How Fidelity Just Made It Easier for the Average American To Invest In Bitcoin
Learn More:
Read Next:
Fidelity brokerage clients recently became the largest shareholders in Metaplanet (through National Financial Services LLC, a clearing and custody broker-dealer of Fidelity), a Tokyo investment firm. This shift may signal a growing trend where traditional finance companies make it easier for everyday investors to dip into crypto without diving all the way in.
Here is what bitcoin-interested investors should know.
What Is Metaplanet — and Why Does It Matter?
Metaplanet has gained attention for its aggressive bitcoin-focused investment strategy. In many ways, Metaplanet is positioning itself as a bitcoin treasury company, with over 16,000 BTC, valued at roughly $1.6 billion. Its goal is to become one of the largest corporate holders of bitcoin in the world.
By buying Metaplanet shares through a Fidelity brokerage account, investors can benefit from bitcoin's value without taking on big risk or forking out the huge costs of buying bitcoin directly.
Find Out:
Fidelity's Involvement: What Just Happened?
Fidelity recently announced that not only was it dipping a toe into bitcoin investing, but it'd also become the largest shareholders of Metaplanet — holding nearly $820 million worth of shares.
This stake suggests that there's growing interest from everyday investors in this kind of indirect bitcoin exposure and that more financial institutions may follow suit.
Why This Could Make Bitcoin More Accessible for Americans
This exciting move marks a potential turning point where it may be about to get a whole lot easier to invest in bitcoin through existing brokerage or other investment accounts, rather than through complex crypto exchanges.
When investors buy shares of a company like Metaplanet — whose business model literally is structured around holding large amounts of bitcoin, you get what's called 'bitcoin proxy exposure.' This means you're not directly buying bitcoin, but the value of your investments is affected by bitcoin's price fluctuations. When bitcoin does well, your portfolio benefits, and vice versa.
The benefits of this include:
Not having to go through any of the compliance hassles of crypto exchanges
Avoiding the risks of directly purchasing bitcoin
Skirting capital gains taxes because your bitcoin exposure would be taxed like stocks
Risks and Realities: What Investors Should Know First
While this is all very exciting for anyone who has been interested in bitcoin, investments of this kind are not the same as owning bitcoin directly. And, since your investments are tied to bitcoin's value, you're still at some risk of price fluctuations. But for anyone who wants to just get an edge on bitcoin, it could be a good way to start.
The Bigger Trend: Institutions Quietly Warming to Bitcoin
The more notable takeaway from Fidelity's move is that it may be the beginning of larger institutional adoption seen across the industry. This could bode well for cryptocurrency like bitcoin's continuing rise in value.
While the decision to invest this way — benefiting from bitcoin without buying it directly may not be for everyone — it's something you can now ask your financial advisor or portfolio manager. For others, it may make more sense to invest in bitcoin exchange traded funds (ETF) or blockchain investing. Your investing style needs to match your financial goals and your risk tolerance.
The good news is that you don't need to be a crypto expert to invest this way, but you should always perform due diligence and consider all investing options.
More From GOBankingRates
5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall
7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: How Fidelity Just Made It Easier for the Average American To Invest In Bitcoin
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Retreats, coaching, and therapy: Inside the $1 billion cottage industry cashing in on the retail-trading phenomenon
A booming cottage industry has taken root amid the retail trader phenomenon. Courses, retreats, coaching, and other services are growing as day traders look for an edge in the market. Those in the industry say traders are bored, desperate to improve, or desire to go full-time. Somewhere in Bali, a group of investors — mostly men — file through the gates of a luxury villa, replete with tiki huts and couches by the poolside. This isn't just a vacation, they say. The goal, in part, is to make tons of money, Aaron Luce, the leader of the weeklong retreat for day traders, tells the camera. "This is a beautiful pool spot. We're all going to be chilling for the week when we make loads of money trading," Luce says in a YouTube video documenting the experience, which includes a montage of traders looking at candlestick charts and, intermittently, taking breaks and cannonballing into the pool. This kind of retreat is a relatively new phenomenon, offered to traders looking for an edge amid the explosion of interest in the stock market since the pandemic. In recent years, a cottage industry has taken root amid the hype for stock trading. Social media is rife with businesses offering courses, getaways, one-on-one coaching, and other services that claim to improve traders' performance and get them in the right mindset to turn a profit. And demand, evidently, is booming — in large part due to traders who are swinging to go full-time, desperate to improve, or, in some cases, are simply bored, sources in the space told Business Insider. The industry offering these kinds of services to day traders swelled to around $1.68 billion in 2024, and is on track to grow 11% each year to hit $3.92 billion in 2033, according to one estimate from Business Research Insights. A separate analysis from Dataintelo Consulting estimated that the market was valued at around $2.5 billion in 2023, and is on track to more than double to $5.8 billion by 2032. Google search interest in "Day trading courses" is up 10% over the past year, according to data from the Google Trends analytics tool Glimpse. Searches for "Trading retreat" and "Trading coach" are up 26% and 69% over the past year, respectively, while interest for "Trading therapist" has skyrocketed 263%. On Coursera, enrollment in online trading courses soared 213% in the five years leading up to 2024, according to data the online course provider shared with Business Insider. The online trading platform Webull also says it's seen the number of users on its learning platform grow 37% over the last 3 years. International Day Trading Academy, a trading school that offers courses and an eight-day trading retreat in Bali, says interest in the retreat has exploded three or fourfold in the past year, according to Kelly Lowry, the general manager. Andrew Menaker, a psychologist and a trading coach who frequently works with retail traders, says he's also noticed a big push among the retail crowd to get in the right mindset for trading. The number of people who have inquired about Menaker's coaching services has about doubled in the past year, he said, adding that the waitlist to nab an appointment with him can range from several weeks to several months. Menaker says some of his clients, who are willing to do just about anything to gain an edge, have said they spent upward of $10,000 on materials like indicators, charting packages, and online courses. Others have said they've spent money on things like cold plunges, heart biofeedback devices, brain wave devices, and even psychedelics. Menaker is skeptical of some of the businesses selling to day traders. The space has become flooded with hype and influencer marketing, he says, especially targeting new traders who are just learning the ropes. "It's really a buyer-beware environment," he said. A trader's elusive dream Making money day trading is hard. One 2020 study found that 97% of traders who persisted for more than 300 days ended up losing money, after accounting for fees. Just 1% were able to make a profit, and it was often minuscule. Still, many are willing to keep trying. Cameron Buchanan, the cofounder of International Day Trading Academy, told Business Insider he believes the heightened volatility is what's behind the boom in traders seeking these kinds of services. Big swings in the market are often ripe with opportunity to win (and lose) big, but navigating the intraday moves is not easy even for professional traders. More people are also lured by the prospect of becoming full-time traders, a once-niche ambition that now offers the possibility of financial freedom and the ability to work from anywhere with an internet connection. "People are sharing that life's stressful," Lowry said of some of the academy's clients. "People come out of retreats and say, 'I've made a decision that I'm going to do this now.'" Dr. Reid Daitzman, a Connecticut-based psychologist who frequently works with day traders, says he's seen a 50% increase in traders wanting to work with him over the past year. He believes that a good chunk of his clients are deeply involved in the stock market and seek to improve their trading, partly because they've already lost a large sum of money, but also because many are bored. "A lot of people just trade because they have too much time on their hands, literally, and they have nothing to do," he said, adding that some of his clients were recovering from substance addictions and picked up day trading in sobriety. Menaker, who consulted with traders on Wall Street prior to opening his own practice, believes the main way traders improve is by understanding themselves better. His work hinges on the idea that traders need to know their "inner market" — a nexus of hopes, dreams, fears, and memories that explain how traders respond to risk and opportunity. While he sees some value in trading education and some evidence-based tools, like HRV biofeedback, he believes most gadgets out there won't make a difference unless traders do the work to understand their own minds. "People will never really get what they need, which is, 'How do I respond when I'm under pressure and how can I change that to act more in my own best interest?' That's really what the courses should be emphasizing more, in my opinion," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Foreign governments bet big to lobby Trump on tariffs. Most came up empty.
Countries across the globe have dropped tens of millions this year on lobbyists with ties to President Donald Trump as they rushed to stave off tariffs that could cripple their economies. In most cases, the spending has gotten them nowhere. As Trump has taken a scattershot approach to setting tariff rates — crafting trade agreements that set a 15 percent tariff on major trading partners while imposing rates that vary between 10 and 41 percent on the rest of the world — traditional lobbying tactics in Washington appear to have had little influence. At least 30 nations hired new lobbyists with connections to Trump since the election. They include major trading partners like South Korea and Japan as well as smaller countries like Bosnia and Ecuador. But employing those lobbyists appeared to bear little relation to whether the countries were able to avoid the most punishing tariffs. 'I think the current leadership in Washington seems to be disrupting the traditional way of doing things. It's not just about the business part, it's about diplomacy, it's about dealing with other nations,' said Mukesh Aghi, the CEO of the U.S. India Strategic Partnership Forum. 'I think the whole old model of trying to influence does not seem to work.' The new model is punishing India. After bringing longtime Trump adviser Jason Miller on board in April, the nation has nonetheless been walloped by Trump over the past two weeks. Tariffs for India are now set to rise to 50 percent, after the country failed to secure a trade agreement and Trump decided to jack up tariffs in response to its purchase of Russian oil. India inked a yearlong contract with Miller worth $1.8 million in exchange for 'strategic counsel, tactical planning and government relations assistance' as well as perception management and public relations, according to documents filed with the Justice Department. He did not respond to a request for comment. The experiences of Canada and Mexico stand out. Canada's provinces stocked up on lobbyists and the country has still been hammered by Trump. Mexico didn't and relied instead on President Claudia Sheinbaum's personal relationship with Trump — a direct approach that worked better. Five of Canada's 10 provinces brought on new lobbying or public relations help in the last year, amid a federal leadership vacuum as the country prepared to elect a new prime minister. Capitol Counsel lobbyists representing Ontario and Alberta set up meetings and calls for provincial officials with more than a dozen Republican members of Congress as well as Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt. Meanwhile, lobbyists at HBW Resources worked to create inroads with Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry on behalf of energy-heavy Saskatchewan and Alberta, DOJ filings show. In February, a federation of Canadian premiers and territorial leaders hired Checkmate Government Relations for assistance arranging a trade mission to Washington. The firm is led by Ches McDowell, a hunting buddy of Donald Trump Jr., and employs the son of Trump's 2024 campaign co-chair. For $85,000, Checkmate got the premiers a meeting at the White House with deputy chief of staff James Blair and director of presidential personnel Sergio Gor. Less than a month later, Canada's D.C. Embassy hired the public affairs firm Signal Group for a crash course and media training on messaging on right-wing media. It included a 'right-wing message analysis' of the Canadian ambassador's recent TV interviews and breakdown of Maslow's hierarchy of needs for the MAGA set. Mexico, by contrast, has just a single lobbying firm, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, on retainer, to provide legal services on trade issues. Yet despite Mexico playing a more direct role in the flow of fentanyl — a top concern of Trump — it was the neighbor to the north that ultimately faced steeper tariffs. Canada now has a 35 percent tariff on its goods, while Mexico has stayed at 25 percent, even though most products are exempt under an existing free trade agreement. Mexico appeared to benefit from what one Mexican official described as personal ties between Trump and Sheinbaum. A Republican lobbyist working on Trump's tariffs suggested that making headway with the president requires a shift in thinking. 'I think what's happened with some of these countries is they felt entitled to the status quo,' the lobbyist argued. 'And they were offended that anyone, even the U.S. president, would suggest changing it at all.' The lobbyist pointed to the success that Sheinbaum has had in wooing Trump. Instead of taking a combative stand, 'the better approach is to look at it from the perspective of: The president wants to redefine the trade relationship between the two countries, and that's his goal, and you have to deal with him on those terms,' the person said. Leader-to-leader calls were particularly valuable in helping countries make their case directly to Trump. 'From my perspective, the best way to lobby President Trump is for the leader to face-to-face lobby him,' Tami Overby, a partner at DGA Group Government who focuses on trade in South Korea. 'It seems President Trump, he always talks about his relationships with other leaders. You know, whether we're in a good spot with that country or not [depending] if he feels like he's got a good relationship. And he sees himself as a deal maker.' Many of the firms enlisted to represent foreign governments before the Trump administration are mainstays of the D.C. lobbying scene, and plenty of countries already had veteran trade lobbyists or lobbyists with ties to Trump on their payrolls before the election. They include Mercury Public Affairs, the former K Street home of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles which signed five new foreign governments since November, including South Korea, Ecuador and Libya. And while South Korea reached an agreement with the White House to set its tariffs to 15 percent in exchange for investments in the U.S. and lower trade barriers, tariff rates increased between April and August for both Ecuador and Libya. In Ecuador's case, it went from being ignored in Trump's first threats of 'reciprocal' tariffs, to facing a 15 percent tariff in August. Mercury also lobbies for the Japanese government, which maintains a roster of more than two dozen lobbying and public relations firms in the U.S. Japan was among the first major trading partners to strike a trade agreement — setting its tariffs at 15 percent, down from a threatened 25 percent. Ballard Partners, the previous home to Wiles and Attorney General Pam Bondi, helped broker a phone call between Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba the day after the election, according to documents filed with DOJ under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Another Trump-linked lobbying firm, BGR Group, has signed six new foreign governments since Trump's win last year. It previously employed Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and is home to Trump adviser David Urban. Some of its foreign clients, like Angola and South Korea, saw their tariff rates drop between April and August. But the firm also lobbies for the Indian government, which paid BGR $300,000 from December through May, though much of that work was related to flaring tensions with Pakistan. Several Southeast Asian economies that have hired help in Washington fared better, with many of them receiving lower rates compared to the initial duties unveiled in April. Their wins were relative, though: The countries' tariff rates are higher than before, and broadly higher than much of the world. In other words, lobbyists might have succeeded in helping their clients avoid the worst case, but the outcomes could hardly be considered triumphs. Countries hired U.S.-based lobbying firms to strengthen ties with the Trump administration, and worked with business groups with ties to lower-level Trump administration officials across the Departments of Commerce and Treasury. Cambodia and Indonesia had their tariff cut to 19 percent, substantially lower compared to rates initially outlined by the president in April. DOJ filings show that Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld reached out to U.S. Trade Representative's Office chief of staff Sam Mulopulos on behalf of the Cambodian government on the same day that Trump announced his so-called reciprocal tariffs. The firm sent Mulopulos multiple follow-up texts over the next few months to coordinate meetings with Cambodia's negotiators and check for updates on the status of tariff negotiations, and organized meetings on the Hill with lawmakers including Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), according to the filings. In the end, Cambodia saw one of the largest tariff rate declines of any country between April and May, dropping from a threatened 49 percent duty. The Trump administration for its part has portrayed the countries with the most significant declines as cooperative partners that were willing to make the greatest concessions to the president's terms. One former diplomat who worked with governments across Southeast Asia said representatives from Vietnam arranged more than two dozen meetings with government officials, which ramped up days after Trump outlined his April rates. The country secured a modest win as its tariff rate was cut from 46 to 20 percent — though the final figure remains higher than what Vietnam officials say was originally agreed to. One Asian diplomat credited lobbying efforts by countries in the region with helping shift the Trump administration away from its original trade strategy, which aimed to pull regional economies out of China's orbit and prioritize crackdowns on Chinese transshipment and other enforcement measures. 'Some countries need the access that lobbyists can give and an intermediary for backdoor and informal talks,' they said. A number of countries turned to first-time foreign lobbyists who are cashing in on their ties to Trump or his circle. The Pakistani government brought on seven new lobbying firms this year, including Trump's former bodyman Keith Schiller and George Sorial, the Trump Organization's former compliance chief. Neither of them had ever registered as foreign agents before, but Pakistan agreed to pay their firm $50,000 per month, according to a copy of the contract filed with DOJ. Islamabad managed to have its 'reciprocal' tariff rate lowered from 29 percent to 19 percent — a contrast to Pakistan's rival next door, India. Among the foreign governments that signed Continental Strategy this spring were Guyana — which is paying the firm $50,000 per month and saw its tariff rate plunge from 38 percent in April to 15 percent in August — and Japan, which is paying the firm $37,500, DOJ filings show. Continental Strategy is led by Carlos Trujillo, a diplomat who served in Trump's first administration, and Alberto Martinez, a top former aide to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Some countries and industries that have been successful in swaying Trump have later had those advantages neutralized. The 'Big Three' American auto companies — Ford, General Motors and Stellantis — helped convince the administration to create a rebate program, aiding auto producers that rely on the North American supply chain. But as Trump set about crafting trade deals, that advantage was quickly neutralized. Japan, South Korea and the European Union — all trading partners with large auto industries — were able to secure a 15 percent tariff on cars and car parts, undermining the efforts of U.S. automakers to build domestically. Even after this week's tariff implementation kickoff, countries and lobbyists are still holding out hope that they can win exceptions or other helpful provisions. That possibility is sure to keep business booming on K Street, despite its lackluster performance. 'A lot of clients are like, 'Well, is it done? Can we still get our thing in there?'' the Republican lobbyist noted. 'The framework is there, but there's still a lot of blank spaces, and that's where we're seeing a lot of activity.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Crypto Investor's 'Never Wrong To Take Profit' Rule Sparked A Heated Debate—Here's Why Bitcoin Holders Are Pushing Back
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The age-old debate about when to take profits in cryptocurrency has reached a fever pitch, with investors split between two radically different philosophies that could determine whether you build wealth or watch it vanish overnight. Reddit user Feisty-Rhubarb-6718 recently sparked intense discussion when he shared his hard-learned lesson: 'It's never wrong to take profit.' After watching significant gains evaporate due to greed, he now advocates for securing partial wins along the way. 'The market owes me nothing,' he explained, emphasizing that leaving the table with something beats walking away empty-handed. His approach represents the 'trader mindset'—selling portions of holdings during rallies and redeploying capital elsewhere. But this strategy has drawn fierce criticism from Bitcoin maximalists who view any profit-taking as fundamentally flawed. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— The Bitcoin Maximalist Counter-Attack Bitcoin purists argue that viewing BTC through a traditional trading lens misses the bigger picture entirely. They compare Bitcoin to a 401(k), where the goal isn't to 'cash out' but to spend from accumulated wealth during retirement. From this perspective, Bitcoin represents financial freedom from traditional banking systems, with its market trajectory consistently outpacing inflation over time. 'Any withdrawal unless for a necessary expense is a foolish decision,' argued one Bitcoin advocate, highlighting the philosophical divide between treating crypto as a trading vehicle versus a long-term wealth preservation tool. This mindset has historical backing. Early Bitcoin investors who held through multiple boom-bust cycles often saw exponentially better returns than those who took profits during intermediate rallies. The difference between a 2x gain and a 100x gain can be life-changing wealth versus modest profits. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. The Hidden Costs of Both Strategies The debate extends beyond philosophy into practical considerations that many investors overlook. Taking profits triggers immediate tax implications and exchange fees, while also resetting capital gains tax clocks. Meanwhile, the emotional toll of 'panic selling' during market downturns can lead to poor timing even when technically taking a profit. Conversely, the 'diamond hands' approach carries its own risks. Even major cryptocurrencies can lose significant value or disappear entirely. The volatility that creates massive upside potential also generates substantial downside risk. Finding Middle Ground: The DCA-Out Strategy Many experienced investors advocate for a hybrid approach called 'dollar-cost averaging out'—selling small portions during price increases while maintaining core positions. This strategy captures some profits while preserving upside exposure, potentially offering the best of both worlds. Automated trading systems can help remove human emotion from these decisions, systematically taking profits as prices rise while accumulating during dips. The key is establishing clear rules before emotions take over during market Personal Finance Reality Check Perhaps the most important factor gets lost in these philosophical debates: individual financial circumstances should drive investment decisions, not tribal loyalty to particular strategies. A financial advisor might correctly recommend liquidating crypto holdings for one investor while suggesting increased allocation for another, depending on their age, income, debt levels, and risk tolerance. The Reddit discussion revealed a crucial truth that both camps often ignore—there's no universally 'correct' approach to crypto investing. Success depends on matching strategy to personal goals, timeline, and psychological makeup. Whether you're team 'secure the bag' or 'diamond hands forever,' the most dangerous mistake is investing without a clear plan and the discipline to stick with it when emotions run high. Read Next: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Image: Shutterstock This article This Crypto Investor's 'Never Wrong To Take Profit' Rule Sparked A Heated Debate—Here's Why Bitcoin Holders Are Pushing Back originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
