang contributed to this report.
