Wash, dry, enroll: Helping people access health care, at the laundromat
SUITLAND, Md. — At a SuperSuds Laundromat just south of D.C., a steady stream of customers loaded clothes into washers and dryers on a recent Sunday morning, passing the time on their phones or watching television.
Amid the low hum of spinning clothes, Adrienne Jones made the rounds in a bright yellow sweatshirt, asking customers about their health needs. 'Do you have health coverage?' Jones, an outreach manager for Fabric Health, asked Brendan Glover, 25, who was doing laundry with his toddler in tow.
Glover works in law enforcement, but he lost his coverage in 2024 when a job ended. 'I am young, so I don't think about it, but I know I will need it,' he said.
Jones collected his contact information, gave him a gift card for a future laundromat visit, and promised to help him find affordable coverage.
State Medicaid and Affordable Care Act coverage programs have long struggled to connect with lower-income Americans to help them access health care. They send letters and emails, place phone calls, and post on social media platforms such as Facebook and X.
Some of these state programs are trying an alternative approach: meeting people at the laundromat — where they regularly go and usually have time to chat.
Fabric Health, a D.C.-based start-up, sends outreach workers into laundromats in Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and — as of January — the District of Columbia, to help people get and use health coverage, including by helping schedule checkups or maternity care. The workers, many of whom are bilingual, visit the laundromats also to establish relationships, build trust, and connect people with government assistance.
Medicaid health plans, including those run by CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield in Maryland, UPMC in Pittsburgh and Jefferson Health in Philadelphia, pay Fabric Health to connect with their enrollees. The company was paid by the Maryland Managed Care Organization Association, the state's Medicaid health plan trade group, to help people recertify their Medicaid eligibility after covid pandemic-era coverage protections expired.
Since 2023, the company has connected with more than 20,000 people in Maryland and Pennsylvania alone, collecting contact information and data on their health and social needs, said Allister Chang, a co-founder and the chief operating officer. Chang also serves on the D.C. State Board of Education as Ward 2's elected representative.
Fabric Health would not disclose its fees to KFF Health News. The company is structured as a public benefit corporation, meaning it is a for-profit business created to provide a social benefit and is not required to prioritize seeking profits for shareholders.
Pennie, Pennsylvania's ACA marketplace, which opened in 2020, pays Fabric Health to talk to people in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas about coverage options and enroll them.
A survey last year found that two-thirds of uninsured people in the state have never heard of Pennie, said Devon Trolley, Pennie's executive director.
'Fabric's approach is very novel and creative,' she said. 'They go to where people are sitting with time on their hands and develop grassroots relationships and get the word out about Pennie.'
For enrollees, the laundromat chats can be easier and quicker than connecting with their health plans' customer service. For the health plans, they can increase state performance payments, which are tied to enrollee satisfaction and effectiveness at getting them services such as cancer screenings.
'Our pitch is: People spend two hours a week waiting around in laundromats and that idle time can be incredibly productive,' said Courtney Bragg, a co-founder and the CEO of Fabric Health.
CareFirst began working with the company last year to help people in Maryland renew coverage, schedule checkups and sign up for other benefits including energy assistance and food stamps.
Sheila Yahyazadeh, chief external operations officer for the CareFirst plan, said the initiative shows the importance of human interaction. 'There is a misconception that technology will solve all, but a human face is absolutely fundamental to make this program successful because at the end of the day people want to talk to someone and feel seen and cared for,' she said.
On a previous visit to SuperSuds, Jones, the Fabric Health outreach worker, met Patti Hayes, 59, of Hyattsville, Maryland, who is enrolled in the Medicaid health plan operated by CareFirst but had not seen a primary care physician in over a year. She said she preferred to see a Black physician.
After they met at the laundromat, Jones helped her find a new doctor and schedule an appointment. She also helped her find a therapist in her plan's network.
'This is helpful because it's more of a personal touch,' Hayes said.
Fabric Health also texts people to stay in touch and tell them when the outreach workers will be back at their laundromat so they can meet again in person.
Paola Flores, 38, of Clinton, Maryland, told a Fabric Health worker she needed help switching Medicaid plans so she could get better care for her autistic child. Communicating with her in Spanish, the worker said she would help her, including by making an appointment with a pediatrician.
'Good help is hard to find,' Flores said.
Ryan Moran, Maryland's Medicaid director, said Fabric Health helped keep people enrolled during the Medicaid 'unwinding,' when everyone on the program had to get renewed after the expiration of pandemic-era coverage protections that lasted three years.
Outreach workers there focused on laundromats in towns that had high rates of people being disenrolled for paperwork reasons.
'There is no question about the value of human-to-human interaction and the ability to be on the ground where people are, that removes barriers and gets people to engage with us,' Moran said.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
What are Americans' morning struggles?
Two in five Americans are 'bad' at mornings, according to new research. The survey of 2,000 general population Americans revealed 38% agreed with this sentiment — and respondents get out of bed later than planned an average of eight times per month. Advertisement For one in 10 respondents, this happens more than 20 times per month. When they're rushing through their morning routine, after staying in bed longer than planned, respondents were most likely to skip eating breakfast (41%). But others will neglect their personal hygiene: 16% will skip showering, while 11% will go about their day without brushing their teeth. 5 The average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed according to new research. Ana Blazic Pavlovic – Advertisement Commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and conducted by Talker Research, the survey also looked at respondents' alarm habits. Less than half (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning — and for these respondents, the results revealed their first alarm goes off at 6:33 a.m. Younger generations were more likely to rely on an alarm: While just a fifth (19%) of baby boomers set an alarm, 63% of Gen Z and millennials do the same. Across ages, the average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed. 5 The survey revealed that less than half of the people who participated (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning SWNS Advertisement The survey also split respondents by early birds and night owls to see how that impacts their alarm habits and their sleep overall. Two-thirds (67%) of early birds who use an alarm said it's 'very effective' at getting them out of bed on time — compared to just half (52%) of night owls. Early birds were more likely to use a 'standard' or preset alarm sound (70% vs. 58%), while night owls were more likely to have an 'annoying' sound — like a fire alarm or honking cars — to wake them up (20% vs. 12%). Unsurprisingly, night owls were more likely to struggle to get out of bed on time (54% vs. 17%). Night owls were also more likely to say their body needs more sleep than they're currently getting (70% vs. 55%). That's despite the two groups getting about the same amount of sleep — right around six and a half hours per night. Advertisement 'Whether you're a morning person or a night owl, quality sleep is non-negotiable,' said Laura Scott, Director of Brand Marketing at Avocado Green Mattress. 'Your natural sleep rhythm should be supported — not disrupted — by an environment designed for deep, restorative rest.' 5 51% of Americans are 'bad' at sleep due to their own anxieties keeping them awake. SWNS The top reason Americans aren't getting enough sleep? Their own worries are keeping them up (51%). That was followed by a sleep condition (like insomnia, sleep apnea, etc.) (30%) and nightmares or stress dreams (20%). Also in the top five was an uncomfortable bed or mattress making it more difficult to sleep (19%) and loud noises outside (14%) keeping respondents awake. 5 Sleep conditions, nightmares, uncomfortable mattresses, and loud noises are other significant sleep deterrents. Prostock-studio – While night owls (35%) and early birds (37%) were almost equally likely to struggle to stay asleep, night owls were more likely to face other difficulties. This included going to bed later than they 'should' in the evening (48% vs. 24%), struggling to fall asleep (44% vs. 27%) and staying in bed longer than they 'should' in the morning (25% vs. 8%). Advertisement 5 Creating a stable sleep habits is very important for daily living. Elnur – 'So many of us lie awake at night, our minds racing with worry or stress,' said Scott. 'That's why it's so important to create sleep spaces and habits that are calm and supportive — so you can wake up feeling like yourself again.' Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 9–15, 2025.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These Are The States On The Brink Of A Caregiver Crisis — And Trump Medicaid Cuts Could Make It Worse
Some days are quiet and peaceful. Other days, Jenise Griffin's brother Michael Griffin spends hours talking to himself out loud or laughing uncontrollably. Auditory hallucinations, episodes of paranoia and other outbursts also aren't uncommon throughout the day. Michael, 59, was diagnosed with schizophrenia in the 1990s, and spent 23 years at state hospitals and jails, including one in their hometown of Naples, Florida. For the past three years he has lived with Jenise, 67, in Riverview, a small city about 20 minutes from Tampa, where she has been his full-time caregiver. Even though she works from home, balancing caregiving for Michael with her own busy work schedule has been a challenge for Jenise. 'I have to take care of his medications, doctors' appointments, therapists and case worker schedules, so his needs constantly interrupt my day,' she said. It has also taken a toll on her health: Jenise was diagnosed with bradycardia —a heart rate that's slower than normal — in December 2023 and had to get a pacemaker. She has moderate asthma and takes medication to manage her depression. 'The stress of taking care of him has made me sick,' she said. Jenise is far from alone. Although it's difficult to determine how many caregivers there are in the United States, AARP estimates that there were 53 million in 2020. Caregivers can be family members or hired professionals, paid or unpaid, full time or part time. But unlike professional home health aides, the labor family caregivers provide is unpaid, and often invisible yet expected by other members of the family. In many cases, the only support family caregivers receive comes from state or local programs that require jumping through multiple hoops in order to get the most basic services or financial assistance. According to a new report from the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, where you live can make all the difference—and 48% of states are on the brink of a caregiving emergency. After assessing the urgency of local caregiving needs, the authors of the Columbia report, titled 'America's Unseen Workforce: The State of Family Caregiving,' classified all 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, into four categories: critical, high risk, safe for now, and well-supported. States in the 'critical' category include: Florida Alabama Arkansas Georgia Louisiana Nevada South Carolina Tennessee States in the 'high risk' states are: Arizona California Hawaii Idaho Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina Oklahoma Oregon Texas Virginia West Virginia 'These states didn't land in a crisis by chance,' Stacey B. Lee, professor at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School with a joint appointment at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, told HuffPost. 'The Columbia Caregiving Index shows a consistent pattern: a lack of paid leave, low Medicaid reimbursement rates, [Home- and Community-Based Services] HCBS waitlists, and the absence of caregiver tax credits.' So why are some states faring so much worse than others? One reason for this, according to Holly Wiberg, Ph.D., assistant professor of operations research and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College, is that the current landscape of policies to support family caregivers is fragmented, with limited national coverage and a lot of variation on the state level. 'This fragmentation has multiple consequences,' Wiberg explained. 'First, caregivers have inconsistent protections with disparate impacts on their own lives and those of their patients. Second, this creates a challenging landscape to navigate, involving multiple agencies, which imposes a further burden on caregivers. The current model is unsustainable and places an undue burden on caregivers, both unpaid and underpaid.' That's been the case for Elizabeth Miller, 53, of Georgia, who spent years juggling caring for her aging parents while raising school-age children and working full time. 'They were some of the most exhausting and emotionally challenging years of my life,' she said. 'I felt completely overwhelmed, isolated and unprepared. I had no prior caregiving experience to draw from, and every day felt like a steep learning curve.' Trying to balance caregiving with parenting and a career meant a demanding schedule for Miller. 'I constantly felt pulled in two directions — guilty when I had to step away from work to care for them, and distracted and depleted when I was at work, worrying about everything that still needed to be done at home,' she said. What Miller and Jenise experience likely sounds familiar to anyone who has been a family caregiver. In fact, it's in line with the findings of a 2023 study from The Arc of the United States, in which 90% of participants reported some impact on their employment related to their caregiving responsibilities, while 54% indicated that they felt 'very' or 'extremely' stressed as a caregiver. After both her parents passed away, Miller became a support caregiver for her 62-year-old brother, who was born with an intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 'The challenges are different now, but just as complex — and still incredibly isolating,' Miller said. 'There are few resources tailored to older adults with developmental disabilities, and even fewer that support sibling caregivers. Despite working in the care economy for over a decade, I still find navigating care for my brother incredibly frustrating and unnecessarily difficult.' Situations like Miller's and Jenise's aren't unusual in Georgia and Florida, nor in other parts of the country. 'The United States remains one of the least supportive high-income countries for caregivers,' Lee said. 'Policies fall short because they were never built to treat caregiving as essential labor. They assume it will happen informally, unpaid, and out of view, usually by women. That's not support — that's systemic erasure.' According to Lee, the systems currently in place assume that caregiving is 'endless, free, and invisible.' Plus, as Wiberg pointed out, caregiving roles are not equally distributed across the population. 'The burden falls hardest on women, especially Black and Latina women, and on low-income families with no access to institutional support,' Lee said. On top of all the emotional and logistical challenges of caregiving, it can be a huge financial strain on family members — who are typically paid little or nothing for their services. In Georgia, for example, family caregivers like Miller can only receive compensation if the care recipient qualifies for a Medicaid waiver — a process she says is grueling, confusing, and comes with long waitlists. 'I believe that any family caregiver who is actively providing care and can demonstrate it should be eligible for compensation and tax relief, regardless of Medicaid status,' she said. 'We are saving the system money — yet paying the price physically, emotionally and financially.' Miller is absolutely right: The Columbia report estimates that the labor of the country's unpaid caregivers is valued at $890.56 billion. But the countless hours that family caregivers essentially donate to the government don't seem to factor into financial support for caregivers and those requiring care. Each month, Jenise's brother Michael gets a $932 disability payment from Social Security and about $132 in food stamps. 'He is 270 pounds, so that doesn't cover the food he eats monthly,' she said. 'He had been giving me $400 a month, but I spend much of that on extra food, his pharmacy co-pays, his life insurance, and other necessities.' And like so many others who require care, Michael depends on Medicaid for health care. But Jenise and other caregivers fear that a reduction in benefits is imminent. That's at least in part because in a few short months, the Trump administration has been taking significant steps towards dismantling Medicaid as we know it. At this point, it's unclear how much damage these laws and policies will do, but it's safe to say things won't be getting better. If signed into law, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed in the House of Representatives on May 22, would make the biggest cuts to Medicaid in the program's 60-year history. It's estimated that the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $625 billion, causing 10.3 million people to lose their Medicaid coverage by 2034. 'The caregiver crisis is fueled by years of underinvestment — and it's about to get worse,' said Kim Musheno, senior director of Medicaid policy at The Arc of the United States. With caregivers already burned out and stretched thin financially, even minor cuts to Medicaid would make a major difference. 'If it becomes law, it will blow a hole in the safety net,' Musheno explained. 'Medicaid is the main source of long-term care in this country, including home- and community-based services that allow people with disabilities to live at home instead of in institutions. And when states face cuts, history tells us what happens: services that help families — like respite care, personal care assistants, and other supports — are the first to go.' Lacking adequate support from the state or federal government, caregivers like Miller have formed their own communities. 'There is a beautiful, grassroots network of caregiver-led organizations out there offering real help,' said Miller, whose Atlanta-based group, Happy Healthy Caregiver, helps caregivers find local resources and navigate the complicated systems in Georgia. But these groups are no replacement for laws and policies that provide actual resources and programs for caregivers. 'Without sustainable financial support and infrastructure, I worry these vital lifelines will burn out, just like so many caregivers do,' she explained. In order for that not to happen, Miller knows what she needs. 'What I need most as a caregiver — and what so many of us are lacking — is time back,' she said. 'Real respite options, financial compensation that reflects the value of our work, and a community of support that truly understands what we're navigating every day.' According to Miller, true respite is more than a day off. 'It means having the financial and practical resources in place to ensure your loved one is safe and well cared-for while you take a real break,' she said. 'Without that, respite is just another wishlist item.' So what would it take for caregivers to get actual support, in the form of programs and services that would genuinely make their lives easier? 'The biggest issue is simple: funding,' Musheno said. 'Good ideas don't go far if there's no money to make them real.' There also has to be a general shift of mentality, away from viewing caregiving as expected and invisible labor, and toward it being seen as legitimate and essential work. 'Unless we commit to federal caregiving infrastructure — paid leave, portable benefits, caregiver tax credits, and living wages for home care workers — we are not solving this crisis. We are institutionalizing harm,' Lee said. Though the situation is looking especially bleak at the moment, there are things you can do to help support caregivers. First, Miller suggests talking to caregivers to get an idea of what they're going through, and sharing their stories. You can also let your voice be heard through the ballot box by voting for candidates who support paid family leave, caregiver tax credits and respite programs. Additionally, Lee recommends organizing within churches, faith-based networks and community health centers. 'These institutions often carry more political and cultural weight in Southern states than formal lobbying efforts, and they're increasingly vocal on elder care and caregiver equity,' she explained. You may also want to seek out volunteering opportunities with organizations for caregivers. Finally, if you know a caregiver, ask how you can support them directly. This might mean grocery shopping, running errands, or spending time with their loved one so they get a much-needed break. 'At the end of the day, caring for the people we love shouldn't be this hard,' Miller said. 'The system should work with us — not against us.' The 1 Truly Difficult Part About Being A Caregiver That Often Gets Overlooked Our Daughter Was Born With A Rare Genetic Difference. Here's The Secret To Keeping Our Marriage Strong As Caregivers. I Was My Mom's Caregiver When She Was Terminal. I Was Shocked By What I Didn't Know About Dying.
San Francisco Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
WASHINGTON (AP) — There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who shave stepped up to the plate." The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation." An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'
