Prince Harry Spoke to Princess Diana's Brother About Changing His Last Name to Spencer & I'm Floored By the Prospect
When I first saw the headlines, I took it with a grain of salt: Over the weekend, The Mail on Sunday reported that Prince Harry spoke with his uncle, Charles Spencer, about the idea of dropping his royal last name of Mountbatten-Windsor in favor of using his late mother Princess Diana's surname, Spencer, instead. But could it really be true? As with many royal things, the sources felt spotty, but as more and more publications picked up the news, the gravity of the Duke of Sussex even considering a move like that hit me: The state of royal relations between father and son (and William) must be bleaker than we ever thought.After all, the move—which Diana's brother, Charles Spencer, is said to have talked Harry out of, according to the reports—would have also affected his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, who are currently sixth and seventh in line to the British throne. (For example, it would have changed Lilibet's name from Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor to Lilibet Diana Spencer.) It also would have read like a royal mic drop and a permanent and symbolic severing of any remaining familial ties.Don't get me wrong: We already know that the state of Harry's relationship, specifically with his father King Charles, is practically non-existent in the wake of the Duke of Sussex's battle for U.K.-based security, per his recent interview with the BBC. But the idea that he would adopt his mother's last name feels like a blow that would remove all associations with the House of Windsor, not to mention chart a path that he couldn't take back. (That said, to formally align his identity with Diana's would not only carry a great deal of meaning for Harry, it would make sense given how similarly their life trajectories inside—but especially outside of—the royal sphere seem to align.)As for Charles Spencer's role, reports state that the 9th Earl Spencer—who recently saw Harry during a rare visit to the U.K. to attend the funeral of his uncle, Robert Fellowes, last year—talked him out of it and told Harry that the legal challenges to a decision like that would be 'insurmountable.' (Both William and Harry are notably close with Diana's brother.)
Of course, this isn't the only name change drama that's cropped up for the Sussexes as of late. When Meghan Markle's recent Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, first debuted, much was made about her revelation to actress Mindy Kaling about changing her last name to Sussex—a move that solidified her family's collective identity, even if it wasn't formalized. 'I love that that is something that Archie, Lili, H and I all have together. It means a lot to me,' she shared.
To be clear, based on reports, it sounds like Harry was just putting feelers out. (It's also good to know he has someone like Charles Spencer to lean on in times like this.) But a move like that would be major—and, sadly, speaks volumes about where things currently stand.
Prince Harry Just Gave a Rare (& Emotional) Interview About the Royal Family
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Russia nears 1 million war casualties in Ukraine, study finds
Nearly 1 million Russian soldiers have been killed or injured in the country's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, according to a new study, a grisly measure of the human cost of Russian President Vladimir Putin's unprovoked three-year assault on his neighbor. Russia will likely hit the 1 million casualty mark this summer, said the study, published Tuesday by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a think tank in Washington, DC. It said the 'stunning' milestone was a 'sign of Putin's blatant disregard for his soldiers.' Of the estimated 950,000 Russian casualties so far, as many as 250,000 are dead, according to the study. 'No Soviet or Russian war since World War II has even come close to Ukraine in terms of fatality rate,' it said. Ukraine has sustained nearly 400,000 casualties, it added, with between 60,000 and 100,000 deaths. Although Kyiv does not disclose its own combat losses in any detail and Moscow is believed to drastically underestimate its own casualties, the CSIS figures are in line with British and United States intelligence assessments. In March, the British defense ministry estimated that Russia had sustained around 900,000 casualties since 2022. For months, it has judged that Russia is losing about 1,000 soldiers each day, whether killed or wounded. Based on that trend, Russia would be expected to surpass the 1 million threshold in the coming weeks. Rebutting claims from some Western lawmakers that Russia holds 'all the cards' in the war in Ukraine, the CSIS study used Russian casualty figures – as well as estimates of its heavy equipment losses and sluggish territorial gains – as evidence that Moscow's military 'has performed relatively poorly on the battlefield' and failed to achieve its main war goals. After Ukraine repelled Russia's initial 'blitzkrieg' assault in 2022, the war has since become attritional. While Kyiv dug in with trenches and mines, Moscow funneled more and more troops into what have become known as 'meat grinder' assaults, throwing soldiers into campaigns for only marginal territorial gains, the study said. In the northeastern Kharkiv region, Russian forces have advanced an average of only 50 meters per day, according to the study. That is slower than the British and French advance in the Battle of the Somme in the trench warfare of World War I. The slow rate of advance has meant Russia has seized only 1% of Ukrainian territory since January 2024, which the authors called a 'paltry' amount. Russia now occupies around 20% of Ukraine's territory, including the Crimean peninsula that Moscow annexed in 2014. But Russia's dwindling territorial gains have not led to a change in strategy. To sustain Russia's staggering rate of casualties, the Kremlin has enlisted convicts from its prisons and welcomed more than 10,000 troops from its ally North Korea, but it has left the children of Moscow and St. Petersburg elites largely untouched. Instead, Moscow has recruited in the far north and far east of the country, where men have been lured by pay packages that are life-changing among poorer communities in those regions. 'Putin likely considers these types of soldiers more expendable and less likely to undermine his domestic support base,' the study noted. Whereas Ukraine, a democracy with a population less than a quarter the size of Russia's, has faced some pushback in its attempts to mobilize more troops, Russia, where criticism of the war has been outlawed, has faced no significant dissent. But, with the war now well into its fourth year, the authors warned that the 'blood cost' of its protracted campaign was a potential vulnerability for Putin. Although Russia has had the 'initiative' in the conflict since early 2024, the authors said the attritional nature of the war has left 'few opportunities for decisive breakthroughs.' Instead, Russia's main hope to win 'is for the United States to cut off aid to Ukraine' – as President Donald Trump briefly did earlier this year – and 'walk away from the conflict' – as officials in his administration have threatened to do.
UPI
11 minutes ago
- UPI
Watch: Jessie J shares early breast cancer diagnosis
1 of 3 | Jessie J opened up about her breast cancer diagnosis on Tuesday. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo June 4 (UPI) -- Jessie J says she has early breast cancer. The British singer, 37, discussed her diagnosis and treatment in a video she shared on Instagram Tuesday. "Before 'No Secrets' came out (on April 25), I was diagnosed with early breast cancer," she shared. "I'm highlighting the word early. Cancer sucks in any form but I'm holding onto the word early. I have been in and out of tests throughout this whole period. I just wanted to be open and share it. One, because selfishly, I do not talk about it enough. I'm not processing it because I'm working so hard." "I also know how much sharing in the past has helped me with other people giving me their love and support and also their own stories," she added. "I'm an open book. It breaks my heart that so many people are going through so much, similar and worse -- that's the bit that kills me.... It's a very dramatic way to get a boob job." Jessie J said her surgery will take place after Summertime Ball, which is described as "the U.K.'s biggest summer party." She added she will "disappear for a bit" during that time. That performance is set for June 15. Singer Rita Ora was among those who left messages of support in the comments. "You're literally my favorite person and I'm praying for you," she said. "You've got this. My mother had it and I know the surgery and any treatment on this matter is mentally tough so I'm here for you."
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Russia nears 1 million war casualties in Ukraine, study finds
Nearly 1 million Russian soldiers have been killed or injured in the country's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, according to a new study, a grisly measure of the human cost of Russian President Vladimir Putin's unprovoked three-year assault on his neighbor. Russia will likely hit the 1 million casualty mark this summer, said the study, published Tuesday by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a think tank in Washington, DC. It said the 'stunning' milestone was a 'sign of Putin's blatant disregard for his soldiers.' Of the estimated 950,000 Russian casualties so far, as many as 250,000 are dead, according to the study. 'No Soviet or Russian war since World War II has even come close to Ukraine in terms of fatality rate,' it said. Ukraine has sustained nearly 400,000 casualties, it added, with between 60,000 and 100,000 deaths. Although Kyiv does not disclose its own combat losses in any detail and Moscow is believed to drastically underestimate its own casualties, the CSIS figures are in line with British and United States intelligence assessments. In March, the British defense ministry estimated that Russia had sustained around 900,000 casualties since 2022. For months, it has judged that Russia is losing about 1,000 soldiers each day, whether killed or wounded. Based on that trend, Russia would be expected to surpass the 1 million threshold in the coming weeks. Rebutting claims from some Western lawmakers that Russia holds 'all the cards' in the war in Ukraine, the CSIS study used Russian casualty figures – as well as estimates of its heavy equipment losses and sluggish territorial gains – as evidence that Moscow's military 'has performed relatively poorly on the battlefield' and failed to achieve its main war goals. After Ukraine repelled Russia's initial 'blitzkrieg' assault in 2022, the war has since become attritional. While Kyiv dug in with trenches and mines, Moscow funneled more and more troops into what have become known as 'meat grinder' assaults, throwing soldiers into campaigns for only marginal territorial gains, the study said. In the northeastern Kharkiv region, Russian forces have advanced an average of only 50 meters per day, according to the study. That is slower than the British and French advance in the Battle of the Somme in the trench warfare of World War I. The slow rate of advance has meant Russia has seized only 1% of Ukrainian territory since January 2024, which the authors called a 'paltry' amount. Russia now occupies around 20% of Ukraine's territory, including the Crimean peninsula that Moscow annexed in 2014. But Russia's dwindling territorial gains have not led to a change in strategy. To sustain Russia's staggering rate of casualties, the Kremlin has enlisted convicts from its prisons and welcomed more than 10,000 troops from its ally North Korea, but it has left the children of Moscow and St. Petersburg elites largely untouched. Instead, Moscow has recruited in the far north and far east of the country, where men have been lured by pay packages that are life-changing among poorer communities in those regions. 'Putin likely considers these types of soldiers more expendable and less likely to undermine his domestic support base,' the study noted. Whereas Ukraine, a democracy with a population less than a quarter the size of Russia's, has faced some pushback in its attempts to mobilize more troops, Russia, where criticism of the war has been outlawed, has faced no significant dissent. But, with the war now well into its fourth year, the authors warned that the 'blood cost' of its protracted campaign was a potential vulnerability for Putin. Although Russia has had the 'initiative' in the conflict since early 2024, the authors said the attritional nature of the war has left 'few opportunities for decisive breakthroughs.' Instead, Russia's main hope to win 'is for the United States to cut off aid to Ukraine' – as President Donald Trump briefly did earlier this year – and 'walk away from the conflict' – as officials in his administration have threatened to do.
