Competing Michigan property tax plans include both reform and elimination
Competing Michigan property tax plans are underway in the state, including a ballot proposal to eliminate the levy.
The other plan calls for simply reforming the system - which hasn't been undertaken in decades.
Property taxes pay for local governments and many school systems, making the funding mechanism a delicate topic.
(FOX 2) - For decades, public officials have avoided touching Michigan's property tax system.
While many complain of high costs associated with owning a home, the taxes help pay for schools and local governments.
Now, competing plans are evolving in Lansing, with one pitching reform and another pushing for their outright elimination.
Big picture view
Michigan voters may have a crowded ballot when they head to the polls in 2026 for the midterm elections next year.
The consequential election is still more than a year out, but the political wheels this summer have been turning a lot and the number of potential questions voters could face could be a lengthy one.
Among possible ballot proposals is one that would completely remove Michigan's property tax.
The main funding mechanism that many schools and local governments use to fund operations would cease if the proposal is approved. Alternative revenue sources would be needed to keep municipalities up and running if voters gave the initiative their approval.
The AxMITAX campaign is led by Karla Wagner, who has set the goal of collecting 600,000 valid signatures this summer to ensure the proposal makes the 2026 ballot.
The petition's language that will be circulating this summer can be found here.
Dig deeper
The campaign is not the only push for property tax relief in Michigan.
State House Speaker Matt Hall said reform was badly needed. The last time lawmakers touched property tax was three decades ago. He predicted the issue would "dominate" state politics.
"How do we do property tax and the potential of putting that on the next ballot if we can't do it all, legislatively," Hall told Tim Skubick on Off The Record earlier in August.
He said he'd be working on reforming Prop A, which funds schools specifically, and the Headlee Amendment, which is a function used by local governments.
But whereas Wagner wants to completely rid the state of property taxes, Hall only wants to reduce it for some people. That's because so many governing agencies rely heavily on the revenue source to stay up and running.
"We need to properly fund education and local governments - that's why you can't get rid of the property tax," Hall said at the time. "After the budget, our next focus is going to be how we tackle this issue and at that time I'll have a good read on whether that's something we can pull that together for this election. We're definitely considering it."
Major ballot proposals
Voters could also be deciding on voting and election security issues next year.
The Michigan Board of State Canvassers, which approves language for ballot initiatives that voters see, has also given the greenlight for issues about Ranked Choice Voting, a tax on the state's wealthiest citizens to fund schools, and voter ID laws.
The Source
Previous reporting and interviews with public officials and campaign leaders were cited for this story.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Legislature overrides governor's veto to enact controversial law: 'An awful turning point'
Legislature overrides governor's veto to enact controversial law: 'An awful turning point' The North Carolina legislature overrode the governor's veto in order to approve a bill that could slow future environmental regulations. What's happening? Having already passed through the State House and Senate this past spring, House Bill 402 was vetoed by Democratic Governor Josh Stein in June. Republican lawmakers found enough votes to override the veto in late July, making it law, along with another seven previously vetoed bills. Also known as the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny — or REINS — Act, HB 402 aims to place additional restrictions on the passage of any new environmental regulation in the state. According to North Carolina Health News, the new law will require any environmental regulation "with a projected financial impact" of $1 million over five years to be approved by a two-thirds majority of the body making the rule. For anything over $10 million, it requires unanimous approval. And for any regulation projected to cost $20 million or more, it requires formal approval from the state's General Assembly. Why is this concerning? This law could make it virtually impossible for any kind of real, substantive regulation to be implemented, environmental advocates say. "Lawmakers who passed this bill did not have the best interests of North Carolinians at heart," said Mary Maclean Asbill, director of the state's Southern Environmental Law Center's office. "This new law marks an awful turning point for families and communities across North Carolina when elected officials in the state legislature ignore serious illnesses and deaths in favor of polluters' profits," she continued in a release, per NCHN. The outlet noted that House Speaker Destin Hall, a Republican, said, "What we had in the REINS Act was a situation where if you have a regulation that is extremely expensive, our position is that it's something that [the legislature] needs to take a look at." Meanwhile, environmental advocates say that viewing each new regulation through a strictly financial lens — rather than through a lens that weighs the cost against the potential benefits for public health and essential ecosystems — will make passage of new legislation practically unobtainable. What's being done in North Carolina? While this legislation's finalization is certainly a blow to many environmentalists and public health advocates, their hopes are not completely lost in North Carolina. A pair of bills, HB 569 and Senate Bill 666, could still have major impacts on the state's environmental regulations, according to NCHN. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. HB 569 would require polluters to reimburse public water systems for clean-ups of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. SB 666 would charge the Environmental Management Commission with setting regulatory limits on PFAS. It's unclear how either bill could be impacted by HB 402 becoming law, though, and the status of both bills remains uncertain at this stage. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
16 hours ago
- USA Today
Lawmaker spends night in Texas Capitol, and could stay longer. Here's why.
A Texas state lawmaker who spent the night on the floor of the Austin statehouse overnight into Aug. 19 plans to stay even longer as she refuses to accept a Republican order demanding all Democrats be monitored by police officers. Democratic State Rep. Nicole Collier is hunkering down in the Texas Capitol building in protest of Republican leadership assigning law enforcement officers to monitor the state's Democratic caucus, after dozens fled the state for two weeks in attempts to halt a vote on new congressional maps that would advantage the GOP in next year's elections. Collier, the former chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus who is serving her seventh two-year term representing Fort Worth, refused to agree to the police monitor, remaining in the Capitol in protest. She has been livestreaming herself for hours on X, in an otherwise largely empty chamber, and posted a photo of herself sleeping on a chair with a blanket and eye mask early on Tuesday, Aug. 19. "This was my night, bonnet and all, in the #txlege," she said in the post. Collier said in a video on X that two other Democratic state representatives, Gene Wu and Vince Perez, joined her overnight, all of them sleeping in chairs on the State House floor. Collier told NBC News that she doesn't plan to leave until Democratic lawmakers are freed from security shadowing. The Texas House is set to reconvene on Wednesday, Aug. 20. "What matters to me is making sure that I resist and fight back against and push back," Collier told Reuters from the Capitol in an interview on Aug. 18. Fallout from Texas redistricting fight Democrats in the Texas House of Representatives returned to Austin on Monday, Aug. 18, ending the stalemate that ballooned into a multistate partisan battle. Leadership of several other states have threatened to redraw their congressional maps in response to Texas Republicans' plans, which could end up adding five more GOP seats to Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections and widen the party's narrow majority. Gavin Newsom, the governor of Democratic stronghold California, announced Aug. 14 the state will hold a special election to re-draw their own maps, in a bid to add more blue seats in response to Texas' moves. As the Democrats settled back in after their absence, Republican Speaker Dustin Burrows implemented a condition for the returned lawmakers that would make it harder for them to flee a second time. Burrows said Democrats who had left the state but returned would only be allowed to leave the House chambers if they agreed to be released into the custody of an agent from the Texas Department of Public Safety, who would ensure they are present at House sessions going forward. Collier's overnight stay is in protest of these conditions, which she refused to agree to. 'Rep. Collier's choice to stay and not sign the permission slip is well within her rights under the House Rules," Burrows said in a statement to USA TODAY. "I am choosing to spend my time focused on moving the important legislation on the call to overhaul camp safety, provide property tax reform and eliminate the STAAR test − the results Texans care about." Burrows' conditions are just the latest example of Republicans employing law enforcement against the Democrats amid the weeks-long battle. At one point, the state's Republican governor, Greg Abbott, said any lawmaker who fundraised or solicited money to pay a $500-per-day fine on absent legislators could violate bribery laws and called them "potential out-of-state felons." Early in their exodus, Abbott issued arrest warrants, which called for the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans," though no arrests were made. Contributing: Erin Mansfield, USA TODAY; Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her atkapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Multiple ballot proposals underway for 2026 election
(The Center Square) – More than a year from Election Day, a number of proposals are already moving toward appearing on Michigan's 2026 ballot. Currently, six proposals have received approval from the state Board of State Canvassers and are in the process of gathering signatures. One proposal is already set to appear on the ballot. Each proposal must be presented in a 100-word summary to voters. According to state law, the board must determine whether the language of the summaries are 'true and impartial.' Since 1986, Michigan voters approved 34 ballot proposals, defeating 31. The one measure already set to appear on the ballot asks voters whether to hold a state constitutional convention. It will appear on the ballot as an automatic ballot referral, meaning it automatically appears on the state's ballot every 16 years. Michigan is one of 14 states that provides for an automatic constitutional convention question, something that was first approved by Michigan voters in 1960. Five of the proposals are constitutional amendments. • AxMITAX: Prohibit state, county, or municipal property taxes; require 60% of voters to approve local taxes; and require a 2/3 vote of both the state Senate and House to increase any state tax which would raise revenue by more than 0.1% over five years. • Protect Voters Rights: Require individuals to verify United States citizenship during voter registration; require photo ID for in-person and absentee voters. • Americans for Citizens Voting, Version 1: Require the Secretary of State to verify citizenship of all registered voters, document citizenship, remove non-citizens using governmental records, and track separate eligibility requirements for federal and state/local elections; and prohibit counting ballots from voters with unverified citizenship. • Americans for Citizens Voting, Version 2: Require citizenship verification for all voters through statewide program, document submission, or provisional voting; require removing noncitizens after notice and 45-day rebuttal; and prohibit counting ballots from voters with unverified citizenship starting in 2027. • Rank MI Vote: Require ranked-choice voting for federal offices and state leadership by allowing voters to numerically rank candidates by voter preference starting in 2029. The sixth proposal that has been approved is a voter referendum. The Voters to Stop Paycuts referendum would repeal Public Act 1 of 2025, which raised the state minimum wage to $15 by 2027. If passed, it would return the state to previous legislation which totally phased out the tipped wage system. Business leaders in the state have been vocal in their opposition to this referendum. 'This is a damaging proposal for the economy, for small businesses, larger businesses, but especially for workers,' said Brian Calley, president and CEO of the Small Business Association of Michigan, as previously reported by The Center Square. To be placed on the November 2026 ballot, each proposal must receive more than 300,000 signatures by March 2026. Solve the daily Crossword
